Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a common cause of revision total knee surgery. Although debridement and implant retention (DAIR) has lower success rates in the chronic setting, it is an accepted treatment for acute PJI. There are two broad DAIR strategies: single debridement or a planned double debridement performed days apart. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of single versus double DAIR with antibiotic beads for acute PJI in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A decision tree using single or double DAIR as treatment strategies for acute PJI was constructed. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) and costs associated with the two treatment arms were calculated. Treatment success rates, failure rates, and mortality rates were derived from the literature. Medical costs were derived from both the literature and Medicare data. A cost-effectiveness plane was constructed from multiple Monte Carlo trials. A sensitivity analysis identified parameters most influencing the optimal strategy decision.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
To perform an incremental cost-utility analysis and assess the impact of differential costs and case volume on the cost-effectiveness of robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (rUKA) compared to manual (mUKA). This was a five-year follow-up study of patients who were randomized to rUKA (n = 64) or mUKA (n = 65). Patients completed the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) preoperatively, and at three months and one, two, and five years postoperatively, which was used to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Costs for the primary and additional surgery and healthcare costs were calculated.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with the estimated lifetime risk of revision surgery after primary knee arthroplasty (KA). All patients from the Scottish Arthroplasty Project dataset undergoing primary KA during the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2019 were included. The cumulative incidence function for revision and death was calculated up to 20 years. Adjusted analyses used cause-specific Cox regression modelling to determine the influence of patient factors. The lifetime risk was calculated as a percentage for patients aged between 45 and 99 years using multiple-decrement life table methodology.Aims
Methods
The aim is to assess the cost-effectiveness of patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) in comparison with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) based on prospectively collected data on health outcomes and resource use from a blinded, randomized, clinical trial. A total of 100 patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either PFA or TKA by experienced knee surgeons trained in using both implants. Patients completed patient-reported outcomes including EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) and 6-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-6D) before the procedure. The scores were completed again after six weeks, three, six, and nine months, and again after one- and two-year post-surgery and yearly henceforth. Time-weighted outcome measures were constructed. Cost data were obtained from clinical registrations and patient-reported questionnaires. Incremental gain in health outcomes (quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)) and incremental costs were compared for the two groups of patients. Net monetary benefit was calculated assuming a threshold value of €10,000, €35,000, and €50,000 per QALY and used to test the statistical uncertainty and central assumptions about outcomes and costs.Aims
Methods
The primary aim of the study was to perform an analysis to identify the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (rUKA) relative to manual total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for patients with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Secondary aims were to assess how case volume and length of hospital stay influenced the relative cost per QALY. A Markov decision analysis was performed, using known parameters for costs, outcomes, implant survival, and mortality, to assess the cost-effectiveness of rUKA relative to manual TKA and UKA for patients with isolated medial compartment OA of the knee with a mean age of 65 years. The influence of case volume and shorter hospital stay were assessed.Aims
Patients and Methods
Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) has experienced significant
improvements in implant survivorship with second generation designs.
This has renewed interest in PFA as an alternative to total knee
arthroplasty (TKA) for younger active patients with isolated patellofemoral
osteoarthritis (PF OA). We analysed the cost-effectiveness of PFA We used a Markov transition state model to compare cost-effectiveness
between PFA and TKA. Simulated patients were aged 60 (base case)
and 50 years. Lifetime costs (2015 United States dollars), quality-adjusted
life year (QALY) gains and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
(ICER) were calculated from a healthcare payer perspective. Annual rates
of revision were derived from the National Joint Registry for England,
Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. Deterministic and probabilistic
sensitivity analysis was performed for all parameters against a
$50 000/QALY willingness to pay. Aims
Patients and Methods
Improvements in the surgical technique of total
knee replacement (TKR) are continually being sought. There has recently
been interest in three-dimensional (3D) pre-operative planning using
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT. The 3D images are increasingly
used for the production of patient-specific models, surgical guides
and custom-made implants for TKR. The users of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) claim that
they allow the optimum balance of technology and conventional surgery
by reducing the complexity of conventional alignment and sizing
tools. In this way the advantages of accuracy and precision claimed
by computer navigation techniques are achieved without the disadvantages
of additional intra-operative inventory, new skills or surgical
time. This review describes the terminology used in this area and debates
the advantages and disadvantages of PSI.
