Knee arthroscopy with debridement is commonly performed to treat osteoarthritis and degenerative meniscal tears in older adults; however robust evidence does not support sustained benefit from this procedure. Current Canadian guidelines advise against its use as first line treatment. Characterizing the use of this low value procedure will facilitate efforts to maximize quality of care, minimize harm and decrease healthcare costs. We sought to understand:. 1). the volume and variations of arthroscopic knee debridement across Canada. 2). The costs associated with potentially unnecessary arthroscopy. 3). The characteristics of surgeons performing knee arthroscopy in older adults. Data were derived from National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS), the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) and the National Physician Database for years 2011-12 to 2019-20. The study included all elective knee arthroscopies (CCI codes 1.VG.80.DA,1.VG.80.FY and 1.VG.87.DA) performed in day surgery and acute care settings in 9 provinces and 3 territories of Canada. Quebec was not included in the analysis due to different reporting methods. We set a threshold of 60 years of age at which it would be highly unlikely that a patient would undergo arthroscopy to treat anything other than osteoarthritis or degenerative meniscal tear. Trends at national and provincial levels were analyzed using regression. Costs were estimated separately using the 2020 case mix groups (CMG) and comprehensive ambulatory care classification system (CACS) methodologies. Surgeons were classified by decade of graduation from medical school (1989 and prior, 1990-99, 2000-09 and 2010+) and categorized based on the proportion of their patient population who were above (“high proportion inappropriate”) or below (“low proportion inappropriate”) the overall national proportion of ≥ 60 years of age. The number of knee arthroscopies decreased by 37% (42,785 in 2011-12 to 27,034 in 2019-20) overall and 39% (11,103 in 2011-12 to 6,772 in 2019-20) in those 60 years and older (p 25% of patients 60 years and older. Fifty four percent of surgeons who graduated prior to 1989 were considered high proportion inappropriate, whereas only 30.1% of surgeons who graduated in 2010 or later were considered high proportion inappropriate (p < 0 .0001). Knee arthroscopy continues to be a common procedure in patients over 60 despite strong evidence for lack of benefit. Lower rates in this population in some provinces are encouraging for potential opportunity for improvement. Efforts at practice change should be targeted at surgeons in practice the longest. Canada spends over $12,000,000 per year on this procedure, decreasing its use could allow these resources to be directed to other areas of orthopaedics that provide higher value care

Aim. To find out the usefulness of knee arthroscopy with debridement in patients of 60 years or more. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively looked at the patients of 60 years or more age who under went knee arthroscopy between Jan 2012 and Dec 2012 and collected demographic data, indications for arthroscopy, grading of preoperative knee x-rays (Kellgren-Lawrence), intra-operative findings, post operative relief of symptoms and any further surgeries till the time of study. Results. n=58, mean age was 67.3 years (60 – 81), male: female ratio 36:26, side 26:36 (R: L). Mean follow up 14.8 weeks (2–52). Most common indication was medial meniscus pathology (60%). More than 50% of the cases were of Grade III and IV (Kellgren-Lawrence). Intra-operative findings showed 62% tri-compartment and 12% bi-compartment arthritic involvement. 59% had medial, 7% had lateral and 7% had both meniscus tears. 75% of the patients felt symptomatically better at the time of last follow up and only 14% of the patients under went arthroplasty till the time of study. Conclusion. We conclude that knee arthroscopy with debridement offers symptomatic relief in majority (75%) of patients of 60 years or more of age with only few (14%) requiring early arthroplasty

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a single per operative injection of sodium hyaluronate (HA, Viscoseal. ¯. ) into the knee following arthroscopy. This was a prospective, randomised controlled study. Knee arthroscopy patients were randomised into two groups: one receiving bupivicaine and the other sodium hyaluronate. Pre and post operative VAS scores for pain and Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities (WOMAC) scores for knee function were obtained. Forty eight patients of a single surgeon were randomised into two groups of 24. Both groups were similar as regards to age, sex, etc. Three patients withdrew from the study after randomisation. There was significant drop in pain scores for the Viscoseal¯ group compared to Bupivicaine group particularly between three-six weeks period (p< 0.05) and a significant improvement in WOMAC scores in the study group compared to control at 3 and 6 weeks (p=0.01). Viscosupplementation after arthroscopic knee surgery offers significantly improved function and pain relief over the medium term period (three-six weeks)

