Autologous injection of platelet rich plasma (PRP) stimulates healing process in degenerated tendons. The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcome of lateral epicondylitis treated with PRP and steroid injection. Tennis elbow patients who failed conservative medical therapy were included and were allocated randomly steroid group (n=70) and PRP group (n=63). Data were collected before procedure, at 4, 8, 12 weeks, 1 year and 2 years after procedure. The main outcome measures were visual analogue score, Mayo elbow performance score, DASH score and hand grip strength. Successful treatment was defined as more than a 25% reduction in visual analogue score or DASH score and more than 75 score in Mayo elbow performance score. We observed that 35 of the 70 patients (50%) in corticosteroid group and 47 of the 63 patients (75%) in PRP group were successful, which was significantly different (p<.001), according to DASH score 37 of the 70 patients (53%) and 47 of the 63 patients (75%) in the PRP group were successful which was also significantly different (P = .005), Mayo elbow performance score was successful in 36 of the 70 patients (51%) in corticosteroid group and 49 of the 63 patients (78%) in PRP group. The improvement in hand grip strength of hand from 24.7kg (mean) 26kg in corticosteroid group and 23.5kg (mean) to 32.9kg (mean) in PRP group. PRP injection for chronic lateral epicondylitis reduces pain, improve functionality and hand grip strength when compared to steroid injection

Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) has shown to be a general stimulation for repair and 1 year results showed promising success percentages. To determine the effectiveness of PRP compared with corticosteroid injections in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis with a two-year follow-up. A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted between May 2006 and January 2008. The trial was conducted in two Dutch teaching hospitals. 100 patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis were randomly assigned to a leucocyte-enriched PRP group (n=51) or in the corticosteroid group (n=49). Randomization and allocation to the trial group were carried out by a central computer system. Patients received either a corticosteroid injection or an autologous platelet concentrate injection through a peppering needling technique. The primary analysis included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Outcome (DASH) scores. The PRP group was more often successfully treated than the corticosteroid group (p<.0001). Success was defined as a reduction of 25% on VAS or DASH scores without a re-intervention after 2 years. When baseline VAS and DASH scores were compared with the scores at 2 years follow-up, both groups significantly improved across time (intention-to-treat principle). However, the DASH scores of the corticosteroid group returned back to baseline levels, while the PRP significantly improved (as-treated principle). There were no complications related to the use of PRP. Treatment of patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis with PRP reduces pain and increases function significantly, exceeding the effect of corticosteroid injection even after a follow-up of two years. Future decisions for application of PRP for lateral epicondylitis should be confirmed by further follow-up from this trial and should take into account possible costs and harms as well as benefits

Following the recognition of platelet rich plasma (PRP) as an interventional procedure by NICE, patients who had failed standard conservative treatment for chronic elbow tendinitis and referred for surgery were recruited prospectively into a PRP injection study. 52 patients at Torbay Hospital, Devon, UK received PRP injections in 18 months and 37 had a minimum of 6 months follow up. The outcomes in these patients are summarised. There were 16 males and 21 females. 30 had tennis elbow and 7 had golfers elbow. All patients had their symptoms for a minimum of 6 months and had failed to improve with standard conservative treatment. 2 had a failed outcome from previous tennis elbow release surgery. The PRP injections were carried out under ultrasound guidance after correlating the tender spot with neovascularisation on flow Doppler. 31 patients had a single injection; the other 21 patients had 2 injections. Quick DASH score and patients own self-satisfaction was used to measure outcome. 18 patients (48%) were discharged by 6 months. DASH score worsened in 7 patients (19%) and 2 of these patients opted to have surgery, which had no benefit either. No complications were observed with the use of PRP. Overall, by using PRP injections, surgery was avoided in 35 patients (95%) at 18 months and nearly half of the patients were discharged from follow up by 6 months

