Summary. Biomechanically, a 2° screw deviation from the nominal axis in the PFLCP leads to significantly earlier implant failure. Screw deviation relies on a technical error on insertion, but in our opinion cannot be controlled intraoperatively with the existing instrumentation devices. Background. Several cases of clinical failure have been reported for the Proximal Femoral Locking Compression Plate (PFLCP). The current study was designed to investigate the failure mode and to explore biomechanically the underlying mechanism. Specifically, the study sought to determine if the observed failure was due to technical error on insertion or due to implant design. Methods. To exclude patient and fracture type related factors, an abstract foam block model simulating an unstable pertrochanteric fracture was created for three study groups with six specimens each (n=6). Group 1 was properly instrumented according to the manufacturer's guidelines. In Group 2 and 3, the first or second screw was placed in a posterior or anterior off-axis orientation by 2° measured in the transversal plane, respectively. Each construct was tested cyclically until failure using a test setup and protocol simulating complex axial and torsional loading. Radiographs were taken prior to and after the tests. Force, number of cycles and failure mode were compared. Results. The 2° screw deviation from the nominal axis led to significantly earlier construct failure in Group 2 and 3. The failure mode consisted of loosening of the off-axis screw due to disengagement with the plate, resulting in loss of construct stiffness and varus collapse of the fracture. Conclusions. In our biomechanical test setup, a screw deviation of only 2° from the nominal axis consistently led to the failure mode observed clinically. In our opinion, screw deviation mostly relies on technical error on insertion. But, proper screw insertion may be difficult or impossible with the existing instrumentation devices, especially as it cannot be controlled or guaranteed intraoperatively

Recently, a new generation of superior clavicle plates was developed featuring the variable-angle locking technology for enhanced screw positioning and optimized plate-to-bone fit design. On the other hand, mini-fragment plates used in dual plating mode have demonstrated promising clinical results. However, these two bone-implant constructs have not been investigated biomechanically in a human cadaveric model. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to compare the biomechanical competence of single superior plating using the new generation plate versus dual plating with low-profile mini-fragment plates. Sixteen paired human cadaveric clavicles were assigned pairwise to two groups for instrumentation with either a 2.7 mm Variable Angle Locking Compression Plate placed superiorly (Group 1), or with one 2.5 mm anterior plate combined with one 2.0 mm superior matrix mandible plate (Group 2). An unstable clavicle shaft fracture AO/OTA15.2C was simulated by means of a 5 mm osteotomy gap. All specimens were cyclically tested to failure under craniocaudal cantilever bending, superimposed with bidirectional torsion around the shaft axis and monitored via motion tracking. Initial stiffness was significantly higher in Group 2 (9.28±4.40 N/mm) compared to Group 1 (3.68±1.08 N/mm), p=0.003. The amplitudes of interfragmentary motions in terms of craniocaudal and shear displacement, fracture gap opening and torsion were significantly bigger over the course of 12500 cycles in Group 1 compared to Group 2; p≤0.038. Cycles to 2 mm shear displacement were significantly lower in Group 1 (22792±4346) compared to Group 2 (27437±1877), p=0.047. From a biomechanical perspective, low-profile 2.5/2.0 dual plates demonstrated significantly higher initial stiffness, less interfragmentary movements, and higher resistance to failure compared to 2.7 single superior variable-angle locking plates and can therefore be considered as a useful alternative for diaphyseal clavicle fracture fixation especially in unstable fracture configurations

