Aims. There is a lack of evidence about the risk factors for local recurrence of a giant cell tumour (GCT) of the sacrum treated with nerve-sparing surgery, probably because of the rarity of the disease. This study aimed to answer two questions: first, what is the rate of local recurrence of sacral GCT treated with nerve-sparing surgery and second, what are the risk factors for its local recurrence?. Methods. A total of 114 patients with a sacral GCT who underwent nerve-sparing surgery at our hospital between July 2005 and August 2017 were reviewed. The rate of local recurrence was determined, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis carried out to evaluate the mean recurrence-free survival. Possible risks factors including demographics, tumour characteristics, adjuvant therapy, operation, and laboratory indices were analyzed using univariate analysis. Variables with p < 0.100 in the univariate analysis were further considered in a multivariate Cox regression analysis to identify the risk factors. Results. The rate of local recurrence of sacral GCT treated with nerve-sparing surgery was 28.95% (33/114). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that large tumour size (> 8.80 cm) (hazard ratio (HR) 3.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27 to 7.87; p = 0.014), high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (> 2.09) (HR 3.13; 95% CI 1.28 to 7.62; p = 0.012), involvement of a sacroiliac joint (HR 3.09; 95% CI 1.06 to 9.04; p = 0.039), and massive intraoperative blood loss (> 1,550 ml) (HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.14 to 5.36; p = 0.022) were independent risk factors for local recurrence. Conclusion. Patients with a sacral GCT who undergo nerve-sparing surgery have a local recurrence rate of 29%. Large tumour size, high NLR, involvement of a sacroiliac joint, and massive intraoperative blood loss are independent risk factors. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(10):1392–1398

We investigated whether the presence of a pathological fracture increased the risk of local recurrence in patients with a giant cell tumour (GCT) of bone. We also assessed if curettage is still an appropriate form of treatment in the presence of a pathological fracture. We conducted a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of papers which reported outcomes in patients with a GCT with and without a pathological fracture at presentation. We computed the odds ratio (OR) of local recurrence in those with and without a pathological fracture. . We selected 19 eligible papers for final analysis. This included 3215 patients, of whom 580 (18.0%) had a pathological fracture. The pooled OR for local recurrence between patients with and without a pathological fracture was 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 1.67, p = 0.854). Amongst the subgroup of patients who were treated with curettage, the pooled OR for local recurrence was 1.23 (95% CI 0.75 to 2.01, p = 0.417). . A post hoc sample size calculation showed adequate power for both comparisons. . There is no difference in local recurrence rates between patients who have a GCT of bone with and without a pathological fracture at the time of presentation. The presence of a pathological fracture should not preclude the decision to perform curettage as carefully selected patients who undergo curettage can have similar outcomes in terms of local recurrence to those without such a fracture. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1566–71

Aims. The aim of this paper was to investigate the prognostic factors for local recurrence in patients with pathological fracture through giant cell tumours of bone (GCTB). Patients and Methods. A total of 107 patients presenting with fractures through GCTB treated at our institution (Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom) between 1995 and 2016 were retrospectively studied. Of these patients, 57 were female (53%) and 50 were male (47%).The mean age at diagnosis was 33 years (14 to 86). A univariate analysis was performed, followed by multivariate analysis to identify risk factors based on the treatment and clinical characteristics. Results. The initial surgical treatment was curettage with or without adjuvants in 55 patients (51%), en bloc resection with or without reconstruction in 45 patients (42%), and neoadjuvant denosumab, followed by resection (n = 3, 3%) or curettage (n = 4, 4%). The choice of treatment depended on tumour location, Campanacci tumour staging, intra-articular involvement, and fracture displacement. Neoadjuvant denosumab was used only in fractures through Campanacci stage 3 tumours. Local recurrence occurred in 28 patients (25%). Surgery more than six weeks after the fracture did not affect the risk of recurrence in any of the groups. In Campanacci stage 3 tumours not treated with denosumab, en bloc resection had lower local recurrences (13%), compared with curettage (39%). In tumours classified as Campanacci 2, intralesional curettage and en bloc resections had similar recurrence rates (21% and 24%, respectively). After univariate analysis, the type of surgical intervention, location, and the use of denosumab were independent factors predicting local recurrence. Further surgery was required 33% more often after intralesional curettage in comparison with resections (mean 1.59, 0 to 5 vs 1.06, 0 to 3 operations). All patients treated with denosumab followed by intralesional curettage developed local recurrence. Conclusion. In patients with pathological fractures through GCTB not treated with denosumab, en bloc resection offers lower risks of local recurrence in tumours classified as Campanacci stage 3. Curettage or resections are both similar options in terms of the risk of local recurrence for tumours classified as Campanacci stage 2. The benefits of denosumab followed by intralesional curettage in these patients still remains unclear

