Laminar flow theatres were first introduced in the United Kingdom in the 1960s and 1970s and have become standard in orthopaedic surgery involving implants. A study from 1982 showed a 50% reduction in infections with joint arthroplasties when compared to conventional theatres and laminar flow became standard in the following decades. Recent evidence including a meta-analysis from 2017 questions the effectiveness of these theatre systems. Most of the evidence for Laminar flow use is based on arthroplasty surgery. We aimed to determine the effect of using non-laminar flow theatres on our trauma patients. A total of 1809 patients who had trauma surgery were identified from 2019 to 2021. 917 patients were operated on in a laminar theatre and 892 in a non-laminar theatre across two operating sites. We identified the surgical site infections as reported through our surveillance program within the first 90 days of infection. Patient co-morbidities were noted through patient records and procedure length was also noted. Of the 1809 trauma patients identified between the years of 2019 and 2021, 917 patients had operations in a laminar flow theatre and 892 in a non-laminar theatre. Of the 892 operated in non-laminar flow theatres, 543 were operated in the University Hospital of Wales (UHW) and 349 at the University Hospital of Llandough (UHL). An analysis of soft tissue infections and hospital acquired infections post-operatively demonstrated 15/543 and 71/543 respectively for non-laminar UHW infections and 4/349 and 21/349 for non-laminar UHL infections. A look at laminar flow patients showed 25/917 with soft tissue infections and 86/917 hospital acquired infections. There was no difference between laminar and non-laminar flow theatre infection rates showing rates of 12.1% and 12.2% respectively. In our trauma patients we noticed no significant advantage of using laminar flow theatres when compared to non-laminar flow theatres. This is in keeping with some recently published literature. Laminar flow theatres have been shown to decrease airborne pathogen counts under controlled conditions, but we conclude in the day to day environment of trauma theatres these conditions are either not met or that the theoretical advantage of laminar flow does not translate to a direct advantage of reduction of infections which may be achieved by standard prophylactic antibiotics

Abstract. Aim. To identify the difference in infection rates in ankle fracture surgery in Laminar and Non Laminar flow theatres. Background. The infection rates in ankle fracture surgery range between 1–8%. The risk factors include diabetes, alcoholism, smoking, open fractures, osteoporotic fractures in the elderly, and high BMI. Laminar flow has been shown to reduce infections in Arthroplasty surgeries. Therefore, it has become mandatory to use in those procedures. However, it's not the same with ankle fracture surgery. Materials and Methods. It was a retrospective study. The data was collected over a 5 year period between 2015 and 2020. It was collected from Blue spier, Panda, and theatre register. There were 536 cases in each group i.e. Laminar flow (LF) and Non-Laminar flow (NLF). The variables looked at were: 1. Superficial and deep infection rates in LF and NLF theatres, 2. The number of open fractures, 3. Type of ankle fractures (Bimalleolar, Trimalleolar), 4. The number of infected cases who had external fixation prior to ORIF, 5. The number of cases that had Plastics reconstructive procedures, and 6. The grade of the operating surgeon. Conclusions. Superficial infection rate between NLF and LF was not significantly different 11.5% vs 10.3%. The deep infection rate was statistically significant against NLF theatres at 6.34% vs 4.29%. The open fracture was a major contributing factor for deep SSI (14.7% vs 26%). The application of an external fixator in LF and NLF theatres did not alter the infection. rates. Bimalleolar fractures were associated with a higher infection rate

