Aims. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) following isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), with those following ACLR and concomitant meniscal resection or repair. Methods. We reviewed prospectively collected data from the UK National Ligament Registry for patients who underwent primary ACLR between January 2013 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into five groups: isolated ACLR, ACLR with medial meniscus (MM) repair, ACLR with MM resection, ACLR with lateral meniscus (LM) repair, and ACLR with LM resection. Linear regression analysis, with isolated ACLR as the reference, was performed after adjusting for confounders. Results. From 14,895 ACLR patients, 4,400 had two- or five-year Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) available. At two years postoperatively, the MM repair group demonstrated inferior scores in KOOS pain (β = −3.63, p < 0.001), symptoms (β = − 4.88, p < 0.001), ADL (β = − 2.43, p = 0.002), sport and recreation (β = − 5.23, p < 0.001), quality of life (QoL) (β = − 5.73, p < 0.001), and International Knee Documentation Committee (β = − 4.1, p < 0.001) compared with the isolated ACLR group. The LM repair group was associated with worse KOOS sports and recreation scores at two years (β = − 4.264, p < 0.001). At five years, PROMs were comparable between the groups. At five years, PROMs were comparable between the groups. Participants undergoing ACLR surgery within 12 weeks from index injury demonstrated superior PROMs at two and five years. Conclusion. Our study showed that MM repair, and to a lesser extent LM repairs in combination with ACLR, were associated with inferior patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared to isolated ACLR at two years postoperatively, while meniscal resection groups exhibited comparable outcomes. However, by five years postoperation, no significant differences in PROMs were evident. Further longer-term, cross-sectional studies are warranted to investigate the outcomes of ACLR and concomitant meniscal surgery

Aims. Limited evidence is available on mid-term outcomes of robotic-arm assisted (RA) partial knee arthroplasty (PKA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate mid-term survivorship, modes of failure, and patient-reported outcomes of RA PKA. Methods. A retrospective review of patients who underwent RA PKA between June 2007 and August 2016 was performed. Patients received a fixed-bearing medial or lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA), or bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BiKA; PFA plus medial UKA). All patients completed a questionnaire regarding revision surgery, reoperations, and level of satisfaction. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were assessed using the KOOS for Joint Replacement Junior survey. Results. Mean follow-up was 4.7 years (2.0 to 10.8). Five-year survivorship of medial UKA (n = 802), lateral UKA (n = 171), and PFA/BiKA (n = 35/10) was 97.8%, 97.7%, and 93.3%, respectively. Component loosening and progression of osteoarthritis (OA) were the most common reasons for revision. Mean KOOS scores after medial UKA, lateral UKA, and PFA/BiKA were 84.3 (SD 15.9), 85.6 (SD 14.3), and 78.2 (SD 14.2), respectively. The vast majority of the patients reported high satisfaction levels after RA PKA. Subgroup analyses suggested tibial component design, body mass index (BMI), and age affects RA PKA outcomes. Five-year survivorship was 98.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97.2 to 99.5) for onlay medial UKA (n = 742) and 99.1% (95% CI 97.9 to 100) for onlay medial UKA in patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m. 2. (n = 479). Conclusion. This large single-surgeon study showed high mid-term survivorship, satisfaction levels, and functional outcomes in RA UKA using metal-backed tibial onlay components. In addition, favourable results were reported in RA PFA and BiKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(1):108–116

