It is not clear which type of casting provides the best initial treatment in adults with a distal radial fracture. Given that between 32% and 64% of adequately reduced fractures redisplace during immobilization in a cast, preventing redisplacement and a disabling malunion or secondary surgery is an aim of treatment. In this study, we investigated whether circumferential casting leads to fewer fracture redisplacements and better one-year outcomes compared to plaster splinting. In a pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, two-period cluster-randomized superiority trial, we compared these two types of casting. Recruitment took place in ten hospitals. Eligible patients aged ≥ 18 years with a displaced distal radial fracture, which was acceptably aligned after closed reduction, were included. The primary outcome measure was the rate of redisplacement within five weeks of immobilization. Secondary outcomes were the rate of complaints relating to the cast, clinical outcomes at three months, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (using the numerical rating scale (NRS), the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) scores), and adverse events such as the development of compartment syndrome during one year of follow-up. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression for the analysis of the primary outcome measure.Aims
Methods
There is conflicting evidence about the functional
outcome and rate of satisfaction of super-elderly patients (≥ 80 years
of age) after carpal tunnel decompression. We compiled outcome data for 756 patients who underwent a carpal
tunnel decompression over an eight-year study period, 97 of whom
were super-elderly, and 659 patients who formed a younger control
group (<
80 years old). There was no significant difference between
the super-elderly patients and the younger control group in terms
of functional outcome according to the mean (0 to 100) QuickDASH
score (adjusted mean difference at one year 1.8; 95% confidence
interval (CI) -3.4 to 7.0) and satisfaction rate (odds ratio (OR)
0.78; 95% CI 0.34 to 1.58). Super-elderly patients were, however,
more likely to have thenar muscle atrophy at presentation (OR 9.2,
95% CI 5.8 to 14.6). When nerve conduction studies were obtained,
super-elderly patients were more likely to have a severe conduction deficit
(OR 12.4, 95% CI 3.0 to 51.3). Super-elderly patients report functional outcome and satisfaction
rates equal to those of their younger counterparts. They are more
likely to have thenar muscle atrophy and a severe nerve conduction
deficit at presentation, and may therefore warrant earlier decompression. Cite this article:
