Aims. The aims of this study were to describe the prevalence of previous lumbar surgery in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to investigate their patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) one year post-operatively. Patients and Methods. Data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register and the Swedish Spine Register gathered from 2002 to 2013 were merged to identify a group of patients who had undergone lumbar surgery before THA (n = 997) and a carefully matched one-to-one control group. We investigated differences in the one-year post-operative PROMs between the groups. Linear regression analyses were used to explore the associations between previous lumbar surgery and these PROMs following THA. The prevalence of prior lumbar surgery was calculated as the ratio of patients identified with previous lumbar surgery between 2002 and 2012, and divided by the total number of patients who underwent a THA in 2012. Results. The prevalence of lumbar surgery prior to THA in 2012 was 3.5% (351 of 10 082). Linear regression analyses showed an association with more pain (B = 4.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.57 to 6.12), worse EuroQol (EQ)-5D index, (B = -0.089, 95% CI -0.112 to -0.066), worse EQ VAS (B = -6.75, 95% CI -8.58 to -4.92), and less satisfaction (B = 6.04, 95% CI 4.05 to 8.02). Conclusion. Lumbar spinal surgery prior to THA is associated with less reduction of pain, worse health-related quality of life, and less satisfaction one year after THA. This is useful information to share in the decision-making process and may help establish realistic expectations of the outcomes of THA in patients who also have previously undergone lumbar spinal surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:759–65

Introduction. Due to co-morbidities in elderly like atherosclerosis and approach-related risks, anterior lumbar surgery is mainly recommended for younger patients. We reviewed approach-related complications in anterior lumbar surgery in senior patients for complex reconstructions. Materials and Methods. Retrospective review of 12 patients (8 female and 4 male), mean age 65.5±4.9 years, treated with anterior fusion mainly for degenerative scoliosis and lumbar kyphosis in between 2007-10. 9(75%) patients had multilevel procedures. Most common co-morbidities were atherosclerosis (CT-proven in 7 patients), coronary heart disease and COPD. Renal impairment was present preoperatively in 3 patients. Results. Mean duration of surgery was 260±120.8 min and mean blood loss 403.3±348.0 ml in the whole group (157±49.1 min and 240.0±162.0 ml in single ALIF; 334.0±100.0 min and 520.0±408.0 ml in multilevel procedures). Retractor related ischaemia occurred in 8 patients (27.3±29.1 min); perfusion of the leg returned immediately after release (confirmed via pulse-oxymetry). 2 patients had a direct vessel suture (2 common iliac veins); hypotension during surgery occurred in 1 patient due to anaesthetic problems. 5 patients needed ICU support after the procedure. Superficial wound infection was reported in one patient. One case of incisional hernia and one case of lymphocele was noticed. Conclusion. In this retrospective review, no specific complications concerning age or co-morbidities occurred in senior patients. In this group, atherosclerosis was the most common co-morbidity. However, no arterial embolism or perfusion deficit occurred. In the future, more and more elderly are to be treated by spinal surgeons. Anterior lumbar surgery is an alternative treatment option even for complex cases in the elderly. This limited group of patients need further investigations and prospective studies regarding anterior lumbar surgery

There have been a few reports of patients with a combination of lumbar and thoracic spinal stenosis. We describe six patients who suffered unexpected acute neurological deterioration at a mean of 7.8 days (6 to 10) after lumbar decompressive surgery. Five had progressive weakness and one had recurrent pain in the lower limbs. There was incomplete recovery following subsequent thoracic decompressive surgery. The neurological presentation can be confusing. Patients with compressive myelopathy due to lower thoracic lesions, especially epiconus lesions (T10 to T12/L1 disc level), present with similar symptoms to those with lumbar radiculopathy or cauda equina lesions. Despite the rarity of this condition we advise that patients who undergo lumbar decompressive surgery for stenosis should have sagittal whole spine MRI studies pre-operatively to exclude proximal neurological compression. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1388–91

