Cheilectomy of the big toe is offered in the early stages of arthritis affecting the big toe MTPJ, with the understanding that if it fails then a more definitive surgical treatment (e.g. MTPJ fusion or replacement) may be required. When considering treatment options, patients want to know how long will a cheilectomy procedure last. There is limited evidence available about the long term results after cheliectomy, particularly with regards to time to revision surgery. Our aim was to establish the long-term results of cheilectomy with regards to revision surgery and patient-satisfaction over a period of 10 years. A retrospective review of big toe MTPJ cheilectomies was performed at our institute from 2002 to 2012. The patients were identified using a combination of medical coding system, clinical records, operative log, and radiographs. A systemic review of chielectomy by Roukis (2010) was identified as the clinical standard and revision surgery after cheilectomy, average time to revision and patient satisfaction was assessed. 204 cheilectomies were identified in 192 patients over a period of 10 years. Majority had grade 2 OA (n = 106, 54 %) with grade 3 (n= 65, 33 %) and grade 1 (n= 24, 12 %). The mean follow-up was 4 yrs. (range 6 m to 9 yrs. and 8 m). The overall revision rate to any surgery was 4.4% (n=9), and revision to MTPJ arthrodesis was 3.4% (n =7). The average time to revision was 1 yr. 4 m. 101 patients (55%) were contactable over the phone, and majority (82 %) of them were satisfied with the clinical outcome. This study shows slightly better overall revision rate (4.4% vs. 8.8%), with revision to arthrodesis being similar (3.4% vs. 3.25%) as compared to the clinical standard. It also suggests that cheilectomy of the big toe can last for a minimum of up to 4 years in 95 % of cases. The 5 % of cases that may require revision surgery are likely to present within the first 2 years. This information is very useful to a patient who wants to know “how long will my cheilectomy last?” whilst making an informed choice

Background. Severe hallux rigidus can be treated with total or hemi arthroplasty to preserve motion in the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ). Decreased dorsiflexion impairs the rollover motion of the 1st MTPJ and recent studies of patients with 1st MTPJ osteoarthritis show increased plantar forces on the hallux. Objectives. Our aim was to examine the plantar force variables under the hallux and the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd – 5th distal metatarsal head (MH) on patients operated with a proximal hemiarthroplasty (HemiCap) in the 1st MTPJ and compare to a control group of healthy patients. Secondary aims: To examine correlations between the force and the 1st MTPJ range of motion (ROM) and pain. Study Design & Methods. Seventy patients operated with HemiCap were invited. 41 were included, (10 men, 31 women), median operation date 2011(range 2007–2014), age 63(47–78), 37 unilateral and 4 bilateral. Dorsal ROM of the 1st MTPJ was measured by goniometer and by x-ray. Pain evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS 1–10) during daily activities (DA) and during testing (DT). Emed (Novel) Foot Pressure Mapping system was used to measure peak force (N) and force/time integral (N/s) under the hallux, 1st and 2nd and 3–5th metatarsal heads (MH). Statistics: Force variables between operated feet and control group were compared by independent two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Force variables association to ROM and pain by linear regression models. Results. Median (range) for HemiCap/Control group: Peak force (N): Hallux: 12(1–26)/20(4–30), 1st MH: 17(8–41)/24(14–42), 2nd MH 24(15–37)/28(24–37), 3rd–5th MH: 27(18–36)/30(25–35). Force/time integral (N/s): Hallux: 1(1–4)/4(1–12), 1st MH: 5(2–18)/7(3–11), 2nd MH 8(4–13)/10(7–13), 3rd–5th MH: 9(6–15)/10(8–14). Significant difference between HemiCap patients and healthy controls in peak force and force/time integral was found under the hallux (p<0.01), 1st (p<0.05) and 2nd MH (p<0.05), and max force under the 3–5th MH (p<0.01). Dorsal ROM of the operated feet was 45 degrees (10–75) by goniometer and 41 degrees (16–70) by x-ray. An increase in dorsal ROM decreased the peak force and force/time integral under the hallux (p>0.05) but not under the MHs. Most patients reported no pain (VAS 1: 62% DA, 78% DT), only 2 patients reported VAS>3. No significant correlation between pain and force or force/time integral. Conclusions. A mid-term hemiarthroplasty do not restore the joint motion to normal. The loading patterns are in opposition to AO patients as as assfgjkdfgjkfdgjk the HemiCap patients show a significantly decreased peak force and force/time integral under the hallux compared to the control group and the larger the dorsiflexion achieved postoperatively the smaller the force/time integral becomes. It may reflect a patient reluctance to load the 1st ray and 2nd MH. The plantar forces are not linked to pain. Most report minimal pain, but the pain score is biased by missing numbers and exclusion of revisions

Tenodesis effect and digital cascade of the foot were never described in the current literature. However, understanding of these effects are important in the diagnoses and managements of foot flexor tendon rupture and lesser toe deformities. We aim to investigate the presence of these effects in the foot with intact and cut tendons. Ten fresh frozen cadaveric specimens were used in our study. 2. nd. , 3. rd. and 4. th. toe metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) and proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) range of motion (ROM) at ankle resting position were measured. Same measurements were repeated with maximum ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion. 4. th. toe Flexor Digitorum Longus (FDL) was then identified over plantar aspect of metatarsal shaft and cut transversely. 2. nd. , 3. rd. and 4. th. toe MTPJ and PIPJ ROM at ankle resting position, maximum plantarflexion and dorsiflexion were then measured. Mean 4. th. toe MTPJ and PIPJ ROM at ankle dorsiflexion were 13.5 ° of dorsiflexion and 25 ° of plantarflexion respectively, compared with values at ankle plantarflexion which were 35 ° and 25 ° respectively. After 4. th. toe FDL was cut, mean 4. th. toe MTPJ and PIPJ ROM at ankle dorsiflexion were 14 ° and 24 ° respectively and at ankle plantarflexion the values were 34.5 ° and 25 ° respectively. At ankle resting position before 4. th. FDL was cut, mean 4. th. toe MTPJ and PIPJ ROM were 22 ° and 31 ° respectively, compared with the values after 4. th. FDL was cut, ie 22.5 ° and 30.5 ° respectively. Tenodesis effect of the foot was shown in our study. However unlike in hand, this effect was only present in MTPJ and was still present following cut FDL. Similarly, digital cascade was still present following cut FDL. The maintenance of tenodesis effect and digital cascade following cut flexor tendon is likely contributed by various soft tissue restraints and intrinsic muscle actions. These findings are important in both the diagnosis and management of foot flexor tendon rupture and help us to better understand the biomechanics of lesser toe deformities and the managements of these deformities

