Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 8 of 8
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 5, Issue 6 | Pages 239 - 246
1 Jun 2016
Li P Qian L Wu WD Wu CF Ouyang J

Objectives. Pedicle-lengthening osteotomy is a novel surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), which achieves substantial enlargement of the spinal canal by expansion of the bilateral pedicle osteotomy sites. Few studies have evaluated the impact of this new surgery on spinal canal volume (SCV) and neural foramen dimension (NFD) in three different types of LSS patients. Methods. CT scans were performed on 36 LSS patients (12 central canal stenosis (CCS), 12 lateral recess stenosis (LRS), and 12 foraminal stenosis (FS)) at L4-L5, and on 12 normal (control) subjects. Mimics 14.01 workstation was used to reconstruct 3D models of the L4-L5 vertebrae and discs. SCV and NFD were measured after 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm, or 5 mm pedicle-lengthening osteotomies at L4 and/or L5. One-way analysis of variance was used to examine between-group differences. Results. In the intact state, SVC and NFD were significantly larger in the control group compared with the LSS groups (P<0.05). After lengthening at L4, the percentage increase in SCV (per millimetre) was LRS>CCS>FS>Control. After lengthening at L5 and L4-L5, the percentage increase in SCV (per millimetre) was LRS>FS>CCS>Control. After lengthening at L4 and L4-L5, the percentage increase in NFD (per millimetre) was FS>CCS>LRS>Control. After lengthening at L5, the percentage increase in NFD (per millimetre) was CCS>LRS>control>FS. Conclusions. LRS patients are the most suitable candidates for treatment with pedicle-lengthening osteotomy. Lengthening L4 pedicles produced larger percentage increases in NFD than lengthening L5 pedicles (p < 0.05). Lengthening L4 pedicles may be the most effective option for relieving foraminal compression in LSS patients. Cite this article: P. Li, L. Qian, W. D. Wu, C. F. Wu, J. Ouyang. Impact of pedicle-lengthening osteotomy on spinal canal volume and neural foramen size in three types of lumbar spinal stenosis. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:239–246. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.56.2000469


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1099 - 1105
1 Aug 2016
Weiser L Dreimann M Huber G Sellenschloh K Püschel K Morlock MM Rueger JM Lehmann W

Aims. Loosening of pedicle screws is a major complication of posterior spinal stabilisation, especially in the osteoporotic spine. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation compared with extended dorsal instrumentation on the stability of posterior spinal fixation. Materials and Methods. A total of 12 osteoporotic human cadaveric spines (T11-L3) were randomised by bone mineral density into two groups and instrumented with pedicle screws: group I (SHORT) separated T12 or L2 and group II (EXTENDED) specimen consisting of T11/12 to L2/3. Screws were augmented with cement unilaterally in each vertebra. Fatigue testing was performed using a cranial-caudal sinusoidal, cyclic (1.0 Hz) load with stepwise increasing peak force. Results. Augmentation showed no significant increase in the mean cycles to failure and fatigue force (SHORT p = 0.067; EXTENDED p = 0.239). Extending the instrumentation resulted in a significantly increased number of cycles to failure and a significantly higher fatigue force compared with the SHORT instrumentation (EXTENDED non-augmented + 76%, p < 0.001; EXTENDED augmented + 87%, p < 0.001). Conclusion. The stabilising effect of cement augmentation of pedicle screws might not be as beneficial as expected from biomechanical pull-out tests. Lengthening the dorsal instrumentation results in a much higher increase of stability during fatigue testing in the osteoporotic spine compared with cement augmentation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1099–1105


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 2 | Pages 257 - 264
1 Feb 2022
Tahir M Mehta D Sandhu C Jones M Gardner A Mehta JS

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS), who had undergone spinal fusion after distraction-based spinal growth modulation using either traditional growing rods (TGRs) or magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs).