Purpose: Purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of elective lumbar spinal surgery as it relates to patient expectations for outcome and outcome as quantified by patient derived generic and disease specific measures. Methods: Prospectively collected patient derived generic health status (SF-36) and disease specific outcome measures (Oswestry) were quantified in all patients prior to surgery, and at serial postoperative clinical follow-ups. Patient expectations for their surgery were also measured; (pain relief, sleep, recreational and daily activities of living, return to work). Postoperatively, patients completed a questionnaire regarding the results of their spinal surgery as it related to meeting their expectations. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to evaluate for factors that influenced the results of surgery relating to patient expectations. Results: Between 1998 and 2002 one hundred and forty three consecutive patients were evaluated. Average age was 52 (range 18–84). Diagnosis was disc herniation 43%, spondylitic spondylolisthesis 10%, degenerative spondylolisthesis 30%, spondylosis 6%, other 11%. The mean preoperative SF-36 mental component and physical component scores were 42.1 and 22.3 respectively (1.2 and 3.4 standard deviations below age and gender matched norms). Postoperative SF-36 scores were 48.1 and 38.6. The mean Oswestry disability scores were 48.7% preoperatively vs. 23.1% postoperatively. 81% (116/143) had their expectations met. Of the 19% (27 patients) who did not meet their expectations, they reported lower preoperative SF-36 general health and vitality domain scores. Patients were also less likely to have their expectations met if they had prior lumbar surgery, were involved in worker compensation or litigation. Patients who reported either back or back > leg symptoms were less satisfied than patients who presented with predominantly leg symptoms. Conclusions: Patient factors inclusive of mental, (as measured by general health perception and vitality), physical (predominance of leg vs back pain), and social (presence of compensation, litigation), all contribute to patient satisfaction and outcomes following lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions

Introduction and Objectives: Bleeding during lumbar surgery requires the use of blood products for its management. Autotransfusions are an alternative to blood transfusions, since these are not free of risk. Although autotransfusion is a very effective technique, its efficiency is conditioned by its high cost and the fact that a large number of autodonations have to be destroyed when the patients do not require them during the postoperative period. We wanted to discover the factors that determine the use of blood products during the postoperative period so as to obtain blood autodonations from these patients. Materials and Methods: We carried out a retrospective study of 143 patients that underwent surgery for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. We assessed different variables: Age, sex, lumbar level operated on, operation time, pre and postoperative hemoglobin and associated conditions (Charlson comorbidity index and ASA scale). Results: We found a significant statistic correlation with female sex, age over 60, ASA 3, preoperative hemoglobin < 136 gr/l. Using logistic regression we found that the combination woman, ASA 3 was the most important prognostic factor with a specificity above 90%. We also found that the possibility of requiring a transfusion in a woman/ASA 3, was 61% and at the other end of the spectrum 1.1% in a man/ASA< 3,. Discussion and Conclusions: If we plan an autotransfusion in a woman with ASA 3, there is a probability of 61% that she will require a transfusion with specificity greater than 90%

In 2000 the Ulrich ALIF cage for lumbar surgery was introduced. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of this new implant device by determining fusion rate, cost and complications. Twenty patients undergoing anterior spinal surgery for failed posterior fusions were offered the option of receiving the implant device and entered into this prospective study. In all patients, the approach was either anterior retroperitoneal or left lateral retroperitoneal. The procedures were done under C-arm control. The mean operating time was 80 minutes. Blood loss was less than 400 ml. Mobilised the day after surgery, all patients used a soft lumbosacral brace for at least six weeks. Follow-up radiographs were taken on the third postoperative day and at six and 12 weeks. The large bone graft surface of the cage allows excellent bone grafting and radiological visualisation. We encountered no complications related to the cage. One case of anterior subluxation of 1 cm occurred when a patient stumbled on the third day after surgery

The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the results of urgent lumbar surgery performed due to severe neurologic deficit. Eight patients underwent urgent lumbar surgery: 7 patients underwent surgery less than 12 hours from the onset of the symptoms. One patient was operated on less than 24 hours from symptoms initiation. 6 Pts. had Cauda Equina Syndrome, 2 pts. had radicular deficiency presented with drop foot. All patients underwent lumbar decompression. The patients were followed up for at least 2 years. Mean follow up was 3 years and 8 months. 5 of the 6 that had Cauda Equina Syn (CER). had complete neurological recovery. One patient had no improvement. The cause of the CER was undifferentiated carcinoma. The two patients operated on because of drop foot had no improvement. Our results confirmed the good outcome of early intervention in patients having CER due to disc herniation No improvement was seen following surgery due to nerve root paresis

