Open debridement and Outerbridge and Kashiwagi debridement arthroplasty (OK procedure) are common surgical treatments for elbow arthritis. However, the literature contains little information on the long-term survivorship of these procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the survivorship after elbow debridement techniques until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and revision surgery. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent open elbow surgical debridement (open debridement, OK procedure) between 2000 and 2015. Patients were diagnosed with primary elbow osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, or inflammatory arthritis. A total of 320 patients had primary surgery including open debridement (n=142) and OK procedure (n=178), and of these 33 patients required a secondary revision surgery (open debridement, n=14 and OK procedure, n=19). The average follow-up time was 11.5 years (5.5 - 21.5 years). Survivorship was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Log Rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used assess the likelihood of conversion to total elbow arthroplasty or revision surgery while adjusting for covariates (age, gender, diagnosis). Significance was set p<0.05. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed open debridement was 100.00% at 1 year, 99.25% at 5 years, and 98.49% at 10 years and for OK procedure 100.00% at 1 year, 98.80% at 5 years, 97.97% at 10 years (p=0.87) for conversion to total elbow arthroplasty. There was no difference in survivorship between procedures after adjusting for significant covariates with the cox proportional hazard model. The rate of revision for open debridement and OK procedure was similar at 11.31% rand 11.48% after 10 years respectively. There were higher rates of revision surgery in patients with open debridement (hazard ratio, 4.84 CI 1.29 – 18.17, p = 0.019) compared to OK procedure after adjusting for covariates. We also performed a stratified analysis with radiographic severity as an effect modifier and showed grade 3 arthritis did better with the OK procedure compared to open debridement for survivorship until revision surgery (p=0.05). However, this difference was not found for grade 1 or grade 2 arthritis. This may suggest that performing the OK procedure for more severe grade 3 arthritis could decrease reoperation rates. Further investigations are needed to better understand the indications for each surgical technique. This study is the largest cohort of open debridement and OK procedure with long term follow-up. We showed that open elbow debridement and the OK procedure have excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post traumatic cases. The OK procedure also has lower rates of revision surgery than open debridement, especially with more severe radiographic arthritis

Open debridement and Outerbridge and Kashiwagi debridement arthroplasty (OK procedure) are common surgical treatments for elbow arthritis. However, the literature contains little information on the long-term survivorship of these procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the survivorship after elbow debridement techniques until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and revision surgery. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent open elbow surgical debridement (open debridement, OK procedure) between 2000 and 2015. Patients were diagnosed with primary elbow osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, or inflammatory arthritis. A total of 320 patients had primary surgery including open debridement (n=142) and OK procedure (n=178), and of these 33 patients required a secondary revision surgery (open debridement, n=14 and OK procedure, n=19). The average follow-up time was 11.5 years (5.5 - 21.5 years). Survivorship was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Log Rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used assess the likelihood of conversion to total elbow arthroplasty or revision surgery while adjusting for covariates (age, gender, diagnosis). Significance was set p<0.05. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed open debridement was 100.00% at 1 year, 99.25% at 5 years, and 98.49% at 10 years and for OK procedure 100.00% at 1 year, 98.80% at 5 years, 97.97% at 10 years (p=0.87) for conversion to total elbow arthroplasty. There was no difference in survivorship between procedures after adjusting for significant covariates with the cox proportional hazard model. The rate of revision for open debridement and OK procedure was similar at 11.31% rand 11.48% after 10 years respectively. There were higher rates of revision surgery in patients with open debridement (hazard ratio, 4.84 CI 1.29 - 18.17, p = 0.019) compared to OK procedure after adjusting for covariates. We also performed a stratified analysis with radiographic severity as an effect modifier and showed grade 3 arthritis did better with the OK procedure compared to open debridement for survivorship until revision surgery (p=0.05). However, this difference was not found for grade 1 or grade 2 arthritis. This may suggest that performing the OK procedure for more severe grade 3 arthritis could decrease reoperation rates. Further investigations are needed to better understand the indications for each surgical technique. This study is the largest cohort of open debridement and OK procedure with long term follow-up. We showed that open elbow debridement and the OK procedure have excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post traumatic cases. The OK procedure also has lower rates of revision surgery than open debridement, especially with more severe radiographic arthritis