The use of tourniquet in lower limb orthopaedic surgery is well established, however, it does have associated risks and complications and its use has been previously questioned. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirements and time to discharge in patients undergoing tourniquet assisted and non-tourniquet assisted routine knee arthroscopy. A total of 40 patients were randomised to tourniquet assisted and non-tourniquet assisted groups. Arthroscopy was performed using a standardised local anaesthetic infiltration in the non-tourniquet assisted group. All patients completed a postoperative pain score. Findings demonstrated that the incidence and mean scores for postoperative pain were significantly lower in the non-tourniquet group. Additionally postoperative analgesic requirements of patients in the non-tourniquet group were also found to be significantly lower and time spent in recovery and on the ward postoperatively was also lower in the non-tourniquet group compared to the tourniquet group. On the basis of the results in our study we recommend abolishing the use of tourniquet in routine knee arthroscopies in the virgin knee

Background. Surgical simulators allow learner-focussed skills training, in controllable and reproducible environments suitable for assessment. Aim. To research the face validity (extent to which the simulator resembles reality, determined subjectively by subjects), and construct validity, (ability to objectively differentiate between subjects with varying levels of arthroscopic experience) of a virtual reality arthroscopy simulator, to validate its effectiveness as an educational tool. Methods. Using the simulator insightArthroVR®, 37 subjects were required to perform diagnostic knee arthroscopy, palpate anatomical landmarks and complete questionnaires. The simulator recorded objective data to assess proficiency: time to complete tasks, roughness in instrument handling, and path length covered by the arthroscope and palpation probe. Results. The simulator succeeded in proving face validity: 86.4% participants agreed the simulator provided insight into arthroscopy. Training met the expectations of 91.3% and showed improvement in novices in simulated diagnostic arthroscopy in completion time (p-value=0.036), roughness (p-value=0.026), and path length covered by the arthroscope (p-value=0.008). Furthermore, the simulator was able to discriminate between experts, intermediates and novices, proving construct validity: time of completion (p-value=0.009), the path length covered by the arthroscope (p-value=0.02) and the probe (p-value=0.028). Conclusions. Results demonstrate the simulator succeeds in emulating real arthroscopy and can discriminate between subjects according to arthroscopic experience, proving face and construct validity. Further research on transfer of skills to the operating room needs to be done. With surgery constantly modernising and increasing time constraints with the EWTD, training must be efficient and assessable without compromising patient safety. Simulators could allow trainees earlier exposure to procedures, a wider range of pathologies in a compressed period, practice outside the OR, and an acceleration of the learning curve. This study has taken a step forward in validating a VR simulator and thus a step towards the future of simulation becoming an indispensable adjunct to surgical training

Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioids than any other surgical speciality. Opioids remain the analgesic of choice following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery. There is growing evidence that opioid-sparing protocols may reduce postoperative opioid consumption while adequately addressing patients’ pain. However, there are a lack of prospective, comparative trials evaluating their effectiveness. The objective of the current randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal, opioid-sparing approach to postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgery. The NO PAin trial is a pragmatic, definitive RCT (NCT04566250) enrolling 200 adult patients undergoing outpatient shoulder or knee arthroscopy. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an opioid-sparing group or standard of care. The opioid-sparing group receives a three-pronged prescription package consisting of 1) a non-opioid prescription: naproxen, acetaminophen and pantoprazole, 2) a limited opioid “rescue prescription” of hydromorphone, and 3) a patient education infographic. The control group is the current standard of care as per the treating surgeon, which consists of an opioid analgesic. The primary outcome of interest is oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption up to 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, quantity of OMEs prescribed and number of opioid refills. Patients are followed at both 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Data analysts and outcome assessors are blinded to the treatment groups. As of December 1, 2021 we have enrolled 166 patients, reaching 83% of target enrolment. Based on the current recruitment rate, we anticipate that enrolment will be completed by the end of January 2022 with final follow-up and study close out completed by March of 2022. The final results will be released at the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Meeting in June 2022 and be presented as follows. The mean difference in OME consumption was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in OMEs prescribed was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction are XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The absolute difference in opioid refills was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The results of the current study will demonstrate whether an opioid sparing approach to postoperative outpatient pain management is effective at reducing opioid consumption while adequately addressing postoperative pain in patients undergoing outpatient shoulder and knee arthroscopy. This study is novel in the field of arthroscopic surgery, and its results will help to guide appropriate postoperative analgesic management following these widely performed procedures

Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioids than any other surgical speciality. Opioids remain the analgesic of choice following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery. There is growing evidence that opioid-sparing protocols may reduce postoperative opioid consumption while adequately addressing patients’ pain. However, there are a lack of prospective, comparative trials evaluating their effectiveness. The objective of the current randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal, opioid-sparing approach to postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgery. The NO PAin trial is a pragmatic, definitive RCT (NCT04566250) enrolling 200 adult patients undergoing outpatient shoulder or knee arthroscopy. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an opioid-sparing group or standard of care. The opioid-sparing group receives a three-pronged prescription package consisting of 1) a non-opioid prescription: naproxen, acetaminophen and pantoprazole, 2) a limited opioid “rescue prescription” of hydromorphone, and 3) a patient education infographic. The control group is the current standard of care as per the treating surgeon, which consists of an opioid analgesic. The primary outcome of interest is oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption up to 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, quantity of OMEs prescribed and number of opioid refills. Patients are followed at both 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Data analysts and outcome assessors are blinded to the treatment groups. As of December 1, 2021 we have enrolled 166 patients, reaching 83% of target enrolment. Based on the current recruitment rate, we anticipate that enrolment will be completed by the end of January 2022 with final follow-up and study close out completed by March of 2022. The final results will be released at the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Meeting in June 2022 and be presented as follows. The mean difference in OME consumption was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in OMEs prescribed was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction are XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The absolute difference in opioid refills was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The results of the current study will demonstrate whether an opioid sparing approach to postoperative outpatient pain management is effective at reducing opioid consumption while adequately addressing postoperative pain in patients undergoing outpatient shoulder and knee arthroscopy. This study is novel in the field of arthroscopic surgery, and its results will help to guide appropriate postoperative analgesic management following these widely performed procedures

The use of cannabis is increasingly medically relevant as it is legalized and gains acceptance more broadly. However, the effects of marijuana use on postoperative outcomes following orthopedic surgery have not been well-characterized. This study seeks to illuminate the relationship between marijuana use and the incidence postoperative complications including: DVT, PE, nonunion, and infection following common orthopedic procedures. This study was conducted using a national orthopaedic claims insurance database. We identified all patients undergoing knee arthroscopy, shoulder arthroscopy, operatively managed long bone fractures (humerus, femur, tibia and/or fibula, and radius and/or ulna), and single-level lumbar fusion. The proportion of patients within each surgery cohort who had a diagnostic code for marijuana dependence was assessed. The rates of DVT, PE, and infection within 90 days were assessed for all patients. The rate of nonunion was assessed for the long bone fracture and lumbar fusion cohorts. Univariate analyses of marijuana dependence on all outcomes were performed, followed by a multivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for known patient comorbidities. We identified 1,113,944 knee arthroscopy, 747,938 shoulder arthroscopy, 88,891 lumbar fusion, and 37,163 long bone fracture patients. Out of the 1,987,936 patients, 24,404 patients had a diagnostic code for marijuana dependence. Within all four surgical subgroups, the marijuana dependence cohort experienced increased rates of infection, PE, and DVT, as well as increased rates of nonunion in the lumbar fusion and long bone fracture populations. In the multivariate analyses controlling for a variety of patient risk factors including tobacco use, marijuana dependence was identified as an independent risk factor for infection within all four surgical subgroups (Knee: OR 1.85, p < 0.001; Shoulder: OR 1.65, p < 0.001; Spine: OR 1.45, p < 0.001; Long bone: OR 1.28, p < 0.001), and for nonunion in the lumbar fusion (OR 1.38, p < 0.001) and long bone fracture (OR 1.31, p < 0.001) subgroups. Our data suggests that marijuana dependence may be associated with increased rates of infection and nonunion following a variety of orthopaedic procedures. During preoperative evaluation, surgeons may consider marijuana use as a potential risk factor for postoperative complications, especially within the context of marijuana legalization. Future research into this relationship is necessary

