Aims. Patients undergoing limb reconstruction surgery often face a challenging and lengthy process to complete their treatment journey. The majority of existing outcome measures do not adequately capture the patient-reported outcomes relevant to this patient group in a single measure. Following a previous systematic review, the Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) was designed with the intent to address this need for an effective instrument to measure patient-reported outcomes in limb reconstruction patients. We aim to assess the face validity of this score in a pilot study. Methods. The SLRS was designed following structured interviews with several groups including patients who have undergone limb reconstruction surgery, limb reconstruction surgeons, specialist nurses, and physiotherapists. This has subsequently undergone further adjustment for language and clarity. The score was then trialled on ten patients who had undergone limb reconstruction surgery, with subsequent structured questioning to understand the perceived suitability of the score. Results. Ten patients completed the score and the subsequent structured interview. Considering the tool as a whole, 100% of respondents felt the score to be comprehensible, relevant, and comprehensive regarding the areas that were important to a patient undergoing limb reconstruction surgery. For individual questions, on a five-point Likert scale, importance/relevance was reported as a mean of 4.78 (4.3 to 5.0), with ability to understand rated as 4.92 (4.7 to 5.0) suggesting high levels of relevance and comprehension. Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level was calculated as 5.2 (10 to 11 years old). Conclusion. The current SLRS has been shown to have acceptable scores from a patient sample regarding relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness. This suggests face validity, however further testing required and is ongoing in a larger cohort of patients to determine the reliability, responsiveness, precision, and criterion validity of the score in this patient group. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):705–709

Introduction. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has gained momentum in the orthopaedic literature. The GOAL-LD (Gait Outcomes Assessment List for Limb Deformity) incorporates the framework of The WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and correlates highly with the Paediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) when applied in a limb reconstruction setting. The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Australia, supported by The University of Melbourne is designing and implementing a Limb Reconstruction Registry, prospectively enrolling patients with a number of key conditions and provide a mechanism for capturing surgical data and PROMs at regular follow-up intervals. LimbDREAM (The Limb Reconstruction Registry of Experience, Aspiration and Measures) has begun recruiting participants, and this paper serves as a narrative review of our design and implementation process. Materials & Methods. After provision of a research grant, audit was conducted to examine local case mix and estimate recruitment based on conditions selected. Literature review was focussed on (i) registries in the paediatric limb reconstruction domain and (ii) use of PROMs across conditions selected. A high-level process-flow chart was constructed in order to inform governance and staffing requirements in addition to REDCap Database structure. Local as well as scalable deployment was considered. Alpha and beta testing was performed by principal and associate investigators prior to participant recruitment. Results. Audit identified 6 condition streams for inclusion: Congenital limb deficiencies, congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia, bone dysplasias, bone tumours, amputation, and complex deformity of other etiology. Literature review identified 20 PROMs used across these conditions, with limited validation studies and significant implementation heterogeneity. REDCap database design took longer than anticipated (planned 10 months, actual 18 months) before being recruitment ready, due to the complexity of ensuring data collection logic would work across highly diverse patient journeys. Initial recruitment across all streams has been promising. Email and text message reminders have proved helpful in increasing survey return rates. Conclusions. Prospective collection of PROMs as well as surgical data via a standardized dataset will provide the basis for future condition-specific research, with the ability to support nested trials. Implementation requires forethought with regard to time frames and staffing for non-automated steps as well as data integrity review. The next phase of the LimbDREAM project will be to integrate use of the Registry into our weekly Limb Reconstruction Meeting to ensure that operative plans and data are captured close to the point of care

Introduction. There is a drive to reduce length of stay in children undergoing limb reconstruction but a reduction in community physiotherapy input and a consequent pressure to ensure children are as independent as possible prior to discharge. This study aims to look at time taken and potential factors effecting the achievement of pre-set mobility goals and length of stay in this population. Materials and Methods. Between June 2018 and November 2021 data was collated for patients who underwent limb reconstruction at Great Ormond Street hospital. 77 patients were reviewed. Data collected included type and location of lengthening device and length of stay. A modified version of the Goal Attainment Score (GAS) was used and included 3 goals which the child needed to achieve within 7 days post-operatively. Results. All children achieved their goals within the 7 days. Length of stay with intramedullary devices was shorter than with external fixators (average of 5 vs 10 days). For children with frames, including the ankle significantly increased hospital stay, whereas inclusion of the knee had no significant effect, and. Bilateral frames were associated with a longer stay. Conclusions. The use of GAS with pre-defined clinically driven goals could be considered feasible within the limb reconstruction population and possibly used for other patient groups. This data may enable us to more accurately predict length of stay in patients undergoing limb reconstruction and will provide a baseline for future comparisons of different interventions in this patient group

