Limb-injury severity scores are designed to assess orthopaedic and vascular injuries. In Gustilo type-IIIA and type-IIIB injuries they have poor sensitivity and specificity to predict salvage or outcome. We have designed a trauma score to grade the severity of injury to the covering tissues, the bones and the functional tissues, grading the three components from one to five. Seven comorbid conditions known to influence the management and prognosis have been given a score of two each. The score was validated in 109 consecutive open injuries of the tibia, 42 type-IIIA and 67 type-IIIB. The total score was used to assess the possibilities of salvage and the outcome was measured by dividing the injuries into four groups according to their scores as follows: group I scored less than 5, group II 6 to 10, group III 11 to 15 and group IV 16 or more. A score of 14 to indicate amputation had the highest sensitivity and specificity. Our trauma score compared favourably with the Mangled Extremity Severity score in sensitivity (98% and 99%), specificity (100% and 17%), positive predictive value (100% and 97.5%) and negative predictive value (70% and 50%), respectively. A receiver-operating characteristic curve constructed for 67 type-IIIB injuries to assess the efficiency of the scores to predict salvage, showed that the area under the curve for this score was better (0.988 (± 0.013 . sem. )) than the Mangled Extremity Severity score (0.938 (± 0.039 . sem. )). All limbs in group IV and one in group III underwent amputation. Of the salvaged limbs, there was a significant difference in the three groups for the requirement of a flap for wound cover, the time to union, the number of surgical procedures required, the total days as an in-patient and the incidence of deep infection (p < 0.001 for all). The individual scores for covering and functional tissues were also found to offer specific guidelines in the management of these complex injuries. The scoring system was found to be simple in application and reliable in prognosis for both limb-salvage and outcome measures in type-IIIA and type-IIIB open injuries of the tibia

Introduction. There is a need for a standardised guideline to assist in optimal decision-making in diabetics who have acquired an ankle fracture. Through a critical analysis of the literature, a diagnostic and management algorithm that incorporates a quantitative scoring system is proposed and presented for consideration. Methods. Publications were identified by conducting a comprehensive keyword search of Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. Search terms included “diabetes,” “ankle,” and “fracture”. Articles published in the English language that were pertinent to the topic were included. Manual search of the references in these relevant papers were also completed to further identify publications for potential inclusion. Publications and conferences not published in the English language or not pertinent to the topic in the above databases were excluded. Duplicate results that occurred in different databases were truncated to a single result. Results. A total of 352 results were revealed using the above methods. Of these, 59 articles met our inclusion criteria. 293 articles met our exclusion criteria. A further 9 articles were included after reviewing the included articles and their respective references. From these results, we propose a detailed diagnostic algorithm that may provide a systematic approach to a diabetic patient who presents with acute ankle pain, swelling, warmth, and/or redness. If a fracture is noted on plain radiographs, a proposed management algorithm and scoring system can be used to assist in deciding whether to proceed with primary open reduction, internal fixation (ORIF) or primary arthrodesis/rigid fixation. This scoring system is based on factors acquired through history and examination. Major factors have been allocated a score of 2, which include: previous or coinciding history of Charcot arthropathy, peripheral neuropathy, insulin dependence with poor compliance, and a diabetic history of greater than 20 years. Minor factors have been allocated a score of 1, which include: age > 50, nephropathy, retinopathy, osteoporosis, vasculopathy, and presence of nutrition/diet deficiency. A score of greater than 7 suggests a primary limb-salvage arthrodesis/rigid fixation because of the likely poor outcome in a primary ORIF. A score of less than 7 suggests that an acceptable outcome will likely result with a primary ORIF. Discussion. Through the use of the AFDA algorithm and score, it will hopefully provide a standardised approach to diabetic ankle fractures and; a method of quantifying risks for both the patient and affected ankle joint, thus, allowing the surgeon to have confidence in achieving the best possible outcome. Although this score is based on a critical analysis of the current literature, further validation of both this algorithm and score is recommended. Once validated, the AFDA score in particular, can also potentially be used as a research tool for further follow-up and outcome studies on diabetic ankle fractures

Although it is widely accepted that grade IIIB open tibial fractures require combined specialised orthopaedic and plastic surgery, the majority of patients in the UK initially present to local hospitals without access to specialised trauma facilities. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients presenting directly to a specialist centre (primary group) with that of patients initially managed at local centres (tertiary group).

We reviewed 73 consecutive grade IIIB open tibial shaft fractures with a mean follow-up of 14 months (8 to 48). There were 26 fractures in the primary and 47 in the tertiary group. The initial skeletal fixation required revision in 22 (47%) of the tertiary patients. Although there was no statistically-significant relationship between flap timing and flap failure, all the failures (6 of 63; 9.5%) occurred in the tertiary group. The overall mean time to union of 28 weeks was not influenced by the type of skeletal fixation. Deep infection occurred in 8.5% of patients, but there were no persistently infected fractures. The infection rate was not increased in those patients debrided more than six hours after injury.

The limb salvage rate was 93%. The mean limb functional score was 74% of that of the normal limb. At review, 67% of patients had returned to employment, with a further 10% considering a return after rehabilitation. The times to union, infection rates and Enneking limb reconstruction scores were not statistically different between the primary and tertiary groups.

The increased complications and revision surgery encountered in the tertiary group suggest that severe open tibial fractures should be referred directly to specialist centres for simultaneous combined management by orthopaedic and plastic surgeons.