Knee arthroscopy with meniscectomy is the third most common Orthopaedic surgery performed after TKA and THA, comprising up to 16.6% of all procedures. The efficiency of Orthopaedic care delivery with respect to waiting times and systemic costs is extremely concerning. Canadian Orthopaedic patients experience the longest wait times of any G7 country, yet perioperative surgical care constitutes a significant portion of a hospital's budget. In-Office Needle Arthroscopy (IONA) is an emerging technology that has been primarily studied as a diagnostic tool. Recent evidence shows that it is a cost-effective alternative to hospital- and community-based MRI with comparable accuracy. Recent procedure guides detailing IONA medial meniscectomy suggest a potential node for OR diversion. Given the high case volume of knee arthroscopy as well as the potential amenability to be diverted away from the OR to the office setting, IONA has the potential to generate considerable improvements in healthcare system efficiency with respect to throughput and cost savings. As such, the purpose of this study is to investigate the cost savings and impact on waiting times on a mid-sized Canadian community hospital if IONA is offered as an alternative to traditional operating room (OR) arthroscopy for medial meniscal tears. In order to develop a comprehensive understanding and accurate representation of the quantifiable operations involved in the current state for medial meniscus tear care, process mapping was performed that describes the journey of a patient from when they present with knee pain to their general practitioner until case resolution. This technique was then repeated to create a second process map describing the hypothetical proposed state whereby OR diversion may be conducted utilizing IONA. Once the respective process maps for each state were determined, each process map was translated into a Dupont decision tree. In order to accurately determine the total number of patients which would be eligible for this care pathway at our institution, the OR booking scheduling for arthroscopy and meniscectomy/repair over a four year time period (2016-2020) were reviewed. A sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the effect of the number of patients who select IONA over meniscectomy and the number of revision meniscectomies after IONA on 1) the profit and profit margin determined by the MCS-Dupont financial model and 2) the throughput (percentage and number) determined by the MCS-throughput model. Based on historic data at our institution, an average of 198 patients (SD 31) underwent either a meniscectomy or repair from years 2016-2020. Revenue for both states was similar (p = .22), with the current state revenue being $ 248,555.99 (standard deviation $ 39,005.43) and proposed state of $ 249,223.86 (SD $ 39,188.73). However, the reduction in expenses was significant (p < .0001) at 5.15%, with expenses in the current state being $ 281,415.23 (SD $ 44,157.80) and proposed state of $ 266,912.68 (SD $ 42,093.19), representing $14,502.95 in savings. Accordingly, profit improvement was also significant (p < .0001) at 46.2%, with current state profit being $ (32,859.24) (SD $ 5,153.49) and proposed state being $ (17,678.82) (SD $ 2,921.28). The addition of IONA into the care pathway of the proposed state produced an average improvement in throughput of 42 patients (SD 7), representing a 21.2% reduction in the number of patients that require an OR procedure. Financial sensitivity analysis revealed that the proposed state profit was higher than the current state profit if as few as 10% of patients select IONA, with the maximum revision rate needing to remain below 40% to achieve improved profits. The most important finding from this study is that IONA is a cost-effective alternative to traditional surgical arthroscopy for medial meniscus meniscectomy. Importantly, IONA can also be used as a diagnostic procedure. It is shown to be a cost-effective alternative to MRI with similar diagnostic accuracy. The role of IONA as a joint diagnostic-therapeutic tool could positively impact MRI waiting times and MRI/MRA costs, and further reduce indirect costs to society. Given the well-established benefit of early meniscus treatment, accelerating both diagnosis and therapy is bound to result in positive effects