Introduction. Reducing infection in total joint replacement by using ultra clean air and protective enclosed suits (space suits) has become the standard in many operating theatres without good supporting evidence. This study examined the impact of laminar flow and space suits on the rate of revision for early infection following total hip (THR) and knee (TKR) replacement. Method. We used the 10-year results of the New Zealand Joint Registry to compare the rates of revision for early infection between laminar flow and conventional theatres both with and without the use of space suits. We separated hospitals and surgeons who had worked with and without space suits in both environments to exclude other confounding variables. Results. There were 51,485 THR and 36,826 TKR registered with laminar flow theatres used for 50% of the procedures and space suits used in 44% of cases. In THR there was a significant increase in revision for early infection in those procedures performed with the use of a space suit (p< 0.0001), for those performed in a laminar flow theatre (p< 0.003) and those procedures performed in a laminar flow theatre with a space suit (p< 0.001). The results were similar in TKR with the use of a space suit (p< 0.001), in laminar flow theatres (p< 0.019) and when laminar flow and space suits were used (p< 0.001). The results were unchanged when the surgeons and hospitals were analysed individually. Conclusion. The rate of revision for early infection has not been reduced by using laminar flow and space suits. The results of this study question the rationale for the increasing use and cost to the health system of these modalities in routine joint replacement

Aim. Whether laminar airflow (LAF) in the operating room (OR) is effective for decreasing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains a clinically significant yet controversial issue. This study investigated the association between operating room ventilation systems and the risk of PJI in TJA patients. Method. We performed a retrospective observational study on consecutive patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) from January 2013-September 2017 in two surgical facilities within a single institution, with a minimum 1-year follow-up. All procedures were performed by five board-certified arthroplasty surgeons. The operating rooms at the facilities were equipped with LAF and turbulent ventilation systems, respectively. Patient characteristics were extracted from clinical records. PJI was defined according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria within 1-year of the index arthroplasty. A multivariate logistic regression model was performed to explore the association between LAF and risk of 1-year PJI, and then a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to further validate the findings. Results. A total of 6,972 patients (2,797 TKA, 4,175 THA) were included. The incidence of PJI within 1 year for patients from the facility without laminar flow was similar at 0·4% to that of patients from the facility with laminar flow at 0·5%. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, after all confounding factors were taken into account, the use of LAF was not significantly associated with reduction of the risk of PJI. After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PJI within 1 year for patients between the two sites. Conclusions. The use of LAF in the operating room was not associated with a reduced incidence of PJI following primary TJA. With an appropriate perioperative protocol for infection prevention, LAF does not seem to play a protective role in PJI prevention

Adherent cells are known to respond to physical characteristics of their surrounding microenvironment, adapting their cytoskeleton and initiating signaling cascades specific to the type of cue encountered. Scaffolds mimicking native biophysical cues have proven to differentiate stem cells towards tissue-specific lineages and to maintain the phenotype of somatic cells for longer periods of culture time. Although the characteristic anisotropy of tendon tissue is commonly replicated in scaffolds, relevant physical cues such as tendon rigidity or mechanical loading are often neglected. The objective of this study is to use tendons' main extracellular matrix component, collagen type I, to create scaffolds with an anisotropic surface topography and controlled rigidity, in an effort to engineer functional tendon tissue equivalents, with native organization and strength. Porcine collagen type I in solution was treated with one of the following cross-linkers: glutaraldehyde, genipin or 4-arm polyethylene glycol (4SP). The resulting mixture was poured on micro-grooved (2×2×2 μm) or planar polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) molds and dried in a laminar flow hood to obtain 5 mg/ml collagen films. Surface topography and elastic modulus of the final scaffolds were analyzed using SEM/AFM and rheometry, respectively. Human tendon cells were isolated from adult tendon tissue and cultured on micro-grooved/planar scaffolds for 4, 7 and 10 days. Cell morphology, collagen III and tenascin C expression were analyzed by immunocytochemistry. Among the different cross-linkers used, only the treatment with 4SP resulted in scaffolds with a recognizable micro-grooved surface topography. Precise control over the micro-grooved topography and the rigidity of the scaffolds was achieved by cross-linking the collagen with varying concentrations of 4SP at low pH and temperature. The elastic modulus of the scaffolds cross-linked with the highest concentration of 4SP matched the physiological values reported in developing tendons (∼15 kPa). Around eighty percent of the human tendon cells cultured on the cross-linked collagen films aligned in the direction of the anisotropy for 10 days in culture. At 4 days, tenoyctes cultured on micro-grooved substrates presented a significant higher nuclei aspect ratio than tenocytes cultured on planar substrates for all the 4SP concentrations. Synthesis, deposition and alignment of collagen III and tenascin C, two important tenogenic markers, were up regulated selectively in the rigid micro-grooved scaffolds after 7 days in culture. These results highlight the synergistic effect of matrix rigidity and cell alignment on tenogenic cell lineage commitment. Collectively, this study provides new insights into how collagen can be modulated to create scaffolds with precise imprinted topographies and controlled rigidities. Gene expression analysis and a replicate study with hBMSCs will be carried out to support the first results and to further identify the optimal biophysical conditions for tenogenic cell lineage commitment. This potentially leads to the design of smart implants that not only restore immediate tendon functionality but also provide microscopic cues that drive cellular synthesis of organized tissue-specific matrix