Benign aggressive tumors are common and can be debilitating for patients especially if they are in peri-articular regions or cause pathological fracture as is common for giant cell tumor of bone (GCT). Although GCT rarely metastasize, the literature reports many series with high rates of local recurrence, and evidence about which risk factors influence recurrence is lacking. This study aims to evaluate the recurrence rate and identify local recurrence risk factors by reviewing patient data from a single high-volume orthopedic oncology center. A retrospective analysis of all patients treated for GCT at a tertiary orthopedic oncology center was conducted. In total 413 patients were treated for GCT between 1989 and 2017. Multiple patient and tumour characteristics were analysed to determine if they influenced local recurrence including: age, gender, anatomical site, Campanacci stage, soft tissue extension, presence of metastasis, pathologic fractures, and prior local recurrence. Additional variables that were analysed included type of treatment (en bloc resection or aggressive intralesional curettage) and use of local adjuvants. The main outcome parameters were local recurrence- free survival, metastasis-free survival and complications. Patients treated with Denosumab were excluded from analysis given its recently documented association with high rates of local recurrence. “There were 63/413 local recurrences (15.3%) at a mean follow-up of 30.5 months. The metastatic rate was 2.2% at a mean 50.6 months follow-up and did not vary based on type of treatment. Overall complication rate of 14.3% was not related to treatment modality. Local recurrence was higher (p=0.019) following curettage (55/310; 17.7%) compared to resection (8/103; 7.8%) however, joint salvage was possible in 87% of patients (270/310) in the curettage group. Use of adjuvant therapy including liquid nitrogen, peroxide, phenol, water versus none did not show any effect on local recurrence rates (p= 0.104). Pathological fracture did not affect local recurrence rates regardless of treatment modality (p= 0.260). Local recurrence at presentation was present in 16.3% (58/356) patients and did not show any significance for further local recurrence (p= 0.396). Gender was not associated with local recurrence (p=0.508) but younger patient age, below 20 years (p = 0.047) or below 30 years (p = 0.015) was associated with higher local recurrence rates. GCT in distal radius demonstrated the highest rate of local recurrence at 31.6% compared to other sites, although this was not significant (p=0.098). In addition, Campanacci stage and soft tissue extension were not risk factors for recurrence. The overall GCT local recurrence rate was 15.3%, but varied based on the type of resection: 17.7% following joint sparing curettage compared to 7.8% following resection. Local recurrence was also higher with younger patient age (30 years or less) and in distal radius lesions. In addition, neither Campanacci stage, soft tissue extension or presence of a pathologic fracture affected local recurrence. Most patients with GCT can undergo successful curettage and joint sparing, while only a minority require resection +/− prosthetic reconstruction. Even in the presence of soft tissue extension or a pathologic fracture, most joints can be salvaged with curettage

