Malnutrition is considered a risk factor for postoperative complications in total hip and knee arthroplasty, though prospective studies investigating this assumption are lacking. The aim of this study was to prospectively analyse the 90-day postoperative complications, postoperative length of stay (LOS) and readmission rates of patients undergoing primary total hip and total kneearthroplasty using albumin, total lymphocyte count (TLC) and transferrin as serum markers of potential malnutrition. 603 primary hip and 823 primary knee arthroplasties over a 3-year period from a single centre wereprospectively analysed. BMI, demographic and comorbidity data were recorded. Complications werecategorised as surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis andpulmonary embolus), implant related (such as dislocation), and non-implant related (such aspneumonia). Outcomes were compared between groups, with malnutrition defined as serumalbumin <3.5g/dL, transferrin <200 mg/dL, or TLC <1,500 cells/mm³. Potential malnutrition was present in 9.3% of the study population. This group experienced a longeraverage LOS at 6.5 days compared to the normal albumin group at 5.0 days (p=0.003). Surgical siteinfection rate was higher in the malnourished group (12.5 vs 7.8%, p=0.02). There was no differencebetween the two groups in implant related complications (0.8 vs 1.0%, p=0.95) medicalcomplications (7.8 vs 13.3%, p=0.17), rate of venous thromboembolism (2.3 vs 2.7%) or 90-dayreadmission rate (14.1 vs 17.0%, p=0.56). TLC and transferrin were not predictive of any of theprimary outcomes measured (p<0.05). Pacific Island (p<0.001), Indian (p=0.02) and Asian (p=0.02) patients had lower albumin than NZ European. This study demonstrates an association between low albumin levels and increased postoperativeLOS and surgical site infection in total joint arthroplasty, providing rationale for consideration ofpreoperative nutritional screening and optimisation

The aims of this study was to determine the incidence of malnutrition in children with supracondylar fractures. It was hypothesised that the presence of malnutrition will increase the severity type of fractures. The study was a retrospective, cross-sectional study at a single institution. Children between 0 years and 12 years of age, who sustained documented supracondylar fracture treated surgically as a result of low velocity trauma were included in the study. Patients who sustained high velocity trauma, who had known bone disorders or had incomplete chart data, were excluded from the study Data was captured from children's’ notes who have been treated surgically for supracondylar fractures from casualty, theatre and the clinic notes. The nutritional status of children and fracture grade were identified and the two sets of data were compared against each other to try to identify a possible relation between fracture severity and malnutrition. Data was analysed in STATA and 5% level of significance was used to signify statistically significant associations. 150 patients were identified and included in the study. The majority of patients reviewed were in the normal nutritional range according to their z-scores. The severity of the fracture was not only associated with a poorer nutritional status however children with high and low z-scores (over weight as well as undernourished children) had the more severe fracture patterns, while children with normal z-scores had a fracture patterns of varying severity. Children who were malnourished were more likely to sustain more severe fracture types. The results highlighted the need for all children to have a good nutritional status as this may play a role in preventing more complex fractures

Malnutrition is often associated with the advanced age and can be influenced by physical, mental, social and environmental changes. Hip fracture is a major issue and a prior poor nutritional status is associated with higher rates of perioperative complications and prolonged hospital length of stay. Prospective observational cohort study performed in a Level one trauma center including 189 consecutive patients admitted for hip fracture. The main outcome measure was the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), a specific tool validated for geriatric population. This questionnaire was performed at admission by an independent assessor, at the same time as a large set of demographic and functional data. Blood samples were tested for blood count and albuminemia. Two groups were constituted and analysed according to a MNA score ≥ 24 (lower limit for normal nutritional status). Factors explored included physical and mental items. Impact of malnutrition was determined on hospital length of stay (HLS), discharge in an adverse location than prior to admission (DAL), complications and mortality rate. The rate of patients with malnutrition (or at risk) in this study is 47% (88 patients). Patients with a MNA < 24 are older (84.81 yrs ± 7.75 vs 80.41 ± 8.11, p<0,01), have more comorbidities (Charlson 2.8 ± 2.21 vs 1.67 ± 3.10, p<0,01), a more impaired mental (MMSE 19.39±8.55 vs 25.6±3.6, p<0,01) or physical status (MIF 105.3 ± 26.6 vs 121.8 ± 6.4, p< 0,01). Blood samples are not selective to detect malnutrition (p=0,64). Malnutrition is associated with a longer HLS (26.04±23.39 days vs 13.95±11.34 days, p<0,01), a greater DAL (58.9% vs 38.2%, p=0,02) and a higher one year mortality rate (23.9% vs 8.9 %, p<0,01). The prevalence of malnutrition in a geriatric population admitted for hip fracture is high. Blood samples at admission have clearly a poor value and a systematic screening with the MNA is mandatory. An early diagnosis will target specific interventions to reduce the physical and socio-economic impact of the malnutrition. Future studies should focus on actions in the perioperative stage (fast-track surgery, nutritional protocols, analgesia) and their impact on the socio-economic burden