Abstract. Background and study aim. The UK National Joint Registry(NJR) has not reported total knee replacement (TKR)survivorship based on design philosophy alone, unlike its international counterparts. We report outcomes of implant survivorship based on design philosophy using data from NJR's 2020 annual report. Materials and methods. All TKR implants with an identifiable design philosophy from NJR data were included. Cumulative revision data for cruciate-retaining(CR), posterior stabilised(PS), mobile-bearing(MB) design philosophies was derived from merged NJR data. Cumulative revision data for individual brands of implants with the medial pivot(MP) philosophy were used to calculate overall survivorship for this design philosophy. The all-cause revision was used as the endpoint and calculated to 15 years follow-up with Kaplan-Meier curves. Results. 1,144,384 TKRs were included. CR is the most popular design philosophy (67.4%), followed by PS (23.1%), MB (6.9%) and least commonly MP (2.6%). MP and CR implants showed the best survivorship (95.7% and 95.6% respectively) at 15 years which is statistically significant at, and beyond, 10 years. Observed survivorship was lower at all time points with the PS and MB implants (94.5% for both designs at 15 years). Conclusions. While all design philosophies considered in this study survive well, CR and MP designs offer statistically superior survivorship at and beyond 10 years. MP design performs better than CR beyond 13 years yet, remain the least popular design philosophy used. Publishing data based on knee arthroplasty design philosophy would help surgeons when making decisions on implant choice

The Accolade®TMZF is a taper-wedge cementless metaphyseal coated femoral stem widely utilized from 2002-2012. In recent years, there have been reports of early catastrophic failure of this implant. Establishing a deeper understanding of the rate and causes of revision in patients who developed aseptic failure in stems with documented concerns about high failure rates is critical. Understanding any potential patient or implant factors which are risk factors for failure is important to inform both clinicians and patients. We propose a study to establish the long-term survival of this stem and analyze patients who underwent aseptic revision to understand the causes and risk factors for failure. A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients who received a primary total hip arthroplasty with an Accolade® TMZF stem at a high-volume arthroplasty center. The causes and timing of revision surgery were documented and cross referenced with the Canadian Institute of Health Information Discharge Abstract Database to minimize loss to follow-up. Survivorship analysis was performed with use of the Kaplan-Meier curves to determine the overall and aseptic survival rates at final follow-up. Patient and implant factors commonly associated with aseptic failure were extracted and Cox proportional hazards model was used. A consecutive series of 2609 unilateral primary THA patients implanted with an Accolade®TMZF femoral hip stem were included. Mean time from primary surgery was 12.4 years (range 22 days to 19.5 years). Cumulative survival was 96.1% ± 0.2 at final follow-up. One hundred and seven patients underwent revision surgery with aseptic loosening of the femoral component was the most common cause of aseptic failure in this cohort (33/2609, 1.3%). Younger age and larger femoral head offset were independent risk factors for aseptic failure. To our knowledge, this is the largest series representing the longest follow-up of this taper-wedge cementless femoral implant. Despite early concerns, the Accolade® TMZF stem has excellent survivorship in this cohort. Trunnionosis as a recognized cause for revision surgery was rare. Younger age and larger femoral head offset were independent risk factors for aseptic failure

