Aims

The impact of a diaphyseal femoral deformity on knee alignment varies according to its severity and localization. The aims of this study were to determine a method of assessing the impact of diaphyseal femoral deformities on knee alignment for the varus knee, and to evaluate the reliability and the reproducibility of this method in a large cohort of osteoarthritic patients.

Purpose. While changes in lower limb alignment and pelvic inclination after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using certain surgical approaches have been studied, the effect of preserving the joint capsule is still unclear. We retrospectively investigated changes in lower limb alignment, length and pelvic inclination before and after surgery, and the risk of postoperative dislocation in patients who underwent capsule preserving THA using the anterolateral-supine (ALS) approach. Methods. Between July 2016 and March 2018, 112 hips (non-capsule preservation group: 42 hips, and capsule preservation group: 70 hips) from patients with hip osteoarthritis who underwent THA were included in this study. Patients who underwent spinal fusion and total knee arthroplasty on the same side as that of the THA were excluded. Using computed tomography, we measured lower limb elongation, external rotation of the knee, and femoral neck/stem anteversion before operation and three to five days after operation. We examined the pelvic inclination using vertical/transverse ratio of the pelvic cavity measured by X-ray of the anteroposterior pelvic region in the standing position before and six to 12 months after operation. All operations were performed using the ALS approach and taper wedge stem. Results. No dislocation was found in both groups. Lower limb elongation was 14.5±6.3 (mean±SD) mm in the non-capsule preservation group and 9.4±8.8 mm in the capsule preservation group. A significant reduction was found in the capsule preservation group (p<0.05). Changes in knee external rotation was 7.2±10.5 degrees in the non-capsule preservation group and 3.5±10.3 degrees in the capsule preservation group. A trend toward decreased knee external rotation in the capsule preservation group (p=0.07) was observed. There was no difference in femoral neck/stem anteversion and vertical/transverse ratio of the pelvic cavity between both groups. Discussion. Patients in the capsule preservation group tended to have reduced external rotation of lower limb, which might prevent postoperative anterior dislocation due to preservation of anterior structures. The capsule preservation group had significantly reduced lower limb elongation, suggesting that preservation of the hip joint capsule ligament contributes to joint stability. There was no significant difference in the pelvic inclination between both groups. Long-term changes will be assessed by regular follow up after operation