This paper presents the nutritional status of a geriatric population admitted for hip fracture. Malnutrition is often associated with the advanced age and can be influenced by physical, mental, social and environmental changes. Hip fracture is a major issue and a prior poor nutritional status is associated with higher rates of perioperative complications and prolonged hospital length of stay. Methods: Prospective observational. Prospective observational cohort study performed in a Level one trauma centreincluding 110 consecutive patients admitted for hip fracture. The main outcome measure was the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), a specific tool validated for geriatric population. This questionnaire was performed at admission by an independent assessor, at the same time as a large set of demographic and functional data. Blood samples were tested for blood count and albuminemia. Two groups were constituted and analysed according to a MNA score > 24 (lower limit for normal nutritional status). Factors explored included physical and mental items. Impact of malnutrition was determined on hospital length of stay (HLS), discharge in an adverse location than prior to admission (DAL), complications and mortality rate. The rate of patients with malnutrition (or at risk) in this study is 49.1% (54 patients). Patients with a MNA < 24 are older (83.6 yrs ± 6.5 vs 80.2 ± 8.3, p<0,01), have more comorbidities (Charlson 2.5 vs 1.27, p<0,01), a more impaired mental (MMSE <27 74.1% vs 41.1%, p<0,01) or physical status (MIF 105.3 +/− 26.6 vs 121.8 +/− 6.4, p<0,01). Blood samples are not selective to detect malnutrition (p=0,64). Malnutrition is associated with a longer HLS (25.2 days +/− 24.2 vs 14.2 +/− 9.0, p<0,01), a greater DAL (58.9% vs 38.2%, p=0,02) and a higher 6 months mortality rate (16.7% vs 3.6%, p=0,02). The prevalence of malnutrition in a geriatric population admitted for hip fracture is high. Blood samples at admission have clearly a poor value and a systematic screening with the MNA is mandatory. An early diagnosis will target specific interventions in order to reduce the physical and socio-economic impact of the malnutrition. Future studies should focus on actions in the perioperative stage (fast-track surgery, nutritional protocols, analgesia) and their impact on the socio-economic burden

Minimizing the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is of interest to all surgeons performing hip and knee arthroplasty. Among the most critical factors to reducing the risk of infection include the use of pre-incisional antibiotics, appropriate skin preparation with clippers (as opposed to a razor for hair removal) and the use of an alcohol-based skin preparation. Host factors are also likewise critically important including obesity, diabetes, inflammatory arthritis, renal insufficiency, skin disorders and patients who are otherwise immune-compromised. If modifiable risk factors are identified, it would seem reasonable to delay elective surgery until these can be optimised. One other factor to consider is the nutritional status of the patient. In a study of 501 consecutive revisions, we found that serological markers suggestive of malnutrition (albumin, transferrin or total lymphocyte count) were extremely common in the revision population. Specifically, among patients who presented for treatment of a chronic infection, 53% (67 of 126) had at least one marker for malnutrition. The prevalence of serological markers of malnutrition was lower (33%) in the group of patients undergoing revision for an aseptic reason suggesting that malnutrition was a risk factor for septic failure (p < 0.001 and OR 2.1). Interestingly, malnutrition was most common among patients of normal weight but was also common among obese patients (so-called “paradoxical” malnutrition). What was more disturbing, however, that of those patients undergoing an aseptic revision, serum markers of malnutrition were associated with a 6x risk of acute postoperative infection complicating the patient's aseptic revision. At our center, we also have studied the use of dilute betadine at the end of the case, prior to wound closure, in an attempt to decrease the load of bacteria in the wound. In a retrospective review the prevalence of acute postoperative infection was reduced from just under 1% (18/1862) to 0.15% (1 of 688; p = 0.04). It is critical that the betadine utilised be STERILE and the dilution we use is 0.35% made by diluting 17.5cc of 10% povidone-iodine paint in 500cc of normal saline. Although this is a retrospective review, it does suggest a benefit and we have not seen any problems associated with its use