Introduction. An important number of factors affecting the outcome of surgical treatment have been identified, and these factors can affect the patient's selection for lumbar surgery. Study Design. Retrospective study with data collected prospectively on patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar pathology (DLP). Purpose. Identification and evaluation of epidemiological factors that influence the quality of life improvement, disability and chronic pain. Outcome measures. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess pain in lower back and extremities, Short Form-36v2 (SF-36), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI). Method. 263 patients were included in our study, with a mean age of 54.0 years (22–86 years). 131 patients were women (49.8%). Questionnaires were completed in the preoperative visit and 2 years after surgery. Epidemiological data collected were age, sex, educational level, employment status, diagnosis, treatment, and comorbidity measure by ASA. The most frequent diagnostics were degenerative discal disease (36,5%) and lumbar stenosis (30,4%) and a main surgical treatment was TLIF (31,9 %). To compare means we used t-Student and Pearson's coefficient or Spearman's test was used to assess the correlation, and, finally, linear regression study (ANOVA) was performed with variables that showed statistically significant correlation. SPSS 15.0 statistical package. Results. Sex and employment status was correlated with the improvement of COMI (r=− 0.257, p <0.05, r=0.272, p <0.05). Employment status was correlated with in ODI (r=0.249, p <0.05) and the degree of improvement physical component of SF-36 (PCS, r=− 0.254, p <0.05). Linear regression showed statistically significant influence of the age (r=0.334, p <0.05) and employment status (r=14.146, p <0.01) on ODI. COMI is statistically influenced by sex (r=− 0.869, p <0.01), age (r=0.027, p <0.05) and employment status (r=0.830, p <0.05). PCS is statistically influenced by the employment status (r=− 8.568, p <0.01), age (r=− 0.228, p <0.05) and sex (r=5.525, p <0.05). Conclusions. According to the present study we observed that the perception of change in the quality of life and disability after surgery of the lumbar spine is independent of the initial pathology, the type of surgery and previous pain and disability; but sex, age and employment status have an important influence

Aims

Our aim was to perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the incidence of post-operative epidural haematomas and wound infections after one-, or two-level, non-complex, lumbar surgery for degenerative disease in patients with, or without post-operative wound drainage.

Aims. People with severe, persistent low back pain (LBP) may be offered lumbar spine fusion surgery if they have had insufficient benefit from recommended non-surgical treatments. However, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2016 guidelines recommended not offering spinal fusion surgery for adults with LBP, except as part of a randomized clinical trial. This survey aims to describe UK clinicians’ views about the suitability of patients for such a future trial, along with their views regarding equipoise for randomizing patients in a future clinical trial comparing lumbar spine fusion surgery to best conservative care (BCC; the FORENSIC-UK trial). Methods. An online cross-sectional survey was piloted by the multidisciplinary research team, then shared with clinical professional groups in the UK who are involved in the management of adults with severe, persistent LBP. The survey had seven sections that covered the demographic details of the clinician, five hypothetical case vignettes of patients with varying presentations, a series of questions regarding the preferred management, and whether or not each clinician would be willing to recruit the example patients into future clinical trials. Results. There were 72 respondents, with a response rate of 9.0%. They comprised 39 orthopaedic spine surgeons, 17 neurosurgeons, one pain specialist, and 15 allied health professionals. Most respondents (n = 61,84.7%) chose conservative care as their first-choice management option for all five case vignettes. Over 50% of respondents reported willingness to randomize three of the five cases to either surgery or BCC, indicating a willingness to participate in the future randomized trial. From the respondents, transforaminal interbody fusion was the preferred approach for spinal fusion (n = 19, 36.4%), and the preferred method of BCC was a combined programme of physical and psychological therapy (n = 35, 48.5%). Conclusion. This survey demonstrates that there is uncertainty about the role of lumbar spine fusion surgery and BCC for a range of example patients with severe, persistent LBP in the UK. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(7):612–620