Aim. Peri-prosthetic joint infection is a serious and expensive complication of joint arthroplasty. Theatre discipline has infection prevention at its core with multiple studies correlating increased door opening with surgical site infection. The WHO, NICE and Philadelphia Consensus all advocate minimal theatre traffic. The Dutch Health Inspectorate consider >5 door openings per procedure excessive. Method. This prospective observational study over five weeks observed theatre door traffic during hip and knee arthroplasty within the eight laminar flow theatres at our institution. Two students attached to the department collected data. Half way through the study notices reminding people not to enter during arthroplasty were placed on the theatre doors. Results. The students observed 59 knees or hip arthroplasty 32 prior to notice's being placed on the theatre doors. The average number of door openings per case was 67 (25–130) prior to intervention and 70 (34–158) after intervention, although opening rates reduced from 1/min to 0.9/min (p=0.053). Reasons for door opening were drawing up medications, blood tests, delivery surgical equipment, general enquiries, staff breaks and “unknown” entries and exits. Conclusions. The rate of door opening was excessive and remained so after reminders were displayed. This deterioration in theatre discipline potentially has a significant negative impact on theatre hygiene and infection control. Individually wrapped components and screws along with the increasing component choice may have played some role in ‘legitimizing’ door opening. It will be challenging to reverse this behavioural trend but must be achieved

Aims. The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic is directly impacting the field of orthopaedic surgery and traumatology with postponed operations, changed status of planned elective surgeries and acute emergencies in patients with unknown infection status. To this point, Germany's COVID-19 infection numbers and death rate have been lower than those of many other nations. Methods. This article summarizes the current regimen used in the field of orthopaedics in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic. Internal university clinic guidelines, latest research results, expert consensus, and clinical experiences were combined in this article guideline. Results. Every patient, with and without symptoms, should be screened for COVID-19 before hospital admission. Patients should be assigned to three groups (infection status unknown, confirmed, or negative). Patients with unknown infection status should be considered as infectious. Dependent of the infection status and acuity of the symptoms, patients are assigned to a COVID-19-free or affected zone of the hospital. Isolation, hand hygiene, and personal protective equipment is essential. Hospital personnel directly involved in the care of COVID-19 patients should be tested on a weekly basis independently of the presence of clinical symptoms, staff in the COVID-19-free zone on a biweekly basis. Class 1a operation rooms with laminar air flow and negative pressure are preferred for surgery in COVID-19 patients. Electrocautery should only be utilized with a smoke suction system. In cases of unavoidable elective surgery, a self-imposed quarantine of 14 days is recommended prior to hospital admission. Conclusion. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, orthopaedic patients admitted to the hospital should be treated based on an interdisciplinary algorithm, strictly separating infectious and non-infectious cases. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:309–315