During total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a tourniquet is often used intraoperatively. There are proposed benefits of tourniquet use including shorter duration of surgery, improved surgical field visualization and increased cement penetration which may improve implant longevity. However, there are also cited side effects that include increased post-operative pain, slowed recovery, skin bruising, neurovascular injury and quadriceps weakness. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated no differences in implant longevity, however they are limited by short follow-up and small sample sizes. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the rates of revision surgery among patients undergoing cemented TKA with or without an intraoperative tourniquet and to understand the causes and risk factors for failure. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of all patients who received a primary, cemented TKA at a high-volume arthroplasty centre from January 1999 to December 2010. Patients who underwent surgery without the use of a tourniquet and those who had a tourniquet inflated for the entirety of the case were included. The causes and timing of revision surgery were recorded and cross referenced with the Canadian Institute of Health Information Discharge Abstract Database to reduce the loss to follow-up. Survivorship analysis was performed with the use of Kaplan-Meier curves to determine overall survival rates at final follow-up. A Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to evaluate independent predictors of revision surgery. Data from 3939 cases of primary cemented TKA were available for analysis. There were 2276 (58%) cases in which a tourniquet was used for the duration of the surgery and 1663 (42%) cases in which a tourniquet was not utilized. Mean time from the primary TKA was 14.7 years (range 0 days - 22.8 years) when censored by death or revision surgery. There were 150 recorded revisions in the entire cohort, with periprosthetic joint infection (n=50) and aseptic loosening (n=41) being the most common causes for revision. The cumulative survival at final follow-up for the tourniquetless group was 93.8% at final follow-up while the cumulative survival at final follow-up for the tourniquet group was 96.9% at final follow-up. Tourniquetless surgery was an independent predictor for all-cause revision with an HR of 1.53 (95% CI 1.1, 2.1, p=0.011). Younger age and male sex were also independent factors for all cause revision. The results of the current study demonstrate higher all-cause revision rates with tourniquetless surgery in a large cohort of patients undergoing primary cemented TKA. The available literature consists of short-term trials and registry data, which have inherent limitations. Potential causes for increased revision rates in the tourniquetless group include reduced cement penetration, increased intraoperative blood loss and longer surgical. The results of the current study should be taken into consideration, alongside the known risks and benefits of tourniquet use, when considering intraoperative tourniquet use in cemented TKA

The Adams-Berger reconstruction is an effective technique for treating distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. Graft preparation techniques vary amongst surgeons with insufficient evidence to support one technique over another. Our study evaluated the biomechanical properties of four graft preparation techniques. Extensor tendons were harvested from fresh frozen porcine trotters obtained from a local butcher shop and prepared in one of three configurations (n=5 per group): tendon only; tendon prepared with non-locking, running suture (2-0 FiberLoop, Arthrex, Naples, FL) spaced at 6 mm intervals; and tendon prepared with suture spaced at 12 mm intervals. A fourth configuration of suture alone was also tested. Tendons were allocated in a manner to ensure comparable average diameters amongst groups. Biomechanical testing occurred using custom jigs simulating radial and ulnar tunnels attached to a Bose Electroforce 3510 mechanical testing machine (TA Instruments). After being woven through the jigs, all tendons were sutured end-to-end with 2-0 PROLENE suture (Ethicon). Tendons then underwent a staircase cyclic loading protocol (5-25 Newtons [N] at 1 hertz [Hz] for 1000 cycles, then 5-50 N at 1 Hz for 1000 cycles, then 5-75 N at 1 Hz for 1000 cycles) until graft failure; if samples did not fail during the protocol, they were then loaded to failure. Samples were visually inspected for mode of failure after the protocol. A one-way analysis of variance was used to compare average tendon diameter; post-hac Tuhey tests were used to compare elongation and elongation rate. Survival to cyclic loading was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log rank. Statistical significance was set at a = 0.05. The average tendon diameter of each group was not statistically different [4.17 mm (tendon only), 4.33 mm (FiberLoop spaced 6 mm), and 4.30 mm (FiberLoop spaced 12 mm)]. The average survival of tendon augmented with FiberLoop was significantly higher than tendon only, and all groups had significantly improved survival compared to suture only. There was no difference in survival between FiberLoop spaced 6 mm and 12 mm. Elongation was significantly lower with suture compared to tendon augmented with FiberLoop spaced 6 mm. Elongation rate was significantly lower with suture compared to all groups. Modes of failure included rupture of the tendon, suture, or both at the simulated bone and suture and/or tendon interface, and elongation of the entire construct without rupture. In this biomechanical study, augmentation of porcine tendons with FiberLoop suture spaced at either 6 or 12 mm for DRUJ reconstruction significantly increased survival to a staircase cyclic loading protocol, as suture material was significantly stiffer than any of the tendon graft configurations