Abstract. Background. Lower limb mechanical axis has long been seen as a key to successful in lower limb surgery, including knee arthroplasty. Traditionally, coronal alignment has been assessed with weight-bearing lower limb radiographs (LLR) allowing assessment of hip-knee-ankle alignment. More recently CT scanograms (CTS) have been advocated as a possible alternative, having the potential benefits of being quicker, cheaper, requiring less specialist equipment and being non-weightbearing. Objectives. To evaluate the accuracy and comparability of lower limb alignment values derived from LLR versus CTS. Methods. We prospectively investigated patients undergoing knee arthroplasty with preoperative and postoperative LLR and CTS, analysing both preoperative and postoperative LLRs & CTS giving 140 imaging tests for direct comparison. We used two independent observers to calculate on each of imaging modalities, on both pre- and post-operative images, the: hip-knee-ankle alignment (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). Results. 840 data points were captured from pre- and post-operative LLRs and CTSs. Analysis demonstrated very strong correlation in pre-operative HKA (LLR vs CTS, r = 0.917), post-operative HKAs (LLR vs CTS, 0.850) and postoperative LDFAs (LLR vs CTS, 0.850). Strong correlation was observed in pre-operative LDFAs (0.732), MPTAs (0.604), and post-operative MPTAs (0.690). Conclusion. Both pre- and post-operative LLR and CTS imaging display very strong correlation for HKA coronal alignment correlation, with strong correlation for other associated angles around the knee. Our results demonstrate that both LLR and CTS can be used interchangeably with similar results. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction. High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a commonly used surgical technique for treating moderate osteoarthritis (OA) of the medial compartment of the knee by shifting the center of force towards the lateral compartment. The amount of alignment correction to be performed is usually calculated prior to surgery and it's based on the patient's lower limb alignment using long-leg radiographs. While the procedure is generally effective at relieving symptoms, an accurate estimation of change in intraarticular contact pressures and contact surface area has not been developed. Using electromyography (EMG), Meyer et al. attempted to predict intraarticular contact pressures during gait patterns in a patient who had received a cruciate retaining force-measuring tibial prosthesis. Lundberg et al. used data from the Third Grand Challenge Competition to improve contact force predictions in total knee replacement. Mina et al. performed high tibial osteotomy on eight human cadaveric knees with osteochondral defects in the medial compartment. They determined that complete unloading of the medial compartment occurred at between 6° and 10° of valgus, and that contact pressure was similarly distributed between the medial and lateral compartments at alignments of 0° to 4° of valgus. In the current study, we hypothesised that it would be possible to predict the change in intra-articular pressures based on extra-articular data acquisition. Methods. Seven cadavers underwent an HTO procedure with sequential 5º valgus realignment of the leg up to 15º of correction. A previously developed stainless-steel device with integrated load cell was used to axially load the leg. Pressure-sensitive sensors were used to measure intra-articular contact pressures. Intraoperative changes in alignment were monitored in real time using computer navigation. An axial loading force was applied to the leg in the caudal-craneal direction and gradually ramped up from 0 to 550 N. Intra-articular contact pressure (kg) and contact area (mm2) data were collected. Generalised linear models were constructed to estimate the change in contact pressure based on extra-articular force and alignment data. Results. The application of an axial load results in axial angle changes and load distribution changes inside the knee joint. Preliminary analysis has shown that it is possible to predict lateral and medial compartment pressures using externally acquired data. For lateral compartment pressure estimation, the following equation had an R of 0.86: Lateral compartment pressure = −1.26*axial_force + 37.08*horizontal_force − 2.40*vertical_force − 271.66*axial_torque − 32.64*horizontal_torque + 18.98*vertical_torque − 24.97*varusvalgus_angle_change + 86.68*anterecurvature_angle_change − 17.33*axial_angle_change − 26.14. For medial compartment pressure estimation, the following equation had an R2 of 0.86: Medial compartment pressure = −2.95*axial_force −22.93*horizontal_force − 9.48*vertical_force − 34.53*axial_torque + 6.18*horizontal_torque − 127.00*vertical_torque − 110.10*varusvalgus_angle_change − 15.10*anterecurvature_angle_change + 55.00*axial_angle_change + 193.91. Discussion. The most important finding of this study was that intra-articular pressure changes in the knee could be accurately estimated given a set of extra-articular parameters. The results from this study could be helpful in developing more accurate lower limb realignment procedures. This work complements and expands on previous research by other groups aimed at predicting intra-articular pressures and identifying optimal alignment for unloading arthritic defects. A possible clinical application of these findings may involve the application of a predetermined axial force to the leg intra-operatively. Given the estimated output from the predictive equation, one could then perform the opening wedge until the desired estimated intra-articular pressure is achieved. With this method, an arthrotomy and placement of intra-articular pressure sensors would not be needed. This work is not without its limitations. This experiment was performed on cadaveric specimens. Therefore, we cannot directly predict what the pressures would be in a de-ambulating patient. However, these sort of experiments do help us understand the complex biomechanics of the knee in response to alterations in multi-planar alignment. Further in vivo research would be warranted to validate these results. Additionally, given our current experimental setup, only axial loading could be performed for testing. Further experiments involving dynamic motion of the lower limb under load would further help us understand the changes in pressure at difference flexion angles. Continued experiments would help us gather additional data to better understand the relationship between these variables and to construct a more accurate predictive model. In summary, we have established a framework for estimating the change in intra-articular contact pressures based on extra-articular, computer-navigated measurements. Quantifying the resulting changes in load distribution, alignment changes, torque generation and deflection will be essential for generating appropriate algorithms able to estimate joint alignment changes based on applied loads