Lumbar fusion surgery is an established procedure for the treatment of several spinal pathologies. Despite numerous techniques and existing devices, common surgical trends in lumbar fusion surgery are scarcely investigated. The purpose of this Canada-based study was to provide a descriptive portrait of current surgeons’ practice and implant preferences in lumbar fusion surgery while comparing findings to similar investigations performed in the United Kingdom. Canadian Spine Society (CSS) members were sampled using an online questionnaire which was based on previous investigations performed in the United Kingdom. Fifteen questions addressed the various aspects of surgeons’ practice: fusion techniques, implant preferences, and bone grafting procedures. Responses were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics. Of 139 eligible CSS members, 41 spinal surgeons completed the survey (29.5%). The most common fusion approach was via transforaminal lumber interbody fusion (TLIF) with 87.8% performing at least one procedure in the previous year. In keeping with this, 24 surgeons (58.5%) had performed 11 to 50 cases in that time frame. Eighty-six percent had performed no lumbar artificial disc replacements over their last year of practice. There was clear consistency on the relevance of a patient specific management (73.2%) on the preferred fusion approach. The most preferred method was pedicle screw fixation (78%). The use of stand-alone cages was not supported by any respondents. With regards to the cage material, titanium cages were the most used (41.5%). Published clinical outcome data was the most important variable in dictating implant choice (87.8%). Cage thickness was considered the most important aspect of cage geometry and hyperlordotic cages were preferred at the lower lumbar levels. Autograft bone graft was most commonly preferred (61.0%). Amongst the synthetic options, DBX/DBM graft (64.1%) in injectable paste form (47.5%) was preferred. In conclusion, findings from this study are in partial agreement with previous work from the United Kingdom, but highlight the variance of practice within Canada and the need for large-scale clinical studies aimed to set specific guidelines for certain pathologies or patient categories

Resident involvement in the operating room is a vital component of their medical education. Conflicting and limited research exists regarding the effects of surgical resident participation on spine surgery patient outcomes. Our objective was to determine the effect of resident involvement on surgery duration, length of hospital stay and 30-day post-operative complication rates. This study was a multicenter retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. All anterior cervical or posterior lumbar fusion surgery patients were identified. Patients who had missing trainee involvement information, surgery for cancer, preoperative infection or dirty wound classification, spine fractures, traumatic spinal cord injury, intradural surgery, thoracic surgery and emergency surgery were excluded. Propensity score for risk of any complication was calculated to account for baseline characteristic differences between the attending alone and trainee present group. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate the impact of resident involvement on surgery duration, length of hospital stay and 30 day post-operative complication rates. 1441 patients met the inclusion criteria: 1142 patients had surgeries with an attending physician alone and 299 patients had surgeries with trainee involvement. After adjusting using the calculated propensity score, the multivariate analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference in any complication rates between surgeries involving trainees compared to surgeries with attending surgeons alone. Surgery times were found to be significantly longer for surgeries involving trainees. To further explore this relationship, separate analyses were performed for tertile of predicted surgery duration, cervical or lumbar surgery, instrumentation, inpatient or outpatient surgery. The effect of trainee involvement on increasing surgery time remained significant for medium predicted surgery duration, longer predicted surgery duration, cervical surgery, lumbar surgery, lumbar fusion surgery and inpatient surgery. There were no significant differences reported for any other factors. After adjusting for confounding, we demonstrated in a national database that resident involvement in surgeries did not increase complication rates, length of hospital stay or surgical duration of more routine surgical cases. We found that resident involvement in surgical cases that were generally more complexed resulted in increased surgery time. Further study is required to determine the relationship between surgery complexity and the effect of resident involvement on surgery duration

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) on the risk of re-operation at an adjacent level.

We compared a group of 46 somatised patients with a control group of 41 non-somatised patients who had undergone elective surgery to the lumbar spine in an attempt to identify pre-operative factors which could predict the outcome. In a prospective single-centre study, the Distress and Risk Assessment method consisting of a modified somatic perception questionnaire and modified Zung depression index was used pre-operatively to identify somatised patients. The type and number of consultations were correlated with functional indicators of outcome, such as the Oswestry disability index and a visual analogue score for pain in the leg after follow-up for six and 12 months.

Similar improvements in the Oswestry disability index were found in the somatised and non-somatised groups. Somatised patients who had a good outcome on the Oswestry disability index had an increased number of orthopaedic consultations (50 of 83 patients (60%) vs 29 of 73 patients (39.7%); p = 0.16) and waited less time for their surgery (5.5 months) (sd 5.26) vs 10.1 months (sd 6.29); p = 0.026). No other identifiable factors were found. A shorter wait for surgery appeared to predict a good outcome. Early review by a spinal surgeon and a reduced waiting time to surgery appear to be of particular benefit to somatised patients.