Infection following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is fortunately a relatively uncommon complication with an incidence of approximately 1%. However, because the morbidity and cost of treatment of deep prosthetic TKA infections is so high, effective prevention strategies are key quality improvement initiatives. The cause of post-operative infections are multifactorial and complex but can generally be categorised into 1) host, 2) surgical, and 3) environmental factors. The purpose of this abstract to provide an outline of these factors and their influences on the infection risk following TKA. Patient factors and optimization of modifiable risk factors have been shown to decrease the risk for infection. While the individual contributions of factors such as body mass index (BMI), diabetes, nutritional status, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and renal disease are unknown, together, they have been shown to influence infection risk. Additionally, Tayton et al. analyzed 64,566 primary TKAs in the New Zealand Joint Registry and found that male gender and prior knee surgery were also independent risk factors of development of PJI 12 months following TKA. Finally, Crowe and colleagues also identified tobacco use and Staphylococcus aureus colonization as modifiable risk factors for minimizing PJI following primary TKA. Timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics prior and after surgery has been shown to be the most effective strategy to reduce infection risk. The optimal prophylaxis regimen for all patients is unknown and in certain situations, administration of Vancomycin in additional to a conventional cephalosporin may be beneficial. However, universal administration of Vancomycin has not been shown to decrease the incidence of surgical site infections and could actually increase the risk for renal failure. Conversely, addition of antibiotics to cement during primary TKA has not been shown to reduce long term infection risk. The use of dilute betadine lavage has been shown by some authors to be beneficial. Finally, good surgical technique, proper soft tissue handling, and meticulous wound closure are all critical factors influencing the risk for infectious complications following TKA. Environmental factors have also been shown to affect infection rates following TKA. While the use of laminar flow and body exhaust suits have not been shown to significantly influence the risk for infection, minimizing operating room traffic has been shown effective in reducing the risk for contamination. Some authors have shown ultraviolet light systems to decrease airborne contaminants. In summary, factors influencing infection risk following TKA are complex and multifactorial. Patient selection, optimization of modifiable risk factors, appropriate use of antibiotics, and minimization of OR traffic are among the most common strategies to minimizing infection

Infection following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is fortunately a relatively uncommon complication with an incidence of approximately 1%. However, because the morbidity and cost of treatment of deep prosthetic TKA infections is so high, effective prevention strategies are key quality improvement initiatives. The cause of post-operative infections are multifactorial and complex but can generally be categorised into 1) host, 2) surgical, and 3) environmental factors. The purpose of this abstract is to provide an outline of these factors and their influences on the infection risk following TKA. Patient factors and optimization of modifiable risk factors have been shown to decrease the risk for infection. While the individual contributions of factors such as body mass index (BMI), diabetes, nutritional status, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and renal disease are unknown, together, they have been shown to influence infection risk. Additionally, Tayton et al. analyzed 64,566 primary TKAs in the New Zealand Joint Registry and found that male gender and prior knee surgery were also independent risk factors of development of PJI 12 months following TKA. Finally, Crowe and colleagues also identified tobacco use and Staphylococcus aureus colonization as modifiable risk factors for minimizing PJI following primary TKA. Timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics prior and after surgery has been shown to be the most effective strategy to reduce infection risk. The optimal prophylaxis regimen for all patients is unknown and in certain situations, administration of Vancomycin in additional to a conventional cephalosporin may be beneficial. However, universal administration of Vancomycin has not been shown to decrease the incidence of surgical site infections and could actually increase the risk for renal failure. Conversely, addition of antibiotics to cement during primary TKA has not been shown to reduce long term infection risk. The use of dilute betadine lavage has been shown by some authors to be beneficial. Finally, good surgical technique, proper soft tissue handling, and meticulous wound closure are all critical factors influencing the risk for infectious complications following TKA. Environmental factors have also been shown to affect infection rates following TKA. While the use of laminar flow and body exhaust suits have not been shown to significantly influence the risk for infection, minimizing operating room traffic has been shown effective in reducing the risk for contamination. Some authors have shown ultraviolet light systems to decrease airborne contaminants. In summary, factors influencing infection risk following TKA are complex and multifactorial. Patient selection, optimization of modifiable risk factors, appropriate use of antibiotics, and minimization of OR traffic are among the most common strategies to minimizing infection