Aim. A two-stage surgical strategy (debridement-negative pressure therapy (NPT) and flap coverage) with prolonged antimicrobial therapy is usually proposed in pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis but has not been widely evaluated. Method. Adult patients with pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis treated by a two-stage surgical strategy were included in a retrospective cohort study. Determinants of superinfection (i.e., additional microbiological findings at reconstruction) and treatment failure were assessed using binary logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. Results. Sixty-four pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis in 61 patients (age, 47 (IQR, 36–63)) were included. Osteomyelitis was mostly plurimicrobial (73%), with a predominance of S. aureus (47%), Enterobacteriaceae (44%) and anaerobes (44%). Flap coverage was performed after 7 (IQR, 5–10) weeks of NPT, with 43 (68%) positive bone samples among which 39 (91%) were superinfections, associated with a high ASA score (OR, 5.8; p=0.022). An increased prevalence of coagulase negative Staphylococci (p=0.017) and Candida (p=0.003) was observed at time of flap coverage. An ESBL Enterobacteriaceae was found in 5 (12%) patients, associated with fluoroquinolone consumption (OR, 32.4; p=0.005). Treatment duration was as 20 (IQR, 14–27) weeks, including 11 (IQR, 8–15) after reconstruction. After a follow-up of 54 (IQR, 27–102) weeks, 15 (23%) failures were observed, associated with previous pressure ulcer (OR, 5.7; p=0.025) and Actinomyces infection (OR, 9.5; p=0.027). Conclusions. Pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis is a difficult-to-treat clinical condition, generating an important consumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Carbapenem should be reserved for ESBL at-risk patients only, including those with previous fluoroquinolone use. The uncorrelation between outcome and the debridement-to-reconstruction interval argue for a short sequence to limit the total duration of treatment

Aim. Pubic osteomyelitis (PO) is one of less frequent Bone and Joint Infections forms (BJI). Its management is still poorly codified as far as nosological framework is still unclear in medical literature. We aim to describe PO epidemiology and to look for factors associated with management failure. Method. We performed a retrospective cohort study, carried out in two Reference Centres, including patients with PO in 2010–2016. Treatment failure was defined by: (i) persistence of clinical signs despite treatment; (ii) clinical relapse with same microorganisms; (iii) infection recurrence with one or more different microorganism(s);. (iv) new signs of infection (abscess, sinus tract) in same area, without recourse to get microbiological documentation. Factors associated with management failure were determined by univariate Cox analysis (hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval calculation). Kaplan-Meier curve were compared between groups by log-rank test. Results. Twenty-five patients were included over thirteen years (median age 67 years; 19 men, median ASA score 3). Six (24 %) had a PO from haematogenous origin. Those were all monomicrobial infection, due to S.aureus, mostly identified in young patients without comorbidities, especially in athletes. No surgery was required if no abcess or bone sequestrum were found. Nineteen patients (76 %) had a post-operative chronic PO (developed from 1 month to 11 years after a pelvic surgery); 15 of them had history of pelvic cancer (60%); 12 received radiotherapy at the site of infection (48 %). Infection was polymicrobial in 68 % of cases, including 32 % of cases with multidrug-resistant pathogens. A clinical success was recorded in only 14 patients (56%). Treatment failure was always noticed in chronic post-operative forms. Potential risk factors associated with failure management were: pelvic cancer history (HR 3.8; p=0,089); pelvic radiotherapy history (HR 2.9; p=0.122); clinical sinus tract (HR 5.1; p=0,011); infection with multidrug-resistant bacteria (HR 2.8; p=0,116), and polymicrobial infection (HR 70.5; p=0,090). Conclusions. Our study highlights predominant chronic complex post-operative forms of PO. They are mostly plurimicrobial, sometimes associated with multi-drug resistance, occurring in fragile patients with pelvic cancer. It frequently leads to complex antibiotherapy, with important risk of relapse. Aggressive surgical procedure with large bone resection is frequently required in patients who underwent pelvic radiotherapy