Background and Purpose. The UK's NIHR and Australia's NHMRC have funded two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to determine if lumbar fusion surgery (LFS) is more effective than best conservative care (BCC) for adults with persistent, severe low back pain (LBP) attributable to lumbar spine degeneration. We aimed to describe clinicians’ decision-making regarding suitability of patient cases for LFS or BCC and level of equipoise to randomise participants in the RCTs. Methods. Two online cross-sectional surveys distributed via UK and Australian professional networks to clinicians involved in LBP care, collected data on clinical discipline, practice setting and preferred care of five patient cases (ranging in age, pain duration, BMI, imaging findings, neurological signs/symptoms). Clinicians were also asked about willingness to randomise each patient case. Results. Of 174 responses (73 UK, 101 Australia), 70 were orthopaedic surgeons, 34 neurosurgeons, 65 allied health professionals (AHPs), 5 others. Most worked in public health services only (92% UK, 45% Australia), or a mix of public/private (36% Australia). Most respondents chose BCC as their first-choice management option for all five cases (81–93% UK, 83–91% Australia). For LFS, UK surgeons preferred TLIF (36.4%), whereas Australian surgeons preferred ALIF (54%). Willingness to randomise cases ranged from 37–60% (UK mean 50.7%), and 47–55% (Australian mean 51.9%); orthopaedic and neuro-surgeons were more willing than AHPs. Conclusion. Whilst BCC was preferred for all five patient cases, just over half of survey respondents in both the UK and Australia were willing to randomise cases to either LFS or BCC, indicating clinical equipoise (collective uncertainty) needed for RCT recruitment. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. No specific funding obtained for the surveys. DB, SA, AG and NEF have funding from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) UK (FORENSIC-UK NIHR134859); NEF, DB and SA have funding from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC FORENSIC-Australia GA268233). AG has funding from Orthopaedic Research UK (combined with British Association of Spine Surgeons and British Scoliosis Society) and Innovate UK. NEF is funded through an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Investigator Grant (ID: 2018182)

Background: A common complication of lumbar spine surgery is incidental tear of the dural sac and subsequent leakage of the cerebrospinal fluid intraoperatively. Studies have reported a wide variation in the rates of dural tears in spine surgery (1%–17%). The rates were higher after revision surgery. Objective: To establish a baseline rate of incidence of dural tears after lumbar surgery in Morriston Hospital Neurosurgical Unit and to compare it with the results reported in the literature. Methods and Results: A prospective review of the operation notes of 65 consecutive patients who had undergone lumbar surgery (Primary lumbar discectomy, primary lumbar laminectomy and revision lumbar discectomy) over a period of 3 months from Jan 2008. Patients were operated on by different neurosurgical consultants. 40 patients had primary lumbar discectomy of which 2 (5%) had dural tears. 20 patients had primary lumbar laminectomy of which 1 (5%) had a dural tear and 5 patients had revision lumbar discectomy of which 1 (20%) had a dural tear. All dural tears were repaired intraoperatively. Conclusion: This study shows that the highest percentage of incidental durotomy was in revision lumbar surgery which was also slightly higher than the reported rates (8.1%–17.4%). The percentage of dural tears after primary discectomy and primary laminectomy was within range of the percentages reported in the literature (1%–7.1%) and (3.1%–13%) respectively. A multicentre prospective larger study which includes all different surgical procedures performed on the lumbar spine is needed to establish a more accurate incidence rate for this common complication

The problems arising at the levels above or below a previous successful fusion are well known. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of junctional disk degeneration and/or stenosis and to attempt to establish preventative measures.

Between July 1993 and December 2000, a single surgeon performed lumbosacral fusions on 938 patients. The primary fusion was subsequently extended in 26 men and 16 women (2.8%). The mean age of patients at the time of the second fusion was 52 years. The mean time from the primary to a second procedure was three years. Initial data showed that seven patients had mild to moderate degeneration of the disc and/or facet joints above the level of intended fusion. No other risk factors were identified.

At 2.8%, it would appear that extension of a fusion is necessary less often than anticipated. The need for extension may have been prevented in seven patients had the primary fusion been extended.

