Introduction. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) is assessed in the acutely injured knee to investigate for ligamentous injury and rotational laxity. Specifically, there is a growing recognition of the significance of anterior medial rotary laxity (AMRI) as a crucial element in assessing knee stability. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are often accompanied with medial collateral ligament (MCL) damage. It has been suggested that Deep MCL (dMCL) fibres are a primary restraint in rotational displacement. This research aims to quantify the difference in rotational laxity of patients with ACL and MCL injuries to deem if the Feagin-Thomas test can robustly capture metrics of AMRI. 2. Methods. AMRI was assessed using the Feagin-Thomas test in 7 isolated ACL (iACL) injured participants, 3 combined ACL and superficial fibre MCL (sMCL) injuries, 5 combined ACL and deep fibre MCL injuries, and 21 healthy controls. Displacement values were recorded using an optical motion capture (OMC) system and bespoke processing pipeline which map and model the knee's anterior displacement values relative to the medial compartment. Since absolute values (mm) of rotational laxity vary dependant on the person, values were recorded as a proportion of the rotational laxity obtained from the subject's contralateral leg. Values were compared between each patient group using an ANOVA test and Tukey's honesty significant difference post hoc test. 3. Results. The healthy control group had a median proportion of 0.97 (3SF), whilst the iACL was 1.12 (3SF), a 12% increase in rotational laxity in the injured leg. The sMCL group yielded a result of 1.64 (3SF), a 64% increase in rotational laxity in the injured leg; finally, dMCL resulted in a proportion of rotational laxity of 1.90 (3SF), a 90% increase in rotational laxity [table 1]. Whilst all groups showed differences in the increase of rotational laxity, dMCL was significantly different from the healthy control group (P value 0.0041). 4. Conclusion. ACL injuries with MCL involvement led to an increase in anterior medial rotary laxity and this is more evident in patients where deep MCL fibres are involved. The Feagin-Thomas test appears to be sensitive in detecting differences in AMRI and should be considered when performing comprehensive clinical knee examination. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Background. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction is a commonly performed orthopaedic operation. The use of a four-strand semitendinosus and gracilis hamstring graft (STG) is a well established method of reconstruction to restore knee stability. Aim. To assess the ten year subjective knee function and activity level following STG anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods. 86 patients underwent anterior cruciate reconstruction by two knee surgeons in the year 1999. 80 patients meet the inclusion criteria of STG reconstruction by a standard operative technique. Patient evaluation was by completion of a Lysholm Knee Score and Tegner Activity Level Scale at a minimum of ten years from reconstructive surgery. This was by initial postal questionnaire and subsequent telephone follow-up. Results. 80 patients underwent anterior cruciate reconstruction with average age 30.9 years +/− 8.8 (15 to 58 years). There was a 77.5% (62 patients) response at ten years to the questionnaire. The mean Lysholm Knee Score at ten years was 78.4 +/− 12.8 (39 to 90). The mean activity level had decreased from 8.3 to 5.3 at ten years according to the Tegner Activity Scale. 11 patients required medial and lateral partial menisectomies at the time of original reconstruction. This group of patients had a Lysholm Knee Score of 67.6 +/− 19.1 and Tegner Activity Scale of 3.9 at ten years following reconstruction. 17 of the 80 patients (21.25%) required re-operation because of further knee symptoms, with 4 patients requiring revision of the anterior cruciate following re-rupture. Conclusion. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with four-strand STG hamstring graft provides a reliable method of restoring knee function with a 5% revision rate for re-rupture at ten years. Combined partial medial and lateral menisectomy at the time of the initial reconstruction is a poor prognostic indicator for function at ten years

INTRODUCTION. This study aimed to intra-operatively quantify the improvements in knee stability given both by anatomic double-bundle (ADB) and single-bundle with additional lateral plasty (SBLP) ACL reconstruction using a navigation system. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We prospectively included 35 consecutive patients, with an isolated anterior cruciate ligament injury, that underwent both ADB and SBLP ACL reconstruction (15 ADB, 20 SBLP). The testing protocol included anterior/posterior displacement at 30° and 90° of flexion (AP30–AP90), internal/external rotation at 30° and 90° of flexion (IE 30–IE90) and varus/valgus test at 0° and 30° of flexion (VV0–VV30); pivot-shift (PS) test was used to determine dynamic laxity. The tests were manually performed before and after the ACL reconstruction and the data were acquired by means a surgical navigation system (BLU-IGS, Orthokey, USA). Comparisons of pre- and post-reconstruction laxities were made using paired Student t-test (P=0.05) within the same group; comparison between ADB and SBLP groups was indeed performed using independent Student t-test (P=0.05), analysing both starting pre-operative condition and post-operative one. RESULTS. Statistically significant reduction of the global amount of laxity and global displacement was observed for both reconstructions (p<0.05) in all the performed clinical tests. Statistical differences was found between the two reconstruction considering the recovery (pre-post laxities) due to the each reconstruction, in VV0 (SBLP: 3.7±0.2° and ADB: 2.3±0.5°, p<0.0001) and in IE90 (SBLP: 9.2±3.1° and ADB: 5.0±2.8°, p=0.0022). Statistical differences were also found between the two reconstruction considering the recovery of global displacement, in particular for the lateral compartment during AP90 SBLP: 8.8±1.0 mm, ADB: 6.4±0.4 mm, p<0.0001), for the maximal lateral joint opening during VV0 (SBLP: 4.5±1.2 mm, ADB: 1.2±1.1 mm, p<0.0001) and VV30 (SBLP 3.5±1.3 mm, ADB 1.8±0.1 mm, p=0.0013) and both for the medial and lateral AP displacement during IE90 (in in medial compartment SBLP:5.6±0.6 mm, ADB: 2.7±0.7 mm, p<0.0001, in lateral compartment SBLP:8.2±1.0 mm, ADB: 3.9±0.8 mm, p<0.0001). During PS test ADB patients revealed less “hysteresis” after reconstruction (p=0.0005). Moreover SBLP patients presented more acceleration after the reconstruction compared to ADB and more evident displacement (p=0.0009). DISCUSSION. Both the reconstructions worked similarly for what concerns knee static laxity. The considered extra-articular procedure plays an important role in better controlling lateral tibial compartment displacement in drawer test and in controlling maximal lateral joint opening both at 0° and 30° of flexion. On the other hand the ADB reconstruction better restores the dynamic behaviour of the joint under PS test