Lower limb alignment after unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has a significant impact on surgical outcomes. The literature lacks studies that evaluate the limb alignment after lateral UKA or compare it to alignment outcomes after medial UKA, making our understanding of this issue based on medial UKA studies. Unfortunately, since the geometry, mechanics, and ligamentous physiology are different between these two compartments, drawing conclusions for lateral UKAs based on medial UKA results may be imprecise and misleading. The purpose of this study was to compare the risk for limb alignment overcorrection and the ability to predict postoperative limb alignment between medial and lateral UKA. We evaluated the results of mechanical limb alignment in 241 patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis who underwent medial or lateral UKA; there were 229 medial UKAs and 37 lateral UKAs. Mechanical limb alignment was measured in standing long limb radiographs pre and post-operatively, intra-operatively it was measured using a computer assisted navigation system. Between the two cohorts, we compared the percentage of overcorrection and the difference between post-operative alignment and alignment measured by the navigation system. The percentage of overcorrection was significantly higher in the lateral UKA group (11%), when compared to the medial UKA group (4%), (p= 0.0001). In the medial UKA group, the mean difference between the intraoperative “virtual” alignment provided by the navigation system, and the post-operative, radiographically measured mechanical axis, was 1.33°(±1.2°). This was significantly lower than the mean 1.86° (±1.33°) difference in the lateral UKA group (p=0.019). Our data demonstrated an increased risk of mechanical limb alignment overcorrection and greater difficulty in predicting postoperative alignment using computer navigation, when performing lateral UKAs compared to medial UKAs

Lower limb alignment after unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has a significant impact on surgical outcomes. The literature lacks studies that evaluate the limb alignment after lateral UKA or compare it to alignment outcomes after medial UKA, making our understanding of this issue based on medial UKA studies. Unfortunately, since the geometry, mechanics, and ligamentous physiology are different between these two compartments, drawing conclusions for lateral UKAs based on medial UKA results may be imprecise and misleading. The purpose of this study was to compare the risk for limb alignment overcorrection and the ability to predict postoperative limb alignment between medial and lateral UKA. We evaluated the results of mechanical limb alignment in 241 patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis who underwent medial or lateral UKA; there were 229 medial UKAs and 37 lateral UKAs. Mechanical limb alignment was measured in standing long limb radiographs pre and post-operatively, intra-operatively it was measured using a computer assisted navigation system. Between the two cohorts, we compared the percentage of overcorrection and the difference between post-operative alignment and alignment measured by the navigation system. The percentage of overcorrection was significantly higher in the lateral UKA group (11%), when compared to the medial UKA group (4%), (p= 0.0001). In the medial UKA group, the mean difference between the intraoperative “virtual” alignment provided by the navigation system, and the post-operative, radiographically measured mechanical axis, was 1.33°(±1.2°). This was significantly lower than the mean 1.86° (±1.33°) difference in the lateral UKA group (p=0.019). Our data demonstrated an increased risk of mechanical limb alignment overcorrection and greater difficulty in predicting postoperative alignment using computer navigation, when performing lateral UKAs compared to medial UKAs

Purpose. To evaluate the accuracy of the alignment of lower extremity in 661 cases of total knee replacement arthroplasty (TKA) using navigation system. Materials and method. From June 2006 to September 2008, 661 cases (431 patients) of TKA using navigation system were operated. To analyze the mechanical axis, the weight bearing full length lower extremity radiographs were taken preoperatively and 3 weeks after the operation. The results from a well- experienced surgeon (423 cases) were compared with those from a less-experienced surgeon (238 cases), and they both used the navigation. Results. The mean of mechanical axis was −13.3Ëš (range: −33.3Ëš∼10.6Ëš) preoperatively, but it was corrected as −2.0Ëš (range: −14.3Ëš∼7.5Ëš) after TKA using navigation. There was no significant difference between the mean, −1.8Ëš (range: −13.4Ëš∼6.8Ëš) by a well-experienced surgeon and the mean, −2.2Ëš (range: −14.3Ëš∼7.5Ëš) by a less-experienced one. Conclusion. According to the radiologic results, the navigation is beneficiary for the accuracy of mechanical axis in TKA. The navigation system helps a less-experienced surgeon increase the accuracy of lower extremity alignment

