Study Aim. To design an educational resource for people with lower back pain (LBP) using creative co-production. Background. Beliefs associated with a traditional biomedical view of LBP can be a barrier to recovery. Education that reframes the problem as complex and multifactorial may help patients except and engage with more positive attitudes and behaviours. Creative co-production provides a different approach to research intervention development. It encourages a collaborative problem-solving and non-hierarchical approach to knowledge mobilisation. Method. A four-phased approach to creative co-production was used based on methods developed by the Translating Knowledge into Action (TK2A) theme of NIHR CLAHRC YH. Service users and providers were brought together in a series of workshops. Initially the lived experience of LBP was explored to generate a shared understanding of the complexities of living with and managing LBP. Then activities designed to promote divergent and convergent thinking were used for idea generation. From these ideas a series of contextually sensitive prototypes were developed and tested on a small scale. Following further iterations the final prototype, ready for implementation, was presented to all key stake holders. Results. The project produced a new interactive educational resource prototype to promote positive behaviours and attitudes for people living with LBP that can be accessed early on in the health care journey. Conclusion. The creative methods applied in this project allowed patients and staff to work together, flattening hierarchies to produce pragmatic and contextually specific outputs fit for purpose in the complex clinical environment. Project funding: Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Charitable Trust supported by National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for
Purpose of study. To evaluate implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme in clinical practice within the National Health Service (NHS). Background. The BeST programme is a group Cognitive Behavioural Approach (CBA) for people with persistent (≥6 weeks) low back pain (LBP). This intervention has been shown to be clinically and cost-effective in a large pragmatic trial. To aid implementation of the BeST programme, an online training intervention (iBeST) was developed. Methods. iBest was promoted through marketing activities (e.g. conferences, social media, evidence briefs) prior to release and launched in March 2016 for NHS health care professionals. Impact of iBeST is being evaluated by measuring number enrolled, course completion, implementation intention, clinical delivery, perceived competence, attitudes/beliefs towards LBP, knowledge and satisfaction. Data is collected at pre and post-training, 4 months and 12 months after course completion. A service evaluation is also being conducted to measure clinical impact. Patients taking part in the BeST programme as part of routine treatment complete questionnaires at baseline, post-treatment, 3 months and 12 months after the programme to assess pain, disability, recovery, satisfaction and usefulness of BeST. Results. 881 clinicians have enrolled on iBeST and 260 have completed training (target: 250). 28 NHS sites are delivering the BeST programme. 385 and 290 participants have provided baseline and post treatment data respectively (target: 400). Data collection is ongoing. Conclusion. Implementation is challenging but iBeST has been well received by NHS clinicians and we plan to report further results of the impact and service evaluation. Conflict of interest: None. Source of funding: This research is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for