Traditional staging systems for high grade osteosarcoma (Enneking, MSTS) are based largely on gross surgical margins and were developed before the widespread use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. It is now well known that both microscopic margins and chemotherapy are predictors of local recurrence. However, neither of these variables are used in the traditional surgical staging and the precise safe margin distance is debated. Recently, a novel staging system utilizing a 2mm margin cutoff and incorporating precent necrosis was proposed and demonstrated improved prognostic value for local recurrence free survival (LRFS) when compared to the MSTS staging system. This staging system has not been validated beyond the original patient cohort. We propose to analyze this staging system in a cohort of patients with high-grade osteosarcoma, as well as evaluate the ability of additional variables to predict the risk of local recurrence and overall survival. A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of all sarcoma patients between 1985 and 2020 at a tertiary sarcoma care center was performed. All patients with high-grade osteosarcoma receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and with no evidence of metastatic disease on presentation were isolated and analyzed. A minimum of two year follow up was used for surviving patients. A total of 225 patients were identified meeting these criteria. Univariate analysis was performed to evaluate variable that were associated with LRFS. Multivariate analysis is used to further analyze factors associated with LRFS on univariate analysis. There were 20 patients (8.9%) who had locally recurrent disease. Five-year LRFS was significantly different for patients with surgical margins 2mm or less (77.6% v. 93.3%; p=0.006) and those with a central tumor location (67.9 v. 94.4; <0.001). A four-tiered staging system using 2mm surgical margins and a percent necrosis of 90% of greater was also a significant predictor of 5-year LRFS (p=0.019) in this cohort. Notably, percent necrosis in isolation was not a predictor of LRFS in this cohort (p=0.875). Tumor size, gender, and type of surgery (amputation v. limb salvage) were also analyzed and not associated with LRFS. The MSTS surgical margin staging system did not significantly stratify groups (0.066). A 2mm surgical margin cutoff was predictive of 5-year LRFS in this cohort of patients with localized high-grade osteosarcoma and a combination of a 2mm margin and percent necrosis outperformed the prognostic value of the traditional MSTS staging system. Utilization of this system may improve the ability of surgeons to stage thier patients. Additional variables may increase the value of this system and further validation is required

To assess the clinical features, development of metastases, and survival rate of patients with local recurrence after the resection of osteosarcoma in a large series. Five hundred and thirty (530) patients with high-grade osteosarcoma were treated between 1989 and 1998. Fifty-four patients (10%) developed local recurrence after resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. There were 38 men and 16 women with a mean age of 19 years (range 6–50). The mean follow up was 39 months (range 7–120 months). Forty-three patients (79%) had clear resection margins microscopically, while in 8 patients (15%) microscopic tumour was found at the resection margin, and contaminated excision was performed in 3 patients. Histological response was category 1 in 24% of the patients, and category 2 in 76%. Clinical features, treatment, and prognosis were analyzed. Survival rates were examined using Kaplan-Meier Analysis. The average interval between the first resection and local recurrence was 15 months (range 2–109 months). Forty-one patients (76%) had local recurrence in deep soft tissue, 7 in bone, and 6 in subcutaneous tissue. Twenty-six patients (49%) had lung metastasis at the time of local recurrence, while 21 patients (38%) developed it later. Thirty patients (57%) were treated with resection of the recurrent lesion and 18 (32%) were treated with amputation. 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates after local recurrence were 0.57, 0.38, and 0.22 respectively. 87% of patients with local recurrence developed metastases either concurrently or at a later date. Immediate amputation did achieve local tumor control. However, the survival rate was not statistically higher. 87% of the local recurrence arose in soft tissue. Therefore, careful attention should be paid to secure the wide margin around biopsy tract, muscle insertion to the affected bone, and neurovascular bundle at the time of initial resection

We analysed metastasis-free survival after local recurrence in a population-based series of 432 patients treated for soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities or trunk wall. Local recurrence was found in 124 patients; of these, 73 had no detectable metastases when the last local recurrence was diagnosed. No patient received chemotherapy for local recurrence. The 73 patients had a 5-year metastasis-free survival rate of 0.73 after the last local recurrence, compared with 0.47 in all 124 patients with local recurrence. The 5-year metastasis-free survival rate was 0.76 in the 308 patients who had never developed local recurrence, and 0.68 in the whole series. The selection of patients with local recurrence but no concurrent metastasis creates a subset of the population with a good prognosis; this makes it difficult to evaluate the effect of treatment for local recurrence on survival rate. In studies of prognosis this group of patients should be analysed separately from patients with primary tumours