Introduction. Continuous compression implants (CCIs) are small memory alloy bone staples that can provide continuous compression across a fracture site, which change shape due to temperature changes. Reviews of CCIs in orthopaedics have documented their use in mainly foot and ankle surgery, with very limited descriptions in trauma. They could be beneficial in the management of complex or open injuries due to their low profile and quick insertion time. The aim of this case series were to clarify the use of CCIs in modern day limb reconstruction practice. Materials & Methods. This was a single centred study looking retrospectively at prospective data for patients who were treated for an acute fracture or non-union with a CCI between September 2019 and May 2023. Primary outcome was to determine the function and indication of the CCI as judged retrospectively and secondary outcomes investigated unplanned returns to theatre for infection or CCI failure. Results. Sixty patients were eligible with a mean age of 44.2 (range 8–89). Fifty-one patients were treated for acute fractures, nine for non-unions; and almost half (27 patients) had open injuries. There were seven different sites for treatment with a CCI, the most common being tibia (25 patients) and humerus (14 patients). Of the 122 CCIs used, 80 were used as adjuncts for fixation in 48 patients. Their indication as an adjunct fell into three distrinct categories – reduction of fracture (39 CCIs), fixation of key fragments (38 CCIs) and compression (3 CCIs). Of these 48 patients, 4 patients had a frame fixation, 19 had a nail fixation, 24 patients had a plate fixation. Forty-two CCIs were used in isolation as definitive fixation, all were for midfoot dislocations expect an open iliac wing fixation from a machete attack and an isolated paediatric medial malleolus fixation. Two patients returned to theatre for infection and two due to CCI failure. Conclusions. This series has demonstrated the versality of CCIs across multiple sites of the body and for a large variety of injuries. It has identified, when not used in isolation, three main indications to support traditional orthopaedic fixations. Given the unpredictability in limb reconstruction surgery, the diversity and potential of CCIs could form part of the staple diet in the modern-day practice

Introduction. Patients undergoing limb reconstruction surgery often face a challenging and often lengthy process to complete their treatment journey. The majority of existing outcome measures do not adequately capture the patient reported outcomes relevant to this patient group in a single measure. Following a previous systematic review, the Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) was designed with the intent to address this need for an effective instrument to measure patient reported outcomes in limb reconstruction patients. Materials and Methods. The SLRS was designed following the use of structured interviews with a group of patients who have undergone limb reconstruction surgery, limb reconstruction surgeons, specialist nurses and physiotherapists. This has undergone further adjustment for language and clarity. The score was then trialled on 10 patients who have been through the process of limb reconstruction surgery, with subsequent structured questioning to understand the perceived suitability. Results. Ten patients have completed the score and the subsequent structured interview. All patients found the score acceptable to complete in the time while waiting in clinic. Considering the tool as a whole, 100% of respondents felt the score to be comprehensible, relevant and comprehensive regarding the areas that were important to a patient undergoing limb reconstruction surgery. For individual questions, on a 5 point Likert scale, importance/relevance was reported as a mean of 4.78 (4.3–5), with ability to understand rated as 4.92 (4.7–5) suggesting high levels of relevance and comprehension. Flesh-Kincaid reading grade level was calculated as 5.2 (10–11 years old). Conclusions. The current Stanmore limb reconstruction score has been shown to have acceptable scores from a patient sample regarding relevance, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness. This demonstrates face validity, however further testing required and is ongoing in a larger cohort of patients to determine the reliability, responsiveness, precision and criterion validity of the score in this patient group

