High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a common procedure for treating medial compartment knee arthritis. The main goal is to reduce knee pain by transferring weight-bearing loads to the relatively unaffected lateral compartment and thus delaying the need of total knee replacement (TKR) by slowing or stopping destruction of medial compartment. Between 2002 and 2010, 34 HTO's were carried out in 32 patients (Mean age 44.2). Results were reviewed in 23 patients with an average follow-up of 10.2 years (range 6–14 years). Oxford knee score (OKS) assessment was carried out on those patients. Of the remaining 11 patients, one was excluded, 2 were lost to follow-up, and 2 had died. Five cases had TKR at an average 8.8 years since having HTO. OKS results revealed nine cases (39.1percnt;) scored (40–48) which indicate satisfactory joint function and don't require treatment. Three cases (13percnt;) scored (30–39) indicating mild to moderate arthritis. Six cases (26.1percnt;), scored (20–29) indicating moderate to severe arthritis. Five cases (21.8percnt;) scored (0–19) indicating severe arthritis. Only five patients (14.7percnt;) had TKR (6–14) years after there HTO. The majority of cases had an OKS suggesting satisfactory joint function. Even those with scores suggesting moderate to severe arthritis were able to function normally for more than 6 years. The successful outcome of HTO can be maintained for more than 6–16 years. We conclude that HTO should be recommended for the treatment of medial compartment arthritis of the knee in young and active patients for symptomatic improvement and maintenance of activity levels.
We aimed to analyse complication rates following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) for knee OA. A regional retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent HTO for isolated medial compartment knee OA from 2003–2013. 115 OWHTO were performed. Mean age = 47 (95%CI 46–48). Mean BMI = 29.1 (95%CI 28.1–30.1). Implants used: 72% (n=83) Tomofix, 21% (n=24) Puddu plate, 7% (n=8) Orthofix Grafts used: 30% (n=35) autologous, 35% (n=40) artificial and 35% (n=40) no graft. 25% (n=29) of patients suffered 36 complications. Complications included minor wound infection 9.6%, major wound infection 3.5%, metalwork irritation necessitating plate removal 7%, non-union requiring revision 4.3%, vascular injury 1.7%, compartment syndrome 0.9%, and other minor complications 4%. Apparent higher rates of non-union occurred with the Puddu plate (8.3%) relative to Tomofix (3.6%) but was not statistically significant. No other significant differences existed in complication rates relative to implant type, bone graft used, patient age or BMI. Serious complications following HTO appear rare. The Tomofix has an apparent lower rate of non-union compared to older implants but greater numbers are required to determine significance. There is no significant difference in union rate relative to whether autologous graft, artificial graft or no graft is used.
The primary aim was to assess survival of the opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for
Introduction. The options for the treatment of the young active patient with unicompartmental symptomatic osteoarthritis and pre-existing Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) deficiency are limited. Patients with ACL deficiency and end-stage
Background. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty provides a good alternative to total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated
A review of current literature describes varying 10-year survival rates for the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (Biomet Orthopedics Inc, Warsaw, Ind). Application of rigorous indications and meticulous surgical technique are two factors considered to reduce revision rates. A retrospective case-note review was conducted for 96 patients (128 knees) aged 42–89 (mean 57) who had an Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement for
Introduction. High Tibial Osteotomy has become an increasingly popular management option for patients with painful
We reviewed 59 bone graft substitutes marketed
by 17 companies currently available for implantation in the United Kingdom,
with the aim of assessing the peer-reviewed literature to facilitate
informed decision-making regarding their use in clinical practice.
After critical analysis of the literature, only 22 products (37%)
had any clinical data. Norian SRS (Synthes), Vitoss (Orthovita),
Cortoss (Orthovita) and Alpha-BSM (Etex) had Level I evidence. We question
the need for so many different products, especially with limited
published clinical evidence for their efficacy, and conclude that
there is a considerable need for further prospective randomised
trials to facilitate informed decision-making with regard to the
use of current and future bone graft substitutes in clinical practice. Cite this article: