Thrombin has many biological properties similar to those of growth factors. In a previous study, we showed that thrombin improves healing of the rat tendo Achillis. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) inhibits the activity and the generation of thrombin. We therefore considered that LMWH at a thromboprophylactic dose might inhibit tendon repair. Transection of the tendo Achillis was carried out in 86 rats and the healing tested mechanically. Low molecular weight heparin (dalateparin) was either injected a few minutes before the operation and then given continuously with an osmotic mini pump for seven days, or given as one injection before the operation. In another experiment ,we gave LMWH or a placebo by injection twice daily. The anti-factor Xa activity was analysed. Continuous treatment with LMWH impaired tendon healing. After seven days, this treatment caused a 33% reduction in force at failure, a 20% reduction in stiffness and a 67% reduction in energy uptake. However, if injected twice daily, LMWH had no effect on tendon healing. Anti-factor Xa activity was increased by LMWH treatment, but was normal between intermittent injections. Low molecular weight heparin delays tendon repair if given continuously, but not if injected intermittently, probably because the anti-factor Xa activity between injections returns to normal, allowing sufficient thrombin stimulation for repair. These findings indicate the need for caution in the assessment of long-acting thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors

Aim. Thromboprophylaxis in total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) remains controversial, conspicuous by absence of consensus. Because of protracted and variable mobilisation, there is an extended risk of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE). We hypothesised that a combination of low molecular weight heparin and miniwarfarin would minimise the initial and extended risk. Therefore we evolved a protocol of enoxaparin sodium 40 mgs for 5 days starting preoperatively and miniwarfarin 1-2mg for 6 weeks following surgery. We undertook a retrospective study of total hip and knee replacements in a District General Hospital between January 2000 and December 2005 to determine the effectiveness of the protocol. Methods. We analysed the incidence of symptomatic VTE in 1307 patients, of who 681 underwent THR and 626 TKR. We evaluated the incidence of symptomatic DVT and PE between 0-6 weeks, 6 weeks-3months and 3-6 months following surgery. Results. Total incidence of VTE in the study group as a whole including both total hip and knee arthroplasty in 6 months following surgery was 29/1307 (2.22%), after THR 12/681 (1.76%) and after TKR 17/626 (2.72%). VTE at 6 weeks following TKR was 12/626 (1.92%) and THR 4/681(0.59%); between 6 weeks-3 months following TKR 1/626 (0.16%) and THR 6/681 (0.88%); between 3- 6 months 4/626 (0.64%) following TKR and 2/681 (0.29%) after THR. DVT following TKR was 12/626 (1.92%) at 6 months and following THR 7/681 (1.03%). PE at 6 months after TKR was 5/626 (0.80%) and THR 5/681(0.73%) with no attributable mortality. Conclusions. The incidence of VTE using our thromboprophylaxis protocol - low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and very low dose warfarin - in THR and TKR not only compares favourably with other modes of thrombo-prophylaxis in literature, but also is cheap and cost effective

The Hospital (Trust) guidelines generally recommend 40mg of Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) twice daily (BD) for all patients over 100kg for those undergoing total hip (THR) and knee replacements (TKR) respectively. British National Formulary (BNF) recommends 40mg of LMWH once daily (OD) for all patients regardless of their overall weight or body mass index (BMI). We evaluated the outcome of prophylactic LMWH dosage for patients undergoing THR and TKR by monitoring surgery related venous-thromboembolic events up to a minimum of three months after surgery. A retrospective audit was carried out after obtaining institutional approval and all consecutive elective patients weighing over 100kg and undergoing THR and TKR were included. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months after their operation to investigate the dose of prophylactic LMWH received, and whether they had developed any venous thromboembolic events (VTE) post operatively. This was done using a combination of electronic notes, drug charts and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) reports on the hospital/trust database. A total of 53 patients underwent elective THR (18) and TKR (35) between the period of March 2017 and September 2017. Forty-four patients received 40 mg OD and 9 patients had 40 mg BD. None of the patients developed a confirmed DVT or pulmonary embolism in the 3 months following surgery regardless of the dose received. We demonstrate that there is no clinical benefit in having patients over 100kg on twice daily LMWH with the aim of preventing post-op thromboembolic complications. This conclusion is in line with the BNF recommendations for VTE prophylaxis

In a prospective study of 205 consecutive patients undergoing surgical stabilisation of acute pelvic and/or acetabular fractures, the incidence of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was 9.2%, pulmonary embolism (PE) was 1.9% and fatal PE 0.5%. Use of a DVT prophylaxis protocol, using a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), administered within 24 hours of injury or achieving haemodynamic stability, was associated with a significantly lower incidence of thromboembolism (p=0.036). Increased rates of thromboembolism were associated with longer delays to surgery (p=0.013), delays to mobilisation of the patient post-operatively (p=0.017), delay in starting chemoprophylaxis (p=0.039) and higher injury severity scores (p=0.042). Patient age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale and fracture classification were not associated with the development of thromboembolic complications. One hundred and thirty four patients had a pre-operative venous Doppler, seven patients had a proximal DVT identified of which six patients had a preoperative inferior vena caval filter applied and underwent successful surgical fracture stabilisation. Five filters were unable to be removed postoperatively and the patients remain on lifelong warfarin. A DVT prophylaxis protocol using LMWH is reported that is safe and effective

There is little in the recent literature about the place of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in routine lumbosacral surgery. This study aimed to determine firstly the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) if Clexane was not given preoperatively, and secondly the complications associated with the use of the drug. In a prospective study undertaken from January 2001 to April 2001, 64 patients scheduled for routine lumbosacral surgery were entered. We excluded patients with a high risk of DVT. The mean age of patients was 51 years (16 to 75). Patients were randomly selected to receive Endoxaparin (Clexane) preoperatively the night before (38 patients in group 1) or Clexane postoperatively (26 patients in group. 2). All patients were evaluated by Doppler sonography pre-operatively, four days postoperatively and at six weeks. Blood loss was monitored intra-operatively and postoperatively. Clexane was administered only for eight days. Posterior lumbosacral spinal procedures only were done on 44 patients, while seven had combined anterior-posterior surgery and 13 anterior procedures only. Mean intra-operative and postoperative blood losses in group 1 were twice those in group 2, and patients in group 1 tended to bleed for longer. Two cases of partial thrombosis were seen, both group 1. In group 1 intraspinal haematoma formation was seen in four patients, two of whom required additional surgery. LMWH should not be given preoperatively for routine spinal cases. In fact, it is contra-indicated

Purpose: The report of a case o f a patient, who underwent a total hip arthroplasty and sustained cerebral hemorrhage due to low molecular weight heparin. Case report: A 46-years-old woman had a total hip replacement due to secondary osteoarthritis after a congenital hip dislocation. She had a free medical record. Treatment with LMWH started the day of the surgery. The patient was dismissed from the hospital the sixth postoperative day, being well, and came back the ninth postoperative day, complaining of hypertension, headache and motor disturbances of her left upper limb. Neurological examination did not revealed any particular findings except reduced strength of her left upper limb. A brain CT scanning showed no significant findings, while her blood platelet count was126000 while immediately postoperatively was 180000 and preoperatively 220000. The following day the patient established a paresis of her left arm and the platelet count fell to 35000, while a new CT scan, revealed small hemorrhages in both parietal cortexes of the brain. LMWH was discontinued. The patient deceased the 11th postoperative day. Conclusion: Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type II and hemorrhage due to LMWH is very rare but should be bared in mind from the orthopaedic surgeon who uses LMWH for DVT prophylaxis. Clinical suspicion mandates immediate discontinuation of the agent and consideration of an alternative anticoagulation therapy along with general support of the patient

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is frequently used as thromboprophylaxis after major orthopaedic surgery. Varying levels of non-adherence (5% to 45%) with outpatient LMWH has been reported. Oral direct thrombin inhibitors have been recommended by industry due to ease of administration. We aim to audit the compliance rate with outpatient LMWH treatment following primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) in our district general hospital (DGH). Using the ORMIS computer system, we identified all primary THA performed in Monklands Hospital between July 2011 and August 2012. Patients’ case notes were analysed retrospectively, looking at operating surgeon's postoperative thromboprophylaxis instructions. We then conducted a telephone interview on patients discharged with outpatient LMWH to assess compliance. There were 58 primary THAs performed during the audit period. 33 patients were discharged on outpatient LMWH, whilst 15 patients and 3 patients were discharged on aspirin and warfarin respectively. Seven patients were excluded as their discharge prescriptions were missing. We successfully contacted 20 of the 33 patients discharged with outpatient LMWH. All respondents showed 100% compliance to the full course of treatment. 50% of patients self-administered; 30% were administered by district nurses and 20% by family members. 35% of patients preferred an oral tablet alternative, for its perceived ease of administration. Bruising and skin irritation were the reported problems in some patients, but these did not affect compliance. Contrary to the previous published non-adherence rates, the compliance rate with outpatient LMWH after THA was high in our DGH. The patient counseling, and family/district nurse involvement in may have contributed to this. However, our numbers of patients are low but data collection continues

Introduction. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Effectiveness recommends both low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and Rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis following lower limb arthroplasty. Despite evidence in the literature that suggests Rivaroxaban reduces VTE events, there are emerging concerns from the orthopaedic community regarding an increase in wound complications following its use. Methods. Through the orthopaedic clinical directors forum, Trusts replacing LMWH with Rivaroxaban for lower limb arthroplasty thromboprophylaxis during 2009 were identified. Prospectively collected Hospital episode statistics (HES) data was then analysed for these units so as to determine rates of 90-day symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), major bleed (cerebrovascular accident or gastrointestinal haemorrhage), all-cause mortality, and 30-day wound infection and readmission rates before and after the change to Rivaroxaban. 2752 patients prescribed Rivaroxaban following TKR or THR were compared to 10358 patients prescribed LMWH. Data was analysed using odds ratios (OR). Results. There were significantly more wound infections in the Rivaroxaban group (3.85% vs. 2.81%, OR=0.72; 95% CI 0.58-0.90). There were no significant differences between the two groups for PTE (OR=1.52; 0.77-2.97), major bleed (OR=0.73; 0.48-1.12), all-cause mortality (OR=0.93; 0.46-1.87) and re-admission rate (OR=1.21; 0.88-1.67). There were significantly fewer symptomatic DVTs in the Rivaroxaban group (0.91% vs. 0.36%, OR=2.51; 1.30-4.82). Conclusion. This study is the first to describe the real impact of the use of Rivaroxaban in the NHS. When compared with LMWH in lower limb arthroplasty patients, wound infection rates were significantly higher following Rivaroxaban use whilst providing no reduction in symptomatic PTE or all-cause mortality

Background. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Effectiveness recommends both low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and Rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis following lower limb arthroplasty. Despite evidence in the literature that suggests Rivaroxaban reduces VTE events, there are emerging concerns from the orthopaedic community regarding an increase in wound complications following its use. Methods. Through the orthopaedic clinical directors forum, Trusts replacing LMWH with Rivaroxaban for lower limb arthroplasty thromboprophylaxis during 2009 were identified. Prospectively collected Hospital episode statistics (HES) data was then analysed for these units so as to determine rates of 90-day symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), major bleed (cerebrovascular accident or gastrointestinal haemorrhage), all-cause mortality, and 30-day wound infection and readmission rates before and after the change to Rivaroxaban. 2752 patients prescribed Rivaroxaban following TKR or THR were compared to 10358 patients prescribed LMWH. Data was analysed using odds ratios (OR). Results. There were significantly more wound infections in the Rivaroxaban group (3.85% vs. 2.81%, OR=0.72; 95% CI 0.58–0.90). There were no significant differences between the two groups for PE (OR=1.52; 0.77–2.97), major bleed (OR=0.73; 0.48–1.12), all-cause mortality (OR=0.93; 0.46–1.87) and re-admission rate (OR=1.21; 0.88–1.67). There were significantly fewer symptomatic DVTs in the Rivaroxaban group (0.91% vs. 0.36%, OR=2.51; 1.30–4.82). Discussion. This study is the first to describe the real impact of the use of Rivaroxaban in the NHS. When compared with LMWH in lower limb arthroplasty patients, there were fewer DVTs in the Rivaroxaban group. However, wound infection rates were significantly higher following Rivaroxaban use whilst providing no reduction in symptomatic PE or all-cause mortality

The purpose of the present study is to determine the incidence, location and rate of VTE following routine mechanical, chemical prophylaxis in trauma/elective patients and to understand what factors are responsible for the continuing high frequency of thromboembolic complication despite the fact that low molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is now widely used for prophylaxis.

All of the inpatients at the orthopaedics ward, Princess Alexandra Hospital (level one trauma centre, Brisbane) between the first May 2009 and 30th of April 2010 with the diagnosis of DVT/PE were included in this study. Patients were chosen based on the diagnosis of DVT with ultrasound or PE with CTPA during their admission in this period which was performed whenever clinical signs indicated DVT or PE.

64% of the included patients had DVT and 42% had PE which was developed during their admission. Included patients had a mean age ±SD age of 56years ± 23 years, 68% were men and 72% suffered trauma. The 18% of patients had previous history of PE or DVT. The incidence of VTE was significantly higher in men at ages between 20–40 .29% of the patients had ICU admission during their stay in hospital. 28%had spinal cord injury, 21%with head trauma, and 36%with multiple bone fractures. Most of the patients had lower limb injury or operation and just one patient was with isolated upper limb injury. The mean period of hospitalization for the included patients were 29 ± 19 days (range, 6–77). DVTs occurred 8 days ± 7 days(range, 1–31) post admission. PEs occurred 10 days ± 8 days (range, 3–30) after admission. Location of DVT was available for 14 patients: 9 (64%)lower and 6 (43 %)upper, with one(0.07%)having both. Twelve of 28 patients with VTE were started on prophylactic clexane (40mg once daily), and six patients were on heparin(5000 unit twice daily). All of the patients with PE had lower limb injury.

Considering the number of orthopaedics ward patients during our study period our data show the incidence of VTE in one year is lower than that of literature and the common standard prophylaxis with early mechanical prophylaxis after admission and following pharmacological prophylaxis when it is safe has acceptable results.

Study design: In order to evaluate a new CECT (Continuous Enhanced Circulation Therapy) based on protocol for DVT prevention a prospective, randomize, single-blind study was designed to compare the effect of the new protocol to the current standard of care in DCT prophylaxis (LMWH).

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the incidence and severity of DVT between the two groups.

Background: Total hip and knee replacements are operations particularly prone to thromboembolic complications. Recommendations regarding prophylaxis have changed over the years. A treatment protocol was proposed, based upon the CECT system as the primary DVT prophylaxis method with the addition of low dose aspirin. This protocol is using two very safe treatment modalities with very low risk for adverse effects. The CECT system applies continuous mechanical enhancement of venous blood flow through a miniature, mobile, battery operated system.

Methods: 39 patients, who underwent total hip or knee replacement, were prospectively randomized into two groups. In the study group the patients received CECT system starting immediately after the induction of anesthesia and covering the operation and the first 5 postoperative days, within 12 hours after surgery aspirin 100 mg per day was added. In the control group the patients received Enoxaparin 40 mg per day for 5 postoperative days. A venography was performed at the 5th to 8th post-operative day and the DVT prevalence was compared.

Results: In the study group 3 patients out of 21 (14.3%) were found to have DVT (1 of them proximal), compared to 8 patients out of 18 (44.4%) in the control group (5 of them proximal). The differences between the two groups are statistically significant for both total and proximal DVT rates (p=0.037).

In the study group only 1 patient needed prolonged high dose anticoagulant treatment while 6 patients in the enoxaparin group were treated (p=0.020).

