Double-level knee osteotomy (DLO) is a challenging procedure that requires precision in preoperative planning and intraoperative execution to achieve the desired correction. It is indicated in cases of severe varus or valgus deformities where a single-level osteotomy would yield significantly tilted joint line obliquity (JLO). A single-centre, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for 26 patients, who underwent DLO by PSCGs for valgus malaligned knees. Post-operative alignment was evaluated and the delta for different lower limb alignment parameters were calculated; HKA, MPTA, and LDFA. At the two-year follow-up, changes in KOOS sub-scores, UCLA scores, lower limb discrepancy, and mean time to return to work and sport were recorded. All intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Abstract. Introduction. Osteotomy is a recognised surgical option for the management of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. The effectiveness of the surgery is correlated with the accuracy of correction obtained. Overcorrection can potentially lead to excess load through the healthy cartilage resulting in accelerated wear and early failure of surgery. Despite this past studies report this accuracy to be as low as 20% in achieving planned corrections. Aim. Assess the effectiveness of adopting modern osteotomy techniques in improving surgical accuracy. Methodology. A prospective cohort study. Patients were identified who had undergone osteotomy surgery for unicompartmental knee OA using a standardised technique. The surgical techniques adopted to ensure accuracy included digital templating software (Orthoview), Precision saw(Stryker), bone wedge allograft and plate osteosynthesis (Tomofix). Pre and post operative analysis of standardised long leg X-rays was performed and the intended (I) and achieved(A) corrections were calculated. Results. A total of 94 (35F/59M) patients with a mean age of 52 years were identified who fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the study. 62 patients were treated with a tibial osteotomy, 21 with femoral and 11 with a double
Abstract. Introduction. Osteotomy is recognised treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee. Evidence suggests favourable outcomes when compared to arthroplasty, for younger and more active individuals[1]. Double
Aims. We aimed to investigate factors related to the technique of medial
opening wedge high tibial osteotomy which might predispose to the
development of a lateral hinge fracture. Patients and Methods. A total of 71 patients with 82 osteotomies were included in the
study. Their mean age was 62.9 years (37 to 80). The classification
of the type of osteotomy was based on whether it extended beyond
the fibular head. The
We have investigated the benefits of patient
specific instrument guides, applied to osteotomies around the knee. Single,
dual and triple planar osteotomies were performed on tibias or femurs
in 14 subjects. In all patients, a detailed pre-operative plan was
prepared based upon full leg standing radiographic and CT scan information.
The planned
This animal study compares different methods
of performing an osteotomy, including using an Erbium-doped Yttrium
Aluminum Garnet laser, histologically, radiologically and biomechanically.
A total of 24 New Zealand rabbits were divided into four groups
(Group I: multihole-drilling; Group II: Gigli saw; Group III: electrical
saw blade and Group IV: laser). A proximal transverse diaphyseal
osteotomy was performed on the right tibias of the rabbits after the
application of a circular external fixator. The rabbits were killed
six weeks after the procedure, the operated tibias were resected
and radiographs taken. The specimens were tested biomechanically using three-point bending
forces, and four tibias from each group were examined histologically.
Outcome parameters were the biomechanical stability of the tibias
as assessed by the failure to load and radiographic and histological
examination of the osteotomy site. The osteotomies healed in all specimens both radiographically
and histologically. The differences in the mean radiographic (p
= 0.568) and histological (p = 0.71) scores, and in the mean failure
loads (p = 0.180) were not statistically significant between the
groups. Different methods of performing an osteotomy give similar quality
of union. The laser osteotomy, which is not widely used in orthopaedics
is an alternative to the current methods. Cite this article:
The management of nonunion following high tibial osteotomy by total knee replacement (TKR) has been reported previously. We have extended the treatment to embrace cases with an infected high tibial osteotomy by performing an initial debridement with a period of antibiotic treatment followed by TKR. We have reviewed the results of seven knees in six patients with a mean follow-up of 40.5 months (20 to 57) after the staged TKR. At the latest follow-up, all the pseudarthroses had healed and there had been no recurrence of infection. The mean Hospital for Special Surgery knee score improved from 51.2 (35 to 73) to a mean of 91.7 (84 to 98) at final review. Management of nonunion following high tibial osteotomy with a TKR can be extended to infected cases when treated in two stages with a debridement and antibiotic therapy prior to TKR.
We assessed the reliability, accuracy and variability of closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) using computer-assisted surgery compared to the conventional technique. A total of 50 closed-wedge HTO procedures were performed using the navigation system, and compared with 50 HTOs that had been performed with the conventional technique. In the navigation group, the mean mechanical axis prior to osteotomy was varus 8.2°, and the mean mechanical axis following fixation was valgus 3.6°. On the radiographs the mean pre-operative mechanical axis was varus 7.3°, and the mean post-operative mechanical axis was valgus 2.1°. There was a positive correlation between the measured data taken under navigation and by radiographs (r >
0.3, p <
0.05). The mean correction angle was significantly more accurate in the navigation group (p <
0.002). The variability of the correction was significantly lower in the navigation group (2.3°