Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXVI | Pages 35 - 35
1 Jun 2012
Henderson L Kulik G Richarme D Theumann N Schizas C
Full Access

Purpose of the study

The aim of this work was to study the influence of the slice orientation of T2 axial images in numerical measurements of DSCA and study the effect that this change of slice angle would have on the morphological grading assessment.

Methods and Results

TSE T2 three dimensional aquisition MRI studies reconstructed with OsiriX DICOM viewer from 32 patients were used. Patients included were a series of consecutive cases with either suspected spinal stenosis or low back pain. A total of 97 disc levels were studied and axial reconstructions were made at 0°, +10°, +20°, +30° relative to the disc space orientation. For each image, DSCA was digitally measured and a severity grade was assigned by two observers according to the recently-published 4-point (A-D) morphological grading system. Interobserver kappa score was 0.71. Statistical analysis of DSCA measurements was performed using kappa and t-tests. Comparing DCSA between 0° at each level and +10°, +20° and +30° slice orientation, a significant increase in surface area was found in each case (P<0.0001). % change in DSCA combining all disc levels comparing 0° and +10°: range -15.48% to +31.89% (SD 18.40%); 0° and +20°: range -24.00% to +143.82% (SD 20.45%); 0° and +30°: range -29.35% to +231.13% (SD 26.52%). At 13 disc levels, DSCA was <100mm2 at 0°, but changed to >100mm2 in three cases by a +10° increase, in five cases by a +20° increase and in 10 cases by a +30° increase. In only two out of 97 levels studied did the morphological grading change as the angle increased, one of which was not amongst those above (change in DSCA from <100mm2 to >100mm2).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_X | Pages 107 - 107
1 Apr 2012
Allan C Gibson L Rice L Thompson L
Full Access

MRI scanning of spinal patients at the Primary Care Triage stage is pivotal in reducing inappropriate referrals into Secondary Care.

A retrospective study was undertaken. Details of patients from spinal triage clinics referred for MRI scan were collated together with a provisional diagnosis. Following imaging the results and management plan were documented.

2191 Patients referred via GP's to Physiotherapy Specialist- lead spinal triage clinics from April to September 2009 inclusive.

Referred to a spinal consultant routine/urgent, Managed conservatively, Failed to attend for MRI scanning or MRI cancelled, Sent for scanning for reassurance and discharged.

Of 2191 patients seen in a 6-month period 194 (9%) were referred for MRI of which 81 (41%) were referred on to spinal consultant. This equates to 3.7% of the total number of patients triaged.

Specialist physiotherapy diagnosticians with access to MRI scanning, allows simultaneous treatment and seamless transfer to spinal consultants for surgical intervention if appropriate1. This process is used effectively to manage large numbers of spinal referrals and minimises the number of patients seen unnecessarily in secondary care1. This is only possible with close multidisciplinary team working2.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXVI | Pages 90 - 90
1 Jun 2012
Lakkol S Taranu R Raju P Trewhella M Dennis R Reddy G Friesem T
Full Access

Aim

The purpose of this study is to compare the pre and post-operative magnetic resonance image clarity of titanium and PEEK based cervical arthroplasty devices at the level of implantation and adjacent level discs.

Methodology and Results

This is a prospective, blinded, randomised study on imaging of cervical arthroplasty devices. The pre and postoperative MRI images of 16 patients who underwent cervical arthroplasty using Prestige LP(r) (Medtronic Sofamor Danek) and NuNec(tm) Cervical Arthroplasty System (Pioneer Surgical Technology, Marquette, Mich., USA) were assessed. Two independent radiologists who were blinded and provided with a sets of random images to score using a four point Jarvick grading system. Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS 16.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) and analysis included comparing MR image quality before and after cervical arthroplasty at the operated and adjacent levels, and in between two types of implant.

The pre-operative MR image quality at operated and adjacent levels was excellent in both groups. In the post-operative images, the adjacent level visualisation was adequate in both groups without much difference in average scores. However, at operated level, the quality of MR images in the NuNec group (PEEK on PEEK articulating disc) was excellent and clear visualisation of the cord, central canal, foramen and disc.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1683 - 1692
1 Dec 2015
Patel A James SL Davies AM Botchu R

The widespread use of MRI has revolutionised the diagnostic process for spinal disorders. A typical protocol for spinal MRI includes T1 and T2 weighted sequences in both axial and sagittal planes. While such an imaging protocol is appropriate to detect pathological processes in the vast majority of patients, a number of additional sequences and advanced techniques are emerging. The purpose of the article is to discuss both established techniques that are gaining popularity in the field of spinal imaging and to introduce some of the more novel ‘advanced’ MRI sequences with examples to highlight their potential uses.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1683–92.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_X | Pages 89 - 89
1 Apr 2012
Nath C Chen Y Wilder-Smith E Kumar N
Full Access

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the cornerstone investigation for cervical disc disease (CDD). However, MRI changes suggestive of CDD are found in people above forty, even in asymptomatic healthy individuals [1]. Mere presence of MRI changes of CDD does not exclude the presence of concomitant extra-foraminal pathology. No study design. We present here a series of three cases where use of ‘high resolution ultrasound’ has allowed accurate diagnosis of concomitant extra-foraminal pathology in patients with MRI-proven CDD. The three cases were acute neuropraxia of aberrant C5 nerve root, anterior interossous nerve compression due to pseudo-aneurysm of brachial artery and ‘acute brachial neuritis’ respectively. No outcome measure. Use of diagnostic high resolution ultrasound revealed accurate diagnosis of concomitant extra-foraminal pathology in all three cases. The cases with acute neuropraxia and acute brachial neuritis recovered with conservative treatment. Pseudo-aneurysm was treated successfully with surgery. High resolution ultrasound of the brachial plexus and peripheral nerves may be useful in following scenarios to identify an extra-foraminal pathology: (1) when symptoms and signs are out of proportion to the MRI findings of CDD; (2) when there is obvious discordance between MRI and nerve conduction findings; (3) where an entrapment neuropathy is suspected but the site of nerve lesion cannot be located


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXVI | Pages 60 - 60
1 Jun 2012
Newsome R Reddington M Breakwell L Chiverton N Cole A Michael A
Full Access

Purpose. To question the reliability of Thoracic Spine pain as a red flag and symptoms of a possible cause of Serious Spinal Pathology (SSP). Methods. The clinical notes and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) results of patients presenting to the Sheffield Spinal Service with Thoracic spine symptoms but no signs were retrospectively reviewed over the period of 2 year (September 2008-August 2010). The clinical reason for request of Thoracic MRIs were noted and the patient notes were reviewed to determine their presentation, length of time of symptoms, age and also it was noted whether any other recognized red flag symptoms were present. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients referred with known SSP or myelopathic symptoms. Results. 57 thoracic spine MRI requests were made in total by the orthopaedic spinal teams for patients presenting with thoracic spine pain in the time period. 8 patients were excluded as per criteria as they were referred with known SSP as were 4 other patients with a history of previous cancer. 45 patients presented with thoracic spine pain but no other red flag signs or symptoms of these none had MRI evidence of serious spinal pathology or indeed anything pathological indicating the cause of their symptoms. Conclusion. The majority of those presenting to orthopaedic spinal clinic with thoracic spine pain alone with no other red flag signs have no pathological cause. Thoracic pain is a widely accepted indicator (red flag) of potential serious spinal pathology. The findings from this review would not support thoracic pain alone as an indicator of SSP