Knee arthroscopy is typically approached from the anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral portals. Access to the posterior compartments through these portals can cause iatrogenic cartilage damage and create difficulties in viewing the structures of the posterior compartments. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of needle arthroscopy using direct posterior portals as both working and visualising portals. For workability, the needle scope was inserted advanced from anterior between the cruciate ligament bundle and the lateral wall of the medial femoral condyle until the posterior compartments were visualised. For visualisation, direct postero-lateral and -medial portals were established. The technique was performed in 9 knees by two experienced researchers. Workability and instrumentation of the posteromedial compartment and meniscus was achieved in 56%. The posterior horns could not be visualised in four specimens as the straight lens could not provide a more medial field of view. Visualisation from the direct medial posterior portal allowed a clear view of the medial meniscus, femoral condyle and posterior cruciate ligament in all specimens. Workability and instrumentation of the posterolateral compartment was not possible with the needle scope. Direct posterior approaches for the posteromedial compartment access are challenging with the current needle scope options and could only be achieved in over 50%. The postero-lateral compartment was not accessible. An angled lens or a flexible Needle scope would be better suited for developing this technique further

The accurate and detailed documentation of surgical procedures is essential, forming part of good clinical practice set out by the General Medical Council (GMC). In the case of knee arthroscopy, it is vital for planning further management when referring to a soft tissue knee specialist. This study assesses the quality of documentation of knee arthroscopy and evaluates the implementation of a novel operative template. A retrospective study of 50 operative-notes of patients undergoing knee arthroscopy was completed. A 41-point assessment was made based on guidelines from the GMC, Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSE), British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) and British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK). An operative-note template was devised to address the criteria important for further interventions and then assessed for its efficacy in providing appropriately detailed findings. Detailed documentation deemed essential by current guidelines were lacking the minimum standards expected. Criteria that were considered necessary for an arthroscopic procedure were as low as 4%. After instigating the new operative template, there was a statistically significant increase (p < 0.001) in documentation accuracy throughout the necessary criteria set out by the GMC, RCSE, BOA and BASK. We have devised an operative template for knee arthroscopy that improves the quality of documentation and allows for optimal further surgical planning. Clear documentation is important for patient safety, adequate referral to a specialist, research and coding purposes. This will ideally reduce the number of repeat knee arthroscopies performed and optimise patient care from the outset

A tourniquet is usually used during ankle arthroscopy to allow for improved visibility and reduced operation time. However, clinical studies on knee arthroscopy have not demonstrated this to be true. In addition, Zengerink and van Dijk emphasized a limited tourniquet time in ankle arthroscopy as a possible factor to lower the complication rate even more. The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to examine the effect of tourniquet use on arthroscopic visualization, operative time, postoperative intra-articular bleeding, postoperative pain scores and outcome of anterior ankle arthroscopy. A consecutive series of 50 patients who were scheduled for anterior ankle arthroscopy were randomized to have the surgery done either without the tourniquet inflated (25 patients) or with the tourniquet inflated (25 patients). The patients were evaluated by the course of the surgery, postoperative intra-articular bleeding, pain during the early postoperative period and by using the subjective and objective functional scores to evaluate the condition of the ankle before and 3 and 6 months after the surgery. The statistical analysis was performed with the normality of distribution tested by both Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Appropriate parametric or non-parametric methods were then used to test statistical hypotheses, while the statistical significance (alpha, Type I error) was set at .05. Fourty-nine patients were present at the final follow-up, 6 months after the surgery. The results between the groups were comparable regarding the duration of the operative procedure, consumption of sterile saline, visualisation and functional scores. Notable difference between the groups in favour of the non-tourniquet group was present regarding postoperative bleeding, but was not statistically significant. Statistically significant difference in favour of the non-tourniquet group was found regarding postoperative pain during several days in the early postoperative period. Our study has shown that anterior ankle arthroscopy may be performed adequately without the use of a tourniquet and that it has the same operative course as in cases in which the tourniquet is used and functional outcomes which are not worse than in cases in which the tourniquet is used