Long radiographs are used to measure lower limb axial alignment, to assess the progression of deformity, and to plan corrective surgery. The purpose of this study was to test the belief that jigs are necessary in order to control limb position for radiography. Above-knee amputated limbs were fixed in different positions of rotation and of knee flexion and radiographed to study the effect on the apparent alignment of the limb. If the limb was rotated no more than 10 degrees from the neutral the effect on apparent axial alignment was minimal and radiographic measurement was reliable. This suggests that standardised positioning jigs are not needed in routine clinical practice

Measures of lower limb alignment and knee joint load during walking were evaluated before and six months after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in ninety-five patients with knee medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA). Full-length standing radiographs were used to calculate the mechanical axis angle, and a gait analysis was performed to calculate the external adduction moment about the knee. Results indicated significant decreases in mechanical axis angle and peak adduction moment. These findings provide an indication of the early success of HTO in reducing the extent of lower limb malalignment and knee joint load during walking. Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is intended to correct lower limb malalignment, resulting in decreased medial knee joint load and improved function. Due to the potential for the amount of alignment correction to change over time after surgery, frequent follow-up evaluations are encouraged. To evaluate the early changes in lower limb alignment and medial knee joint load experienced during walking after medial opening wedge HTO. Ninety-five patients (seventy-nine males, sixteen females; age range = 21–76 years; BMI range = 18.0–38.5) with knee joint OA affecting primarily the medial compartment underwent radiographic and gait analyses pre-surgically and six months following HTO. Full-length standing radiographs were obtained on both occasions and used to measure the static mechanical axis angle. Three-dimensional kinetic and kinematic data were also collected and combined to calculate the external knee joint adduction moment, an indirect measure of knee joint load. Paired t-tests indicated the mechanical axis angle (mean decrease = 8.32 degrees, 95% CI = 7.54,9.10) and peak external knee joint adduction moment (mean decrease = 1.61%BW*ht, 95% CI = 1.25,1.95) significantly decreased post-operatively (p< 0.001). These results indicate less varus angulation and reduced medial knee joint load following HTO. These preliminary findings suggest that medial opening wedge HTO is an effective surgical treatment for improving alignment and reducing knee joint load. Although these early results are promising, future research is required to determine the long-term success of this surgery in the treatment of knee OA. Funding:. CIHR, NSERC, Arthrex Inc

Aims

Once knee arthritis and deformity have occurred, it is currently not known how to determine a patient’s constitutional (pre-arthritic) limb alignment. The purpose of this study was to describe and validate the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) algorithm as a straightforward method for preoperative planning and intraoperative restoration of the constitutional limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Aim. To assess the efficacy of combined medical and surgical management in obtaining normal lower limb mechanical alignment in a patient cohort with genotypically similar hypophosphataemic rickets. Methods. A notes and radiograph audit was performed of all patients attending our institution with hypophosphataemic rickets: a subset with PHEX gene anomalies was studied further. Lower limb radiographs were assessed at two points during childhood and note made of treatment start, compliance; indication, timing and result of surgery. Standing leg alignment radiographs were measured at skeletal maturity or at latest review. Results. 35 patients (16 females, 18 skeletally mature) were identified. 10 commenced treatment at <12m. 11 patients (5 female) underwent 24 surgical procedures (13 for varus deformities). Surgery was bilateral in 10/11 patients. 5/14 osteotomies were performed after skeletal maturity. Malalignment was common: with NSA (neck-shaft angle) abnormalities in 20%, abnormal angles at distal femur and proximal tibia in 58% and 60% respectively and ankle abnormalities in 24%, prior to surgery. Surgical management led to normal mechanical alignment at skeletal maturity. At latest review, no patient had a leg length difference. 40% of non-operated, skeletally immature limbs have significant malalignment despite medical therapy. There was no statistical relationship between treatment onset and need for surgical correction. The relationship between non-compliance with medical treatment and surgical intervention was confounded by the changing emphasis on preferred method of surgical correction from osteotomy to guided growth. Conclusion. Even when medical treatment is commenced promptly and adhered to, significant lower limb malalignment can occur requiring surgical correction. Guided growth principles allow early deformity correction. Significance. Lower limb malalignment should not be considered a failure of medical treatment but more a consequence of the disease process. Earlier surgical intervention may encourage a more normal pattern of growth