Introduction. Traditionally, limb reconstruction physiotherapy consisted of face to face group rehabilitation. During the COVID-19 pandemic OP physiotherapy service provision was significantly reduced and delivery methods limited due to staff redeployment, service prioritisation and restriction of footfall within the hospital. A virtual exercise group for acute limb reconstruction patients was set up to maintain contact and clinical support. Materials and Methods. A small single centre study was performed over two 4 week periods capturing the experience of 35 patients. A patient reported questionnaire was used and revised post-pandemic to gather quantitative and qualitative data about the patients experience of the Limb Reconstruction Physiotherapy Service at each point in time. The qualitative data was analysed using an inductive thematic analysis. Results. Four key themes emerged from the qualitative data: Sense of community through shared experience, support & encouragement from staff and peers, increasing confidence with the frame – fostering independence, the challenging nature of the class. Recommendation of the service, positive functional impact and overall experience remained >88% of the population (face to face & virtual). Conclusions. The results highlight the benefits of group physiotherapy (face to face & virtual) to patients recovery with improvements in confidence, mobility, function, psychosocial factors and overall QoL. Peer support is paramount in the rehabilitation and progression of limb reconstruction patients. Virtual platforms for rehabilitation are helpful in maintaining participation and should be offered where possible to facilitate ongoing inclusion, however face to face contact is preferred

The requirement for the peer support groups were born out of concern for the psychological wellbeing of the paediatric patients and to assess if this would improve their wellbeing during their treatment. Groupwork is a method of Social Work which is recognised as a powerful tool to allow people meet their need for belonging while also creating the forum for group members to empower one another. Social Work meet with all paediatric patients attending the limb reconstruction service in the hospital. The focus of the Medical Social Worker (MSW) is to provide practical and emotional support to the patient and their parent/guardian regarding coping with the frame. Some of the challenges identified through this direct work include patient's struggling with the appearance of the frame and allowing peers to see the frame. The peer support group aims to offer its attendees the opportunities to engage with fellow paediatric patients in the same position. It allowed them to visually identify with one another. We wanted to create a safe space to discuss the emotional impact of treatment and the frames. It normalises the common problems paediatric patients face during treatment. We assisted our participants to identify new coping techniques and actions they can take to make their journey through limb reconstruction treatment more manageable. Finally, we aimed to offer the parents space to similarly seek peer support with regard to caring for a child in treatment. All paediatric patients were under the care of the Paediatric Orthopaedic Consultant and were actively engaging with the limb reconstruction multi-disciplinary team (MDT). The patient selection was completed by the MDT; based on age, required to be in active treatment, or their frames were removed within one month prior to the group's commencement. Qualitative data was collected through written questionnaires and reflection from participants in MSW sessions. We also used observational data from direct verbal feedback from the MDT. In the first group, parents gave feedback due to participants age and completed written feedback forms. For our second group, initial feedback was collated from the participants after the first session to get an understanding of group expectations. Upon completion, we collected data from both the participants and the parents. Qualitative and scaling questions gathered feedback on their experience of participating in the group. We held two peer support groups in 2022:One group for patients aged between 3–6 years in January 2022 across two sessions, which was attended by four patients. The second group for young teenage patients aged between 11–15 years in April 2022 across four sessions, which was attended by five patients. The written feedback received from group one focused on eliciting the participant's experience of the groupwork. 100% of participants identified the shared experience as the main benefit of the groupwork. 100% of participants agreed they would attend a peer support group again, and no participant had suggestions for improvement to the group. Feedback did indicate that group work at the beginning of treatment could be more beneficial. In relation to the second group, 60% of the paediatric patients and their parents returned the questionnaires. All of the parent's feedback identified that it was beneficial for their child to meet peers in a similar situation. They agreed that it was beneficial to meet other parents, so they could get support and advice from one another. On a scale between 1 and 5, 5 being the highest score, the participants scored high on the group work meeting their expectations, enjoyment of the sessions, and the group work was a beneficial aspect of their treatment. All respondents would strongly recommend groupwork to other paediatric patients attending for limb reconstruction treatment. Overall, the MDT limb reconstruction team, found the peer support group work of great benefit to the participants and their parents. The MSW team identified that during a period on the limb reconstruction team, when a high number of patients were in active treatment, the workload of the MSW also increased reflecting this activity. Common issues and concerns were raised directly to MSW (particularly from group two) regarding numerous difficulties they experienced trying to cope with the frame. The group work facilitators created a space where the participants could get peer support, share issues caused by the frame, hear directly from others, and that they too experience similar feelings or issues. Collectively, they identified ways of coping and promoting their own wellbeing while in treatment. The participants in group two, subsequently created a group on social media, to be able to continue their newly formed friendships and to continue to update one another on their treatment journeys. The participants self-requested another group in the future. This was facilitated in November 2023, the facilitators sought more feedback from all participants and their parents after this session. These findings will contribute towards the analysis for the presentation. Peer support groupwork was presented at the hospital's foundation day and has been well received by senior management in the hospital, as a positive addition to the limb reconstruction service. The focus of the MDT in 2024, is to further develop and facilitate more peer support groups for our paediatric patients