Methods

We undertook a retrospective review of skeletally mature patients who had undergone fusion for an EOS, which had been previously treated using either TGRs or MCGRs. Measured outcomes included sequential coronal T1 to S1 height and major curve (Cobb) angle on plain radiographs and any complications requiring unplanned surgery before final fusion.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_X | Pages 62 - 62
1 Apr 2012
Michael A Tiyagi A Rao A
Full Access

To report on the management of a patient with grade 1 holocord pilocytic astrocytoma and scoliosis. Case report of a rare spinal cord tumour and a management of the scoliosis. An 11 year boy complained of gradually worsening neck, back pain and pain in all limbs. This was accompanied by unsteadiness, weakness of lower limbs and bed wetting of recent onset. There was a family history of spinal cord tumour. Examination revealed signs of spinal cord compression and a left thoracic scoliosis. Magnetic resonance imaging showed an intra-medullary tumour extending through the spinal cord and syrinx formation. He underwent T1-3 approach for drainage of syrinx, biopsy of tumour and laminoplasty with plates. He was started on chemotherapy for 14 months. During this period a syringo-peritoneal shunt was inserted. There was further growth of the tumour and neurological deterioration. He subsequently underwent T8-L1 laminoplasty, debulking of tumour and insertion of dual diameter growing rods. There has been no significant neurological deterioration. There was good correction of the scoliosis with Cobb angle reducing from 50 to 15 degrees. Lengthening of growing rods has been done 4 times with good length achieved. Excision of tumour and growing rod insertion (not previously reported) is a good way of controlling neurological symptoms and the scoliosis in this rare spinal cord tumour


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 6 | Pages 772 - 779
1 Jun 2018
Helenius IJ Oksanen HM McClung A Pawelek JB Yazici M Sponseller PD Emans JB Sánchez Pérez-Grueso FJ Thompson GH Johnston C Shah SA Akbarnia BA

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of surgery using growing rods in patients with severe versus moderate early-onset scoliosis (EOS).

Patients and Methods

A review of a multicentre EOS database identified 107 children with severe EOS (major curve ≥ 90°) treated with growing rods before the age of ten years with a minimum follow-up of two years and three or more lengthening procedures. From the same database, 107 matched controls with moderate EOS were identified.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1187 - 1200
1 Sep 2018
Subramanian T Ahmad A Mardare DM Kieser DC Mayers D Nnadi C

Aims

Magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) systems use non-invasive spinal lengthening for the surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of these devices in the prevention of progression of the deformity. A secondary aim was to record the rate of complications.

Patients and Methods

An observational study of 31 consecutive children with EOS, of whom 15 were male, who were treated between December 2011 and October 2017 was undertaken. Their mean age was 7.7 years (2 to 14). The mean follow-up was 47 months (24 to 69). Distractions were completed using the tailgating technique. The primary outcome measure was correction of the radiographic deformity. Secondary outcomes were growth, functional outcomes and complication rates.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 2 | Pages 238 - 243
1 Feb 2016
Qian L Li P Wu W Fang Y Zhang J Ouyang J

Aims

This study aimed to determine the relationship between pedicle-lengthening distance and bulge-canal volume ratio in cases of lumbar spinal stenosis, to provide a theoretical basis for the extent of lengthening in pedicle-lengthening osteotomies.

Methods

Three-dimensional reconstructions of CT images were performed for 69 patients (33 men and 36 women) (mean age 49.96 years; 24 to 81). Simulated pedicle-lengthening osteotomies and disc bulge and spinal canal volume calculations were performed using Mimics software.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 1 | Pages 75 - 80
1 Jan 2013
Dannawi Z Altaf F Harshavardhana NS El Sebaie H Noordeen H

Conventional growing rods are the most commonly used distraction-based devices in the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis. This technique requires repeated lengthenings with the patient anaesthetised in the operating theatre. We describe the outcomes and complications of using a non-invasive magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) in children with early-onset scoliosis. Lengthening is performed on an outpatient basis using an external remote control with the patient awake.

Between November 2009 and March 2011, 34 children with a mean age of eight years (5 to 12) underwent treatment. The mean length of follow-up was 15 months (12 to 18). In total, 22 children were treated with dual rod constructs and 12 with a single rod. The mean number of distractions per patient was 4.8 (3 to 6). The mean pre-operative Cobb angle was 69° (46° to 108°); this was corrected to a mean 47° (28° to 91°) post-operatively. The mean Cobb angle at final review was 41° (27° to 86°). The mean pre-operative distance from T1 to S1 was 304 mm (243 to 380) and increased to 335 mm (253 to 400) in the immediate post-operative period. At final review the mean distance from T1 to S1 had increased to 348 mm (260 to 420).

Two patients developed a superficial wound infection and a further two patients in the single rod group developed a loss of distraction. In the dual rod group, one patient had pull-out of a hook and one developed prominent metalwork. Two patients had a rod breakage; one patient in the single rod group and one patient in the dual rod group. Our early results show that the MCGR is safe and effective in the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis with the avoidance of repeated surgical lengthenings.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:75–80.