Among the most critical factors to reducing the risk of infection include the use of pre-incisional antibiotics, appropriate skin preparation with clippers (as opposed to a razor for hair removal) and the use of an alcohol-based skin preparation. Host factors are also likewise critically important including obesity, diabetes, inflammatory arthritis, renal insufficiency, skin disorders and patients who are otherwise immune-compromised. If modifiable risk factors are identified, it would seem reasonable to delay elective surgery until these can be optimised. One other factor to consider is the nutritional status of the patient. In a study of 501 consecutive revisions, we found that serological markers suggestive of malnutrition (albumin, transferrin or total lymphocyte count) were extremely common. Specifically, 53% of patients who presented for treatment of a chronic infection had at least one marker for malnutrition, compared to 33% in the group of patients undergoing revision for an aseptic reason. Malnutrition was found to be an independent risk factor for septic failure (p < 0.001 and OR 2.1). Interestingly, malnutrition was most common among patients of normal weight but was also common among obese patients (so-called “paradoxical” malnutrition). What was more disturbing, however, was that of those patients undergoing an aseptic revision, serum markers of malnutrition were associated with a 6× risk of acute post-operative infection complicating the patient's aseptic revision. We have confirmed this association using the NSQIP database where hypoalbuminemia was associated with a higher risk of infection, pneumonia and readmission. At our center, we also have studied the use of dilute betadine at the end of the case, prior to wound closure, in an attempt to decrease the load of bacteria in the wound. In a retrospective review the prevalence of acute post-operative infection was reduced from just under 1% (18/1862) to 0.15% (1 of 688; p = 0.04). It is critical that the betadine utilised be STERILE and the dilution we use is 0.35% made by diluting 17.5cc of 10% povidone-iodine paint in 500cc of normal saline

Minimizing the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is of interest to all surgeons performing hip and knee arthroplasty. Among the most critical factors to reducing the risk of infection include the use of pre-incisional antibiotics, appropriate skin preparation with clippers (as opposed to a razor for hair removal) and the use of an alcohol-based skin preparation. Host factors are also likewise critically important including obesity, diabetes, inflammatory arthritis, renal insufficiency, skin disorders and patients who are otherwise immune-compromised. If modifiable risk factors are identified, it would seem reasonable to delay elective surgery until these can be optimised. One other factor to consider is the nutritional status of the patient. In a study of 501 consecutive revisions, we found that serological markers suggestive of malnutrition (albumin, transferrin or total lymphocyte count) were extremely common in the revision population. Specifically, among patients who presented for treatment of a chronic infection, 53% (67 of 126) had at least one marker for malnutrition. The prevalence of serological markers of malnutrition was lower (33%) in the group of patients undergoing revision for an aseptic reason suggesting that malnutrition was a risk factor for septic failure (p < 0.001 and OR 2.1). Interestingly, malnutrition was most common among patients of normal weight but was also common among obese patients (so-called “paradoxical” malnutrition). What was more disturbing, however, that of those patients undergoing an aseptic revision, serum markers of malnutrition were associated with a 6× risk of acute post-operative infection complicating the patient's aseptic revision. At our center, we also have studied the use of dilute betadine at the end of the case, prior to wound closure, in an attempt to decrease the load of bacteria in the wound. In a retrospective review the prevalence of acute post-operative infection was reduced from just under 1% (18/1862) to 0.15% (1 of 688; p = 0.04). It is critical that the betadine utilised be STERILE and the dilution we use is 0.35% made by diluting 17.5 cc of 10% povidone-iodine paint in 500 cc of normal saline. Although this is a retrospective review, it does suggest a benefit and we have not seen any problems associated with its use