Objective. was to review the experience of the Rizzoli with megaprosthetic reconstruction of the extremities in musculoskeletal oncology. Material and methods. Between April 1983 and December 2007, 1036 modular uncemented megaprostheses of the lower limbs were implanted in 605 males and 431 females: 160 KMFTR(r), 633 HMRS(r) prostheses, 68 HMRS(r) Rotating Hinge and 175 GMRS(r). Sites: distal femur 659, proximal tibia 198, proximal femur 145, total femur 25, distal femur and proximal tibia 9. Histology showed 612 osteosarcomas, 113 chondrosarcomas, 72 Ewing's sarcoma, 31 metastatic carcinomas, 89 GCT, 36 MFH,68 other diagnoses. Between 1975 and 2006 at Rizzoli 344 reconstructions of the humerus using prosthetic devices (alone or in association with allografts) were performed: 289 MRS(r), 37 HMRS(r), 2 Osteobridge(r), 4 composite prostheses, 8 Coonrad-Morrey(r), 4 custom made prostheses. Sites of reconstruction were: proximal humerus 311, distal humerus 19, diaphysis 5, total humerus 9. Histology showed 146 osteosarcomas, 56 chondrosarcomas, 23 Ewing's sarcoma, 67 metastatic carcinomas, 14 GCT, 10 MFH, 28 other diagnoses. Patients were followed periodically in the clinic. Information were obtained from clinical charts and imaging studies with special attention to major complications requiring revision surgery. Major prostheses-related complications were analysed and functional results evaluated according to the MSTS system. Univariate analysis by Kaplan-Meier actuarial curves was used for studying implant survival to major complications. Results. Major complications causing implants failure in lower limbs were 80 infections (7.7%), 64 aseptic loosening (6.2%) and 33 breakages (3.2%). In lower limbs infection occurred in 18 KMFTR(r), 47 HMRS(r), 5 HMRS(r) Rotating Hinge, 10 GMRS(r). Breakage of the prosthetic reconstruction occurred in 16 KMFTR(r), 16 HMRS(r), 1 HMRS(r) Rotating Hinge. Aseptic loosening occurred in 15 KMFTR(r), 28 HMRS(r), 18 HMRS(r) Rotating Hinge, 3 GMRS(r). Major complications causing implants failure in upper limbs were 15 infections (4.3%), 8 aseptic loosening (2.3%) and 4 breakages (1.2%). In upper limbs infection occurred in 14 MRS(r) and 1 Coonrad-Morrey(r). Aseptic loosening in 8 cases MRS(r). Breakage in 4 cases MRS(r) prostheses. Most patients in both lower and upper extremities series showed satisfactory function (good or excellent) according to the MSTS evaluation system. Implant survival to all major complications of lower limb megaprostheses evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curve was 80% at 10 years and 60% at 20 years. Implant survival for the newer designs (GMRS(r)) available only at middle term follow up showed an implant survival to major complications at about 90% at 5 years. Implant survival to all major complications was over 80% at 10 years and 78% at 20 years. Conclusions. Megaprostheses are the most frequently used type of reconstruction after resection of the extremities, since they provide good function and a relatively low incidence of major complications. Both function and implant survival improved in the last decades with the introduction of newer designs and materials

