Management of irreparable rotator cuff tears is challenging and controversial. Surgeons have been utilising biological tissue scaffolding to augment repairs, but there are concerns regarding viability and function. We wished to investigate this viability and clinical outcome in a small group of patients. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon over a three-year period. Inclusion criteria were patients with large cuff tears and failure of non-operative treatment. Exclusion criteria were patients with glenohumeral arthritis and where cuff repair could not be successfully performed. Open rotator cuff repair followed by augmentation with Graft Jacket® Regenerative Tissue Matrix (Wright Medical) was performed in all patients. A structured cuff repair physiotherapy protocol was then followed. Follow-up was at six months and at minimum twenty-four months post-operatively where Constant scores (CS) and Oxford Shoulder scores (OSS) were noted and a repeat ultrasound performed. Fourteen patients underwent the procedure. No patient was lost to follow-up. There were seven males and seven females with a mean age of 63 years (range 31–77). At minimum twenty-four month follow-up, thirteen patients had flexion and abduction above 90 degrees and symmetrical external rotation. Mean CS was 81 (range 70–91) and mean OSS was 46 (range 41–48). Shoulder ultrasound revealed an intact Graft Jacket® in all thirteen patients. The final patient had lower functional movement and lower CS (34) and OSS (25) and ultrasound identified a re-rupture. This study indicates that augmentation of large rotator cuff repairs with biological tissue scaffolding is a viable option and has good functional results

Introduction. Insufficient arthroscopic cuff tear reconstruction leading to massive osteoarthritis and irreparable rotator cuff tears might be salvaged by implantation of an inverted total shoulder prosthesis Delta in the elderly. However, despite the generally high success rate and satisfying clinical results of inverted total shoulder arthroplasty, this treatment option has potential complications. Therefore, the objective of this study was a prospective evaluation of the clinical and radiological outcome after a minimum of 2 years follow-up of patients undergoing inverted shoulder replacement with or without prior rotator cuff repair. Patients and Methods. Sixty-eight shoulders in 66 patients (36 women and 30 men) operated between February 2002 and June 2007 with a mean age of 66 years (ranging from 53 to 84 years) were first assessed preoperatively and then at minimum 2 years follow-up, using the Constant score for pain, Constant Shoulder Score, Oxford Shoulder Score, UCLA Shoulder rating scale, DASH Score, Rowe Score for Instability and Oxford Instability Score. 29 patients (Group A) had undergone previous shoulder arthroscopy for cuff tear reconstruction at a mean of 29 months (range 12 to 48 months) before surgery and 39 patients (Group B) underwent primary implantation of an inverted total shoulder prosthesis Delta. Any complications in both groups were assessed according to Goslings and Gouma. Results. We report statistically significant improvements of all obtained scores at a mean follow-up of 42 months (ranging from 24 to 96 months) in both groups. Significant outcome differences between 29 patients with previous shoulder arthroscopy for cuff tear reconstruction and 39 without previous shoulder arthroscopy were not observed. Eight complications occurred altogether, in terms of a nerve lesion once, loosening of the humeral stem three times, and loosening or fracture of the glenoid component four times. Conclusion. We did not detect any statistically significant impact of previous insufficient shoulder arthroscopy for cuff tear reconstruction on the outcome and survival rate after the implantation of the inverted total shoulder prosthesis Delta. We conclude that reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the Delta prosthesis is significantly beneficial in terms of less shoulder pain, higher stability and gain of range of motion without this beneficial effect being significantly weakened by previous insufficient shoulder arthroscopy for cuff tear reconstruction. We believe that previous arthroscopic cuff tear reconstruction should therefore be included in the treatment algorithm