Background. Since its first description, the pathology, natural history and treatment of lateral epicondylitis have remained controversial. For those who fail conservative management, surgery remains an option. The optimal method of surgery remains debatable and is further confounded by a relative lack of long-term follow up studies. Material and methods. This study describes a previously unpublished surgical technique and presents its long term results. Patients undergoing this open technique were reviewed using the HSS-1 and Mayo elbow performance assessment tools as well as having grip strength and subjective outcome recorded. Results. From June 1986 to December 2001 inclusive, 158 consecutive patients (171 elbows) underwent surgery in a single surgeon series. They were followed up to a mean of 9.8 years. The mean age of the group was 42 years and 86.7% of patients were available for follow up. Subjectively, 94.6 % were good to excellent with 92.6-94.0% good to excellent using the HSS-1 and Mayo scores respectively. No differences were noted in grip strength. No patient required revision surgery. Discussion/Conclusions. This repeatable open technique offers excellent results with low complications at a mean follow up of 9.8 years. These results compare favourably in terms of numbers followed up, length of follow up and outcome and offer strong evidence of its efficacy

Microtenotomy coblation using a radiofrequency (RF) probe is a minimally invasive procedure for treating chronic tendinopathy. It has been described for conditions including tennis elbow and rotator cuff tendinitis. There have been no studies to show the effectiveness of such a procedure for plantar fasciitis. Fourteen patients with plantar fasciitis with failed conservative treatment underwent. TOPAZ RF treatment for their symptoms between 2007 and 2008. The RF-based microdebridement was performed using the TOPAZ Microdebrider device (ArthroCare, Sunnyvale, CA). They were followed-up for up to six months thereafter. Pre-operative, three and six months post-operative VAS, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot and SF-36 scores were analysed. There were six men and eight women, with an average age of 44.0 years (23–57). There were 15 feet, with six right and nine left feet. They were followed up for six months post-operatively. There was a significant improvement in mean pre-op and six-month VAS scores from 8.13 to 3.27(p=0.00), and AOFAS hindfoot scores from 34.37 to 71.33 (p=0.00). There was a significant decrease in SF-36 for bodily pain, and significant increases in physical and social function scores. Twelve out of 14 (85.7%) patients reported ‘good’ to ‘excellent’ satisfaction results at six months, and 11 out of 14 (78.6%) patients had their expectations met from the procedure at six months follow-up. TOPAZ RF coblation is a good and effective method for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Early results are encouraging, and we believe that the pain experienced by the patients in the follow-ups will subsequently improve

The cause of elbow tendinosis is most likely a combination of mechanical overloading and abnormal microvascular responses. Numerous methods of treatment have been advocated. In this study, we evaluated the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a treatment for resistant epicondylitis. The rationale for using platelets is that they participate predominantly in the early inflammation phases and degranulation. They constitute a reservoir of critical growth factors and cytokines which when placed directly into the damaged tissue, may govern and regulate the tissue healing process. We looked at 25 patients (19 with lateral and 6 with medial) who failed to improve after physiotherapy, cortisone injections and application of epicondylar clasps and assessed the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma injections using Gravitational platelet separation system (GPS). The cohort of patients included over a period of three years had physiotherapy, stretches, epicondylar clasp and an average of 2.9steroid injections (1–6) before having a PRP injection. The mean patient age was 43 years ranging between 24 and 54. There were 11 men and 14 women. The study included 19 patients with lateral epicondylitis and 6 patients with symptoms on the medial side. The ratio between dominant and nondominant side was according to the literature: 76%. The quick DASH scores imroved by 14% on an average in the first 3 months and further 26% in the following 9 months. 4 patients needed reintervention, 3 lateral and 1 medial and had surgical release between 6 and 12 months. 2 of them had reinjections before surgery. No local infections except mild inflammation and no systemic effects were noted. Within the limitations of being a case series and limited follow-up PRP injections provided a safe and progressive benefit over a period of 1 year in refractory cases, providing a good nonoperative alternative

Drug therapy forms an integral part of the management of many orthopaedic conditions. However, many medicines can produce serious adverse reactions if prescribed inappropriately, either alone or in combination with other drugs. Often these hazards are not appreciated. In response to this, the European Union recently issued legislation regarding safety measures which member states must adopt to minimise the risk of errors of medication.

In March 2014 the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and NHS England released a Patient Safety Alert initiative focussed on errors of medication. There have been similar initiatives in the United States under the auspices of The National Coordinating Council for Medication Error and The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. These initiatives have highlighted the importance of informing and educating clinicians.

Here, we discuss common drug interactions and contra-indications in orthopaedic practice. This is germane to safe and effective clinical care.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:434–41.