Cryocompression therapy is a non-invasive and non-pharmacological modality used in managing acute post-operative inflammation and pain. A prospective, randomised controlled trial (RCT) was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of a post-operative cryocompression protocol using the Game Ready™ (GR) device versus usual care on recovery following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A single centre RCT was conducted with 70 TKAs (68 patients) randomised to a 2-week intervention period consisting of treatment with GR cryocompression (n=33, 33.3% males) or a usual care protocol of ice with static compression using tubigrip (n=35, 54.3% males). Knee range of movement (ROM) (flexion and extension), a visual analogue pain score (VAS) and limb circumference were documented at day 1, 2 and 14, as well as 6 and 12 weeks post-surgery. ROM was also recorded at day 90, while medication use and length of hospital stay were documented. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the KOOS and patient satisfaction questionnaire were employed. The GR group demonstrated 2.3° more (p=0.05) knee extension ROM overall, as well as 2. 8° more at day 1 (p=0.048), 3.8° at day 14 (p=0.007) and 5.4° at 3 months (p=0.017). There were no group differences (p>0.05) observed in pain (VAS), flexion ROM, limb circumference, opioid use or other PROMs. Across the full cohort, higher pain levels resulted in increased opioid intake (p=0.002), older patients used significantly less opioids (p<0.001) and males reported significantly less pain (VAS) than females (p=0.048). Using GR following TKA is a safe, non-invasive tool that can be used to aid in the post-operative recovery period. Patients using the GR cryocompression device gained significantly more extension ROM compared to the conventional ice with compression group, despite no other group differences

Aims. The Precice intramedullary limb-lengthening system has demonstrated significant benefits over external fixation lengthening methods, leading to a paradigm shift in limb lengthening. This study compares outcomes following antegrade and retrograde femoral lengthening in both adolescent and adult patients. Patients and Methods. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was undertaken of a consecutive series of 107 femoral lengthening operations in 92 patients. In total, 73 antegrade nails and 34 retrograde nails were inserted. Outcome was assessed by the regenerate healing index (HI), hip and knee range of movement (ROM), and the presence of any complications. Results. The mean lengthening was 4.65 cm (1.5 to 8) in the antegrade group and 4.64 cm (1.6 to 8) in the retrograde group. Of the 107 lengthenings, 100 had sufficient datapoints to calculate the mean HI. This was 31.6 days/cm (15 to 108). There was a trend toward a lower (better) HI with an antegrade nail and better outcomes in adolescent patients, but these were not statistically significant. Hip and knee ROM was maintained and/or improved following commencement of femoral lengthening in 44 patients (60%) of antegrade nails and 13 patients (38%) of retrograde nails. In female patients, loss of movement occurred both earlier and following less total length achieved. Minor implant complications included locking bolt migration and in one patient deformity of the nail, but no implant failed to lengthen and there were no deep infections. Three patients had delayed union, five patients required surgical intervention for joint contracture. Conclusion. This study confirms excellent results in femoral lengthening with antegrade and retrograde Precice nails. There is a trend for better healing and less restriction in hip and knee movement following antegrade nails. There are clinical scenarios, that mandate the use of a retrograde nail. However, when these are not present, we recommend the use of antegrade nailing. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1168–1176

Objective. To determine differences in fracture stability and functional outcome between synthetic bone graft and allograft/autograft with internal fixation of tibia plateau metaphyseal defects. Patient & Methods. Between 2007- 2008, 84 consecutive cases of internal fixation of tibia plateaux were identified from our theater logbook. 29 patients required additional autologous, allogenic bone graft, or synthetic bone graft substitute to ensure fracture stability. 5 patients were excluded due to lost to follow up leaving a cohort of 24 patients. Hydroxyapatite calcium carbonate synthetic bone graft was utilised in 14 patients (6 male and 8 female). Allograft/autograft were utilised in the remaining 10 patients (6 male and 4 female). All 24 patients had closed fractures, classified using the AO and Schatzker classification. Roentograms at presentation, post-operatively and regular follow-up till 12 months were analysed for maintenance of reduction, early and late subsidence of the articular surface. Functional outcomes such as knee range of movement and WOMAC Knee scores were compared between groups. Results. There was no significant statistical difference between groups for post-operative joint reduction, long term subsidence, and WOMAC scores. The degree of subsidence was not related to age or fracture severity. Maintenance of knee flexion was found to be better in the allograft/autograft group (p=0.015) when compared between groups. Multivariate analysis compared graft type, fracture severity, postoperative reduction, subsidence rate, range of movement and WOMAC score. The only finding was a statistical significant (p=0.025) association with the graft type and range of movement. Conclusion. Allograft/autograft may allow better recovery of long-term flexion, possibly due to reduced inflammatory response compared with synthetic bone graft. However, all other parameters such as maintenance of joint reduction and subjective outcome measures were comparable with the use of hydroxyapatite calcium carbonate bone graft. This study shows that synthetic bone graft is a suitable option in fixation of unstable tibia plateau fractures, avoiding risk of viral disease transmission with allograft and donor site morbidity associated with autograft

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is technically challenging, but has the advantage over total knee replacement (TKR) of conserving bone and ligaments, preserving knee range of movement and stability. Computer navigation allows for accurate placement of the components, important for preventing failures secondary to mal-alignment. Evidence suggests an increase in failure rates beyond 3 degrees of coronal mal-alignment. Our previous work has shown superior functional scores in those patients having undergone UKR, when compared with those having had TKR. However, to a certain extent, this is likely to be due to differences in the two cohorts. Those selected for UKRs are likely to be younger, with less advanced and less widespread degenerative disease. It is almost inevitable, therefore, that functional outcomes will be superior. We aimed to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of UKR vs TKR in a more matched population. Ninety-two patients having had one hundred consecutive computer navigated UKRs were reviewed both clinically and radiographically. The Smith & Nephew Accuris fixed-bearing modular prosthesis was used in all cases, with the ‘Brainlab’ navigation system. For our comparative group we identified patients who had actually undergone navigated TKR several years ago, but who, in retrospect, would have now been offered a UKR in line with our current practice. These patients were identified following review of pre-operative radiographs and operation notes, confirming degenerative disease confined mainly to one compartment of the knee, in the absence of any concern as to the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament. This sub-group of patients were also assessed clinically and radiographically. Mean follow-up for the UKR group was 25 months, (range 8–45.) For our TKR sub-group, nineteen patients were identified. Average length of stay for the UKR group was 3.7 days, (range 2 to 7,) and for the TKR group this was 5.2 days, (range 3 to 10.). Functional scores (Oxford Knee Score) were good to excellent for the majority of patients in both groups, although they were significantly better in the UKR group. Mean Oxford Knee Score in the UKR group was 7.5, (0–48, with 0 being best.) Mean score in the TKR sub-group was 12.1. (p = 0.02). Reliably comparing TKR with UKR is difficult, due to the fundamental differences in the two groups. We have endeavoured to match these two cohorts as best possible, in order to compare the outcomes of both. Our use of computer navigation in both groups allows for accurate prosthesis placement. When measuring component position, there were no ‘outliers,’ outside of the widely accepted three degrees of deviation. We propose that, with the correct patient selection, UKR gives a better functional outcome than TKR. Longer-term follow-up of our UKR group is required to monitor the onset of progressive arthrosis in other joint compartments, although our early results are very encouraging. Furthermore, we advocate the use of computer navigation to firstly allow for more accurate component positioning, and secondly to make challenging UKR surgery less technically demanding