The aim of the New Zealand National Shoulder Arthroplasty Register is to evaluate the provision of shoulder arthroplasty across the entire country by both recording accurate technical information and measuring the clinical outcomes of all shoulder replacements performed in New Zealand. An initial form is completed at the time of surgery which includes details of the patient, surgical indications, the surgical procedure, the implant and the operating surgeon. Six months following surgery, all registered patients are asked to complete the Oxford Shoulder Score and comment on post-operative complications. Data from 686 consecutive primary and 44 revision shoulder arthroplasties were prospectively collected from January 2000 until December 2003. 82 surgeons performed shoulder arthroplasty during the study period but only 9 performed on average more than 5 per year. Their results at 6 months were statistically superior to those provided by other surgeons. Amongst all diagnoses, osteoarthritis scored significantly better than the rest and for this condition total shoulder replacement scored higher than hemiarthroplasty. 15 different prostheses were used, many of them too infrequently. There was no difference in outcome amongst the 5 most commonly used prostheses. The number of complications reported by patients and the revision rate within the study period was low. No benefit was observed in the use of laminar flow theatre to prevent infection. The combination of technical data about the joint implanted and the individual patient assessment has made the New Zealand Shoulder Arthroplasty Register unique in its own kind. Our findings are in general agreement with the current literature and supports the idea that shoulder arthroplasty is better provided by surgeons with a higher yearly case-load

Introduction. Infection is disastrous in arthroplasty surgery and requires multidisciplinary treatment and debilitating revision surgery. Between 80-90% of bacterial wound contaminants originate from colony forming units (CFUs) present in operating room air, originating from bacteria shed by personnel present in the operating environment. Steps to reduce bacterial shedding should reduce wound contamination. These steps include the use of unidirectional laminar airflow systems and the introduction of theatre attire modelled on this principle (e.g. total body exhaust suits). Our unit introduced the use of the Stryker Sterishield Personal Protection System helmet used with laminar flow theatre systems. This study compares an enclosed helmet system used with standard gowns, with standard hood and mask attire. Method. 12 simulated hip arthroplasties were performed, six using disposable sterile impermeable gown, hood and mask and a further 6 using a Sterishield helmet and hood. Each 20 minute operation consisted of arm and head movements simulating movements during surgery. Air was sampled at wound level on a sterile draped operating table using a Casella slit sampler, sampling at 700l/minute. Samples were incubated on Blood agar for 48 hours at 37°c and the CFUs grown were counted. Results. Mean number of CFUs for the helmet was 9.33 with hood and mask attire having 49.16 CFUs (S. Ds 6.34 and 26.17; p value 0.0126). In all cases a coagulase negative staphylococcus was isolated. Conclusion. Although the sample size was small, we demonstrated a fivefold increase in the number of CFUs shed when using hood and mask attire compared to personal helmet and sterile hood. We conclude that the helmet system is superior to non-sterile hood and mask at reducing bacterial shedding by theatre personnel

Introduction. We report the results of a prospective study of 1349 patients undergoing 1509 total knee replacements, identifying factors increasing the risk of infection. Methods. Data were collected prospectively between October 1998 and February 2002 by a dedicated audit nurse. Pre-operative demographic and medical details were recorded. Operative and post-operative complications were noted. The definitions of surgical-site infection were based on a modification of those published by the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) in 1992. A superficial wound infection had a purulent discharge or positive culture of organisms from aseptically-aspirated fluid, tissue, or from a swab. Deep infection was counted as an infection that required a secondary procedure. Patients were seen at 6, 18 and 36 months post-operatively in a dedicated knee audit clinic and infection details recorded. The association between infection and other factors was tested by chi-squared or Mann-Whitney tests for categorised or quantitative factors respectively. Results. 18 patients (1.2% of all total knee replacements) had deep infection and a further 49 suffered a superficial infection. We found no correlation between risk of infection and age, sex, BMI, ASA grade, tourniquet time, lateral release, surgeon, transfusion or the need for catheterisation in the early post-operative period. Diabetic patients had an increased odds ratio for deep and superficial infection, but these results did not reach statistical significance. Only 3 of the 49 superficial infections went onto develop a deep infection at an average of 21 months after surgery. Conclusion. Using modern orthopaedic surgical techniques including laminar flow theatres, systemic antibiotics and antibiotic loaded cement, the risk of infection following TKR is 1.2%. There is a mildly increased risk of infection in diabetics. Catheterisation with antibiotic cover does not increase the risk of infection