Progression of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is related to alignment of the lower extremity. Postoperative lower extremity alignment is commonly regarded as an important factor in determining favourable kinematics to achieve success in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO). An automated image-matching technique is presented to assess three-dimensional (3D) alignment of the entire lower extremity for natural and implanted knees and the positioning of implants with respect to bone. Sawbone femur and tibia and femoral and tibial components of a TKA system were used. Three spherical markers were attached to each sawbone and each component to define the local coordinate system. Outlines of the 3D bone models and the component computer-aided design models were projected onto extracted contours of the femur, tibia, and implants in frontal and oblique X-ray images. Threedimensional position of each model was recovered by minimizing the difference between the projected outline and the contour. The relative positions were recovered within −0.3 ± 0.5 mm and −0.5 ± 1.1° for the femur with respect to the tibia, −0.9 ± 0.4 mm and 0.4 ± 0.4° for the femoral component with respect to the tibial component, −0.8 ± 0.2 mm and 0.8 ±0.3° for the femoral component with respect to the femur, and −0.3 ± 0.2 mm and −0.5 ± 0.4° for the tibial component with respect to the tibia. Clinical applications were performed on 12 knees in 10 OA patients (mean age, 72.5 years; range, 62–87 years) to check change in the 3D mechanical axis alignment before and after TKA and to measure position of the implant with regard to bone. The femorotibial angle significantly decreased from 187.8° (SD 10.5) to 175.6° (SD 3.0) (p=0.01). The 3D weight-bearing axis was drawn from the centre of the femoral head to the centre of the ankle joint. It intersected significantly medial (p=0.01) and posterior (p=0.023) point at the proximal tibia before TKA. The femoral component rotation was 3.8° (SD 3.3) internally and the tibial component rotation was 14.1° (SD 9.9) internally. Compared with a CT-based navigation system using pre-and post-operative CT for planning and assessment, the benefit to patients of our method is that the post-operative CT scan can be eliminated

Introduction

The current standard for alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is neutral mechanical axis within 3° of varus or valgus deviation [1]. This configuration has been shown to reduce wear and optimally distribute load on the polyethylene insert [2]. Two key factors (patient-specific hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and surgical component alignment) influence load distribution, kinematics and soft-tissue strains across the tibiofemoral (TF) joint. Improvements in wear characteristics of TKA materials have facilitated a trend for restoring the anatomic joint line [3]. While anatomic component alignment may aid in restoring more natural kinematics, the influence on joint loads and soft-tissue strains should be evaluated. The purpose of the current study was to determine the effect of varus component alignment in combination with a variety of HKA limb alignments on joint kinematics, loads and soft-tissue strain.

Introduction: With the rising popularity of biological fixation, “Less invasive skeletal stabilisation system” (L.I.S.S.) has emerged as a valid option to treat complex fractures around the knee. Published reports have shown good results with shorter healing time and lesser re-operation rates. However as with any close procedure, restoring correct alignment of the limb could be difficult with this system and has not been reported previously. We report the results of CT alignment study in 20 cases of LISS fixation.

Methods: In a combined retrospective-prospective study, 20 patients, who were treated with LISS system for stabilizing either femoral or tibial fractures were enrolled. Patents with only unilateral fractures with a normal contra-lateral lower limb were included. All patients had CT scannograms and limited axial CT cuts of both lower limbs. Axial and rotational alignments were measured and assessed by one consultant radiologist.