Abstract. INTRODUCTION. A paucity of literature exists regarding efficacy of lateral unloader bracing in treatment for pathologies effecting the lateral compartment of the knee. We evaluate patient outcomes following customised lateral unloader bracing (cLUB) in treatment of lateral compartment osteoarthritis (LCOA), lateral tibial plateau fractures (LTPF) and spontaneous osteonecrosis of knee (SONK). METHODS. Institutional study approval was obtained. All patients undergoing cLUB between January 2013 and January 2021 were included, and prospectively followed-up. Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were assessed at brace fitting and final follow-up. Brace compliance, complications and surgical interventions were also collected. Statistical analysis utilised paired t-test. RESULTS. 71 patients (LCOA n=47, LTPF n=21, SONK n=3) were analysed. VAS, OKS and KOOS scores show significant improvements after bracing (p<0.05). Brace compliance was 90.5%. One patient developed a deep-vein thrombosis, 12.7% suffered skin irritation (n=5 LTPF/n=4 LCOA) managed with bio-skin calf sleeves, and brace intolerance occurred in 8.5% (n=6). Brace survivorship was 64.8% (n=46). Twenty-five patients underwent post-bracing surgery; LTPF n=2, LCOA n=22, SONK n=1. The mean time interval between brace fitting and arthroplasty for LKOA patients was 2.1 (range 0.5-4) years. CONCLUSION. Our cohort demonstrates good compliance and significant improvements with cLUB across acute and chronic pathologies. Surgery and associated risks were avoided in certain cases. Further research is required alongside a cost-analysis. However, with increasing disease burden and surgical waiting times cLUB could be a crucial component of management in selected knee pathology cases

Introduction. Implementing operative eligibility thresholds based on body mass index (BMI) alone risks restricting access to improved pain, function, and quality-of-life. The purpose of this study was to: 1) investigate the relationship between BMI and improvements in 1-year patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), and 2) determine how many patients would have been denied 1-year improvements with specific BMI cut-offs. Methods. Data were collected on a prospective cohort of 3,214 TKA patients from 2015–2018. Clinically meaningful 1-year improvements were defined as 15 points for Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) pain and Physical Function Shortform (PS), and 14 points for Knee-Related Quality-of-Life (KRQOL). For specific BMI cut-offs, the positive predictive value for predicting a failure to improve and number of patients denied surgery to avoid one failed improvement was calculated. Results. PROMs improvements were greater with increasing BMI. Patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m. 2. had median (Q1, Q3) KOOS pain improvements of 47.2 points (33.3, 58.3) and those with BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m. 2. had median improvements of 41.7 (27.8, 55.6). Similar findings were observed for KOOS PS (28.4 vs. 26.3) and KRQOL (50.0 vs. 43.8). With a BMI cut-off of 30 kg/m. 2. , 9 patients would have been denied improvements from surgery for each failed improvement avoided whereas with a BMI cut-off of 50 kg/m. 2. , 15 patients would have been denied improvements from surgery. Implementing BMI thresholds alone did not influence the rate of improvements in KOOS-PS or KRQOL. Conclusion. Patients with higher BMI were observed to have greater improvements in PROMs after primary TKA. Enforcing arbitrary BMI cut-offs would deprive pain and functional improvements from patients who would benefit the most. Moreover, there appears to be no increase in the rate of PROMs improvements by enforcing BMI thresholds. This study demonstrates that determining TKA eligibility should involve a holistic approach rather than limiting to BMI measurements alone

Aims. This study compares the PFC total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system in a prospective randomized control trial (RCT) of the mobile-bearing rotating-platform (RP) TKA against the fixed-bearing (FB) TKA. This is the largest RCT with the longest follow-up where cruciate-retaining PFC total knee arthroplasties are compared in a non-bilateral TKA study. Patients and Methods. A total of 167 patients (190 knees with 23 bilateral cases), were recruited prospectively and randomly assigned, with 91 knees receiving the RP and 99 knees receiving FB. The mean age was 65.5 years (48 to 82), the mean body mass index (BMI) was 29.7 kg/m. 2. (20 to 52) and 73 patients were female. The Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical and Mental Component Scores (SF-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS) were gathered and recorded preoperatively, at five-years’ follow-up, and at ten years’ follow-up. Additionally, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were collected at five- and ten-year follow-ups. The prevalence of radiolucent lines (RL) on radiographs and implant survival were recorded at five- and ten-year follow-ups. Results. At the ten-year follow-up, the RP group (n = 39) had a statistically significant superior score in the OKS (p = 0.001), WOMAC (p = 0.023), SF-12 PCS (p = 0.019), KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (p = 0.010), and KOOS Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec) (p = 0.006) compared with the FB group (n = 46). The OKS, SF-12 PCS, and KOOS Sport/Rec at ten years had mean scores above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold. There was no significant difference in prevalence of radiolucency between groups at five-years’ follow-up (p = 0.449), nor at ten-years’ follow-up (p = 0.08). Implant survival rate at 14 years postoperative was 95.2 (95% CI 90.7 to 99.8) and 94.7 (95% CI 86.8 to 100.0) for the RP and FB TKAs, respectively. Conclusion. At ten-year follow-up, the mobile-bearing knee joint arthroplasty had statistically and clinically relevant superior OKS, SF-12 PCS, and KOOS (Sport/Rec) than the fixed-bearing platform. No difference was seen in prevalence of radiolucent lines. There was a greater than 94% implant survival rate for both cohorts at 14 years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1336–44