Aim. Serum parameters continue to be a focus of research in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Several workgroups have recently proposed serum Albumin-Globulin-Ratio (AGR) as a potential new biomarker. Due to controversies in the literature, its usability in clinical practice remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the value of serum AGR in diagnosing PJI preoperatively, especially in comparison with the well-established marker C-reactive Protein (CRP). Method. From January 2015 to June 2022, patients with indicated revision hip (rTHA) and knee (rTKA) arthroplasty were included in this retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. A standardized diagnostic workup was performed using the 2021 European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) definition of PJI, excluding CRP. Diagnostic accuracies of serum AGR and CRP were calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. A z-test was used to compare the area under the curves (AUC). Results. A total of 275 patients with rTHA and rTKA were included, 144 joints (52.4%) were identified as septic. Decreased AGR and elevated CRP were strongly associated with PJI, optimal diagnostic thresholds were calculated with 1.253 and 9.4 mg/L, respectively. Sensitivities were 62.5% (95%-confidence interval: 54.3–70.0) and 73.6% (65.8–80.1), and specificities 84.7% (77.5–89.9) and 87.8% (80.9–92.4), respectively. CRP showed a significantly higher AUC than AGR (0.807 (0.761–0.853) and 0.736 (0.686–0.786); p<0.0001). Subgroup analysis of acute versus chronic infections yielded significantly higher diagnostic accuracies in acute PJI for both parameters (p<0.0001). Similar results were observed when focusing on the causative microorganism; a better diagnostic performance was observed in high-virulence PJI compared to low-virulence PJI (p≤0.005). Furthermore, higher AUCs were calculated in knee PJI compared with hip PJI, with a significant difference for AGR (p=0.043). Conclusions. Due to its limited diagnostic accuracy, serum AGR cannot be recommended as an additional marker for diagnosing PJI. Serum parameters are generally unspecific and can be influenced by comorbidities and other foci of infection. Additionally, parameters may remain within normal levels in low-grade PJI. Evaluating AGR, further possible pitfalls must be considered, for example an increased latency until bottom values are reached and the impact of malnutrition

Background. Malnutrition has been suggested to increase the risk of falls in frail elderly. It has been hypothesised that elderly, orthopaedic trauma patients may be malnourished. We conducted an observational study to identify if this was the case. Methods. 30 trauma patients (? 65 years) admitted for surgical intervention for a fracture were recruited. Consent/ethical approval was obtained. Serum markers (LFTs, CRP, U&Es, FBC, magnesium), anthropometric measurements (triceps skin-fold thickness [TSF], mid-arm circumference [MAC], body mass index [BMI]) and short form mini-nutritional assessment (MNA-SF®) were carried out at presentation and at 3 months post-operation. Serum markers were also repeated at day 1 and day 3 post-operation. Results. 60% had an initial MNA-SF® score of ?11 points indicating that they were at risk from possible malnutrition. However, median BMI at presentation was normal at 22.79 kg/m. 2. (WHO) (Interquartile range 19.8–28). Interestingly, a higher proportion of the group (67%) were below the 50. th. centile for age related BMI centiles. At follow-up (15 patients), there was no significant difference in anthropometric measures (BMI p=0.884; BMI Centile p=0.687; MAC p=0.095; TSF p=0.260) or with the MNA-SF® (p=0.121). The mean MNA-SF® had increased, but not significantly. Conclusions. This study indicates that elderly trauma patients may be at risk of malnutrition regardless of their BMI at presentation and should be screened and monitored. The MNA-SF® has been shown to be 100% specific and 98% sensitive in predicting malnutrition. Our study correlates with others illustrating that patients may have normal BMI and albumin levels, but have poor nutritional intake, highlighting the need to identify patients at risk of malnutrition prior to detectable changes in BMI. Screening should be given to all elderly trauma patients being admitted to a trauma unit. We would suggest that it become the standard. Further research is needed using larger sample sizes

Malnutrition is an important consideration during the perioperative period and albumin is the most common laboratory surrogate for nutritional status. The purpose of this study is to identify if preoperative serum albumin measurements are predictive of infection following arthroscopic procedures. Patients undergoing knee, shoulder or hip arthroscopy between 2006–2016 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients with an arthroscopic current procedural terminology code and a preoperative serum albumin measurement were included. Patients with a history of prior infection, including a non-clean wound class, pre-existing wound infection or systemic sepsis were excluded. Independent t-tests where used to compare albumin values in patients with and without the occurrence of a postoperative infection. Pre-operative albumin levels were subsequently evaluated as predictors of infection with logistic regression models. There were 31,906 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 55.7 years (standard deviation (SD) 14.62) and average BMI was 31.7 (SD 7.21). The most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (49.2%), diabetes (18.4%) and smoking history (16.9%). The average preoperative albumin was 4.18 (SD 0.42). There were 45 cases of superficial infection (0.14%), 10 cases of wound dehiscence (0.03%), 17 cases of deep infection (0.05%), 27 cases of septic arthritis or other organ space infection (0.08%) and 95 cases of any infection (0.30%). The preoperative albumin levels for patients who developed septic arthritis (mean difference (MD) 0.20, 95% CI, 0.038, 0.35, P = 0.015) or any infection (MD 0.14, 95% CI 0.05, 0.22, P = 0.002) were significantly lower than the normal population. Additionally, disseminated cancer, Hispanic race, inpatient status and smoking history were significant independent risk factors for infection, while female sex and increasing albumin were protective towards developing any infection. Rates of all infections were found to increase exponentially with decreasing albumin. The relative risk of infection with an albumin of 2 was 3.46 (95% CI, 2.74–4.38) when compared to a normal albumin of 4. For each albumin increase of 0.69, the odds of developing any infection decreases by a factor of 0.52. This study suggests that preoperative serum albumin is an independent predictor of septic arthritis and all infection following elective arthroscopic procedures. Although the effect of albumin on infection is modest, malnutrition may represent a modifiable risk factor with regard to preventing infection following arthroscopy