We have investigated the significance of local recurrence on survival in 173 patients with localised soft-tissue sarcomas of the limbs and of the trunk. The overall survival rates at five and ten years were 75.2% and 68.0%, respectively. After definitive surgery at our hospitals, there was local recurrence in 25 patients (14.5%). After inadequate operations elsewhere, there was a higher incidence of late local recurrence (28.3%), in comparison with those with primary tumours treated by us (9.0%), or patients referred to us immediately after inadequate surgery elsewhere (10.2%). Because of small numbers these differences in the survival rates were not statistically significantly different. Univariate survival analysis showed that local recurrence after definitive surgery (p = 0.006) together with the histological grade (p = 0.0002), the size of the tumour (p = 0.002), its depth in relation to deep fascia (p = 0.003), and the surgical margin (p = 0.0001) were the significant prognostic factors. Local recurrence at the initial presentation did not affect survival. Multivariate analysis showed that local recurrence after definitive surgery also lost its apparent prognostic significance

Introduction: Chondrosarcoma has always been treated with respect by oncology surgeons, given that it is relatively resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The importance of the adequacy of surgical resection margins has been previously reported, however, the aim of the study was to study the outcomes of surgery for Chondrosarcoma and determine the role of initial surgical margins and local recurrence on final outcome. Methods: Electronic patient records were retrieved on all patients seen at a tertiary referral musculoskeletal oncology centre with Chondrosarcoma of bone with a minimum of 2 years follow up. A total of 532 patients were seen with Chondrosarcoma between 1970 and 1/1/2006. Patients were excluded if they had initial treatment in another unit (20 patients), a subdiagnosis of dedifferentiated Chondrosarcoma (due to very poor prognosis, 43 patients), metastases at presentation (6 patients) and if they presented with disseminated metastases prior to local recurrence (12 patients). This left 451 patients in the study group and the clinicopathological records were reviewed on these patients. Results: Of the 451 patients, the mean age was 48 years old at diagnosis (range 6–89 years) with the most commonly sites of presentation being in the pelvis in 132 patients (29%), proximal femur in 81 patients (18%), distal femur in 40 patients (9%) and proximal humerus in 40 patients (9%). Grade at presentation was grade 1 in 44%, grade 2 in 44% and grade 3 in 12%. Surgical margins were wide in 45%, marginal in 28% and incisional (including curettage procedures) in 27%. Local recurrence occurred in 88 patients (19.5%). Local recurrence rates were significantly different for surgical margins on Fisher exact testing (p=0.003), which held true even when stratified by presenting grade of tumour. Local recurrence occurred at a mean of 2.8 years, however, 12.5% occurred more than 5 years from diagnosis. There was a significant difference in survival compared between those patients with local recurrent disease and those without on Kaplan Meier analysis; 10 year survival for those without recurrence was 73.1% compared to 41% for those with local recurrence(p< 0.0001, Logrank). On cox regression analysis significant factors affecting survival were pelvic location (p=0.004), local recurrence (p=0.007), age at presentation (p=0.01), marginal margins (p=0.04) and initial tumour grade (p=0.043). There was no significant difference between survival and initial surgical margin when stratified by grade of tumour, possibly as further surgery to improve adequacy of margins. Further sub-analysis is being performed. Conclusions: There is a complex relationship between surgical margins, local recurrence and margins. It appears that long term survival is possible in approximately 1/3 patients who have local recurrence in intermediate and high grade chondrosarcomas and therefore ever effort should be made to regain local control following local recurrence

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of patients with a sacral chordoma and the surgical management of locally recurrent disease. Between October 1990 and August 2013 we operated on 54 consecutive patients with a sacral chordoma. There were 34 men and 20 women with a mean age of 60 years (25 to 86). The mean maximum diameter of the tumour was 9.3 cm (3 to 20). The mean follow-up was 7.8 years (2 months to 23.4 years). The disease-specific survival was 82% at five years, 57% at ten years and 45% at 15 years. The local recurrence-free survival was 49% at five years, 37% at ten years and 20% at 15 years. Local recurrence occurred in 30 patients (56%) at a mean of 3.8 years (3 months to 13 years) post-operatively. Survival after the treatment of recurrence was 89% at two years, 56% at five years and 19% at ten years. Of nine patients who had complete resection of a recurrence, one died after 72 months and eight remain disease-free. Incomplete resection of recurrent disease resulted in a survival of 54% at two years and 36% at five years. For 12 patients with a local recurrence who were treated palliatively, survival was 81% at two years and 31% at five years. A wide margin of resection gave the best chance of long-term survival and complete resection of local recurrence the best chance of control of disease. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:711–15

