Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 79 - 79
1 Mar 2005
Todd R Challen C Dildey P Murray S Gerrand C Verrill M Calvert H Lunec J
Full Access

The soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a diverse collection of malignant tumours of the connective tissues arising from the primitive mesoderm and ectoderm. While the primary treatment of most is surgery, chemotherapy can be offered to patients presenting with locally advanced or metastatic disease although sarcomas are resistant to the majority of anticancer drugs. The reasons for this are not fully understood but it is thought that p53 abnormalities and mdm2 overexpression may be involved. Samples from twenty eight adult patients with soft tissue sarcomas have been analysed for p53 mutations in exons 4 to 9 both by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC) and by direct automated sequencing. By sequencing we found mutations in 7/28 patients, giving a mutation rate of 25%. 4/6 were point mutations in exons 5, 7 and 8 and the remaining three were deletions in exons 4, 7 and 8. Six of these samples gave abnormalities in dHPLC analysis with a concordance rate of 97.5% between the sequencing and dHPLC data. Thirty nine and forty samples have been assessed by immunohistochemistry for p53 and mdm2 expression respectively. Do7 antibody which recognises the N terminus of p53 and F4-14 which recognises the carboxy-terminus of mdm2 were used. Immunohistochemistry was scored semiquantitatively by two independent observers and the results scored accordingly: low (< 20%), intermediate (20–80%) and high (> 80%). The initial results showed that 23/40 (58%) of patients were high staining for mdm2 in contrast to only 15/39 (38%) of patients for p53. All patients with deletions in p53 had intermediate staining for mdm2. 2/3 of these had intermediate staining for p53 and 1/3 had high staining for p53. One patient with a point mutation had high staining for both p53 and mdm2 but the other two have yet to be analysed by immunohistochemistry. These results confirm the overexpression of mdm2 in STS. Future experiments are planned using fluorescent in situ hydridisation (FISH) to determine whether MDM2 amplification is one of the mechanisms involved in mdm2 overexpression


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 6 | Pages 745 - 752
1 Jun 2019
Toki S Kobayashi E Yoshida A Ogura K Wakai S Yoshimoto S Yonemori K Kawai A

Aims. The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical behaviour, prognosis, and optimum treatment of dedifferentiated low-grade osteosarcoma (DLOS) diagnosed based on molecular pathology. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 13 DLOS patients (six men, seven women; median age 32 years (interquartile range (IQR) 27 to 38)) diagnosed using the following criteria: the histological coexistence of low-grade and high-grade osteosarcoma components in the lesion, and positive immunohistochemistry of mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) associated with MDM2 amplification. These patients were then compared with 51 age-matched consecutive conventional osteosarcoma (COS) patients (33 men, 18 women; median age 25 years (IQR 20 to 38)) regarding their clinicopathological features. Results. The five-year overall survival (OAS) rates in the DLOS and COS patients were 85.7% and 77.1% (p = 0.728), respectively, and the five-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 57.7% and 44.9% (p = 0.368), respectively. A total of 12 DLOS patients received chemotherapy largely according to regimens for COS. Among the nine cases with a histological evaluation after chemotherapy, eight showed a poor response, and seven of these had a necrosis rate of < 50%. One DLOS patient developed local recurrence and five developed distant metastases. Conclusion. Based on our study of 13 DLOS cases that were strictly defined by histological and molecular means, DLOS showed a poorer response to a standard chemotherapy regimen than COS, while the clinical outcomes were not markedly different. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:745–752


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 1 | Pages 99 - 106
1 Jan 2024
Khal AA Aiba H Righi A Gambarotti M Atherley O'Meally AO Manfrini M Donati DM Errani C

Aims

Low-grade central osteosarcoma (LGCOS), a rare type of osteosarcoma, often has misleading radiological and pathological features that overlap with those of other bone tumours, thereby complicating diagnosis and treatment. We aimed to analyze the clinical, radiological, and pathological features of patients with LGCOS, with a focus on diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 49 patients with LGCOS (Broder’s grade 1 to 2) treated between January 1985 and December 2017 in a single institute. We examined the presence of malignant features on imaging (periosteal reaction, cortical destruction, soft-tissue invasion), the diagnostic accuracy of biopsy, surgical treatment, and oncological outcome.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 439 - 439
1 Jul 2010
Parafioriti A Del Bianco S Armiraglio E Daolio P Mapelli S
Full Access

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare vaso-formative tumor of variable biological behavior that has been considered a tumor of borderline malignancy and low-grade angiosarcoma. The majority of cases are associated with low mortality, but some metastasize and cause patient death. Its principal sites of occurrence are soft tissues, liver, lung, and bone. EHE develops as a solitary, painful mass in superficial or deep soft tissue of the extremities and it generally arises from a vessel. Cytogenetic findings are very limited and comprises three reports on totally 4 cases, describing translocations between chromosomes 1 and 3 in two cases, chromosomes 7 and 22 in one case and chromosome 10 and 14 in the last case. We characterized immunohistochemically 5 cases of this tumour type and currently we are performing Real-Time PCR assays to analyze the expression of two genes (MDM2 and CDK4) known to be involved in pathogenesis of tumours. Three out 5 patients presented epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the bone while two affected soft tissues. All the samples showed positivity for CD34 and CD31; 4 samples out 5 were also positive for FLI1. We tested Factor VIII immunostaining on 3 of these cases which resulted positive; EMA was positive on 3 samples out 5. Cytocheratins (AE1/AE3, CAM 5.2 and CK7) were always negative except in one case which showed CAM 5.2 positivity. Our preliminary results by Real-Time PCR analysis performed on 5 cases suggest that MDM2 and CDK4 have a different expression in epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas compared to normal tissue. Our study shows that use of molecular techniques such as Real-Time PCR could complement histopathological diagnosis in order to identify a marker of biologic behaviour of this enigmatic tumour type


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 12 | Pages 640 - 648
1 Dec 2017
Xia B Li Y Zhou J Tian B Feng L

Objectives

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease. The aim of this study was to identify key genes in osteoporosis.

Methods

Microarray data sets GSE56815 and GSE56814, comprising 67 osteoporosis blood samples and 62 control blood samples, were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in osteoporosis using Limma package (3.2.1) and Meta-MA packages. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analyses were performed to identify biological functions. Furthermore, the transcriptional regulatory network was established between the top 20 DEGs and transcriptional factors using the UCSC ENCODE Genome Browser. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was applied to investigate the diagnostic value of several DEGs.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 7 | Pages 955 - 958
1 Jul 2006
Siegel HJ Connor GS Lee D Lopez-Ben R Kelly DR

We report a case of bifocal rhabdomyosarcoma involving the hand and thigh in an 11-year-old female. We highlight the importance of a thorough clinical examination and an aggressive surgical approach in which each lesion is treated as a separate primary.