Introduction. Legg-Calve-Perthes (Perthes Disease) was first recognised by three physicians, Arthur Legg (1874–1939), Jacqui Calve (1875–1954) and George Perthes (1869 – 1927) in 1910. Perthes disease is a rare childhood condition that affects the hip. It occurs when the blood supply to the femoral head is disrupted. Without this blood supply, the bone cells die and avascular necrosis can occur. The Herring classification is used to diagnose the stages of Perthes Disease. It is an important prognostic factor. There are three classifications, Herring A, B and C. Herring A has no involvement of the lateral pillar with no density changes noted on x-ray. Herring B has at least 50% of the lateral pillar height maintained on x-ray. Herring C has less than 50% of the lateral pillar height on x-ray (Herring et al, 1992). Children with Perthes disease require specialist Limb Reconstruction team throughout their treatment journey, this includes Orthopaedic surgery and therapy (Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy). The National Limb Reconstruction Therapy Team is based at the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Cappagh. The therapy team consists of 1 Clinical Specialist Physiotherapist, 1 Senior Physiotherapist and 1 Senior Occupational Therapist who provide input to this cohort. This study aims to analyse the importance of a comprehensive pre-operative assessment by the therapy team (Physiotherapist and Occupational Therapist) to maximise patient outcomes post operatively. Methodology. This is a quantitative research study conducted by the National Limb Reconstructive Therapy Service of the National Orthopaedic Hospital in Cappagh, Dublin. The inclusion criteria for this study consisted of:. Age – Patient must be part of the Paediatric Service, i.e., under the age of 16. Diagnosis – Patient must have a diagnosis of Perthes Disease with a Herring Classification documented. Application of a Hip Distractor Frame formed part of the patient's surgical management. Surgery was completed by Mr Connor Green. Surgery was completed between January 2021 and December 2022. Patient were required to have their external hip distractor frame removed by December 2022. Exclusion Criteria: Those not meeting the above inclusion criteria. Following the inclusion criteria, a number of cases were identified of which 10 cases were selected at random. A retrospective analysis of these samples was completed. The medical charts were reviewed as well as patient electronic healthcare records. Microsoft Excel was utilised to analyse the data and capture results. Results. From analysing the data, the following results were identified:. 80% of the sample cohort had a length of stay of 5 days following surgery. There were two outliers due to infection who had a length of stay of 14 days. 90% of the sample received a pre-operative Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy assessment. This assessment included information gathering regarding the child's home and social environment; their functional baseline and anticipated post-operative needs. Standardised and non-standardised assessments were used. 88.89% of those who completed a pre-operative assessment required referral to community Occupational Therapy teams for equipment provision (wheelchair, transfer aids) to allow for timely discharge. On average, each patient in the sample required 17 physiotherapy outpatient sessions prior to handover to the community teams. 100% of our sample required post operation onward referral for MDT input in the community (Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy). Conclusions. The importance of a multi-disciplinary approach towards family and children was highlighted in this study. A comprehensive pre-operative therapy assessment optimizes care for this cohort by preparing them in terms of equipment provisions, local team input and expectations for therapy. The data suggests future Limb Reconstruction team should include Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy as part of the multi-disciplinary team, in the treatment of children with Perthe's Disease. We suggest an MDT pre-assessment is completed to optimize patient care, reduce length of stay and improve patient satisfaction in the acute hospital setting

Introduction. Patients undergoing complex limb reconstruction are often under immense physical, psychological and financial stress. We already provide psychological support within our unit. We have identified that patients struggle to obtain proper advice on the financial support to which they are entitled. In September 2019, . rebuildcharity.org. commissioned a Citizens Advice Clinic. One advisor from the local Citizens Advice staffs the clinic. Currently we have no set criteria for referral and patients can be referred by any member of the limb reconstruction team. Although severely affected by the coronavirus pandemic and the disruption of all routine work we were able to run clinics from September 2019 to March 2020 and September 2020 to January 2021. We present our initial results. Materials and Methods. In total 19 patients (68% male) have been seen. There have been 58 clinic appointments which have been a combination of face to face and virtual. The majority (80%) of issues dealt with relate to benefits – including claiming tax credits, universal credits and Personal Independence Payments. Other issues include housing problems, employment and claiming for travel and transport. Results. Through the advice given our cohort of patients have been able to claim back £51,175 in total. The cost for the charity is £11,000 per annum based on one clinic per week. Patient satisfaction is high with 100% expressing satisfaction with the service and reporting decrease levels of stress. 100% of patients are better able to pay for essential bills and 50% to pay for their travel to hospital. Conclusions. Our study identified the difficulties our patients have negotiating the complexities of the benefit system and how Citizens Advice can help. This project is in its early days with an initial slow uptake and then severely affected by the coronavirus pandemic such that no clinics were held for 6 months. Despite this our early results are promising