Chondrosarcoma is treated with respect by oncology surgeons, given that it is relatively resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The aim was to study the outcomes of surgery for chondrosarcoma and determine the role of initial surgical margins and local recurrence on outcome. Electronic patient records were retrieved on all patients seen with chondrosarcoma of bone with a minimum of two years follow up. A total of 532 patients were seen with Chondrosarcoma between 1970 and 2006. Patients were excluded if they had initial treatment in another unit (20 patients), a subdiagnosis of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (due to very poor prognosis, 43 patients), metastases at presentation (30 patients), if they presented with disseminated metastases prior to local recurrence (12 patients) or were not offered surgery, leaving 402 patients in the study group. The mean age was 48 years old (range 6–89 years) with the most commonly sites of presentation being in the pelvis in 132 patients (29%), proximal femur in 81 patients (18%), distal femur in 40 patients (9%) and proximal humerus in 40 patients (9%). Grade at presentation was grade 1 in 44%, grade 2 in 44% and grade 3 in 12%. Surgical margins were radical in 3%, wide in 44%, marginal in 29%, planned incisional in 13% and unplanned incisional in 11%. Local recurrence occurred in 87 patients (22%). Local recurrence rates were significantly different for surgical margins on Fisher exact testing (p=0.003), which held true even when stratified by presenting grade of tumour. Surgery for local control was successful in 62% of cases. Complex relationships exist between surgical margins, local recurrence and survival. Long term survival is possible in 1/3 patients who have local recurrence in intermediate and high grade chondrosarcomas and therefore ever effort should be made to regain local control following local recurrence

The outcome for patients with Ewing's sarcoma recurrence is poor. Local recurrences occur in 8%-25%of these patients. The aim of the study was to analyze the patients who had a local recurrence to identify factors predicting the local recurrence and if it could be prevented. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 650 patients who had a diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma treated between 1975 and 2009 at a single institution was performed and 64 patients (10%) who had a local recurrence were identified and analysed. Results. Fifteen patients had metastases at diagnosis.20 patients had chemotherapy and radiotherapy only while 44 had chemotherapy and surgery +/− post op radiotherapy. Thirteen patients who were suitable for post –operative radiotherapy could not receive the treatment due to various reasons like biological reconstruction. The estimated 5 years survival for the patients was 15%. The risk of local recurrence is higher if the tumour is located in the axial skeleton, treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy alone [location and size of the tumour precluding surgery]. The risk of local recurrence is higher if the tumour was in the fibula or radius. One out of three patients who have good response to chemotherapy still went on to develop a LR. The use of biological reconstruction and younger age group often resulted in deferral of post-operative radiotherapy. Location and type of treatment can predict LR. Surgery with clear margins and post-operative radiotherapy given when indicated may reduce the incidence of LR

We retrospectively studied local recurrence of giant cell tumour in long bones following treatment with curettage and cementing in 137 patients. The median follow-up time was 60 months (3 to 166). A total of 19 patients (14%) had at least one local recurrence, the first was diagnosed at a median of 17 months (3 to 29) after treatment of the primary tumour. There were 13 patients with a total of 15 local recurrences who were successfully treated by further curettage and cementing. Two patients with a second local recurrence were consequently treated twice. At the last follow-up, at a median of 53 months (3 to 128) after the most recent operation, all patients were free from disease and had good function. We concluded that local recurrence of giant cell tumour after curettage and cementing in long bones can generally be successfully treated with further curettage and cementing, with only a minor risk of increased morbidity. This suggests that more extensive surgery for the primary tumour in an attempt to obtain wide margins is not the method of choice, since it leaves the patient with higher morbidity with no significant gain with respect to cure of the disease

