Aims
Patients and Methods
We used a knee-sparing distal femoral endoprosthesis in young patients with malignant bone tumours of the distal femur in whom it was possible to resect the tumour and to preserve the distal femoral condyles. The proximal shaft of the endoprosthesis had a coated hydroxyapatite collar, while the distal end had hydroxyapatite-coated extracortical plates to secure it to the small residual femoral condylar fragment. We reviewed the preliminary results of this endoprosthesis in eight patients with primary bone tumours of the distal femur. Their mean age at surgery was 17.years (14 to 21). The mean follow-up was 24 months (20 to 31). At final follow-up the mean flexion at the knee was 102° (20° to 120°) and the mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 80% (57% to 96.7%). There was excellent osteointegration at the prosthesis-proximal bone interface with formation of new bone around the hydroxyapatite collar. The prosthesis allowed preservation of the knee and achieved a good functional result. Formation of new bone and remodelling at the interface make the implant more secure. Further follow-up is required to determine the long-term structural integrity of the prosthesis.
In skeletally immature patients, resection of
bone tumours and reconstruction of the lower limb often results
in leg-length discrepancy. The Stanmore non-invasive extendible
endoprosthesis, which uses electromagnetic induction, allows post-operative
lengthening without anaesthesia. Between 2002 and 2009, 55 children
with a mean age of 11.4 years (5 to 16) underwent reconstruction
with this prosthesis; ten patients (18.2%) died of disseminated
disease and one child underwent amputation due to infection. We
reviewed 44 patients after a mean follow-up of 41.2 months (22 to
104). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 24.7 (8 to
30) and the Toronto Extremity Salvage score was 92.3% (55.2% to
99.0%). There was no local recurrence of tumour. Complications developed
in 16 patients (29.1%) and ten (18.2%) underwent revision. The mean length gained per patient was 38.6 mm (3.5 to 161.5),
requiring a mean of 11.3 extensions (1 to 40), and ten component
exchanges were performed in nine patients (16.4%) after attaining
the maximum lengthening capacity of the implant. There were 11 patients
(20%) who were skeletally mature at follow-up, ten of whom had equal
leg lengths and nine had a full range of movement of the hip and
knee. This is the largest reported series using non-invasive extendible
endoprostheses after excision of primary bone tumours in skeletally
immature patients. The technique produces a good functional outcome,
with prevention of limb-length discrepancy at skeletal maturity.
We report our early experience with the use of a non-invasive distal femoral expandable endoprosthesis in seven skeletally immature patients with osteosarcoma of the distal femur. The patients had a mean age of 12.1 years (9 to 15) at the time of surgery. The prosthesis was lengthened at appropriate intervals in outpatient clinics, without anaesthesia, using the principle of electromagnetic induction. The patients were functionally evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society scoring system. The mean follow-up was 20.2 months (14 to 30). The prostheses were lengthened by a mean of 25 mm (4.25 to 55) and maintained a mean knee flexion of 110° (100° to 120°). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 68% (11 to 29). Complications developed in two patients; one developed a flexion deformity of 25° at the knee joint, which was subsequently overcome and one died of disseminated disease. The early results from patients treated with this device have been encouraging. The implant avoids multiple surgical procedures, general anaesthesia and assists in maintaining leg-length equality.
