Background. Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) has achieved favorable effects in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH), as a new surgical procedure. With its wide range of applications, a series of complications related to the operation has gradually emerged. Objective. To describe the type, incidence and characteristics of the complications following PEID and to explore preventative and treatment measures. Study Design. Retrospective, observational study. Setting. A spine center affiliated with a large general hospital. Method. In total, 479 cases of patients with LDH received PEID, which was performed by an experienced spine surgeon between January 2010 and April 2013. Data concerning the complications were recorded. Result. All of the 479 cases successfully received the procedure. A total of 482 procedures were completed. The mean follow-up time was 44.3 months, ranging from 24 to 60 months. The average patient age was 47.8 years, ranging from 16 to 76 years. There were 29 (6.0%) related complications that emerged, including 3 cases (0.6%) of fragment omission, and the symptoms gradually eased following 3–6 weeks of conservative treatment; 2 cases (0.4%) of nerve root injury, and the patients recovered well following 1–3 months of taking neurotrophic drugs and functional exercise; 15 cases (3.1%) of paresthesia, and this condition gradually improved following 3–6 weeks of rehabilitation exercises and treatment with mecobalamin and pregabalin; and recurrence occurred in 9 cases (1.9%), and the condition was controlled in 4 of these cases by using a conservative method, while 5 of the cases underwent reoperation, including 3 traditional open surgeries and 2 PEID. Furthermore, the complication rate for the first 100 cases was 16%. This rate decreased to 3.4% (for cases 101–479), and the incidence of L4–5 (8.2%) was significantly higher than L5-S1 (4.5%). Limitations. This is a retrospective study, and some bias exists due to the single-center study design. Conclusion. PEID is a surgical approach, which has a low complication rate. Fragment omission, nerve root injury, paresthesia and recurrence are relatively common. Some effective measures can prevent and reduce the incidence of the complications, such as strict indications for surgery, a thorough action plan and skilled operation skills

Background. Microdiscectomy involves substantial aggressive excision of disc material from the intervertebral space to prevent reherniation. However, the recent trend is towards conservative disc removal and simple fragment excision (sequestrectomy). Aim. To compare the clinical outcome of microdiscectomy and sequestrectomy. Methods. During the 2-year study period, we performed 196 lumbar microdiscectomies for disc herniation. One hundred and one patients met the inclusion criteria: unilateral single level lumbar disc herniation. Cases suitable for sequestrectomy were based on intraoperative assessment (stable fibrous ring without significant disc bulge; posterior longitudinal ligament perforation of < 5mm). Results. Five patients were lost to follow-up, 72 patients underwent conventional microdiscectomy and 24 patients were suitable for sequestrectomy and included in the final analysis. There was no significant difference in terms of age and pre-operative VAS in both groups (p >0.05, unpaired t test. In the microdiscectomy group, 17/31 patients with motor deficit and 34/66 patients with sensory deficit showed post-operative improvement, but in sequestrectomy group, only 1 of 5 patients with motor deficit and 8 of 13 with sensory deficit recovered but this was not statistically significant (p>0.05, Fisher's exact test). Conclusion. In the sequestrectomy group, patients had significantly better improvement in VAS score. There was no significant difference between either group with regards to reherniation or post-operative neurological deficit. In a selected group of patients with single level lumbar disc herniation, clinical outcome of sequestrectomy is comparable to conventional microdiscectomy