MPFL reconstruction has demonstrated a very high success rate with improved patella stability, physical function, and patient-reported outcomes. However technical error and a lack of consideration of anatomic risk factors have been shown to contribute to failure after MPFL reconstruction. Previous research has also reported a complication rate of 26% following surgery. The purposes of this study were to determine the re-dislocation rate, type and number of complications, and most common additional surgical procedures following MPFL reconstruction. Patients with symptomatic recurrent patellofemoral instability underwent an MPFL reconstruction (n = 268) and were assessed with a mean follow-up of 31.5 months (minimally 24-months). Concomitant procedures were performed in addition to the MPFL reconstruction in order to address significant anatomic or biomechanical characteristics. Failure of the patellofemoral stabilization procedure was defined as post-operative re-dislocation of the patella. Rates of complications and re-procedures were assessed for all patients. The re-dislocation rate following MPFL reconstruction was 5.6% (15/268). There were no patella fractures. A total of 49/268 patients (18.3%) returned to the operating room for additional procedures following surgery. The most common reason for additonal surgery was removal of symptomatic tibial tubercle osteotomy hardware in 24/268 patients (8.9%). A further 9.3% of patients underwent addtional surgery including revision MPFL reconstruction: with trochleoplasty 8/268 (3.0%), with tibial tubercule osteotomy 4/286 (1.5%) and with femoral derotation osteotomy 3/268 (1.1%); manipulation under anaesthesia for reduced knee range of motion 4/268 (1.5%); knee arthroscopy for pain 8/268 (3.0%); and cartilage restoration procedures 3/268 (1.1%). There was 1 case of wound debridement for surgical incision infection. MPFL reconstruction using an a la carte approach to surgical selection demonstrated a post-operative redislocation rate of 5.6%. The rate of complications following surgical stabilization was low, with the most common reason for additional surgery being removal of hardware

Introduction. Ischaemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is a very common metabolic insult in orthopaedics. It is often a subtle clinical event such as after brief tourniquet use, however severe injury, even multi-organ failure or death may result from prolonged tourniquet-use, crush injuries, vascular trauma or the release of compartment-syndrome. IRI is mediated by leukocyte infiltration and oxidatively-induced endothelial disruption. Antioxidants clearly attenuate or prevent this effect in animal models. Hypothesis. That the antioxidant medications ascorbate and n-acetyl-cysteine attenuate IRI in the setting of elective knee arthroscopy. Methods & Materials. A EudraCT-registered, prospective, randomized-controlled trial was performed. Patients undergoing elective knee arthroscopy (n=24) were randomized to one of 3 groups (IV NAC/oral ascorbate/placebo). Full blood counts, cytokines, adhesion molecules, physiological response, pain scores and analgesia were recorded pre-operatively and at 3 post-operative time-points. Results. Physiological response, analgesia and VAS did not differ. NAC inhibited VCAM-1 (p=0.003) and tended to inhibit ICAM-1 (p=0.094). NAC tended to increase circulating leukocytes (p=0.093), neutrophils (p=0.12) and monocytes (p=0.04) and also induced a transient early increase in IFN-gamma (p=0.022). Conclusions. NAC attenuates the IRI resulting from tourniquet use in elective knee arthroscopy by apparently reducing adhesion molecule expression and leukocyte trapping in the post-ischaemic limb. The potential systemic benefits of NAC warrant further study in the setting of a more extensive ischaemic insult