Background and aims. Hallux rigidus in the metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) can be treated with arthroplasty to reduce pain and enhance motion. Few studies have investigated the functionality and the survival of HemiCap arthroplasty. Primarily we aimed to examine the medium to long-term functionality and the degree of pain after surgery. Secondarily the failure and revision rate of HemiCap implants. Methods. A total of 106 patients were operated with HemiCap arthroplasty (n=114) from 2006 to 2014, median age 53 (16 to 80) years, 78 females, 37 dorsal flange (DF) implants. Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively to collect revision data. Pre operative Coughlin/Shurnas arthrosis degree, hallux valgus (HV), intermetatarsalintermetatarsal (IM) and Distal Metaphyseal Articular Angle (DMAA) angles was were measured. Pre- and post operative 3 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 year2-year pain levels of the first MTPJ by Visuel Analog Skala (VAS 1–10), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS 0 to 100 points) and, Range of Motion (ROM), were available for 51 patients. FortysevenForty-seven of the 70 available for reexamination partook in a cross sectional follow up where the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS 0–48 points) was added to the Patients Related Outcome Measures (PROMs). Statistics. Kaplan-Meier for survival analysis, adjusted for sex, radiological angles, degree of arthrosis and dorsal flange. Prospective PROMs and ROM compared by paired t-test. Results. At 3, 5 and 7 years we had an mean implant survival of 85%, 83% and 78%. Almost all were revised due to pain, one due to malalignment and one due to loosening of the Hemicap. Dorsal flange, gender, preoperative arthrosis degree, HV, IM or DMAA angles did not statistically influence the result. For those (n=23) that were re-examined, preoperative dorsal ROM changed from mean(sd) 21 (6) to 42 (18) degrees, VAS from 7 (2) to 2 (2) and AOFAS from 61 (11) to 87 (11) (p < 0.001). At mean 5 year follow up (n=47), mean (sd) dorsal ROM was 46 (17) degrees,. AOFAS was 84 (9), VAS 2 (1) and SEFAS 42 (6) points. The dorsal flange made no statistical significant difference for ROM or PROMs, but DF displayed 51 degrees of extension vs. 44 without (p=0.1). Periprostethic lucency (<2 mm) was observed in 27/47. Conclusions. In general, we saw an acceptable implant survival rate. We did not find any predictors that influenced implant failure and the design alterations with the dorsal flange are not evident clinically. Patients who were not revised had significantly less pain, greater ROM, and better overall foot and ankle conditions than preoperatively, but the data are biased by missing numbers and revisions

Background. PROMS and PREMS are a fundamental and essential part of the NHS. Chilectomy and fusion procedures for hallux rigidus produce varied outcomes due to their subjective nature. PROMS2.0, a semi-automated web-based system, which allows collection and analysis of outcome data, to compare what PROMS/PREMS for chilectomy/fusion for hallux rigidus are at UHSM including variance across osteoarthritis grades. Methods. Data was collected from March-2013 to December-2014. Scores used to assess outcomes included EQ-5D-VAS, EQ-5D Health-Index, and MOxFQ, collected pre-operatively and post-operatively. Patient-Personal-Experience (PPE-15) was collected postoperatively. Data was compared. Results. 10 patients (4F, 6M) (9R, 1L) had a 1st MTPJ chilectomy. Average age- 47.3 (range 34–70). 16 patients (12F, 4M) (9RT, 7LT) had a 1st-MTPJ fusion. Average age-60.3yrs (range19–83). Chilectomy pre-op average MOXFQ scores for pain, walking and social interaction: 33.5 (range 5–70), 27.6 (range 0–64) and 24.9 (range 0–75) respectively. Post operatively these improved to 25.0 (range 0–70), 24.3 (range 0–68) and 21.9 (range 0–50). EQ5D scores showed a regression; pre-op index average of 0.72 and post op 0.70. Pre-op VAS score average of 86.8 with post-op 80.4. Fusion pre-op average MOXFQ scores for pain, walking and social interaction: 50.7 (range 25–75), 49.1 (range 4–75) and 48.4 (range 25–75) respectively. Post-operatively improved to 9.7 (range 0–57), 16.1 (range 0–57) and 20.1 (range 0–50). EQ5D scores showed improvement; with pre-op index average of 0.68 and post-op 0.83. Pre-op VAS score average of 72.5 and post-op 83.6. Higher grades of OA responded better to fusion and lower grades better to chilectomy. 17 patients (10 fusion/7 chilectomy) filled PPE-questionnaires. Results show overall satisfactory experience for both sets of patients. Conclusion. Both procedures show improved outcomes. Fusions have greater improvements than chilectomy based on reported outcomes. Higher grades of OA do better with fusion. Level of Evidence. Prospective case series- Level 3