There is increasing knowledge regarding the functional outcome of patients following posterior lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions of the spine. There is less known regarding the expectations patients have for spinal surgery and how that may relate to commonly reported surgical outcome measures. It was the purpose of this study to evaluate the results of elective lumbar spinal surgery as it relates to patient expectations for outcome. and outcome as quantified by both physician reported outcome and patient derived generic and disease-specific measures. Patient expectations for surgery were evaluated in one hundred and fifty-five consecutive patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions (single institution, two surgeons). SF-36+Oswestry disability was quantified preoperatively, and serially postoperatively. Preoperative expectations (pain relief, sleep, recreational, ADL, work return) were documented and postoperative expectations quantified at time of anticipated maximal medical improvement (6mos decompressions,1yr with fusions). Mean preoperative SF-36 MCS and PCS scores were 3.4 and 1.2 S.D. below age/gender matched Canadian norms. Although patients reported improvements in SF-36+Oswestry scores following surgery, mean SF-36 MCS and PCS scores were still 2 and 1.5 S.D. below norms. Mean Oswestry disability improved from 48.7%±1.7% to 23.1±1.9%. Expectations for surgery were met in 81%(responders:143/155). Of 19%(27/143) where expectations were not met, 6/27 have either nonunion, technical, or medical factors. There was no difference in mean age, gender, comorbidity, procedure type and follow-up comparing patients where expectations were met to those that were not. Patients where expectations were not met reported lower preoperative SF-36 (GH and VT) domain scores (p=0.02 and 0.04, respectively), however, preoperative Oswestry, SF-36 MCS and PCS scores were not significantly different. Patients were less satisfied if they had prior lumbar surgery (p=0.02) or involved in WCB/litigation (p< 0.001). We note 15%(21/143) where expectations were not met and there were no apparent surgical or medical confounds to account. There are likely other factors that may influence patient perception and expectation for treatment which requires further study

Background:. Following lumbar spine surgery patients with a high BMI appear to have increased post-operative complications including surgical site infections (SSI), urinary complications, increased anaesthetic/operative time and a greater need for post-operative blood transfusion. There is no current evidence, however, analysing the effect of BMI on functional outcome. Purpose:. We aimed to analyse the effect of BMI on functional outcome following lumbar spine surgery. Study Design:. Retrospective Cohort Study. Patient Sample:. 131. Outcome Measures:. Outcome measures included mean post-operative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at six and twelve months, the incidence of SSI, mean operative time and the requirement for post-operative blood transfusion. Methods:. Patients that underwent lumbar spinal surgery between September 2010 and November 2013 were identified retrospectively and categorised into discectomy, decompression, fusion and revision is created. A BMI threshold of 30 was used to group patients as non-obese or obese. Univariate analysis was used to compare the effect of BMI on the above outcome measures. Results:. Post-operative complication rates were higher in the obese group in each category. However, there was no significant difference in the post-operative ODI at six ad twelve months post-operatively. Conclusions:. Increased BMI is related to increased post-operative complications but is not associated with a poorer functional outcome in the short to mid-term

Introduction. This study investigates the effect of somatisation on results of lumbar surgery. Methods. Pre- and post-operative data of all primary discectomies and posterior lumbar decompressions were prospectively collected. Pain using the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) and disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were measured. Psychological assessment used the Distress Risk Assessment Method (DRAM). Follow-up was at 1 year. Results. There were a total of 320 patients (average age 49.7 years). Pre-operatively there were 61 Somatising and 75 psychologically Normal patients. 47 of the pre-operative Somatisers were available for follow-up. All pre-operative parameters were significantly higher compared with the Normal group (back pain VAS 6.3 and 3.8; leg pain VAS 7 and 4.7; ODI 61 and 34.4 respectively). At 1 year follow-up, 23% of the somatising patients became psychologically Normal; 36% became At Risk; 11% became Distressed Depressed; and 30% remained Distressed Somatisers. The post-operative VAS for back and leg pain of the 11 patients who had become psychologically Normal was 3.4 (pre-op 6.8) and 3.2 (pre-op 6.6) respectively. In the 14 patients who remained Distressed Somatisers the corresponding figures were 5.6 (pre-op 7.8) and 6.7 (pre-op 7.0). The post-operative ODI of the 11 patients who had become psychologically Normal was 26.4 (pre-op 55.5). In the 14 patients who remained Distressed Somatisers the corresponding figures were 56.7 (pre-op 61.7). These differences are statistically significant. Discussion. Patients with features of somatisation are severely functionally impaired pre-operatively. One year following lumbar spine surgery, 60% (28) had improved psychologically, 23% (11) were defined as psychologically normal. This was associated with a significant improvement in function and back and leg pain. The 14 (30%) patients who did not improve psychologically and remained somatisers had a poor functional outcome. Our results demonstrate that psychological distress is not an absolute contraindication to lumbar spinal decompressive surgery