Purpose. The development of skills in arthroscopic surgery is essential to the training of modern orthopedic surgeons. Few validated, objective tools exist which track improvement in arthroscopic skills. The purpose of this study was to validate an objective global assessment of arthroscopic skills employing videotape footage of diagnostic arthroscopy performed by participants of various skill levels on a cadaveric knee. Method. A total of 22 participants with varying arthroscopic experience performed a recorded diagnostic knee arthroscopy on a cadaveric knee. Recorded footage of the procedures from an arthroscopic and external view was assessed by five blinded evaluators and scored on a global skills evaluation and checklist evaluation form. Interclass correlation coefficient analyses were used to determine the inter-rater reliability. Mean scores of novice and experienced residents and practicing arthroscopists (based on rank and experience) were compared using a students t-test. Results. Interclass correlation coefficient for the five raters on the global rating scale was 0.626 indicating moderate to good agreement. Interclass correlation coefficient for visual analogue scale skill measurement was 0.645. Discriminant validity was shown by the ability of the global assessment to differentiate novice (95% CI=24-29%) and experienced residents (95% CI=33-59%) from fellows (95% CI=70-87%) and knee arthroscopy staff (95% CI=79-84%). There was a ceiling effect based on the inability to differentiate fellows from knee arthroscopy staff. Conclusion. The Objected Assessment of Arthroscopic Skills global rating scale is a valid, reliable measure of arthroscopic skills in residents. It could be used for evaluative or educational purposes in orthopedic training. The method of blinded evaluation of participants provides a feasible method for the evaluation of resident arthroscopic skills with limited bias which could be implemented in training programs

Objective. To investigate the effect of lab-based simulator training, on the ability of surgical trainees to perform diagnostic knee arthroscopy. Method. 20 orthopaedic SHOs with minimal arthroscopic experience were randomised to 2 groups. 10 received a fixed protocol of simulator based arthroscopic skills training using a bench-top knee model. Learning curves were clearly demonstrated using motion analysis equipment to monitor performance. All 20 then spent an operating list with a blinded consultant trainer. They received instruction and demonstration of diagnostic knee arthroscopy before performing the procedure independently. Their performance was assessed using the intra-operative section of the Orthopaedic Competence Assessment Project (OCAP) procedure based assessment (PBA) protocol for diagnostic arthroscopy. Performance was further quantified with a ten point global rating assessment scale. Results. Motion analysis demonstrated objective and significant improvement in performance during simulator training. In theatre the simulator-trained group performed significantly better than the untrained group. The simulator trainees were scored as OCAP competent on more than 70% of occasions, compared to less than 15% for the untrained group (p<0.01). The mean global rating score of the trained group was 24.5 out of 45 compared with 12 for the untrained group (p<0.01). Conclusion. Learning curves showing significantly improved performance at simulated diagnostic knee arthroscopy are clearly demonstrated using motion analysis assessment. Arthroscopic simulator training led to subsequent significant improvement in operating theatre performance as determined by OCAP and a global rating assessment scale. This demonstrates a degree of transfer validity from lab based arthroscopic simulator training using motion analysis assessment to the operating theatre. In addition OCAP PBAs appear to provide a useful framework for in theatre assessment; however questions are raised about the need for more objective assessment tools in order to truly distinguish between trainees varying levels of competence