The cumulative incidence of adverse events in the study group was significantly lower than that observed in the control group (p=0.000). Average postoperative hospital stay was 8.4 days in the study group and 11.7 days in the control group (p=0.002).

The CECT device was very well tolerated by the patients and facilitated early mobilization.

Conclusions: The protocol combining CECT and Aspirin was found to be both safe the effective. Comparison to the standard prophylaxis with enoxaparin revealed significant advantage of the proposed protocol with: better DVT prevention, less adverse events and shorter hospital stay. Further research is needed in order to establish the place of this prophylaxis protocol as the treatment of choice in orthopaedic patients.

The number of arthroplasties being performed increases each year. Patients undergoing an arthroplasty are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and appropriate prophylaxis has been recommended. However, the optimal protocol and the best agent to minimise VTE under these circumstances are not known. Although many agents may be used, there is a difference in their efficacy and the risk of bleeding. Thus, the selection of a particular agent relies on the balance between the desire to minimise VTE and the attempt to reduce the risk of bleeding, with its undesirable, and occasionally fatal, consequences.

Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) is an agent for VTE prophylaxis following arthroplasty. Many studies have shown its efficacy in minimising VTE under these circumstances. It is inexpensive and well-tolerated, and its use does not require routine blood tests. It is also a ‘milder’ agent and unlikely to result in haematoma formation, which may increase both the risk of infection and the need for further surgery. Aspirin is also unlikely to result in persistent wound drainage, which has been shown to be associated with the use of agents such as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and other more aggressive agents.

The main objective of this review was to summarise the current evidence relating to the efficacy of aspirin as a VTE prophylaxis following arthroplasty, and to address some of the common questions about its use.

There is convincing evidence that, taking all factors into account, aspirin is an effective, inexpensive, and safe form of VTE following arthroplasty in patients without a major risk factor for VTE, such as previous VTE.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1420–30.

The incidence of deep-vein thrombosis and the need for thromboprophylaxis following isolated trauma below the knee is uncertain. We have investigated this with a prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial using low molecular weight heparin with saline injection as placebo in patients aged between 18 and 75 years who had sustained an isolated fracture below the knee which required operative fixation. All patients had surgery within 48 hours of injury and were randomised to receive either the placebo or low molecular weight heparin for 14 days, after which they underwent bilateral lower limb venography, interpreted by three independent radiologists. Further follow-up was undertaken at two, six, eight and 12 weeks. A total of 238 patients fulfilled all the inclusion criteria, with 127 in the low molecular weight heparin group and 111 in the placebo group, all of whom underwent bilateral venography. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis between those patients treated with low molecular weight heparin or the placebo (p = 0.22). The number of deep-vein thromboses in the two groups was 11 (8.7%) and 14 (12.6%), respectively. Age and the type of fracture were significantly associated with the rate of deep-vein thrombosis (p = 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively) but gender, comorbidities and the body mass index were not. The overall incidence of deep-vein thrombosis in this series was 11%. There was no clinical or statistical significant reduction in the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis with the use of thromboprophylaxis. However, we accept that owing to a cessation of funding, recruitment to this trial had to be ended prior to establishing the necessary sample size. Our results cannot, therefore, categorically exclude the possibility that low molecular weight heparin treatment could be beneficial. We recommend a further multicentre trial be undertaken to resolve this matter