Introduction. Innovations in surgical robotics and navigation have significantly improved implant placement accuracy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, many comparative studies have not been shown to substantially improve revision rates or other clinical outcome scores. We conducted a simulation study based on the reported distribution of patient-specific characteristics and estimated potential effect of coronal plane alignment (CPA) on risk of revision to evaluate the hypothesis that most published study designs in this area have been too underpowered to detect improvements in revision rates. Methods. To model previously reported studies, we generated a series of simulated TKA patient populations, assigning each patient a set of patient-specific factors (age at index surgery, BMI, and sex (Fig.1a)), as well as one surgeon-controlled factor (CPA) (Fig.1b) based on registry data and published literature. We modelled the survival probability for an individual patient at time t as a Gaussian function (exp[-(t/(k∗τ. max. )). 2. ]), where τ. max. (99.5 years) is selected to ensure the mean survival probability of the patient population matched 92% at 15 years. The value of k was adjusted for simulated patients within a range of 0 to 1 as a function of their patient and surgeon-specific factors (Fig.2). To evaluate power associated with a study design, we ran a Monte Carlo simulation generating 10,000 simulated populations of ten different cohort sizes. We divided the patient population into two groups: one group was assigned CPAs governed by the precision of a navigated/robotic approach (σ=1.5°), and the other CPAs governed by the precision of a conventional approach (σ=3°). We then simulated the time to failure for each patient, computed the corresponding Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and applied a Log-Rank test to each study to test for statistical difference. From the 10,000 simulations associated with each cohort size, we determined the percentage of simulated studies that found a statistically significant difference at each time point. Results. Figure 3 shows a contour plot illustrating the probability that a survival analysis with a specific study design would find statistical significance between the conventional and navigated/robotic patient groups. Entries from recently published literature are overlaid for context. No studies achieved statistical significance (p<0.05). Discussion. The effectiveness of navigated/robotic surgery is one of the most controversial debates in orthopedic surgery. The results from this simulation suggest that most revision studies aiming to settle this debate are likely significantly underpowered, falling below the normal 80% threshold. Limitations of this analysis include using only a single surgeon-controlled variable in the survival simulation, and only a single precision for the navigated/robotic approaches. Further studies will include more implant-related risk factors and a wider range of precisions for navigated/robotic procedures. Based on this simulation, it appears the effect size afforded by navigated/robotic surgeries on revision rates in TKA surgery is too small to recommend broad application, especially since adoption could involve added costs and unforeseen risks associated with novelty. Clinically, it may be beneficial to examine the use of robotics/navigation on high-risk patients, where studies are likely to have higher power due to larger effect sizes. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Objectives. To assess the affects of a delay in diagnosis on the survival rates of Bone Sarcoma (BS) using size and symptom duration as measures of delay. Methods. All patients diagnosed with a Primary BS from 1970 to 2005 were included. Demographic data concerning age, sex, diagnosis and tumour site were recorded. The data were collected retrospectively from a prospective database, with 2573 patients included. Symptom duration is defined as the length of time the patient was experiencing symptoms for until the date of diagnosis. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox Regression was carried out to identify variables affecting outcome. Results. 2489 patients with Primary BS that matched out inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified. Osteosarcoma (40.4%), Chondrosarcoma (20.6%) and Ewing's Sarcoma (17.6%) were the most common diagnoses, with a median size of 10cm at presentation. Overall 5 year survival was 61.2%, extremity sited tumours carried a statistically significant better prognosis compared to axial tumours (5yr survival 63.2% vs. 53.3%) and patients with axial tumours had significantly longer symptom duration (Mann-Whitney U test p = 0.000 31 and 12 weeks). Overall analysis of all BS diagnoses showed lengthier duration of symptoms was associated with a better outcome (Hazard Ratio = 0.998, p = 0.000), which suggests that 1 extra week of symptoms confers an increased survival of 0.2%. Larger tumour size was associated with a poorer survival rate (p=0.000 to 3 sig. fig, Hazard Ratio 1.059 respectively) which suggests that for every 1cm increase in size there is a decreased survival of 5.9%. Conclusions. Although many factors have been associated with survival, the limited literature concerning symptom interval and outcome is varied. This large study has shown that regardless of diagnosis, overall, shorter symptom duration and a large tumour size are associated with a poorer prognosis

Purpose. of this study is to analyze the results of a modular reconstructive tumor prosthesis for the lower limb (GMRS. (r). ) with a comparative statistical analysis of primary and secondary implants. Material and methods. From October 2003 to September 2007 at Rizzoli 161 GMRS. (r). prostheses were implanted, most after resection of osteosarcoma (94 cases, 58%). It is a modular system with a rotating hinge mechanism for the knee, cemented and uncemented stems, in titanium and chromium-cobalt-molybdenum, curved and straight-fluted, with or without hydroxyapatite coating. Moreover adaptors are available to revise HMRS. (r). implants. This series includes 88 males and 73 females ranging in age from 9 to 80 years. Sites of reconstruction were 109 distal femurs, 19 proximal femurs, 1 total femur and 32 proximal tibias. There were 149 oncologic and 12 non oncologic diagnoses, including 96 primary reconstructions and 65 revisions after failure of previous implant. A retrospective analysis of imaging and complications was performed and functional results assessed according to MSTS system. Statistical analysis with Kaplan-Meier curves was used to study implant survival. Results. At a mean follow up of 2 yrs. 106 patients are continuously NED, 31 are NED after treatment of one or more local recurrence or metastasis, 7 AWD, 5 DWD. There were 10 major complications: 8 infections (4,7%) (5 in primary and 3 in secondary implants, 2 previously infected) and 2 aseptic loosening (1,2%) (1 each). There were 9 minor complications (4 wound sloughs, 1 stiff joint, 3 disrupted extensor apparatus,1 patellar instability) requiring revision. Comparative statistical analysis of primary and secondary implants survival at major complications shows no statistically significant difference. Functional results were good or excellent in 95% of the evaluated patients, without any poor. Conclusions. Middle term results are promising: good function, very low incidence of major complications, no breakage of implant components. This prosthetic reconstruction is indicated in oncological cases as well as in selected in some non oncological settings, such as challenging revisions of prosthetic failures with massive bone loss or post-radiation non unions or allografts failures. Although a higher incidence of complications was expected in secondary implants, statistical analysis shows similar survival