Purpose. Surgical complications are common and frequently preventable. The introduction of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist has improved surgical outcomes. WHO guidelines reduce, but do not prevent errors. Successful arthroplasty surgery requires strict infection control measures. We observed a single surgical team to see if errors caused by operating room personnel were covered by the WHO Checklist. Method. Two independent observers studied compliance of WHO Checklists and operating room etiquette, for one surgical team. All operating room personnel were observed during thirteen arthroplasties (hips and knees) from induction to recovery. All Personnel were blinded to the purpose of this study. Data was categorised into errors with WHO checklists and operating room etiquette. Results. 120 errors were observed in thirteen cases, none of these errors affected patient outcome and they were all corrected promptly. 113 (94%) were operating room etiquette errors and 7 (6%) were WHO checklist errors. Types of operating room etiquette errors which occurred were 32% laminar flow errors, 27% sterility errors and 20% operating room attire errors. Eleven arthroplasties were signed off as WHO Checklist compliant and two arthroplasties were observed prior to the introduction of WHO checklists. Despite going through the checklist, in seven of the eleven cases subsequent errors were found which should have been identified during the initial surgical pause: two imaging errors, two implant error and three other patient safety errors. Conclusion. The majority of errors are breaches of operating room etiquette, all being infection control issues in arthroplasty procedures. Many of these errors are not covered by the WHO Checklists. Standardised teaching of operating room etiquette may reduce these. The development of a specific arthroplasty checklist may optimise patient safety

Aim. To test the hypothesis that surface skin swabs taken after skin preparation with alcoholic povidone iodine (APVPI) would not grow bacteria, whereas full thickness biopsies taken from the line of surgical incision would grow bacteria. Method. Informed consent was obtained from 44 patients undergoing primary hip (n=13) and knee (n=31) arthroplasty. Each received antimicrobial prophylaxis before skin preparation with APVPI under laminar flow. After the APVPI had dried, a skin swab and a full thickness 8mm x 4mm elliptical skin biopsy were taken from the line of incision. The skin swab was rolled in 5mL anaerobe basal broth to inactivate the APVPI, incubated at 37 degrees and checked for growth for 2 weeks. One half of the skin biopsy was snap frozen and used for gram and nitroblue tetrazolium staining. The other half was placed into 5mL of anaerobe basal broth, incubated at 37 degrees and monitored for growth for 2 weeks. Results. Forty-four skin biopsy samples and 42 corresponding swabs were collected. Fourteen of 42 surface swabs were positive for bacteria (5 Staphylococcus epidermidis, 6 Propionibacteria acnes, 1 S. aureus, 1 S. capitis, 1 S. epidermidis and P. acnes, and 1 S. warneri and P. acnes). Fifteen of 44 skin biopsies were positive for bacteria (7 P. acnes, 3 S. epidermidis, 1 S. aureus, 1 S. capitis, 1 Psuedomonas spp, 1 P. acnes and S. epidermidis, 1 S. edidermidis and S. capitis). Gram positive bacteria were seen in all gram stained sections of skin and all sections of skin were positive for live bacteria when stained with nitroblue tetrazolium. Discussion. This study shows that skin preparation with APVPI does not completely remove viable bacteria from the skin. Surgeons need to be aware of this and to adapt their surgical technique to avoid coming into contact with the patient's skin, including cut edges, when performing surgery involving implants