Venous Thromboembolism is a common complication following a hip replacement. Recently the pulmonary embolism prevention study was published. It reported that aspirin decreased the fatal pulmonary embolism rate in patients admitted with a fracture neck of femur. In addition new products (synthetic factor X inhibitor -Fondaparinux, and a direct thrombin inhibiter-Desirudin) have been reported to be more effective than low molecular weight heparin in preventing asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis. We felt it was important to repeat a survey, done in 1997, on the use thromboembolism prophylaxis among British Orthopaedic Surgeons. A single page questionnaire was sent out to all 1308 consultants Orthopaedic surgeons who were members of the British Orthopaedic Association. Those who did not respond were sent a reminder letter. We achieved a 72% response rate. All surgeons use some form of prophylaxis. Eighty five percent of surgeons use pharmacological prophylaxis. Low molecular weight heparin is used by 55% of surgeons. Twenty percent of surgeons use aspirin as their only form of pharmacological prophylaxis. Less than 1% (5 consultants) use early mobilisation alone and nearly 2% (13 consultants) use graded stockings and early mobilisation as their only form of prophylaxis. Seventy four percent of surgeons have a unit policy. Thirty percent have changed their regime in the last 3 years. The majority of British Orthopaedic surgeons still use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. There has been a significant increase in the use of Aspirin from 5% to 30%. Aspirin is often combined with a mechanical prophylaxis. This has led to an increase in the use of intermittent calf compression (3% to 22%), and foot pumps (12% to 19%). Low molecular weight heparin use has fallen by 10%. The majority of British Orthopaedic surgeons still use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. There has been a significant increase in the use of Aspirin from 5% to 30%. Aspirin is often combined with a mechanical prophylaxis. This has led to an increase in the use of intermittent calf compression (3% to 22%), and foot pumps (12% to 19%). Low molecular weight heparin use has fallen by 10%

Introduction and Aims: Venous Thromboembolism is a common complication following a hip replacement. Recently the pulmonary embolism prevention study was published. It reported that aspirin decreased the fatal pulmonary embolism rate in patients admitted with a fracture neck of femur. In addition, new products (synthetic factor X inhibitor-Fondaparinux, and a direct thrombin inhibiter-Desirudin) have been reported to be more effective than low molecular weight heparin in preventing asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis. We felt it was important to repeat a survey, done in 1997, on the use of thromboembolism prophylaxis among British Orthopaedic Surgeons. Method: A single page questionnaire was sent out to all 1308 consultants – orthopaedic surgeons who were members of the British Orthopaedic Association. Those who did not respond were sent a reminder letter. Results: We achieved a 72% response rate. All surgeons use some form of prophylaxis. Eighty-five percent of surgeons use pharmacological prophylaxis. Low molecular weight heparin is used by 55% of surgeons. Twenty percent of surgeons use aspirin as their only form of pharmacological prophylaxis. Less than 1% (five consultants) use early mobilisation alone and nearly 2% (13 consultants) use graded stockings and early mobilisation as their only form of prophylaxis. Seventy-four percent of surgeons have a unit policy. Thirty percent have changed their regime in the last three years. Conclusion: The majority of British orthopaedic surgeons still use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. There has been a significant increase in the use of Aspirin, from 5% to 30%. Aspirin is often combined with a mechanical prophylaxis. This has led to an increase in the use of intermittent calf compression (3% to 22%), and foot pumps (12% to 19%). Low molecular weight heparin use has fallen by 10%

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence, UK published guidelines in 2007 encouraging the use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) joint replacement surgery. Subsequently, our hospital adopted these guidelines in the treatment of total hip replacements. This study is based on our prospective database of total hip replacements between 2005 and 2009 and compares the complication and mortality rates pre- and post institution of the NICE guidelines. We analysed prospectively collected data on 686 patients who underwent a primary total hip replacement done by a single surgeon between January 2005 and April 2009. We compared the incidence of mortality, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction and intracranial bleeding between the two groups. Prior to the guidelines, all patients were treated for the duration of their admission with 75mg aspirin followed by 4 weeks after discharge. Subsequent to the guidelines, the treatment changed to 40mg of LMWH (Clexane) while an inpatient with aspirin being prescribed for 4 weeks on discharge. Patients unable to tolerate aspirin were treated with low molecular weight heparin. High risk patients (previous pulmonary embolism, previous deep vein thrombosis, family history) were treated with 6 weeks of warfarin. Each patients was reviewed at 8 weeks and 6 months following surgery, and adverse incidents were documented at each review or incident. Results: 686 patients were identified from the study – 328 pre and 358 post implementation of the NICE guidelines. In the pre-guideline group the mortality was 0.6%, with the incidence of pulmonary embolism being 0.3%, myocardial infarction 0.9% and intracranial bleed 0.3%. Both complications of myocardial infarction occurred early in the post-operative stage and were fatal. The post-guideline group had a mortality rate of 0.2%, with the incidence of pulmonary embolism being 0.2% and intracranial bleeding 0.2%. No myocardial infarctions were noted in this group. The single death was as a result of an intracranial bleed. The was no significant statistical difference in the incidence of mortality, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction or intracranial bleeding between the two groups (p value > 0.05, 95% confidence interval). There were no complications in the warfarinised patients of which there were equal numbers in both groups (16). Conclusion: This study has shown that the change in thromboprophylaxis has not had a significant effect on complication rates in primary total hip replacements and that our mortality rate (0.4%) compares favourably with recent literature. The lack of complications in the war-farinised group probably reflects that high risk patients were identified in the screening process and commenced on warfarin early in the post operative period. Note must be made of the single death due to an intracranial bleed while on low molecular weight heparin