Background. Giant cell tumours of bone (GCT) are benign bone tumours with a locally aggressive character. Local recurrence is considered the main complication of surgical treatment and is described in up to 50% of patients. Intralesional curettage with the use of adjuvants like phenol or polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) is recommended as initial treatment, significantly decreasing the risk of recurrence. However, risk factors for local recurrence in skeletal GCT have not yet been firmly established and a golden standard for local therapy remains controversial. Objective. The identification of risk factors predisposing for an increased risk of local recurrence. In addition, different surgical techniques are compared to identify the optimal surgical approach for the identified risk factors. Methods. In a retrospective study all 215 patients with bone GCT treated between 1964 and 2009 in one centre were included, of which 193 were suitable for analysis. All patients had minimal follow-up of 12 months (mean 115; range 12–445). Using a Kaplan Meier survival analysis recurrence free survival rates were calculated. Cox-regression was used to determine the influence of different types of therapy, the use of adjuvants, and various patient and tumour characteristics. Results. The mean local recurrence rate for all patients was 35.2% (n=68, 95%CI: 28.3–42.1). Recurrence rate after wide resection was 0.17 (n=6, 95%CI: 0.04–0.29), after curettage with adjuvants 0.32 (n=42, 95%CI 0.24–0.41) and after curettage alone 0.74 (n=20, 95%CI: 0.57–0.91, p < 0.001). Soft tissue extension (Hazard Ratio: 3.8, p < 0.001), localisation in radius and ulna (HR: 2.6, p=0.013), and surgical experience (HR: 2.2, p=0.022) were identified as significant general risk factors for local recurrence. For intralesional resection, Campanacci grade III (HR: 3.9, p=0.019) and location in axial skeleton (HR: 3.3, p=0.016) additionally significantly increased this risk. Comparing treatments our data showed that curettage followed by adjuvants was superior to curettage alone (p < 0.004), and the application of both phenol and PMMA did not present a significantly better outcome than curettage and PMMA alone (HR: 1.07, p=0.881). Conclusion. Of all possible risk factors only soft tissue extension, localisation in radius and ulna and non-radical resections significantly influenced the risk of local recurrence for all treatments. In addition, we found that high-grade tumours and localisation in the axial skeleton were additional risk factors for local recurrence after intralesional surgery. Although wide resection increases patient morbidity, it can be the therapy of choice in high risk patients. Intralesional therapy can be advised for low recurrence risk patients using curettage and PMMA only, whereas our study could not confirm the predicted effect of phenol as an additional adjuvant

Two hundred and forty-eight high-grade central osteosarcomata were treated by amputation or disarticulation; in 5.2 per cent the tumour recurred at the amputation site. The following causes may be responsible for local recurrence: the level of the amputation is too close to the tumour; there is an unrecognised intramedullary extension of the tumour; during a previous block resection tumour cells may have been seeded in the soft tissues; the primary tumour was too extensive even for radical surgery; "skip" metastases may have been present; iatrogenic tumour implantation may have occurred while a biopsy was being performed during the course of an amputation. Treatment of the primary osteosarcoma should take all these possibilities into account. In our experience adjuvant chemotherapy has not significantly changed the frequency of local recurrences which should be treated by radical operation or, if this is not possible, by irradiation; chemotherapy may be used as an adjuvant. The prognosis of local recurrences is bad

