Different factors associated with an adverse functional outcome of acetabular fractures involving the posterior wall have been well documented. Among these is marginal impaction. From 1998 until mid-2006, 105 cases were prospectively reviewed to assess the functional and radiological results of simple and complex acetabular fractures associated with a posterior wall component, with special reference to the marginal impaction. Associated posterior wall components associated with marginal impaction were compared to the pattern of fractures without marginal impaction. The exclusion criteria were non-anatomic reductions i.e. > 2 mm displacement, avascular necrosis, deep infection, heterotropic ossification grade III, IV, chondrolysis and nerve injuries. All marginal impaction fractures were identified on the pre-operative CT scan. They were openly reduced, elevated and autografted from the greater trochanter, followed by rigid internal fixation for early post-operative mobilisation i.e. CPM use. Results were assessed clinically by the modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score and radiologically by Kellgren and Laurence method of grading of osteoarthritis. 40 cases were excluded for the reasons above. This left 27 cases of marginal impaction and 38 cases of control. The average period of follow-up was 35.7 months. The functional results of the marginal impaction grafting group revealed 13 (48.1%) excellent, 7 (25.9%) very good, 6 (22.2%) good and one (3.8%) fair, while the control group showed 18 (47.4%) excellent, 10 (26.3) very good, 8 (21%) good, one (2.6%) fair and one (2.6%) poor result. The functional and radiological outcome of the posterior wall component fractures associated with marginal impaction showed very satisfactory results in comparison with a control group in the short and mid-term period. An integral part of this is careful recognition of this injury pattern and its management as part of the open reduction and fixation

Management of acetabular fractures in the elderly population remains somewhat controversial in regards to when to consider is open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) versus acute primary total hip. study aims to (1) describe outcome of this complex problem and investigate predictors of successful outcome. This retrospective study analyzes all acetabular fractures in patients over the age of 60, managed by ORIF at a tertiary trauma care centre between 2007 and 2018 with a minimum follow up of one year. Of the 117 patients reviewed, 85 patients undergoing ORIF for treatment of their acetabular fracture were included in the analysis. The remainder were excluded based management option including acute ORIF with THA (n=10), two-stage ORIF (n=2), external fixator only (n=1), acute THA (n=1), and conservative management (n=1). The remainder were excluded based on inaccessible medical records (n=6), mislabelled diagnosis (n=6), associated femoral injuries (n=4), acetabular fracture following hemiarthroplasty (n=1). The mean age of the cohort is 70±7 years old with 74% (n=62) of patients being male. Data collected included: demographics, mechanism of injury, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), ASA Grade, smoking status and reoperations. Pre-Operative Radiographs were analyzed to determine the Judet and Letournel fracture pattern, presence of comminution and posterior wall marginal impaction. Postoperative radiographs were used to determine Matta Grade of Reduction. Outcome measures included morbidity-, mortality- rates, joint survival, radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) at follow-up. A poor outcome in ORIF was defined as one of the following: 1) conversion to THA or 2) the presence of radiographic OA, combined with an OHS less than 34 (findings consistent with a hip that would benefit from a hip replacement). The data was analyzed step-wise to create a regression model predictive of outcome following ORIF. Following ORIF, 31% (n=26) of the cohort had anatomic reduction, while 64% (n=54) had imperfect or poor reduction. 4 patients did not have adequate postoperative radiographs to assess the reduction. 31 of 84 patients undergoing ORIF had a complication of which 22.6% (n=19) required reoperation. The most common reason being conversion to THA (n=14), which occurred an average of 1.6±1.9 years post-ORIF. The remainder required reoperation for infection (n=5). Including those converted to THA, 43% (n=36) developed radiographic OA following acetabular fracture management. The mean OHS in patients undergoing ORIF was 36 ± 10; 13(16%) had an OHS less than 34. The results of the logistic regression demonstrate that Matta grade of reduction (p=0.017), to be predictive of a poor outcome in acetabular fracture management. With non-anatomic alignment following fixation, patients had a 3 times greater risk of a poor outcome. No other variables were found to be predictive of ORIF outcome. The ability to achieve anatomic reduction of fracture fragments as determined by the Matta grade, is predictive of the ability to retain the native hip with acceptable outcome following acetabular fracture in the elderly. Further research must be conducted to determine predictors of adequate reduction in order to identify candidates for ORIF