Abstract. Introduction. Neck of femur (NOF) fracture patients are at risk of developing venous thromboembolisms (VTE). VTE risks could be reduced by adhering to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendation for 1 month of prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin. This audit aimed to assess and improve local compliance to national guidelines on VTE prophylaxis in NOF fracture patients following discharge. Methods. A retrospective consecutive case series of all NOF fractures treated at our institution from May – July 2021 was conducted. Those not eligible for outpatient VTE prophylaxis were excluded (anticoagulated for other indications, completed prophylactic course in hospital, inpatient death, pharmacological prophylaxis contraindicated). The agent and duration of VTE prophylaxis, and the occurrence of clinically significant VTE or bleeds were recorded. A re-audit was conducted in March 2022. Results. From May – July 2021, only 1/65 (1.5%) patient was discharged on a VTE prophylaxis regime consistent with NICE guidelines (1 enoxaparin, 56 rivaroxaban, 6 apixaban; 58 35-day course, 5 28-day course). A quick-guide document summarising the standard inpatient and outpatient VTE prophylaxis regimes for various orthopaedic indications was designed and widely disseminated. In March 2022, 30/34 (88.2%) patients were discharged with enoxaparin and 24/34 (70.6%) received a 28-day course. There were no cases of clinically significant VTE or bleeds in both cycles. Conclusion. Local compliance to national guidelines improved significantly with the implementation of a standardised VTE prophylaxis protocol. Our quick-guide document is a reproducible way of communicating consensus and ensuring consistency within a department

Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA) is a successful orthopaedic procedure allowing dramatic clinical and functional improvements. Globally, there's been an increase in demand and performed cases associated with an increase in complications. Subsequently, focus on the prevention of complications has become important worldwide. The incidence of venous-thrombolic events (VTE) despite great attention has not diminished despite much investigation. A balance between efficacy and safety from the available agents is essential. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been commonly used, but oral anti-coagulants have become more popular. The aim of this study was to assess the adherence LMWH and the effectiveness and safety of preventing VTE in post-operative arthroplasty patients in a South African setting. We conducted a prospective cohort study that included hip and knee, primary and revision, arthroplasty patients who received thromboprophylaxis with one daily injection of LMWH for 14 days post discharge. Patients who omitted 1 or more doses during the follow up period were classified as “non adherent”. A questionnaire was used at follow up visits at least 6 weeks post-operatively. 100 consecutive patients were followed up. The mean age of patients was 63.45 years. There were 68 % female patients. There was a 92% compliance rate. 60 % of patients had the injection administered by a family member, 38 % administered it themselves and 2 % had the injection administered by health professionals. Venous thromboembolic events were confirmed in 5 % at 7.86 days after surgery. Three patients had persistent wound drainage after surgery, however, none required reoperation or readmission. Compliance with LMWH is high and is comparable with oral agents. It is effective in preventing VTE and safe with regards to bleeding and wound complications in a South African setting. Patient education regarding medications may improve compliance of the medication