Introduction. Current work-hour restrictions and cost pressures have highlighted the limitations of apprenticeship-based learning, and led to the development of alternative methods to improve the skills of orthopaedic trainees outside of the clinical environment. These methods include using synthetic bones and simulators in the laboratory setting. Educational theory highlights the importance of context for effective learning, yet full-immersion simulation facilities are prohibitively expensive. This study explored the concept of contextualised training day in trauma & orthopaedics. Methods. Fifteen novice surgeons provided feedback after completing three teaching modules:. 1). OSCE-style Problem-based Learning of Orthopaedic Trauma in the Fracture Clinic Setting, utilising an actor and radiographs to teach history, examination, diagnostic and management skills. 2). The positioning, preparing and draping of a patient, and Examination under anaesthesia (EUA) for arthroscopic knee surgery, utilising an operating table and theatre equipment to teach procedural and examination skills. 3). Simulator based training for diagnostic shoulder and knee arthroscopy; and Bankart repair, utilising arthroscopic stack and synthetic joint models to develop arthroscopic motor skill and procedural knowledge. Findings. The combination of simulated patients and part-task trainers (a simulator that simulates a limited component of a clinical procedure) created a multimodal clinical context. The three novel teaching modules allowed the integration of technical and non-technical skills in low-cost and high-fidelity orthopaedic simulation environments

Literature has suggested that obese (BMI >30) and morbidly obese (BMI > 35) patients should not be offered surgery as a day case due to increases in complication and readmission rates. At Torbay hospital, patients are routinely offered day case surgery, in a specialist day case unit, regardless of BMI. This is done with minimal complications and enables a higher throughput of patients and at least 75% of surgical procedures to be performed as a day case, as per NHS guidelines. We present 12 year data of day case knee arthroscopy surgery performed at Torbay hospital. Over 12 years, 3421 knee arthroscopies were performed. 649 were performed on obese patients and 222 on morbidly obese patients. No anaesthetic complications were observed in any of the obese patient groups and readmissions rates (up to 28 days) were 0.8% in the morbidly obese group and 0.9% in the Obese group, compared to 0.9% for patients with BMI <30. Our data shows that day case surgery can be performed on all patients regardless of BMI and patient obesity. We believe that other units should offer surgery to obese and morbidly obese patients to allow increased efficiency and achievement of NHS day case guidelines

Aims

The standard of wide tumour-like resection for chronic osteomyelitis (COM) has been challenged recently by adequate debridement. This paper reviews the evolution of surgical debridement for long bone COM, and presents the outcome of adequate debridement in a tertiary bone infection unit.

Previous authors have suggested that the analgesic effects of intra-articular morphine may be beneficial. Clonidine has been found to potentiate the analgesic effect of morphine. Following knee arthroscopy, morphine has demonstrated equivocal effect in comparison to bupivicaine for analgesia while circumventing the issue of chondrotoxicity. There have been no studies evaluating the effect of intra-articular morphine following hip arthroscopy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intra-articular morphine in combination with clonidine on pain and narcotic consumption following hip arthroscopy surgery for femoroacetabular impingement. A retrospective review was performed on 43 patients that underwent hip arthroscopy between September 2014 and May 2015 at our institution for femoroacetabular impingement. All patients received preoperative Celebrex and Tylenol per our anesthesia protocol, and 22 patients received an additional intra-articular injection of 10 mg morphine and 100 mcg of clonidine at the conclusion of the procedure. Narcotic consumption, duration of anesthesia recovery, and perioperative pain scores were compared between the two groups. We found that patients who received intra-articular morphine and clonidine used significantly less opioid analgesic in the PACU, with 23 mEq of morphine equivalents required in the intra-articular morphine and clonidine group compared to 40 mEq of opiod equivalents in the non-injection group (p=0.0259). There were no statistically significant differences in time spent in recovery prior to discharge or in VAS pain scores recorded immediately post-operatively and at one hour following surgery. In conclusion, we found that an intraoperative intra-articular injection of morphine and clonidine significantly reduced the amount of narcotic requirement following hip arthroscopy. We do believe that there may be significant benefits to this, including less systemic effects from overall narcotic usage in the perioperative period. Our study demonstrated a beneficial effect of intra-articular morphine that may help with overall pain improvement, less narcotic consumption, and improved patient satisfaction following outpatient hip arthroscopy. This study provides the foundation for future research currently being conducted in a randomised-control setting