Background. Procedural sedation (PS) requires two suitably qualified clinicians and a dedicated monitored bed space. We present the results of intra-articular haematoma blocks (IAHB), using local anaesthetic, for the manipulation of closed ankle fracture dislocations and compared resource use with PS. Methods. Patients received intra-articular ankle haematoma blocks for displaced ankle fractures requiring manipulation between October 2020 to April 2021. The technique used 10ml of 1% lignocaine injected anteromedially into the tibiotalar joint. Pain scores (VAS), time from first x-ray to reduction, and acceptability of reduction were recorded. A comparison was made by retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone PS for manipulation of an ankle fracture over the six month period March – August 2020. Results. During the periods assessed, 25 patients received an IAHB and 28 received PS for ankle fractures requiring manipulation (mean age 57.8yr vs 55.1yr). Time from first x-ray to manipulation was 65.9 min (IAHB) vs 82.9 min (PS) (p = 0.087). In the IAHB group mean pain scores pre, during and post manipulation were 6.1, 4.7 and 2.0 respectively (‘pre’ to ‘during’ p < 0.05; ‘pre’ to ‘post’ p < 0.01). In the IAHB group, 23 (92%) had a satisfactory reduction without need of PS or general anaesthetic. In the PS group 23 (82%) had a satisfactory reduction. There was no significant difference in the number of unsatisfactory first attempt reductions between the groups. There were no cases of deep infection post operatively in either group. Conclusion. Intra-articular haematoma block of the ankle appears to be an efficacious, safe and inexpensive means of providing analgesia for manipulation of displaced ankle fractures. Advantages of this method include avoiding the risks of procedural sedation, removing the requirement of designated clinical space and need for qualified clinicians to give sedation, and the ability to re-manipulate under the same block

Aim. To examine the mid-term survival, clinical and patient reported outcomes of the silastic 1. st. metatarsophalangeal joint replacement for the treatment of end stage hallux rigidus. Methods. We reviewed 83 consecutive silastic arthroplasties performed in 79 patients for end stage hallux rigidus. There were 3 men and 76 women; mean age 63 years (range 45–78 years). No patient was lost to follow up. Average follow-up was 5.3 years (1.1–11.3 years). The EQ 5D–5L Health index, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain and overall satisfaction rate (Likert scale) were collected for patient reported outcomes. Results. 2 patients required revision; 1 for early infection (2 months) and 1 for stem breakage (10 years 1 month). 5 patients reported lateral metatarsalgia, 2 patients reported neuropathic pain, 6 patients developed superficial infection which fully responded to oral antibiotics, and 1 patient developed interphalangeal joint pain. 2 patients died in the cohort. Pre-operative mean MOXFQ was 44, mean EQ5D Index was 0.564 and VAS was 6.97. At mean follow-up of 5.3 years, the mean MOXFQ was 12.7 (0–57), the mean EQ5D Index was 0.851 (−0.02–1) and the mean VAS was 1.67 (0–8). The mean range of motion was 35° (30° dorsiflexion and 5° plantarflexion). The overall satisfaction rate was 90.2%. The implant survival rate was 97.6%. Conclusions. The silastic big toe arthroplasty offers excellent clinical mid term survival and functional outcomes and could be considered as an attractive alternative to traditional fusion for end stage hallux rigidus

Aims

Postoperative rehabilitation regimens following ankle arthrodesis vary considerably. A systematic review was conducted to determine the evidence for weightbearing recommendations following ankle arthrodesis, and to compare outcomes between different regimens.

Introduction. Various rehabilitation shoes are prescribed to protect the forefoot following surgery. Patients often complain of discomfort in other areas as a result of the postoperative shoe, including the knee, hip and lower back. This has never been quantified. This study aims to establish the effect on other joints using gait analysis. Methods: 11 healthy volunteers were investigated using various common types of postoperative shoe. They were studied with gait analysis equipment and the joint motion assessed with commercial software. The effect of commercial devices designed to minimise gait changes by lifting the contralateral foot were also evaluated. Results. There was a reduction in knee flexion and extension compared to the contralateral leg in all phases of the gait cycle. This was the case with both heel wedge shoes and inflatable air boots. There was also an increase in pelvic tilt during gait with both shoes, which was more pronounced with the air boot. The foot raise device for the contralateral foot which is designed to decrease these changes was effective in decreasing gait changes. Discussion. The use of rehabilitation shoes after forefoot surgery is almost universal. Patients are rarely counselled of the risk of joint pain or back pain as a result of the postoperative shoe. Patients with pre-existing back pain or hip pain may have fewer symptoms if they are supplied with an equalising device to raise the other foot. Conclusions. Patients are at risk of initiation or exacerbation of low back pain or lower limb joint pain from the use of postoperative shoes. Patients with a history of back or limb symptoms should be provided with an equalising device for the contralateral limb to minimise their discomfort. Patients should be warned of this risk when giving consent

We report the incidence and intensity of persistent pain in patients with an otherwise uncomplicated total ankle replacement (TAR). Arthroscopic debridement was performed in selected cases and the clinical outcome was analysed.

Among 120 uncomplicated TARs, there was persistent pain with a mean visual analogue scale (VAS) of 2.7 (0 to 8). The intensity of pain decreased in 115 ankles (95.8%). Exercise or walking for more than 30 minutes was the most common aggravating factor (62 ankles, 68.1%). The character of the pain was most commonly described as dull (50 ankles, 54.9%) and located on the medial aspect of the joint (43 ankles, 47.3%).

A total of seven ankles (5.8%) underwent subsequent arthroscopy. These patients had local symptoms and a VAS for pain ≥ 7 on exertion. Impingement with fibrosis and synovitis was confirmed. After debridement, the median VAS decreased from 7 to 3 and six patients were satisfied. The median VAS for pain and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score of the ankles after debridement was similar to that of the uncomplicated TARs (p = 0.496 and p = 0.066, respectively).

Although TAR reduces the intensity of pain, residual pain is not infrequent even in otherwise uncomplicated TARs and soft-tissue impingement is the possible cause.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:378–83.

We reviewed the outcome of distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy without tendon transfer in 19 consecutive patients (19 feet) with a hallux varus deformity following surgery for hallux valgus. All patients underwent distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy with medial displacement and a medial closing wedge osteotomy along with a medial capsular release.

The mean hallux valgus angle improved from −11.6° pre-operatively to 4.7° postoperatively, the mean first-second intermetatarsal angle improved from −0.3° to 3.3° and the distal metatarsal articular angle from 9.5° to 2.3° and the first metatarsophalangeal joints became congruent post-operatively in all 19 feet. The mean relative length ratio of the metatarsus decreased from 1.01 to 0.99 and the mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score improved from 77 to 95 points.

In two patients the hallux varus recurred. One was symptom-free but the other remained symptomatic after a repeat distal chevron osteotomy. There were no other complications.

We consider that distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy with a medial wedge osteotomy and medial capsular release is a useful procedure for the correction of hallux varus after surgery for hallux valgus.