In a recent study, 54.5% of patients reporting to arthroplasty clinics in the US were obese. We performed a recent literature review to determine how obesity impacts outcomes in total hip and knee arthroplasty and what must be done to improve outcomes in the obese arthroplasty patient. Specifically, obese patients have shown increased rates of infection, dislocation, need for revision, wound dehiscence, increased operative time and prolonged hospital stay. Additionally, obese TKA patients have been shown to have increased rates of aseptic loosening, thromboembolic events, wound complications, and cardiopulmonary events. Worsening severity of obesity seems to correlate with worsening outcomes and super obesity (BMI>50) has been identified as an independent risk factor for complications. Patients with BMI>35 have shown to be 6.7 times more likely to develop infection after TKA. Patients with BMI>40 have a 3.35 times higher rate of revision for deep infection than those with BMI<35. The odds ratio for major complications increases dramatically beyond BMI>45. How can we improve outcomes in the obese patient? Preoperative care for the obese patient involves nutritional counseling, incorporating weight loss methods, physical therapy, metabolic workup and diagnosis and management of frequent comorbid conditions (OSA, DM2, HTN, HLD, malnutrition, renal failure). Identifying and managing comorbidities is especially important given that some comorbidities such as malnutrition have been shown to be as strong or even stronger an independent risk factor for postoperative TJA complications than obesity. In some cases higher complications were seen which some authors attribute to bariatric patients remaining in a catabolic state after weight loss.  . We know that obesity and its associated comorbid conditions do have worse outcomes and increased complications in TJA patients. We also know that complications proportionately increase with increasing severity of obesity. The super-obese population is at the greatest risk of complication following TJA and preoperative screening and management is essential in reducing complications. Although weight loss is important, bariatric data has shown that it does not solve the problem of obesity in itself and the patient's metabolic state is likely a more important issue. Implant selection is important and strong consideration should be given to avoiding direct anterior approach in the THA obese patient. Understanding of obesity specific complications and treatment options is crucial for patient counseling and optimization to ensure successful treatment in obese TJA patients

Aim. A large body of evidence is emerging to implicate that dysregulation of the gut microbiome (dysbiosis) increases the risk of surgical site infections. Gut dysbiosis is known to occur in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), allowing for translocation of bacteria across the inflamed and highly permeable intestinal mucosal wall. The null hypothesis was that IBD was not associated with increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Our aim was to investigate whether a prior diagnosis of IBD was associated with a higher risk of PJI following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Method. A matched cohort study was designed. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of PJI at 2-year. Secondary endpoints were aseptic revisions, as well as discharge to rehab facility, complications up to 30 days, and readmission up to 90 days after TJA. ICD-9 and −10 codes were used to identify patients with IBD and the control cohort. A chart review was performed to confirm diagnosis of IBD. Using our institutional database, 154 patients with IBD were identified and matched (3 to 1) for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), year of surgery, and joint affected with 462 individuals without IBD undergoing TJA. Results. The cumulative incidence of PJI was 4.55% among patients with IBD versus 1.32% among the control cohort (p=0.024). When bivariate logistic regression was performed, a diagnosis of IBD was found to be an independent risk factor for PJI (OR 3.56 95% C.I. 1.17 – 11.23; p=0.024) and aseptic revisions (OR 3.47, 95% C.I. 1.30 – 3.47; p=0.012). The rate of postoperative complications was also higher in patients with IBD. Conclusions. Based on the findings of this study, it appears that patients with IBD are at higher risk for failure due to PJI or aseptic loosening after TJA. The exact reason for this finding is not known but could be related to the bacterial translocation from the inflamed intestinal mucosa, the dysregulated inflammatory status of these patients, malnutrition, and potentially other factors. Some of the so-called aseptic failures maybe also as a result of infection that may have escaped detection and/or recognition