Introduction. Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism (PE) resulting from deep vein thrombosis (DVT), remains a well-known serious complication after femoral fractures. The low molecular heparin is widely used to prevent VTE. This study compared the effectiveness of VTE prevention between dalteparin and enoxaparin. Materials and Methods. From 2013 to 2014, we retrospectively recruited 712 patients who had femoral fractures with operative treatment. All patients receiving VTE chemoprophylaxis with perioperative period using dalateparin in Group 1(N=395) and enoxaparin in Group 2(N=317). The prophylactic dosing was determined using individual product labeling and identified as enoxaparin 40 mg every 12 hours and dalteparin 2500 international unit (IU) once daily, based on clinical practice guidelines. The prophylaxis was started at admission, and maintained during average 8.43.5 days after operation. The outcome including the incidence of clinically significant deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, perioperative bleeding and cost of drugs were evaluated between two groups. Results. The two study groups did not differ significantly in fracture type, age, gender, ASA score. The overall incidence of VTE is similar between two groups. However, the incidence of fatal PE is significantly lower in patients with dalteparin (Group 1: 4/395(1.00%), Group 2: 10/317(3.15%), p<0.001). And the overall cost of each group is significantly different between two groups (Group 1: average KRW 89,426, Group 2: average KRW 32,188, p<0.001). Conclusion. Both dalteparin and enoxaparin could be safely used without notable complications in VTE prophylaxis. However, dalteparin had more advantages for prevention of fatal PE, compared to enoxaparin in patients with femoral fractures with significant cost effectiveness

Thrombelastography (TEG) is a point-of-care tool that can measure clot formation and breakdown using a whole blood sample. We have previously used serial TEG analysis to define hypercoagulability and increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk following a major fracture requiring surgical treatment. Additionally, we have used serial TEG analysis to quantify the prolonged hypercoagulable state and increased VTE risk that ensues following a hip fracture. Recently developed cartridge-based platelet mapping (PLM) using TEG analysis can be used to activate platelets at either the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor or at the Thromboxane A2 (AA) receptor, in order to evaluate clot strength when platelets are activated only through those specific receptors. This study aim was to evaluate platelet contribution to hypercoagulability, in order to identify potential therapeutic targets for VTE prevention. We hypothesized that there would be a platelet-predominant contribution to hypercoagulability following a hip fracture. Patients aged 50 years or older with a hip fracture treated surgically were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Exclusion criteria were: prior history of VTE, active malignancy, or pre-injury therapeutic dose anticoagulation. Serial TEG and PLM analyses were performed at admission, post-operative day (POD) 1, 3, 5, 7 and at 2-, 4-, 6- and 12-weeks post-operatively. All patients received thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for 28 days post-operatively. Hypercoagulability was defined as maximal amplitude (MA; a measure of clot strength) over 65mm based on TEG analysis. Independent samples t-tests were used to compare MA values with this previously established threshold and a mixed effects linear regression model was used to compare MA values over time. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-sqaured analyses were used to compare between the surgical fixation and arthroplasty groups. Forty-six patients with an acute hip fracture were included, with a mean age of 77.1 (SD = 10.6) years, with 61% (N=11) being female. Twenty-six were treated with arthroplasty (56.5%), while the remainder underwent surgical fixation of their hip fractures. TEG analysis demonstrated post-operative hypercoagulability (mean MA over 65mm) at all follow-up timepoints until 12-weeks. PLM identified a platelet-mediated hypercoagulable state based on elevated ADP-MA and AA-MA, with more pronounced platelet contribution demonstrated by the AA pathway. Patients treated with arthroplasty had significantly increased AA-MA compared with ADP-MA at POD 3 and at the 12-week follow-up. Thrombelastography can be used to identify hypercoagulability and increased risk for VTE following a hip fracture. Platelet mapping analysis from this pilot study suggests a platelet-mediated hypercoagulable state that may benefit from thromboprophylaxis using an anti-platelet agent that specifically targets the AA platelet activation pathway, such as acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). This research also supports differences in hypercoagulability between patients treated with arthroplasty compared to those who undergo fracture fixation