Aims. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale, appropriately powered, randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing internal fracture fixation and distal femoral replacement (DFR) for distal femoral fractures in older patients. Patients and Methods. Seven centres recruited patients into the study. Patients were eligible if they were greater than 65 years of age with a distal femoral fracture, and if the surgeon felt that they were suitable for either form of treatment. Outcome measures included the patients’ willingness to participate, clinicians’ willingness to recruit, rates of loss to follow-up, the ability to capture data, estimates of standard deviation to inform the sample size calculation, and the main determinants of cost. The primary clinical outcome measure was the EuroQol five-dimensional index (EQ-5D) at six months following injury. Results. Of 36 patients who met the inclusion criteria, five declined to participate and eight were not recruited, leaving 23 patients to be randomized. One patient withdrew before surgery. Of the remaining patients, five (23%) withdrew during the follow-up period and six (26%) died. A 100% response rate was achieved for the EQ-5D at each follow-up point, excluding one missing datapoint at baseline. In the DFR group, the mean cost of the implant outweighed the mean cost of many other items, including theatre time, length of stay, and readmissions. For a powered RCT, a total sample size of 1400 would be required with 234 centres recruiting over three years. At six months, the EQ-5D utility index was lower in the DFR group. Conclusion. This study found that running a full-scale trial in this country would not be feasible. However, it may be feasible to undertake an international multicentre trial, and our findings provide some guidance about the power of such a study, the numbers required, and some challenges that should be anticipated and addressed. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1408–1415

Magnesium calcium alloys are promising candidates for an application as biodegradable osteosynthesis implants [1,2]. As the success of most internal fracture fixation techniques relies on safe anchorage of bone screws, there is necessity to investigate the holding power of biodegradable magnesium calcium alloy screws. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the holding power of magnesium calcium alloy screws and commonly used surgical steel screws, as a control, by pull-out testing. Magnesium calcium alloy screws with 0.8wt% calcium (MgCa0.8) and conventional surgical steel screws (S316L) of identical geometries (major diameter 4mm, core diameter 3mm, thread pitch 1mm) were implanted into both tibiae of 40 rabbits. The screws were placed into the lateral tibial cortex just proximal of the fibula insertion and tightened with a manual torque gauge (15cNm). For intended pull-out tests a 1.5mm thick silicone washer served as spacer between bone and screw head. Six animals with MgCa0.8 and four animals with S316L were followed up for 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks, respectively. Thereafter the rabbits were sacrificed. Both tibiae were explanted, adherent soft tissue and new bone was carefully dissected around the screw head. Pull-out tests were carried out with an MTS 858 MiniBionix at a rate of 0.1mm/sec until failure of the screw or the bone. For each trial the maximum pull-out force [N] was determined. Statistical analysis was performed (ANOVA, Student's t-test). Both implant materials were tolerated well. Radiographically, new bone was detected at the implantation site of MgCa0.8 and S316L, which was carefully removed to perform pull-out trials. Furthermore, periimplant accumulations of gas were radiographically detected in MgCa0.8. The pull-out force of MgCa0.8 and S316L did not significantly differ (p = 0.121) after two weeks. From 6 weeks on the pull-out force of MgCa0.8 decreased resulting in significantly lower pull-out values after 8 weeks. Contrary, S316L pull-out force increased throughout the follow up. Thus, S316L showed significantly higher pull-out values than MgCa0.8 after 4, 6 and 8 weeks (p<0.001). MgCa0.8 showed good biocompatibility and pull-out values comparable to S316L in the first weeks of implantation. Thus, its application as biodegradable osteosynthesis implant is conceivable. Further studies are necessary to investigate whether the reduced holding power of MgCa0.8 is sufficient for secure fracture fixation. In addition, not only solitary screws, but also screw-plate-combinations should be examined over a longer time period. Acknowledgements. The study is part of the collaborative research centre 599 funded by the German Research Foundation