Aim. Infection is one of the worst complications following total joint arthroplasty, which is often associated with significant morbidity and increased medical costs. Although Gram–positive bacteria remains the most prevalent causative agents, an increase in prosthetic joint infections (PJI) due to gram-negative bacteria (GNB) has been reported. Additionally, the emergence of multidrug resistant resistance (MDR) in GNB impacts the therapeutic options and may increase the rate of treatment failure and drug toxicity adverse effects due the prescription of harmful and toxics antimicrobial schemes. The purpose of the present study was to describe the predisposing factors associated to PJI caused by MDR-GNB in a specialized orthopedic reference hospital in Brazil from 2014 through 2018. Method. Retrospective case-control analysis of patients treated for MDR-GNB PJI over a four-year period (2014–2018). Data were collected from medical, surgical and laboratory records. PJI were defined according the criteria of MSIS. MDR was defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories. Patients with prosthetic infection with at least two positive tissue cultures for MDR-GNB were selected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the independent risk factors associated with MDR-GNB PJI. Controls: patients with PJI with at least two positive tissue culture for non MDR- GNB. Results. A total of 104 patients were selected, 59 patients in the MDR-GNB PJI group and 44 in the control. Patients with MDR-GNB PJI were elderly (mean age of 68.36), distribution among sex was similar (49.2% female and 50.8% male) and 72.3% had one or more comorbidities. Most frequently identified comorbidities were diabetes (10.2%), malnutrition (5.5%), hypertension (4.7 %) and obesity (3.9%). Hip replacement accounted for 91.5% of the cases and 59.3% were revision arthroplasty. The mean time between the placement of the prothesis and the onset of PJI signs and symptoms was 438 days. In the univariate regression, the significant risk factors for MDR-GNB PJI were revision arthroplasty, alcoholism, nonelective arthroplasty, prior antimicrobial use, presence of concomitant infection and blood transfusion. However, in the multivariate analysis, prior use of antimicrobials (OR 9.31, CI95% 3.02–28.64) and the nonelective arthroplasty (OR 6.29, CI95% 1.75–22.6) remained as independent risk factors for MDR-GNB PJI. Conclusions. Previous use of antimicrobial and nonelective arthroplasty are important risk factors for PJI by GNB MDR

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a devastating complication. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality. It remains, unfortunately, one of the most common modes of failure in TKA. Much attention has been paid to the treatment of PJI once it occurs. Our attention, however, should focus on how to reduce the risk of PJI from developing in the first place. Infection prevention should focus on reducing modifiable risk factors that place patients at increasing risk for developing PJI. These areas include pre-operative patient optimization and intra-operative measures to reduce risk. Pre-operative Modifiable Risk Factors: There are several patient related factors that have been shown to increase patient's risk of developing PJI. Many of these are modifiable risk factors can and should be optimised prior to surgery. Obesity and in particular Morbid Obesity (BMI >40) has a strong association with increased risk of PJI. Appropriate and healthy weight loss strategies should be instituted prior to elective TKA. Uncontrolled Diabetes (Hgb A1C >8) and poor glycemic control around the time of surgery increases the risk for complications, especially PJI. Malnutrition should be screened for in at-risk patients. Low Albumin levels are a risk factor for PJI and should be corrected. Patients should be required to stop smoking 6 weeks prior to surgery to lower risk. Low Vitamin D levels have been show to increase risk of PJI. Reduction of colonization of patient's nares with methicillin sensitive (MSSA) and resistant (MRSA) staphylococcus should be addressed with a screen and treat program. Intra-operative Measures to Reduce PJI: During surgery, several steps should be taken to reduce risk of infection. Appropriate dosing and timing of antibiotics is critical and a first generation cephalosporin remains the antibiotic of choice. The use of antibiotic cement remains controversial with regards to its PJI prophylactic effectiveness. The utilization of a dilute betadine lavage has demonstrated decreased rate of PJI. Maintaining normothermia is critical to improve the body's ability to fight infection. An alcohol-based skin preparation can reduce skin flora as a cause of PJI. Appropriate selection of skin incisions and soft tissue handling can reduce wound healing problems and reduce development of PJI. Likewise, the use of occlusive dressing has been shown to promote wound healing and reduce PJI rates