Ewing Sarcoma is the second most common primary bone sarcoma in young patients, however, there remains geographical variation in the treatment of these tumours. All patients receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and, in most cases, the soft tissue mass diminishes significantly in volume. Controversy surrounds whether to then treat the pre- or post-chemotherapy tumour volume. Many centres advocate either (1) resection of the pre-chemotherapy volume or (2) treatment of the pre-chemotherapy volume with radiation followed by resection of the post-chemotherapy volume. These approaches increase both the short and long-term morbidity for this young patient population. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed our experience resecting only the post-chemotherapy volume without the use of (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy. A retrospective analysis of all patients with Ewing Sarcoma treated at a tertiary orthopaedic oncology centre was conducted. All patients were treated as per the consensus opinion of the multidisciplinary tumour board. Demographic and oncological variables were collected from our institutional database. Presentation and re-staging MRI scans were reviewed to evaluate pre- and post-chemotherapy tumour volumes. Operative and pathology reports were utilized to determine the extent of the surgical resection. Outcome variables included local recurrence free-, metastasis free- and overall survival. Sixty-five patients were identified in our institutional database of which 56 did not receive (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 24 years (range 13–64), 60% of patients were male and 67.6% of tumours were located in the appendicular skeleton. All 56 patients not treated with radiotherapy had resection of the post-chemotherapy tumour volume. There were 3 local recurrences in this group with a mean follow-up of 70.8 months (range 2 to 328). The median overall survival was 47 months and the mean of 70.8months. The rate of local recurrence is comparable to reports in the literature in which patients had their entire pre-chemotherapy tumour volume treated by radiation and/or surgery. Similarly, two-year overall survival for our patient cohort is not significantly different from previous studies in which more aggressive local control measures were employed. Resecting the post-chemotherapy tumour volume in Ewing Sarcoma without the use of (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy does not appear to increase the risk of local recurrence or negatively impact overall survival. This approach should be studied further as it reduces the risk of short and long-term complications for this patient population.”

Aim: To identify prognostic for patients who develop local recurrence after initial attempted curative treatment for a soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Method: All patients who developed a local recurrence (LR) after initial primary treatment of a STS were identified from a prospective database. Their management and outcome were analysed to find prognostic factors. Results: 178 patients were identified. They had a median age at original diagnosis of 53 and 102 of the patients had high grade tumours, 50 intermediate grade and 23 low grade. The median time to LR was 14 months but extended up to 11.5 years. 47 of the patients developed metastases either before or synchronously with the LR. In these patients the median survival was 20 months with only 4% surviving to 5 years. In the 131 patients who did not have identifiable metastases at the time of diagnosis, 74 subsequently developed metastases at a median time of 12 months following the development of LR. The median survival for patients without metastases at the time of LR was 3 years with a 31% survival at 10 years. The most important prognostic factor in this group was grade with low grade tumours having a much better outlook (70% survival at 10 years) than intermediate or high grade tumours (24% at 10 years). Complete control of the first local recurrence could not be shown to be a prognostic factor. Conclusion: Local recurrence has a poor prognosis but this is because it frequently arises in patients who have other bad prognostic factors. Whilst obtaining local control is important, overall survival is poor, but not as bad for those patients who develop metastases

Aims. Iliosacral sarcoma resections have been shown to have high rates of local recurrence (LR) and poor overall survival. There is also no universal classification for the resection of pelvic sarcomas invading the sacrum. This study proposes a novel classification system and analyzes the survival and risk of recurrence, when using this system. Methods. This is a retrospective analysis of 151 patients (with median follow-up in survivors of 44 months (interquartile range 12 to 77)) who underwent hemipelvectomy with iliosacral resection at a single centre between 2007 and 2019. The proposed classification differentiates the extent of iliosacral resection and defines types S1 to S6 (S1 resection medial and parallel to the sacroiliac joint, S2 resection through the ipsilateral sacral lateral mass to the neuroforamina, S3 resection through the ipsilateral neuroforamina, S4 resection through ipsilateral the spinal canal, and S5 and S6 contralateral sacral resections). Descriptive statistics and the chi-squared test were used for categorical variables, and the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed. Results. Resections were S1 in 25/151 patients (17%), S2 in 70/151 (46%), S3 in 33/151 (22%), S4 in 77/151 (11%), S5 in 4/151 (3%), and S6 in 2/151 (1%). An internal hemipelvectomy was performed in 113/151 patients (75%), and 38/151 patients (25%) had an external hemipelvectomy. The predominant types of sarcoma were high-grade osteosarcoma in 48/151 patients (32%), chondrosarcoma in 41/151 (27%), Ewing sarcoma in 33/151 (22%), pleomorphic sarcoma in 17/151 (11%), and others in 2/151 (8%). LR was found in 24/151 patients (15%) with S3, S5, with S6 resections showing the highest rate of LR (p = 0.038). Overall, 19/151 patients (16%) had evidence of metastastic disease at the time of surgery and these patients showed poorer survival when compared to patients with no metastasis. Conclusion. The proposed classification can help to report and compare different surgical and reconstructive approaches in these difficult cases who are still have a considerable risk of LR. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):290–296