In 1823 J. White excised the head. In 1887 a German surgeon replaced the head with ivory. Interposition arthroplasties were common after WW1. Short-stemmed head replacing prosthesis were developed after WW2. Moores and Thompson designed a more stable intramedullary stem. Acetabular erosion was troublesome—and so replacing both surfaces started in the late 1950s using Teflon cup and metal femur. Unfortunately, these quickly became loose due to wear or sepsis. In 1960, Charnley used a polyethylene cup and stainless-steel femur and fixed both with dental cement. This ‘low friction arthroplast’ became a routine procedure after 1961. In the 1970s there were many ‘Charnley look-alike’ prosthesis with similar problems of poly-wear, granulomas and cysts causing bone loss, loosening, breakages and infection. Resurfacing with two thin shells was developed to reduce the foreign material, the bone resection and the cement used. Unfortunately, neck fractures, avascular necrosis and excessive wear of the poly shell were common. Despite operating theatres with laminar flow of sterile air, space suits and improved cementing techniques, the same problems occurred. To avoid poly and cement, Mittelmayer developed a ceramic screw cup, which did not require cement. Although some screws migrated, they did not wear. Because the un-cemented metal stem remained fixed solid to the femur, un-cemented metal cups and stems were developed. To avoid the poly-wear, ceramic liners became popular. To provide the active patients with a stable joint that requires no restriction in physical activity, a large head in a large cup is desirable. Unfortunately, the large metal-on-metal resurfacing prosthesis produce metal wear ions and nanoparticles which can form hypersensitivities, cysts and pseudotumours. Computer assisted navigation to ensure correct positioning of the prosthetic components is obviously useful for surgeons that use incisions too small to see enough to be certain of the cups position. Presently, articular cartilage research is progressing rapidly and by 2020 most arthritic hip joints will be arthroscopically debrided and resurfaced by an injection of genetically engineered articular cartilage stem cells

Aim. The purpose of this study was to compare the presence of P.acnes on the skin after topical pre-operative application with benzoyl peroxide (BPO) to chlorhexidine soap (CHS) and whether this also affected skin recolonization after surgical preparation and draping. Method. Forty volunteers – twenty-four men and sixteen women were randomized to pre-operative topical treatment at home with either CHS or BPO in the area of a delto-pectoral approach of their left shoulder. The right served as a control. Five skin swabs were taken in a standardized manner on different occasions: before and after topical treatment, after surgical skin preparation and sterile draping and 120 minutes after draping. A fifth sample was taken on the contralateral untreated side as a control when the patient was draped. The draping took place in an operating room with laminar air flow and skin preparation was performed for 2 minutes with 0.5% chlorhexidine solution in 70% ethanol according to the recommendations of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Bacterial colonies were then analyzed on agar plates by colony forming units (CFU) and surface characteristics. P.acnes were identified with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-ToF) mass spectrometry. Results. Topical treatment with BPO significantly reduced the presence of P.acnes as CFU on the skin after surgical preparation. P.acnes was found in 1/20 subjects of the BPO group, and 7/20 in the CHS-group (p<0.044). The results remained after two hours (p<0.048). Topical treatment with BPO before surgical skin preparation significantly decreased the presence of CFU (p-value 0.035). Conclusions. Topical preparation with BPO before shoulder surgery may be effective in reducing P.acnes on the skin and prevent recolonization

Aim. The aim of this study was to validate the information on operating room ventilation reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) and to assess the influence of this ventilation on the risk of revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Method. Current and previous ventilation systems were evaluated together with the hospitals head engineer in 40 orthopaedic hospitals. The ventilation system of each operating room was assessed and confirmed as either conventional ventilation, vertical laminar airflow (LAF) or horizontal LAF. We then identified cases of first revision due to deep infection after primary THA and the type of ventilation system reported to the NAR in the period 1987–2014. The association between revision due to infection and operating room ventilation was estimated by relative risks (RR) in a Cox regression model. Results. 103370 primary THAs and 971 (0.9%) first revisions due to deep infection were reported. 51% of the primary THAs were performed in a room with vertical LAF, 44% in a room with conventional ventilation and 5% in a room with horizontal LAF. There was a mean misreporting rate of approximately 12%. There was similar risk of revision due to infection after THA performed in operating rooms with vertical laminar air flow compared to conventional ventilation (RR=0.95, 95 % CI: 0.8–1.1) and an increased risk of revision due to infection after THA performed in horizontal LAF conditions compared to conventionally ventilated conditions (RR=1.3, 95 % CI: 1.0–1.7). Conclusions. Surgeons are not fully aware of what kind of ventilation there is in the operating room. This study may indicate that vertical LAF is not superior to conventional ventilation concerning reduction of THA infection, and therefore does not justify any increased installation costs. Also, horizontal LAF systems appear to be inferior to other ventilation systems