As the American population ages and a trend toward performing total hip arthroplasty (THA) in younger patients continues, the number of Americans undergoing THA is projected to increase over time. The advent of the bundled payment system combined with the current medical utilization climate has placed considerable pressure on surgeons to produce excellent results with early functional recovery and short hospital stays. The US obesity epidemic has transcended into the arthroplasty patient population and surgeons must assess whether obesity is a risk factor for poor outcomes in THA and determine how it should be managed. We performed a recent literature review to determine how obesity impacts outcomes in total hip arthroplasty and what must be done to improve outcomes in the obese arthroplasty patient. Our goal is to answer 3 questions: does obesity increase the complication rate in THA, if obesity matters how obese is too obese, and what must be done to improve outcomes in the obese patient?. Ultimately, obesity has been shown to correlate with increased post-operative complications in THA. The arthroplasty surgeon must optimise the obese patient prior to surgery by identifying associated comorbidities and consider malnutrition screening with counseling. Notice should be taken of the degree of obesity as patients with BMI > 40 have demonstrated much higher complication rates. Strong consideration should be given to avoiding direct anterior approach in the obese patient. Healthy weight loss must be encouraged with appropriate patient counseling and treatment in order to achieve success with THA in obese patients.  

Obesity and the diseases linked to it such as diabetes have been associated with higher complication rates and increased medical costs following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Due to the rising prevalence of obesity and the adverse impact it has on the development of osteoarthritis, there has been a worldwide surge in the number of obese patients presenting for THA procedures, including those morbidly obese (BMI > 40) and those who are super-obese (BMI > 50). The Reward. When THA is successful (as is true for the majority of morbidly obese patients) the operation is just as dramatically effective as it is for other patients. Excellent pain relief and dramatically improved function is the result, even though obese patients generally achieve a lower overall level of function than non-obese patients. Morbidly obese patients with a successful THA and without early complications are some of the most grateful of patients. This is especially true if they have been denied surgery for prolonged periods due to their weight and have had to bear severe joint changes and symptoms during a long period of time leading up to arthroplasty. The Risks. There is a nonlinear increase in complications, reoperations, and especially infection with increasing BMI that begins between a BMI of 25 to 30, and rises thereafter with a relative inflection point in some incidence curves for complications at around a BMI of 40. This has caused some surgeons to suggest a BMI of 40 as an upper limit for elective hip arthroplasty. Risks continue to rise after a BMI of 40 and when the BMI is over 50, in our series 52% of patients had at least one complication. Of these 24% had at least one major complication and 33% at least one minor complication with some suffering more than one complication overall. These data make it reasonable to ask whether the outcomes in some morbidly obese patients might be improved by weight loss, bariatric surgical intervention and other measures aimed at optimizing the multiple companion comorbidities and medical conditions (such as diabetes) that often accompany excess weight. Unfortunately there has been limited information to date on the best means for optimizing of these patients, and as important the effectiveness of these interventions, so that the timing and performance of the eventual arthroplasty procedures might have the highest possible success rate. The Costs. The adverse impact of obesity on medical resource utilization and costs associated with THA has been well documented, Due to longer initial length of stay, greater resource utilization, higher early complication rates and any readmissions and reoperations the costs for even a single individual patient can climb dramatically. In a review of data on primary THA patients from our institution, even after adjusting for age, sex, type of surgery, and other comorbidities, for every 5 unit increase in BMI beyond 30 kg/m2 there was an associated $500 higher cost of hospitalization and an increase of $900 in 90-day total costs (p=0.0001). The Future. The numbers of morbidly obese patients with severe osteoarthritis presenting for possible THA will only continue to increase in the years ahead. Comprehensive multidisciplinary programs are urgently needed to better manage obese patients with weight reduction options, optimization of medical comorbidities, and treatment of any associated issues, such as protein malnutrition. When end-stage joint changes and symptoms occur we must have such help to maximise the benefit and reduce the complications of hip arthroplasty in this high risk patient population