Aims

The standard of wide tumour-like resection for chronic osteomyelitis (COM) has been challenged recently by adequate debridement. This paper reviews the evolution of surgical debridement for long bone COM, and presents the outcome of adequate debridement in a tertiary bone infection unit.

Aim. Bone infection can recur months or years after initially successful treatment. It is difficult to review patients for many years to determine the true incidence of recurrence. This study determined the minimum follow-up period which gives a good indication of the recurrence rate after surgery for chronic osteomyelitis and infected non-union. Method. We studied five cohorts of patients who had surgery for long bone infection, over a 10 year period. We investigated the efficacy of various antibiotic carriers (PMMA and Collagen; n=185, Calcium Sulphate; n=195, Calcium Sulphate/Hydroxyapatite; n=233) and management of infected non-unions (n=146). Patients were reviewed and Kaplan-Meier Survivorship curves were constructed to show the incidence and timing of recurrence. The microbiology of the initial infection and the recurrent culture was also compared. Results. 759 patients were reviewed between 12 and 131 months after surgery (mean 43.7 months). Infection recurred in 52 cases (6.9%). 34 patients recurred in the first year (65.4%), 14 in the second year (27%), 2 in the third year (3.8%) and 2 in the following 4 years (3.8%). 89% of recurrences after infected non-union occurred early after treatment. Later recurrences, after 3 years, usually followed new injuries or operations and tended to have different organisms from the original infection. Conclusions. In clinical trials of new methods of treatment of osteomyelitis, a minimum follow-up period of 2 years would reveal over 90% of the recurrences. For infected non-union surgery, one year may be adequate. Late ‘recurrences’ may represent new infections, rather than reactivation of previous infection

Aims

The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) when adequate methods of culture are used, and to evaluate the outcome in patients who were treated with antibiotics for a culture-negative PJI compared with those in whom antibiotics were withheld.

Introduction & Objective. Labral refixation has established as a standard in open or arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The rationale for this refixation is to maintain the important suction seal in the hip. To date, only few short-term results are available which indicate a superior result in FAI hips with labral refixation compared to labral resection. Scientific evidence of a beneficial effect of labral refixation in the long-term follow-up is lacking. Aim of this study was to evaluate if labral refixation can improve the cumulative 10-year survivorship in hips undergoing surgical hip dislocation for FAI compared to labral resection. Methods. We performed a retrospective comparative study of 59 patients treated with surgical hip dislocation for symptomatic FAI between December 1998 and January 2003. We analyzed two matched groups: The ‘resection’ group consisted of 25 hips that were treated consistently by excision of the damaged labrum. The ‘refixation’ group consisted of 34 hips that were treated with labral reattachment. Correction of the osseous deformity (rim trimming/femoral osteochondroplasty) did not differ between the two groups. We then evaluated the clinical (Merle d'Aubigné score) and radiographical results (according to Tönnis) at a follow-up of ten years. We calculated a cumulative Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve with the following factors as endpoints: conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis progression, or a poor clinical result (defined as Merle d'Aubigné score of less than 15). The two curves were compared using the Log-rank test. Results. Hips with labral refixation had a significantly higher survivorship (78%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 64–92%) at ten years compared to labral resection (46%, 95% CI 26–66, p=0.008). 7 (20.6%) patients in the refixation group reached an endpoint: 2 with THA; 5 with a poor clinical result, and 5 with progression of OA. 15 (60.0%) patients in the resection group reached an endpoint: 3 with THA; 12 with a poor clinical result, and 4 with progression of OA. Conclusion. This is the first study proving that labral refixation leads to significantly better results in patients 10 years after open surgical hip dislocation for FAI. It seems advisable to preserve the labrum in this patient population whenever possible