Introduction. External fixators are common surgical orthopaedic treatments for the management of complex fractures and in particular, the use of circular frame fixation within patients requiring limb reconstruction. It is well known that common complications relating to muscle length and patient function without rehabilitation can occur. Despite this there remains a lack of high-quality clinical trials in this area investigating the role of physiotherapy or rehabilitation in the management of these patients. We aim to complete a systematic review of rehabilitation techniques for patients undergoing external fixator treatment for Limb Reconstruction of the lower limb. Materials & Methods. A comprehensive search of AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE and COCHRANE databases was conducted to identify relevant articles for inclusion, using a search strategy developed in collaboration with a research librarian. Inclusion criteria consisted of adults aged 18 years and over who have experienced leg trauma (open fracture, soft tissue damage), elective leg deformity corrective surgery, bone infection or fracture non-union who have been treated with the use of an external fixator for fixation. Specific exclusion criteria were patients below the age of 18 years old, patients with cancer, treatment of the injury with internal nail, patients who underwent amputation, the use of external fixators for soft tissue contracture management, editorials, comment papers, review papers, conference proceedings and non-English papers. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened for suitability by pairs of reviewers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria using Rayyan QCRI online software. Any conflicts were resolved through discussion with three independent specialist senior reviewers. Following full text screening, references lists of included articles were manually searched to ensure that all relevant studies were identified. Due to lack of evidence, forward searching was also completed for studies included in the review. Data quality was assessed using the mixed methods appraisal tool and the CERT assessment tool was utilised to look at completeness of reporting of exercise interventions. Results. A total number of 832 articles were initially retrieved from our search once duplicate articles removed. After title and abstract screening, 45 articles remained for full text screening. Of these, 11 articles met our inclusion criteria and included for data extraction. Conclusions. We expect high variability of results due to our inclusion criteria and therefore plan to conduct a narrative synthesis to summarise the findings whilst measing against the mixed methods appraisal tool and CERT assessment scores to assess the data quality. We anticipate lower assessment scores within the fewer articles found and therefore poorer-quality data. We currently are in the process of finalising this data extraction. This will be completed ready for submission and potential presentation at the BLRS conference in March 2023

Introduction. Limb deformity is usually assessed clinically assisted by long leg alignment radiographs and further imaging modalities (MRI and CT). Often decisions are made based on static imaging and simple gait interpretation in clinic. We have assessed the value of gait lab analysis in surgical decision making comparing surgical planning pre and post gait lab assessment. Materials & Methods. Patients were identified from the local limb reconstruction database. Patients were reviewed in the outpatient clinic and long leg alignment radiographs and a CT rotational limb profile were performed. A surgical plan was formulated and documented. All patients then underwent a formal gait lab analysis. The gait lab recommendations were then compared to the initial plan. Results. Twelve patients (8 female) with mean age of 14 (range 12–16) were identified. Nine were developmental torsional malalignments, one arthrogryposis, one hemiparesis secondary to spinal tumour resection and one syndromic limb deficiency. The gait lab recommended conservative management in four patients and agreed with eight surgical plans with one osteotomy level changing. Five patients are post-operative: two bilateral distal tibial osteotomies, two de-rotational femoral osteotomy with de-rotational tibial osteotomies and one bilateral femoral de-rotational osteotomies. Conclusions. Limb deformity correction is major surgery with long rehabilitation and recovery period. Gait lab analysis can identify who would benefit from conservative management rather than surgery with our study showing changes to surgical planning in one third of patients. The gait lab analysis helps to identify patients with functional and neuromuscular imbalances where correcting the bony anatomy may not actually benefit the patient