Result: There were 9 cases of femoral and 11 cases of tibial LISS . The mean total malrotation was found to be 11.97 degrees (2.0–34.5). All femora were found to be malrotated externally with a mean of 11.71 degrees where as for the tibiae the mean internal and external malrotaions were found to be12.53 and 11.74 respectively. Mean coronal malalignment was found to be 3.76 degrees. If acceptable alignment was taken as 5 degrees in any plane, then the degree of malrotation in our study was found to be statistically significant.

Discussion and conclusion: Malalignment, mainly in the rotational plane has been reported in other closed techniques such as femoral and tibial nailing. As LISS is also minimally invasive and done through indirect reduction techniques, restoration of correct alignment could be difficult to achieve. This study is reassuring as we have found that generally, alignment of limb in our study was satisfactory and no corrective surgery was needed.

Introduction

In prosthetic knee surgery, the axis of the lower limb is often determined only by static radiographic analysis. However, it is relevant to determine if this axis varies during walking, as this may alter the stresses on the implants. The aim of this study was to determine whether pre-operative measurement of the mechanical femorotibial axis (mFTA) varies between static and dynamic analysis in isolated medial femorotibial osteoarthritis.

Introduction

Limb alignment after unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has a significant impact on surgical outcomes. The literature lacks studies that evaluate the limb alignment after lateral UKA or compare alignment outcomes between medial and lateral UKA. In this study, we retrospectively compare a single surgeon's alignment outcomes between medial and lateral UKA using a robotic-guided protocol.

Accurate evaluation of lower limb coronal alignment is essential for effective pre-operative planning of knee arthroplasty. Weightbearing hip-knee-ankle (HKA) radiographs are considered the gold standard. Mako SmartRobotics uses CT-based navigation to provide intra-operative data on lower limb coronal alignment during robotic assisted knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to compare the correlation between the two methods in assessing coronal plane alignment. Patients undergoing Mako partial (PKA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were identified from our hospital database. The hospital PACS system was used to measure pre-operative coronal plane alignment on HKA radiographs. This data was correlated to the intraoperative deformity assessment during Mako PKA and TKA surgery. 443 consecutive Mako knee arthroplasties were performed between November 2019 and December 2021. Weightbearing HKA radiographs were done in 56% of cases. Data for intraoperative coronal plane alignment was available for 414 patients. 378 knees were aligned in varus, and 36 in valgus. Mean varus deformity was 7.46° (SD 3.89) on HKA vs 7.13° (SD 3.56) on Mako intraoperative assessment, with a moderate correlation (R= 0.50, p<0.0001). Intraoperative varus deformity of 0-4° correlated to HKA measured varus (within 3°) in 60% of cases, compared to 28% for 5-9°, 17% for 10-14°, and in no cases with >15° deformity. Mean valgus deformity was 6.44° (SD 4.68) on HKA vs 4.75° (SD 3.79) for Mako, with poor correlation (R=0.18, p=0.38). In this series, the correlation between weightbearing HKA radiographs and intraoperative alignment assessment using Mako SmartRobotics appears to be poor, with greater deformities having poorer correlation

Purpose: Knowledge of the radiological axes in the normal lower limb is important for correction and reconstruction surgery. Classically, the femorotibial mechanical axis presents a zero angle on the anteroposterior view, with 3° femoral valgus being compensated by an equivalent tibial varus. Reference data have however been established with questionable methodology because they have been obtained with small selected samples.

Material and methods: We obtained teleradiograms of the lower limbs in 100 healthy volunteers free of any disease of the lower limbs and selected randomly among patients undergoing surgery for trauma or degenerative lesions of the upper limb. The following angles were measured by the same senior surgeon: mechanical femorotibial angle, orientation of the femoral condylar complex in relation to the mechanical axis of the femur, angle between the mechanial axis and the anatomic axis of the femur, orientation of the tibial plateaux in relation to the mechanical axis of the tibia.