The purpose of this study was to determine the survivorship for a MOM implant series performed by a single community surgeon followed using a practical clinical model. A retrospective cohort of 104 primary MOM THA procedures (94 patients) were all performed by one surgeon at three local hospitals now with 10–13 years follow-up. Sixteen patients are deceased and 16 patients have been lost to follow-up. In the remaining 62 patients, 8 are bilateral providing a total of 70 THA for study. The clinical follow-up model included: hip scores, X-rays, ultrasound, and metal ion concentrations (Co, Cr, Ti). Due to the diversity of patient location, a variety of clinical labs were utilized for metal ions. Statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier survival curve and One-way ANOVA. Hip scores were available for 70 THA and of these 61 had a hip score (HHS) above 80 (87%). X-rays were available for 49 hips and of these 38 (78%) had lateral/version angles in the safe zone (Fig 1: inclination ≤ 55 and anteversion ≤ 35). Thirty-eight ultrasound exams were performed and of these three yielded fluid collections (8%). Metal ion concentrations were documented in 39 of 62 patients (63%, either serum or whole blood). Six outliers were identified with high concentrations of metal ions (Fig 2); Co 0.3–143.9 ppb (median 3.6), Cr 0.2–200.3 ppb (median 2.2) and Ti 2-110 ppb (median 54). Six patients were revised by the original surgeon. Three of six with elevated ions were documented as wear problems and the other three were revised for infection, femur fracture and metal-ion sensitivity. The survivorship of 92.5% at 10 years (Fig. 3) may be partly due to the exclusive use of antero-lateral approach performed by one surgeon with 78% of cups well placed and the MOM design used exclusively

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to assess the independent association of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on postoperative mortality for patients undergoing orthopaedic and trauma surgery. The secondary aim was to identify factors that were associated with developing COVID-19 during the postoperative period.

Introduction. Infection remains a serious complication following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Many factors including primary diagnosis, comorbidities and duration of procedure are known to influence the rate of infection. Although the association between patient and surgical factors is increasingly well understood, little is known about the role of the prosthesis. This analysis from the Australian Registry (AOANJRR) was undertaken to determine if revision for infection varied depending on the type of bearing surface used. Methods. Three different bearing surfaces, ceramic on ceramic (CoC), ceramic on cross-linked polyethylene (CoXP) and metal on cross-linked polyethylene (MoXP) were compared. The study population included all primary THA undertaken for OA using these bearing surfaces and reported to the AOANJRR between 1999 and 2013. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were compiled with revision for infection as the end point. Hazard Ratios (HR) from Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare revision rates. Sub analysis examining the effect of age, gender, fixation of the femoral stem and femoral head size. To ensure there was no confounding due to differences in femoral and acetabular component selection a further analysis was undertaken which compared the three different bearings with the same stem and acetabular component combinations. Results. During the study period there were 177,237 primary THA's reported to the registry that met the inclusion criteria (57,839 CoC, 24,269 CoXP and 95129 MoXP). When all procedures were included Both MoXP and CoXP had a higher revision rate for infection compared to CoC (HR 1.46 (1.25, 1.72) p<0.001 and HR 1.42 (1.15, 1.75) p=0.001 respectively). There was no difference in the revision rate for infection when MoXP and CoXP were compared. There was an age variation with the lower revision rate for infection rate being evident in patient's age 70 years or younger but not older patients. Both men and women had a lower revision rate when CoC was used. The difference was evident when a cementless femoral stem was used but not when the stem was cemented. The difference was also evident for most head sizes with the exception of 28 mm heads. CoC also had a lower revision rate for infection when the same femoral stem and acetabular component combinations were compared. Conclusion. Patients aged 70 years or less have a lower revision rate for infection when a CoC bearing is used compared to both CoXP and MoXP. This difference was independent of gender, and femoral and acetabular prostheses selection. No difference was evident if the femoral component was cemented or a head size of 28 mm was used

Aims

COVID-19 represents one of the greatest global healthcare challenges in a generation. Orthopaedic departments within the UK have shifted care to manage trauma in ways that minimize exposure to COVID-19. As the incidence of COVID-19 decreases, we explore the impact and risk factors of COVID-19 on patient outcomes within our department.