The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of common mental disorders in patients undergoing complex limb reconstruction. Patients undergoing limb reconstruction are vulnerable to mental health problem as they must adapt to significant and prolonged physical disability. Treatment emphasis has been on restoration and rehabilitation of physical health with little or no attention given to spectrum of psychological consequences. IMPARTS (Integrating Mental and Physical healthcare: Research, Training and Services) is a King's Health Partners initiative aiming to develop informatics to improve detection and management of common mental disorders in medical settings. IMPARTS screening in the King's College Hospital limb reconstruction clinic commenced in April 2012. Outpatients attending between April 2012 and November 2013 were screened prior to their appointment. Patients were screened for symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), alcohol dependence and drug use. In total, 298 individual patients were screened. The prevalence of depression was found to be 21.8%, with 6.4% experiencing suicidal thoughts. Probable anxiety disorder was identified in 20.7% of patients. Symptoms of PTSD were reported by 29.2%, with 9.0% reporting severe symptoms. Probable alcohol dependence was identified in 2.7% of patients, and 3.0% screened positive for drug misuse. The consequences of undergoing limb reconstruction stretch beyond the physical problem to mental well-being, rendering patients vulnerable to mental health problems and substance misuse. Early detection and management of such problems may have a significant effect on physical treatment outcome and rehabilitation to productive social life. There is urgent need to integrate mental health care as part of early management of severely injured patients

Claims for clinical negligence are increasing annually. Limb reconstructive surgery recognises ‘problems, obstacles, and complications’ as part of the treatment process, but this does not prevent a claim for an alleged poor result or a complication. We analysed claims for clinical negligence in the National Health Service in England and Wales for issues following limb reconstructive surgery. A database of all 10,456 claims related to Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery from 1995–2010 was obtained from the NHS Litigation Authority. A Search Function for keywords “Ilizarov, limb reconstruction, external fixation, and pin-site” was used for subset analysis. Data was analysed for type of complaint, whether defended or not, and for costs. 52 claims fitted our filters - 48 were closed, and 4 ongoing. The claims included damage to local structures (n=3), missed compartment syndrome (n=2), premature frame removal (n=5), infection (n=13), wrong-site-surgery (n=1), poor outcome (n=16) and technical error (n=10). Seven patients underwent amputation. The total cost of litigation was £4,444,344, with a mean of £90,700 per settled claim. 40% were successfully defended, with defence cost of £15,322. The mean pay-out for confirmed negligence/liability was £90,056 (£1,500-£419,999, median £45,000) per case. We believe this is the first study looking at complications following limb reconstruction from this perspective. Analysis reveals a spectrum of claims for negligence. Perceived technical errors and poor outcome predominate. Whilst the limitations of the database preclude against identification of whether the procedures were carried out in specialist units, claims for technical errors are a cause for concern. These will be discussed in detail. Outcomes following limb reconstruction are difficult to quantify, and the settling of claims for a perceived poor outcome makes the case for pre-operative counselling and the need for robust outcome measures in our specialty

Introduction. Management of deformity involving limb length discrepancy (LLD) using intramedullary devices offers significant benefits to both patients and clinicians over traditional external fixation. Following the withdrawal of the PRECICE nail, the Fitbone became the primary implant available for intramedullary lengthening and deformity correction within our service. This consecutive series illustrates the advantages and complications associated with the use of this device, and describes a novel technique modification for antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails. Materials & Methods. A retrospective cohort review was performed of patient outcomes after treatment with the Fitbone nail at two tertiary referral limb reconstruction services (one adult, one paediatric) between January 2021 to December 2023. Aetiology, indications, initial and final LLD, use of concomitant rail assisted deformity correction (ORDER), removal time and healing index were assessed. Complications of treatment were evaluated and described in detail, alongside technique modifications to reduce the rate of these complications. Results. 21 nails (18 femoral, 2 tibial, 1 humeral) were inserted in 6 adult and 13 paediatric patients. Post-traumatic and congenital/developmental LLD were the most common indications for surgery in the adult and paediatric cohorts respectively. ORDER was employed in 11 cases (9 femurs and 2 tibias). Treatment goals were achieved in all but one case. Complications included superficial infection, locking bolt migration, periprosthetic fracture and component failure. Seven patients required unplanned returns to theatre. Conclusions. The Fitbone nail is an established option for intramedullary limb lengthening, however its use in the UK has been relatively limited compared to the PRECICE until 2021. Our data helps to define its place for limb lengthening and complex deformity correction in both adult and paediatric patients, including in humeral lengthening and retrograde femoral insertion across an open physis. We have identified important potential risks and novel techniques to simplify surgery and avoid complications

