We aim to determine the differences in lower limb joint kinematics during the golf swing of patients who had undergone Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) and a control group of native knee golfers. A case-control study was undertaken with ten golfers who had undergone TKA (cruciate retaining single radius implant) and five age and matched golfers with native knees. Each golfer performed five swings with a driver whilst being recorded at 200Hz by a ten-camera motion capture system. Knee and hip three-dimensional joint angles (JA) and joint angular velocities (JAV) were calculated and statistically compared between the groups at six swing events. The only significant differences in knee joint kinematics between TKA and control groups was a lower external rotation JA in the left knee during the backswing (p=0.010). There was no significant difference in knee JAV between the groups. Both hips demonstrated significantly (p=0.023 for left and p=0.037 for right) lower flexion in the TKA group during the takeaway swing event, and there was lower internal rotation in the backswing and greater external rotation in the downswing of the right hip. There was also slower left hip extension JAV in the downswing. Normal knee kinematics were observed during the golf swing following TKA, with the exception of reduced external rotation in the left knee during the back swing and the right during the down swing. The differences demonstrated in the hip motion indicate that they may make compensatory movements to adjust to the reduced external rotation demonstrated in the knee

Introduction. There has been renewed interest in the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with reports of good long term outcomes. Advantages over a more extensive knee replacement include: preservation of bone stock, retention of both cruciate ligaments, preservation of other compartments and better knee kinematics. However, a number of authors have commented on the problem of osseous defects requiring technically difficult revision surgery. Furthermore, a number of recent national register studies have shown inferior survivorship when compared to total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to review the cases of our patients who had a revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. To determine the reason for failure, describe the technical difficulties during revision surgery and record the clinical outcomes of the revision arthroplasties. Methods. Between 2003 and 2009 our institute performed thirty three revisions of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty on thirty two patients. The time to revision surgery ranged from 2 months to 159 months with a median of 19 months. Details of the operations and complications were taken form case notes. Patient assessment included range of motion, need for walking aids and the functional status of the affected knee in the form of the Oxford knee score questionnaire. Results. The reasons for failure were aseptic loosening of tibial component, persistent pain, dislocated meniscus, mal-alignment and osteoarthritis in another compartment. Of the 33 revision knee arthroplasties 18 required additional intra-operative constructs. 11 knees required a long tibial stem while 1 required a long femoral stem. 10 knees required medial wedge augmentation and bone graft was used in 6. Mean 1 year Oxford knee scores for failed unicompartmental knee replacements was 29 compared to 39 for primary total knee replacements performed at the same institute. Of the revision knee replacements 2 required further revision due to infection and loosening. Conclusion. From the evidence of our group of failed unicompartmental knee replacements, revision surgery is technically difficult and often requires intra-operative constructs. Clinical outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty following failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is not comparable to primary total knee arthroplasty

Introduction. Minimally invasive implanted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) leads to excellent functional results. Due to the reduced intraoperative visibility it is difficult to remove extruded bone cement particles, as well as bone particles generated through the sawing. These loose third body particles are frequently found in minimally invasive implanted UKA. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of bone and cement particles on the wear rate of unicompartmental knee prostheses in vitro. Material & Methods. Fixed- bearing unicompartmental knee prostheses (n = 3; Univation F®, Aesculap, Tuttlingen) were tested with a customized four-station servo-hydraulic knee wear simulator (EndoLab GmbH, Thansau, Germany) reproducing exactly the walking cycle as specified in ISO 14243-1:2002. After 5.0 million cycles crushed cortical bone chips were added to the test fluid for 1.5 million cycles to simulate bone particles, followed by 1.5 million cycles blended with PMMA- particles (concentration of the third-body particles: 5g/l; particle diameter: 0.5- 0.7 mm). Every 500 000 cycles the volumetric wear rate was measured (ISO 14243-2) and the knee kinematics were recorded. For the interpretation of the test results we considered four different phases: breaking in- (during the first 2.0 million cycles), the steady state- (from 2.0 million to 5 million cycles), bone particle- and cement particle phase. Finally, a statistical analysis was carried out to verify the normal distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), followed by direct comparisons to differentiate the volumetric wear amount between the gliding surfaces (paired Student's t-test, p<0.05). Results. The wear rate was 12.5±0.99 mm. 3. /mio. cycles in the breaking-in phase and decreased during the steady state phase to 4.4±0.91 mm. 3. /mio cycles (not significant, p = 0,3). The bone particles did not have any influence on the wear rate (3.0±1.27 mm. 3. /mio cycles; p = 0,83) compared to the steady state phase. The cement particles, however, lead to a significantly higher wear rate compared to the steady state phase (25.0±16.93 mm. 3. /mio cycles; p<0.05). Discussion. To our knowledge this is the first study demonstrating that free cement debris which can be found after minimally invasive implanted UKA increases significantly the wear- rate. Bone particles generated for instance through sawing during implantation, however, had no influence on the prostheses wear rate. Our Data suggests, that it is extremely important to remove all the extruded cement debris accurately during implantation in order to avoid a higher wear rate which could result in an early loosening of the prostheses