Results: Sixty-nine men and 31 woman, mean age 39 years (range 17 – 62 years) participated in this study. The mean mechanical femorotibial angle was 179° (SD 3°, median 179°, range 168°–185°). The mean orientation of the femoral condylar complex in relation to the femoral mechanical axis was 91° (SD 2°, median 91°, range 86°–98°); 17 subjects had the classical value of 93°. The mean angle between the mechanical and anatomic axis of the femur was 6° (SD 1°, median 6°, range 3°–9°); 29 subjects had the classical value of 7°. The mean orientation of the tibial plateaux in relation to the mechanical axis of the tibia was 88° (SD 2°, median 88°, range 82°–84°); 14 subjects had the classical value of 87°.

Discussion and conclusion: The values considered to be normal in the literature only included 15–20% of the subjects in this study. Although there could be a theoretical selection bias in this series, it can be assumed that there is a wide dispersion of “normal” values around the means. The pertinence of this dispersion in clinical practice remains to be established. The question of individualising reconstruction or prosthetic procedures is raised.

We compared lower limb coronal alignment measurements obtained pre- and post-operatively with long-leg radiographs and computer navigation in patients undergoing primary total knee replacement (TKR). A series of 185 patients had their pre- and post-implant radiological and computer-navigation system measurements of coronal alignment compared using the Bland-Altman method. The study included 81 men and 104 women with a mean age of 68.5 years (32 to 87) and a mean body mass index of 31.7 kg/m. 2. (19 to 49). Pre-implant Bland–Altman limits of agreement were -9.4° to 8.6° with a repeatability coefficient of 9.0°. The Bland–Altman plot showed a tendency for the radiological measurement to indicate a higher level of pre-operative deformity than the corresponding navigation measurement. Post-implant limits of agreement were -5.0° to 5.4° with a repeatability coefficient of 5.2°. The tendency for valgus knees to have greater deformity on the radiograph was still seen, but was weaker for varus knees. . The alignment seen or measured intra-operatively during TKR is not necessarily the same as the deformity seen on a standing long-leg radiograph either pre- or post-operatively. Further investigation into the effect of weight-bearing and surgical exposure of the joint on the mechanical femorotibial angle is required to enable the most appropriate intra-operative alignment to be selected

The emergence of patient specific instrumentation has seen an expansion from simple radiographs to plan total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with modern systems using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging scans. Concerns have emerged regarding accuracy of these non-weight bearing modalities to assess true mechanical axis. The aim of our study was to compare coronal alignment on full length standing AP imaging generated by the EOS acquisition system with the CT coronal scout image. Eligible patients underwent unilateral or bilateral primary TKA for osteoarthritis under the care of investigating surgeon between 2017 and 2022, with both EOS X-Ray Imaging Acquisition System and CT scans performed preoperatively. Coronal mechanical alignment was measured on the supine coronal scout CT scan and the standing HKA EOS. Pre-operative lower limb coronal alignment was assessed on 96 knees prior to TKA on the supine coronal scout CT scan and the standing HKA EOS. There were 56 males (56%), and 44 right knees (44%). The mean age was 68 years (range 53-90). The mean coronal alignment was 4.7 degrees (SD 5.3) on CT scan and 4.6 degrees (SD 6.2) on EOS (p=0.70). There was a strong positive correlation of coronal alignment on CT scan and EOS (pearson. 0.927, p=0.001). The mean difference between EOS and CT scan was 0.9 degrees (SD 2.4). Less than 3 degrees variation between measures was observed in 87% of knees. On linear regression for every 1° varus increase in CT HKA alignment, the EOS HKA alignment increased by 0.93° in varus orientation. The model explained 86% of the variability. CT demonstrates excellent reliability for assessing coronal lower limb alignment compared to EOS in osteoarthritic knees. This supports the routine use of CT to plan TKA without further weight bearing imaging in routine cases