Introduction and Objective. Plating of geriatric distal femoral fractures with Locking Compression Plate Distal Femur (LCP–DF) often requires augmentation with a supplemental medial plate to achieve sufficient stability allowing early mobilization. However, medial vital structures may be impaired by supplemental medial plating using a straight plate. Therefore, a helically shaped medial plate may be used to avoid damage of these structures. Aim of the current study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of augmented LCP–DF plating using a supplemental straight versus helically shaped medial plate. Materials and Methods. Ten pairs of human cadaveric femora with poor bone quality were assigned pairwise for instrumentation using a lateral anatomical 15-hole LCP–DF combined with a medial 14-hole LCP, the latter being either straight or manually pre-contoured to a 90-degree helical shape. An unstable distal femoral fracture AO/OTA 33–A3 was simulated by means of osteotomies. All specimens were biomechanically tested under non-destructive quasi-static and destructive progressively increasing combined cyclic axial and torsional loading in internal rotation, with monitoring by means of optical motion tracking. Results. Initial axial stiffness and torsional stiffness in internal and external rotation for straight double plating (548.1 ± 134.2 N/mm, 2.69 ± 0.52 Nm/° and 2.69 ± 0.50 Nm/°) was significantly higher versus helical double plating (442.9 ± 133.7 N/mm, 2.07 ± 0.32 Nm/° and 2.16 ± 0.22 Nm/°), p≤0.04. Initial interfragmentary axial displacement and flexural rotation under 500 N static loading were significantly smaller for straight plating (0.11 ± 0.14 mm and 0.21 ± 0.10°) versus helical plating (0.31 ± 0.14 mm and 0.68 ± 0.16°), p<0.01. However, initial varus deformation under this loading remained not significantly different between the two fixation methods (straight: 0.57 ± 0.23°, helical: 0.75 ± 0.34°), p=0.08. During dynamic loading, within the course of the first 4000 cycles the movements of the distal fragment in flexion were significantly bigger for helical over straight plating (1.03 ± 0.33° versus 0.40 ± 0.20°), p<0.01. However, no significant differences were observed between the two fixation methods in terms of varus, internal rotation, axial and shear displacements at the fracture site, and number of cycles to failure. Conclusions. Augmented lateral plating of unstable distal femoral fractures with use of supplemental helically shaped medial plate was associated with more elastic bone-implant construct behavior under static and dynamic loading compared to straight double plating. Both fixation methods resulted in comparable number of cycles to failure. From a biomechanical perspective, the more elastic helical double plating may be considered as useful alternative to straight plating, potentially reducing stress risers at the distal bone-implant interface due to its ameliorated damping capacities

Introduction and Objective. Distal femoral fractures are commonly treated with a straight plate fixed to the lateral aspects of both proximal and distal fragments. However, the lateral approach may not always be desirable due to persisting soft-tissue or additional vascular injury necessitating a medial approach. These problems may be overcome by pre-contouring the plate in helically shaped fashion, allowing its distal part to be fixed to the medial aspect of the femoral condyle. The objective of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of medial femoral helical plating versus conventional straight lateral plating in an artificial distal femoral fracture model. Materials and Methods. Twelve left artificial femora were instrumented with a 15-hole Locking Compression Plate – Distal Femur (LCP-DF) plate, using either conventional lateral plating technique with the plate left non-contoured, or the medial helical plating technique by pre-contouring the plate to a 180° helical shape and fixing its distal end to the medial femoral condyle (n=6). An unstable extraarticular distal femoral fracture was subsequently simulated by means of an osteotomy gap. All specimens were tested under quasi-static and progressively increasing cyclic axial und torsional loading until failure. Interfragmentary movements were monitored by means of optical motion tracking. Results. Initial axial stiffness was significantly higher for helical (185.6±50.1 N/mm) versus straight (56.0±14.4) plating, p<0.01. However, initial torsional stiffness in internal and external rotation remained not significantly different between the two fixation techniques (helical plating:1.59±0.17 Nm/° and 1.52±0.13 Nm/°; straight plating: 1.50±0.12 Nm/° and 1.43±0.13Nm/°), p≥0.21. Helical plating was associated with significantly higher initial interfragmentary movements under 500 N static compression compared to straight plating in terms of flexion (2.76±1.02° versus 0.87±0.77°) and shear displacement under 6 Nm static rotation in internal (1.23±0.28° versus 0.40±0.42°) and external (1.21±0.40° versus 0.57±0.33°) rotation, p≤0.01. In addition, helical plating demonstrated significantly lower initial varus/valgus deformation than straight plating (4.08±1.49° versus 6.60±0.47°), p<0.01. Within the first 10000 cycles of dynamic loading, helical plating revealed significantly bigger flexural movements and significantly lower varus/valgus deformation versus straight plating, p=0.02. No significant differences were observed between the two fixation techniques in terms of axial and shear displacement, p≥0.76. Cycles to failure was significantly higher for helical plating (13752±1518) compared to straight plating (9727±836), p<0.01. Conclusions. Although helical plating using a pre-contoured LCP-DF was associated with higher shear and flexion movements, it demonstrated improved initial axial stability and resistance against varus/valgus deformation compared to straight lateral plating. Moreover, helical plate constructs demonstrated significantly improved endurance to failure, which may be attributed to the less progressively increasing lever bending moment arm inherent to this novel fixation technique. From a biomechanical perspective, helical plating may be considered as a valid alternative fixation technique to standard straight lateral plating of unstable distal femoral fractures