Osteomyelitis is an inflammatory condition accompanied by the destruction of bone and caused by an infecting microorganism. Open contaminated fractures can lead to the development of osteomyelitis of the fractured bone in 3-25% of cases, depending on fracture type, degree of soft-tissue injury, degree of microbial contamination, and whether systemic and/or local antimicrobial therapies have been administered. Untreated, infection will ultimately lead to non-union, chronic osteomyelitis, or amputation. We report a case series of 10 patients that presented with post-operative infected non-union of the distal femur with or without prior surgery. The cases were performed at Padmashree Dr. D. Y. Patil Hospital, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, India. All the patients’ consents were taken for the study which was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. The methodology involved patients undergoing a two-stage procedure in case of no prior implant or a three-stage procedure in case of a previous implant. Firstly, debridement and implant removal were done. The second was a definitive procedure in form of knee arthrodesis with ring fixator and finally followed by limb lengthening surgery. Arthrodesis was planned in view of infection, non-union, severe arthritic, subluxated knee, stiff knee, non-salvage knee joint, and financial constraints. After all the patients demonstrated wound healing in 3 months along with good radiographic osteogenesis at the knee arthrodesis site, limb lengthening surgeries by tibial osteotomy were done to overcome the limb length discrepancy. Distraction was started and followed up for 5 months. All 10 patients showed results with sound knee arthrodesis and good osteogenesis at the osteotomy site followed by achieving the limb length just 1-inch short from the normal side to achieve ground clearance while walking. Our case series is unique and distinctive as it shows that when patients with infected nonunion of distal femur come with the stiff and non-salvage knee with severe arthritic changes and financial constraints, we should consider knee arthrodesis with Ilizarov ring fixator followed by limb lengthening surgery

The implementation of knee arthrodesis has become synonymous with limb salvage in the presence of chronic sepsis and bone loss around the knee. This can be seen in failed trauma surgery or knee arthroplasty as an alternative to trans-femoral amputation. There is no prior literature assessing which factors affect knee arthrodesis using external fixation devices. Sixteen consecutive patients (four women and twelve men) made up of eleven infected knee implants, three internal fixations of the tibial following fractured tibial plateau as well as 2 infected native joints were identified. The mean age at initial surgery was 56 years (range 25 to 82 years). All procedures were performed under the direct supervision of the limb reconstruction teams using a standard protocol with either a Taylor spatial frame or Ilizarov frame. The patient records, microbiology results and radiographs of all patients who underwent knee arthrodesis at this institution between 1999 and 2010 were reviewed. Of the 16 patients in this study knee fusion occurred in eleven patients (69%). The five patients where arthrodesis failed all had significant bone loss on the pre-operative radiographs and confirmed at surgery. We found a relationship between a significant infection of the knee with MRSA and failure to fuse. Three of the five patients had MRSA isolated from inside the knee at some stage during their treatment. The five patients where fusion failed were on average older (mean age 63 years against 51 years) and had more extensive bone loss. Those who failed to fuse had more co-morbidities. We would conclude that where there is little or no bone loss, arthrodesis of the knee can be reliably achieved with the use of circular frame fixation. A greater number of negative factors also prolongs the amount of time spent in the external fixator. The presence of significant bone loss, infection, increased age and multiple co-morbidities requires careful evaluation and consideration of trans-femoral amputation as an alternative

The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis often includes surgical debridement and filling the resultant void with antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cement, bone grafts or bone substitutes. Recently, the use of bioactive glass to treat bone defects in infections has been reported in a limited series of patients. However, no direct comparison between this biomaterial and antibiotic-loaded bone substitute has been performed.

In this retrospective study, we compared the safety and efficacy of surgical debridement and local application of the bioactive glass S53P4 in a series of 27 patients affected by chronic osteomyelitis of the long bones (Group A) with two other series, treated respectively with an antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate compound (Group B; n = 27) or a mixture of tricalcium phosphate and an antibiotic-loaded demineralised bone matrix (Group C; n = 22). Systemic antibiotics were also used in all groups.

After comparable periods of follow-up, the control of infection was similar in the three groups. In particular, 25 out of 27 (92.6%) patients of Group A, 24 out of 27 (88.9%) in Group B and 19 out of 22 (86.3%) in Group C showed no infection recurrence at means of 21.8 (12 to 36), 22.1 (12 to 36) and 21.5 (12 to 36) months follow-up, respectively, while Group A showed a reduced wound complication rate.

Our results show that patients treated with a bioactive glass without local antibiotics achieved similar eradication of infection and less drainage than those treated with two different antibiotic-loaded calcium-based bone substitutes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:845–50.