The aim of this study was to validate the information on operating room ventilation reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR). We then wanted to assess the influence of operating room ventilation on the rate of revision due to infection after primary THA performed in operating rooms with conventional ventilation, “greenhouse”–ventilation and Laminar Airflow ventilation (LAF). We identified cases of THA revisions due to deep infection and the type of ventilation system reported to the NAR from the primary THA. We included 5 orthopaedic units reporting 17947 primary THAs and 136 (0.8%) revisions due to infection during the 28 year inclusion period from 1987 to 2014. The hospitals were visited and the current and previous ventilation systems were evaluated together with the hospitals head engineer, and the factual ventilation on the specific operating rooms was thereby assessed. The association between revision due to infection and operating room ventilation was estimated by calculating relative risks (RR) in a Cox regression model. 73% of the primary THAs were performed in a room with LAF, in contrast to the reported 80 % of LAF. There was similar risk of revision due to infection after THA performed in operating rooms with laminar air flow compared to conventional ventilation (RR=0.7, 95 % CI: 0.2–2.3) and after THA performed in operating rooms with “greenhouse”-ventilation compared to conventional ventilation (RR=1.2, 0.1–11). Surgeons are not fully aware of what kind of ventilation there is in the operating room. This study may indicate that, concerning reduction in incidence of THA infection, LAF does not justify the substantial installation cost. The numbers in the present study are too small to conclude strongly. Therefore, the study will be expanded to include all hospitals reporting to the NAR

Postoperative sepsis is a costly and potentially devastating problem in total joint arthroplasty. Airborne bacteria and other viable microorganisms shed from surgical staff are a source of deep prosthetic infection, and the density of airborne bacteria is correlated with the rate of postoperative joint sepsis in total joint arthroplasty surgery. Previous studies have also reported a positive relationship between the density of nonviable airborne particulate and viable CFU counts, both airborne and in the surgical wound, during surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which a system that delivers a small field of local, directed HEPA-filtered air flow over the surgical field reduces airborne particulate and airborne bacteria during total hip arthroplasty. A minimum of 8 subjects per group provided 80% power (a = 0.05) to detect a =75% difference in bacterial density between groups. All patients who consented to undergo primary total hip arthroplasty were eligible. Thirty-six patients were prospectively randomized into three groups: directed air flow, air flow system present but turned off (sham), and control (standard) conditions. Airborne particulate and bacteria were continuously collected in consecutive 10 minute intervals within 5 cm of the surgical wound using an air sampling device. Data were analyzed using a generalized linear model for repeated measures. Particulate counts and bacterial density at the surgical site were 80% lower on average in the directed air flow group compared to the other two groups (p<0.001) (Figure 1). Density of particulate >10 μm in diameter was strongly related to bacterial density at the surgical site (p<0.001), as was staff count (p<0.001) and bacterial density at a control site that was remote from the surgical field (p<0.001). The directed air flow system's effectiveness in reducing bacteria appears to be related to its ability to reduce particulate that may carry and allow proliferation of bacteria. The directed air flow system is relatively simple to use and does not appear to hinder the function of the surgeon or operating room staff, impede access to the surgical site, or interfere with the surgical procedure. The directed air flow system can be used in any operating room environment to provide clean air equivalent to a properly-used, well-functioning laminar air flow system. The directed air flow system was effective in reducing airborne particulate and bacteria in the surgical field during total hip arthroplasty

Aims

COVID-19 has changed the practice of orthopaedics across the globe. The medical workforce has dealt with this outbreak with varying strategies and adaptations, which are relevant to its field and to the region. As one of the ‘hotspots’ in the UK , the surgical branch of trauma and orthopaedics need strategies to adapt to the ever-changing landscape of COVID-19.