Osteotomies are commonly carried out in orthopaedic surgery, particularly in limb reconstruction. Complications are uncommon provided that sufficient care is taken and a sound technique used. We describe three cases of formation of false aneurysm after osteotomy, with acute, delayed and asymptomatic onset. The diagnosis was supported by ultrasound investigation, and confirmed by angiography. Embolisation with coils was a successful method of treatment. We recommend a safe method of osteotomy with good bone exposure and adequate soft-tissue protection

The Masquelet technique, also known as the ‘induced membrane technique’ has been utilised in adult reconstruction with varied success. However, there is limited literature on its use in children and this study aims to share our experience.

Introduction

Adjusting an external fixator can be a daunting process for patients. Despite comprehensive training, patients often request supervision for the initial adjustments which may result in a prolonged hospital stay. Following the introduction of telemedicine during the pandemic we believed that this could be utilised to support patients with their fixator adjustments. A quality improvement project was implemented to assess and evaluate a change in practice from existing Face to Face support to a telemedicine format. The aim of the project was to reduce median length of stay (LOS).

Guidelines on the care of the seriously injured have led to widespread changes in clinical practice. The ‘hub and spoke’ model of trauma care means increasing numbers of patients with complex problems are concentrated into regional centres. Though providing the highest standards of treatment, this has cost implications for the receiving unit, particularly given the Department of Health's move towards a ‘Payment by Results’ model of health provision. We undertook an economic evaluation of complex limb reconstruction within our tertiary referral unit. Patients referred to the complex trauma service were identified. Patients were assigned to either a ‘complicated’ or ‘straightforward’ group by two consultant surgeons, based on the nature of their treatment. 5 cases from each group were randomly selected for further analysis. Data pertaining to the direct healthcare costs for these patients was analysed. Costs per investigation/intervention were obtained relating to hospital stay, outpatient care, operative interventions and investigations. Overall 26 patients were referred to our complex trauma service from other units over 6 months. A mean of £8,375 (6,163) per patient was recouped using current Service Level Agreements. This amounts to a £26,587 deficit per patient, or £1,394,905 per year assuming current referral rates. Those planning a service treating complex trauma must allow for the considerable costs involved and make provisions to recoup this from the referring Primary Care Trust

Aims and methods. We present a review of our use of the Ilizarov apparatus in a non-acute NGO hospital in Cambodia specialising in limb reconstruction. Frames are applied without on table image intensification. A retrospective case-note analysis of Ilizarov apparatus use for all indications was conducted. 53 frames were applied between November 2005 and October 2011. Indications for application were chronic open fracture, osteomyelitis, fracture malunion, infective and non-infective non-union, bone lengthening, primary bone tumour resection, ankle fusion, congenital deformity or pseudarthrosis, chronic hip dislocation, or a combination of the above. Results. Median delay in presentation was 104 weeks for all indications (range 4–864). Median treatment length was 21 weeks (3–76). The most frequent complication was pin-site infection. This occurred in 18 patients (34%). Return to theatre occurred in 21 patients (40%). Indications were frame adjustment, pin addition or removal, addition of bone graft or re-osteotomy. Failure of union occurred in three patients. These rates are comparable with those published in both Asian and Western literature. Conclusions. Our data demonstrate the versatility of the Ilizarov apparatus and its importance in limb reconstruction in a developing world setting. Our centre relies on it as a cost-effective tool for traditional and novel indications. In our centre the apparatus is applied without x-ray control and is maintained without a dedicated outreach pin-site care programme. Despite this our complication rates are comparable with western literature. We therefore recommend it as a safe and cost-effective tool for use in other developing world settings

We would like to present this service evaluation of Taylor Spatial Frame use within a busy limb reconstruction unit. We present a cohort of 60 patients representing a year of work from January 2011 to January 2012 with a breakdown of coding data. Included are details of operative episodes, length of stay, outpatient follow up including software programming episodes, strut changes and general frame care from our specialist nurses. We have produced a comparison of cost to HRG coding tarifs with an audit of coding errors and cost implications of these corrections. Also included is a breakdown of comparison data from patients undergoing frame assisted deformity correction and internal fixation, Computer Hexapod Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery. Exact and careful coding of these procedures is required considering their relatively high cost