This study aims to compare the outcomes of Volar locking plating (VLP) versus percutaneous Kirschner wires (K-wire) fixation for surgical management of distal radius fractures. We systematically searched multiple databases, including MEDLINE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of VLP fixation and K-wire for treatment of distal radius fracture in adults. The methodological quality of each study was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Patient-reported outcomes, functional outcomes, and complications at 1 year follow up were evaluated. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models and results presented as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). 13 RCTs with 1336 participants met the inclusion criteria. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores were significantly better for VLP fixation (MD= 2.15; 95% CI, 0.56-3.74; P = 0.01; I2=23%). No significant difference between the two procedures for grip strength measured in kilograms (MD= −3.84; 95% CI,-8.42-0.74; P = 0.10; I2=52%) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores (MD= −0.06; 95% CI,-0.87-0.75; P = 0.89; I2=0%). K-wire treatment yielded significantly improved extension (MD= −4.30; P=0.04) but with no differences in flexion, pronation, supination, and radial deviation (P >0.05). The risk of complications and rate of reoperation were similar for the two procedures (P >0.05). This meta-analysis suggests that VLP fixation improves DASH score at 12 months follow up, however, the difference is small and unlikely to be clinically important. Existing literature does not provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate the superiority of either VLP or K-wire treatment in terms of patient-reported outcomes, functional outcomes, and complications

Recent researches indicate that both M1 and M2 macrophages play vital roles in tissue repair and foreign body reaction processes. In this study, we investigated the dynamics of M1 macrophages in the induced membrane using a mouse femur critical-sized bone defect model. The Masquelet method (M) and control (C) groups were established using C57BL/6J male mice (n=24). A 3mm-bone defect was created in the right femoral diaphysis followed by a Kirschner wire fixation, and a cement spacer was inserted into the defect in group M. In group C, the bone defect was left uninserted. Tissues around the defect were harvested at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after surgery (n=3 in each group at each time point). Following Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, immunohistochemical staining (IHC) was used to evaluate the CD68 expression as a marker of M1 macrophage. Iron staining was performed additionally to distinguish them from hemosiderin-phagocytosed macrophages. In group M, HE staining revealed a hematoma-like structure, and CD68-positive cells were observed between the spacer and fibroblast layer at 1 week. The number of CD68-positive cells decreased at 2 weeks, while they were observed around the new bone at 4 and 6 weeks. In group C, fibroblast infiltration and fewer CD68-positive cells were observed in the bone defect without hematoma-like structure until 2 weeks, and no CD68-positive cells were observed at 4 and 6 weeks. Iron staining showed hemosiderin deposition in the surrounding area of the new bone in both groups at 4 and 6 weeks. The location of hemosiderin deposition was different from that of macrophage aggregation. This study suggests that M1 macrophage aggregation is involved in the formation of induced membranes and osteogenesis and may be facilitated by the presence of spacers

Distal radial fractures are amongst the most common trauma referrals, however controversy remains regarding their optimum management. We undertook a retrospective review of the management of distal radial fractures in our department. The prospectively maintained trauma database was used to identify patients admitted for operative management of a dorsally displaced distal radial fracture between June 2008 and June 2009. Only extra-articular or simple intra-articular fractures were included (AO classification A2/A3/C1/C2). Operation notes were reviewed to determine the method of fixation. Patients were contacted by post and asked to complete a functional outcome score - Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). A further 12 patients with similar fractures who had been managed conservatively were also asked to complete a DASH score to provide a comparison between operative and non-operative management. 98 patients were identified - 67 female, 31 male. Mean age was 51 years, range 15-85 years. All patients were at least 1 year post-op. 26 patients had manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA). 48 patients had MUA and K-wire fixation, which was supplemented with synthetic bone substitute in 16 cases. 3 patients had MUA and bone graft and 21 patients had open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a volar plate. 34 correctly completed DASH scores were returned. A lower score equates to a better functional outcome. Mean DASH scores were: MUA 14.8; MUA+K-wire 13.1; ORIF 13.6; conservative 47.1. This data would indicate that patients with a significantly displaced distal radial fracture have a better functional outcome with operative management to improve the fracture alignment. However, all of the methods of fixation used resulted in similar functional outcomes at one year

Objectives

The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire are patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used for clinical and research purposes. Methodological high-quality clinimetric studies that determine the measurement properties of these PROMs when used in patients with a distal radial fracture are lacking. This study aimed to validate the PRWE and DASH in Dutch patients with a displaced distal radial fracture (DRF).

We have evaluated four different fixation techniques for the reconstruction of a standard Mason type-III fracture of the radial head in a sawbone model. The outcome measurements were the quality of the reduction, and stability.

A total of 96 fractures was created. Six surgeons were involved in the study and each reconstructed 16 fractures with 1.6 mm fine-threaded wires (Fragment Fixation System (FFS)), T-miniplates, 2 mm miniscrews and 2 mm Kirschner (K-) wires; four fractures being allocated to each method using a standard reconstruction procedure.

The quality of the reduction was measured after definitive fixation. Biomechanical testing was performed using a transverse plane shear load in two directions to the implants (parallel and perpendicular) with respect to ultimate failure load and displacement at 50 N.

A significantly better quality of reduction was achieved using the FFS wires (Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001) than with the other devices with a mean step in the articular surface and the radial neck of 1.04 mm (sd 0.96) for the FFS, 4.25 mm (sd 1.29) for the miniplates, 2.21 mm (sd 1.06) for the miniscrews and 2.54 mm (sd 0.98) for the K-wires. The quality of reduction was similar for K-wires and miniscrews, but poor for miniplates.

The ultimate failure load was similar for the FFS wires (parallel, 196.8 N (sd 46.8), perpendicular, 212.5 N (sd 25.6)), miniscrews (parallel, 211.8 N (sd 47.9), perpendicular, 208.0 N (sd 65.9)) and K-wires (parallel, 200.4 N (sd 54.5), perpendicular, 165.2 N (sd 37.9)), but significantly worse (Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001) for the miniplates (parallel, 101.6 N (sd 43.1), perpendicular, 122.7 N (sd 40.7)). There was a significant difference in the displacement at 50 N for the miniplate (parallel, 4.8 mm (sd 2.8), perpendicular, 4.8 mm (sd 1.7)) vs FFS (parallel, 2.1 mm (sd 0.8), perpendicular, 1.9 mm (sd 0.7)), miniscrews (parallel, 1.8 mm (sd 0.5), perpendicular, 2.3 mm (sd 0.8)) and K-wires (parallel, 2.2 mm (sd 1.8), perpendicular, 2.4 mm (sd 0.7; Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001)).

The fixation of a standard Mason type-III fracture in a sawbone model using the FFS system provides a better quality of reduction than that when using conventional techniques. There was a significantly better stability using FFS implants, miniscrews and K-wires than when using miniplates.