The following checklist is derived from the “Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Peri-prosthetic Joint Infection”, under the auspices of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society, August 1, 2013. It is available online at . http://www.msis-na.org/wp-content/themes/msis-temp/pdf/ism-peri-prosthetic-joint-information.pdf. . Pre-Operative: Patient Factors, AODM, Obesity, Smoking, Immunodeficiency, ASA score > 2, Prior open surgery?, MRSA history, EtOH abuse, Malnutrition, Anemia, Recurrent infections. Peri-Operative: Avoid pre-op hospitalization, Chlorhexidine scrub < 6 h pre-op, Hair removal: depilatory or clipper, Appropriate Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Cephalosporin 30–60 min pre-incision, or Vancomycin 1 hour pre-incision, Alcohol based hand emollient after antiseptic soap hand scrub, Limit OR Traffic and Talking!, Double glove, change gloves q2h, ABC bone cement: revisions, high risk patients (immunocompromised), Dilute Betadiner lavage?. Post-Operative: Careful wound closure (Sealed, dry), Sterile, impervious dressing x 24 h, Drain optional, < 48 h, Antibiotic prophylaxis x 24 h, Aggressive drainage hematomas

The following checklist is derived from the “Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Periprosthetic Joint Infection”, under the auspices of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society, August 1, 2013. It is available online at . http://www.msis-na.org/wp-content/themes/msis-temp/pdf/ism-periprosthetic-joint-information.pdf. . Pre-Operative: Patient Factors, AODM, Obesity, Smoking, Immunodeficiency, ASA score > 2, Prior open surgery?, MRSA history, EtOH abuse, Malnutrition, Anemia, Recurrent infections. Peri-Operative: Avoid pre-op hospitalisation, Chlorhexidine scrub < 6 h pre-op, Hair removal: depilatory or clipper, Appropriate Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Cephalosporin 30–60 min pre-incision, or Vancomycin 1 hour pre-incision, Alcohol based hand emollient after antiseptic soap hand scrub, Limit OR Traffic and Talking!, Double glove, change gloves q2h, ABC bone cement: revisions, high risk patients (immunocompromised), Dilute Betadine lavage?. Post-Operative: Careful wound closure (Sealed, dry), Sterile, impervious dressing × 24 h, Drain optional, < 48 h, Antibiotic prophylaxis × 24 h, Aggressive drainage hematomas

1. Reconstruction of Failed Hip Abductors following THA-A New Surgical Technique using Graft Jacket Matrix. 2. A Comparison of Modular Tapered versus Cylindrical Stems for Complex Femoral Revisions. 3. Clinical Presentation and Imaging Results of Patients With Symptomatic Gluteus Medius Tears. 4. Should Patients Undergoing Elective Arthroplasty Be Screened for Malnutrition. 5. Revision UKA to TKA: Not a Slam Dunk. 6. HgBA1C – A Marker for Surgical Risk in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty. 7. Dexamethasone Reduces Post Operative Hospitalisation and Improves Pain and Nausea After Total Joint Arthroplasty. 8. Infection Following Simultaneous Bilateral TKA. 9. Staph Decolonisation in Total Joint Arthroplasty Is Effective. 10. Comparison of One Versus Two Stage Revision Results for Infected THA. 11. Should Draining Wounds and Sinuses Associated With Hip and Knee Arthroplasties Be Cultured. 12. Differences In Short Term Complications Between Spinal and General Anesthesia for Primary TKA

Wound complications are much more common following knee arthroplasty as compared to hip arthroplasty, due in part to the precarious blood supply to the knee, as well as the subcutaneous position of the joint. Many, if not most, infections are related to wound problems, and thus avoiding wound problems is a critical issue in knee replacement surgery. Many wound problems are avoidable and can be minimised by care to detail by the surgeon. The important steps are to first identify patients at risk and optimally addressing these risk factors. Patient risk factors include: chronic corticosteroid use, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, malnutrition, obesity, and smoking. Soft tissue handling is a second major issue. Minimal incision surgery should be used with great caution for knee replacements since the skin is much less forgiving than in hip replacements. A midline skin incision should be utilised when possible. When multiple incisions are present it is usually advisable to use the lateral most incision through which it is feasible to perform a knee replacement. In rare cases, a soft tissue expander may be used preoperatively for thin, adherent skin. Perioperative steps that can be taken include delaying CPM in high risk wounds, and using a wound vac system in obese or other high risk wounds to minimise persistent drainage. Furthermore, anticoagulation should be used judiciously to avoid prolonged drainage. The final step in salvaging the problem wound is early recognition and aggressive management of wound healing problems. Prolonged, serous drainage is the most common clinical scenario. Drainage that is increasing beyond 5–7 days frequently requires evacuation, irrigation, debridement, and liner exchange. Early aspiration can decompress a hematoma and also rule out infection