Introduction. Knee ligament laxity and soft tissue balance are important pre- and intra- operative balancing factors in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Laxity can be measured pre-operatively from short-leg radiographs using a stress device to apply a reproducible force to the knee, whereas intra-operative laxity is routinely measured using a navigation system in which a variable surgeon-applied force is applied. The relationship between these two methods and TKA outcome however, has not been investigated. This study aims to determine how intra-operative assessments of laxity relate to functional radiographic assessments performed on pre-operatively. We also investigate how laxity relates to short-term patient-reported outcomes. Method. A prospective consecutive study of 60 knees was performed. Eight weeks prior to surgery, patients had a CT scan and functional radiographs captured using a Telos stress device (Metax, Germany). This device applies a force to the knee joint while bracing the hip and ankle causing either a varus or valgus response. 3D bone models were segmented from the CT scan and landmarked to generate patient specific axes and alignments. Individual bone models were registered to the 2D stressed X-rays in flexion and extension. Reference axes identified on the registered 3D bone models were used to measure the coronal plane laxity. These laxity ranges were compared with those measured by a navigation system (OMNINAV, OMNI Life Science, MA) used during surgery, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) captured 6 months postoperatively. Results. Laxity measurements were acquired from 54 patients (58 knees; 4 bilaterals). The average age was 65±15 years old and 57% (n=31) of the patients were female. The midpoints of the laxity curves generated by Telos and navigation techniques show significant strong correlations in extension (r = 0.83, p < 0.001) and flexion (r = 0.53, p < 0.001). However, the laxity ranges measured by the two techniques did not. On average the navigation system produced significantly larger laxity range measurements than the Telos stressed x- ray technique in both extension (Nav: 8.4° ± 2.0°; Telos: 4.0° ± 2.4°; p < 0.001) and flexion (Nav: 5.0 ± 2.4; Telos: 3.0 ± 2.4; p < 0.001). Telos-generated laxity ranges indicate that patients who have initially greater laxity in extension than flexion (laxity range difference > 2°) have significantly better 6-month pain KOOS than those who show greater laxity in flexion (laxity range difference < −2°) (p = 0.018), see Figure 1. This correlation does not hold however, when examining laxity ranges generated by the navigation system, see Figure 2. Discussion and Conclusions. Significantly larger navigation-generated laxity ranges may be caused by: variable forces applied by the surgeon while the patient is under anaesthetic, surpassing the patient's functional limit; as well as due to the altered physical state of the knee during surgery. More sophisticated techniques to reproducibly assess intra-operative soft tissue balance may be required to accurately define laxity range. Results indicate that functional Telos-generated laxity ranges may provide unique insight into the relationship between laxity and postoperative outcomes that cannot be attained with passive navigated measurements

Aims

Implantation of ultra-purified alginate (UPAL) gel is safe and effective in animal osteochondral defect models. This study aimed to examine the applicability of UPAL gel implantation to acellular therapy in humans with cartilage injury.

The October 2015 Research Roundup360 looks at: Wasted implants; Biofilms revisited; Peri-operative anticoagulation not required in atrial fibrillation; Determinants in outcome following orthopaedic surgery; Patient ‘activation’ and outcomes; Neuroplasticity and nerve repair; KOOS Score in predicting injury?