Background. Many patients undergo frame removal in the outpatient setting and nitrous oxide is frequently used, but has varying effects. The aim of the study was to ascertain whether pain levels during frame removal are improved with local infiltration of local anaesthetic (LA) and to assess the effect of LA and nitrous oxide compared to nitrous oxide alone. Methodology. This was a small single centre study using patient reported questions to assess pain levels during frame removal. The test group received 5–20ml 2% lidocaine infiltrated into tissues surrounding half pins and olive wire exit sites. All patients were asked to complete a questionnaire to assess pain levels and patient satisfaction following the procedure. Patients were asked to mark their pain level on a 100mm visual analogue scale giving a final pain score out of 100. Results. There were twenty three patients in the LA group but due to observed levels of increased distress without LA, the control group was restricted to 7 patients. Patient satisfaction was high and there were no complications across both groups. The LA group (N=23) had a mean pain score of 35, which was significantly lower than the mean of 62 in the N=7 control patients (unpaired t-test: p=0.010). Conclusion. Frame removal in clinic has been shown to be a safe and well tolerated procedure and this study has shown that LA does improve pain levels during frame removal. Further work to compare pain levels and patient satisfaction with alternative frame removal methods at other centres is being carried out

Background. There are several case reports of chondrolysis following joint arthroscopy. Continuous post-operative infusion of local anaesthetic solutions, especially 0.5% Bupivacaine, has been implicated as the causative factor in many of these cases. Recent in vitro studies have shown that even a single exposure of articular cartilage to different local anaesthetic solutions can cause apoptosis and mitochondrial dysfunction in chondrocytes leading to cell death. There is currently no study looking at methods to prevent this toxicity of local anaesthetic solutions to articular cartilage. Glucosamine has a protective and reparative effect on articular cartilage and a Cochrane review in 2007 found that it provides mild benefit in pain and function in patients with arthritis. Aims. Oncologic: To compare the effect of a single exposure, in vitro, of different local anaesthetic solutions on human articular cartilage. To investigate the protective and reparative effects of Glucosamine on articular cartilage exposed to 0.5% Bupivacaine. Methods. Chondral explants (n = 354) were obtained from femoral heads of 14 fracture neck of patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty. To compare the effect of local anaesthetics, each specimen was exposed to one of 8 test solutions for one hour. After this exposure, the specimens were washed and incubated in culture medium containing radio-labelled 35-sulphur for 16 hours. The unbound radioactivity was then washed off and the chondral specimens were digested with proteinase for 24 hours. The uptake of 35-S by each specimen was measured and this gave an estimate of proteoglycan metabolism. Test solutions: 1. 1% Lidocaine; 2. 2% Lidocaine; 3. 0.25% Bupivacaine; 4. 0.5% Bupivacaine,. 5. 0.5% Levo-Bupivacaine; 6. Control solution of M199 culture medium. 7. To investigate its protective effect, 100 micrograms of Glucosamine was added along with 0.5% Bupivacaine; 8. To investigate the reparative effect of Glucosamine, the specimen was exposed to 0.5% Bupivacaine for one hour. After washing, 100 mcg of Glucosamine was added to the culture medium in which the chondral specimen was incubated. Results. Compared to the control culture medium, the inhibition of proteoglycan metabolism was 54% with 1% Lidocaine (p<0.001), 75% with 2% Lidocaine (p<0.01), 50% with 0.25% Bupivacaine (p = 0.04), 78% with 0.5% Bupivacaine (p<0.001) and 73% with 0.5% Levo-Bupivacaine (p<0.001). Adding Glucosamine for protection reduced the toxicity of 0.5% Bupivacaine to 43%, compared to 78% without. However, Glucosamine was not able to repair the damage caused by 0.5% Bupivacaine, with inhibition of proteoglycan metabolism at 70% even after 16 hours of incubation. Conclusion. All local anaesthetic solutions tested were toxic to articular cartilage, 0.5% Bupivacaine being the worst offender. Higher concentrations were more harmful. The addition of Glucosamine to 0.5% Bupivacaine protected against its toxicity to articular cartilage but was not able to repair the damage caused

Aims

The purpose was to compare operative treatment with a volar plate and nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and over in a cost-effectiveness analysis.

In a randomised prospective study, 20 patients with intra-articular fractures of the distal radius underwent arthroscopically- and fluoroscopically-assisted reduction and external fixation plus percutaneous pinning. Another group of 20 patients with the same fracture characteristics underwent fluoroscopically-assisted reduction alone and external fixation plus percutaneous pinning. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically at follow-up of 24 months. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and modified Mayo wrist score were used at 3, 9, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. In the arthroscopically- and fluoroscopically-assisted group, triangular fibrocartilage complex tears were found in 12 patients (60%), complete or incomplete scapholunate ligament tears in nine (45%), and lunotriquetral ligament tears in four (20%). They were treated either arthroscopically or by open operation. Patients who underwent arthroscopically- and fluoroscopically-assisted treatment had significantly better supination, extension and flexion at all time points than those who had fluoroscopically-assisted surgery. The mean DASH scores were similar for both groups at 24 months, whereas the difference in the mean modified Mayo wrist scores remained statistically significant.

Although the groups are small, it is clear that the addition of arthroscopy to the fluoroscopically-assisted treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures improves the outcome. Better treatment of associated intra-articular injuries might also have been a reason for the improved outcome.