Introduction. Local recurrence of Giant cell tumours of bone (GCT) is considered the main complication of surgical treatment (50%). Intra-lesional curettage with adjuvants like phenol or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is recommended as initial treatment, decreasing the risk of recurrence. However, risk factors for local recurrence in skeletal GCT have not yet been firmly established and a golden standard for treatment remains controversial. Aim of this study is identification of risk factors for recurrence in GCT, specifically after intra-lesional curettage with or without adjuvants. Methods. In a retrospective single-institution study 191 patients treated for GCT between 1964 and 2009 were included. Mean follow-up was 111 months (range 12-415). The recurrence-free survival and hazards for different treatment strategies and various patient and tumour characteristics were determined. Results. Overall risk of recurrence was 36.1% (n=66, 95% CI: 28.3-42.1). Recurrence rate after wide resection was 20%, after curettage with adjuvants 33% and after curettage alone 77%. Hogendoorn-grade III (Hazard Ratio: 5.7, p⋋0.001), localisation in axial skeleton (HR: 3.7, p⋋0,001), primary treatment in a non-specialised centre (HR: 2.8, p⋋0.001) and extension into soft tissue (HR: 2.0, p=0.02) were significant risk factors for local recurrence. Curettage with adjuvants proved superior to curettage alone (p⋋0.004 p=0.07, HR: 0.54), but the application of both PMMA and phenol did not present a significantly better outcome than PMMA alone (HR: 1.07, p=0.9). Discussion. Of all possible risk factors only soft tissue extension and localisation in distal radius significantly influenced the risk of local recurrence for all treatments. We found that high-grade tumours and localisation in the axial skeleton were additional risk factors for local recurrence after intra-lesional surgery. Although wide resection increases morbidity, it can be the therapy of choice in high risk patients. Intra-lesional therapy can be advised for low risk patients using curettage adjuvants and PMMA

Purpose. The main predictors in the literature of local control for patients operated on for a soft tissue sarcoma are age, local presentation status, depth, grade, size, surgical margins and radiation. However, due to the competing effect of death (patients who die are withdrawn from the risk of local recurrence), the influence of these predictors on the cumulative probabilities may have been misinterpreted so far. The objective of the study was to interpret the influence of known predictors of local recurrence in a competing risks setting. Method. This single center study included 1519 patients operated on for a localized soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity or trunk. Cox models were used to estimate the cause specific hazard of known predictors on local recurrence. Cumulative incidences were estimated in a competing risks scenario. Results. Overall the cumulative probabilities of local recurrence at 2, 5, and 10 years were 5.4% (4.3%–6.7%), 8.2% (6.8%–9.8%), and 11.7% (9.8%–14.3%). The cumulative probabilities of metastasis at 2, 5, and 10 years were 23.3% (21.1%–25.5%), 28.7% (26.2%–31.1%), and 33.7% (30.8%–36.7%). Older age, locally recurrent, high grade and deep tumors, absence of radiation and positive surgical margins were significantly associated with an increased risk of local recurrence. However, when considering competing risks, the cumulative probabilities of local recurrence were significantly different only with presentation status (P < 0.0001), surgical margins (P < 0.0001) and use of adjuvant radiation (P = 0.04). At 10 years, the cumulative probability of local recurrence was 10.6% and 22.6% for patients presenting with a primary or locally recurrent tumor, 9.3% and 23.3% for patients with negative or positive surgical margins, and 9.8% and 16.8% for patients receiving or not receiving radiation respectively. There was no difference in the cumulative probabilities of local recurrence with regard to tumor depth (P = 0.29), size (P = 0.78) or grade (P = 0.29). Patient survival at 2, 5, and 10 years was 85.5% (95% CI: 83.7%–87.4%), 74.6% (95% CI: 72.1%–77.1%), and 64.3% (95% CI: 61%–67.7%). Conclusion. The effect of variables on the cumulative probability of local recurrence should be interpreted in a competing risks setting. Grade and depth are not associated with an increased cumulative probability of local recurrence