In older patients (>75 years of age), with an intact rotator cuff, requiring a total shoulder replacement (TSR) there is, at present, uncertainty whether an anatomic TSR (aTSR) or a reverse TSR (rTSR) is best for the patient. This comparison study of same age patients aims to assess clinical and radiological outcomes of older patients (≥75 years) who received either an aTSR or a rTSA. Consecutive patients with a minimum age of 75 years who received an aTSR (n=44) or rTSR (n=51) were prospectively studied. Pre- and postoperative clinical evaluations included the ASES score, Constant score, SPADI score, DASH score, range of motion (ROM) and pain and patient satisfaction for a follow-up of 2 years. Radiological assessment identified glenoid and humeral component osteolysis, including notching with a rTSR. Postoperative improvement for ROM and all clinical assessment scores for both groups was found. There were significantly better patient reported outcome scores (PROMs) in the aTSR group compared with the rTSR patients (p<0.001). Both groups had only minor osteolysis on radiographs. No revisions were required in either group. The main complications were scapular stress fractures for the rTSR patients and acromioclavicular joint pain for both groups. This study of older patients (>75 years) demonstrated that an aTSR for a judiciously selected patient with good rotator cuff muscles can lead to a better clinical outcome and less early complications than a rTSR

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears often lead to superior migration of the humeral head, which can markedly impair glenohumeral kinematics and function. Although treatments currently exist for treating such pathology, no clear choice exists for the middle-aged patient demographic. Therefore, a metallic subacromial implant was developed for the purpose of restoring normal glenohumeral kinematics and function. The objective of this study was to determine this implant's ability in restoring normal humeral head position. It was hypothesized that (1) the implant would restore near normal humeral head position and (2) the implant shape could be optimized to improve restoration of the normal humeral head position. A titanium implant was designed and 3D printed. It consisted of four design variables that varied in both implant thickness (5mm and 8mm) and curvature of the humeral articulating surface (high constraint and low constraint. To assess these different designs, these implants were sequentially assessed in a cadaver-based biomechanical testing protocol. Eight cadaver specimens (64 ± 13 years old) were loaded at 0, 30, and 60 degrees of glenohumeral abduction using a previously developed shoulder simulator. An 80N load was equally distributed across all three deltoid heads while a 10N load was applied to each rotator cuff muscle. Testing states included a fully intact rotator cuff state, a posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tear state (cuff deficient state), and the four implant designs. An optical tracking system (Northern Digital, Ontario, Canada) was used to record the translation of the humeral head relative to the glenoid in both superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions. Superior-Inferior Translation. The creation of a posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tear resulted in significant superior translation of the humeral head relative to the intact cuff state (P=0.016). No significant differences were observed between each implant design and the intact cuff state as all implants decreased the superior migration of the humeral head that was observed in the cuff deficient state. On average, the 5mm low and high constraint implant models were most effective at restoring normal humeral head position to that of the intact cuff state (-1.3 ± 2.0mm, P=0.223; and −1.5 ± 2.3mm, P=0.928 respectively). Anterior-Posterior Translation. No significant differences were observed across all test states for anterior-posterior translation of the humeral head. The cuff deficient on average resulted in posterior translation of the humeral head, however, this was not statistically significant (P=0.128). Both low and high constraint implant designs were found to be most effective at restoring humeral head position to that of the intact cuff state, on average resulting in a small anterior offset (5mm high constraint: 2.0 ± 4.7mm, P=1.000; 8mm high constraint: 1.6 ± 4.9mm, P=1.000). The 5mm high constraint implant was most effective in restoring normal humeral head position in both the superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions. The results from this study suggest the implant may be an effective treatment for restoring normal glenohumeral kinematics and function in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Future studies are needed to address the mechanical efficiency related to arm abduction which is a significant issue related to patient outcomes

Background. Rotator cuff atrophy evaluated with computed tomography scans has been associated with asymmetric glenoid wear and humeral head subluxation in glenohumeral arthritis. Magnetic resonance imaging has increased sensitivity for identifying rotator cuff pathology and has not been used to investigate this relationship. The purpose of this study was to use MRI to assess the association of rotator cuff muscle atrophy and glenoid morphology in primary glenohumeral arthritis. Methods. 132 shoulders from 129 patients with primary GHOA were retrospectively reviewed and basic demographic information was collected. All patients had MRIs that included appropriate orthogonal imaging to assess glenoid morphology and rotator cuff pathology and were reviewed by two senior surgeons. All patients had intact rotator cuff tendons. Glenoid morphology was assigned using the modified-Walch classification system (types A1, A2, B1, B2, B3, C, and D) and rotator cuff fatty infiltration was assigned using Goutallier scores. Results. 46 (35%) of the shoulders had posterior wear patterns (23 type B2s, 23 type B3s). Both the infraspinatus and teres minor independently had significantly more fatty infiltration in B2 and B3 type glenoids compared to type A glenoids (p<0.001). There was a greater imbalance in posterior rotator cuff muscle fatty atrophy in B2 and B3 type glenoids compared to type A glenoids (p<0.001). However, there was no difference in axial plane imbalance between B2 and B3 glenoids (p=1.00). There was increased amount fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus among B2 and B3-type glenoids compared to type A glenoids on multivariate analysis controlling for age and gender (p<0.001). Conclusions. These results identify significant axial plane rotator cuff muscle imbalances in B2 and B3-type glenoids compared to concentrically worn glenoids, favoring a relative increase in fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus and teres minor compared to the subscapularis in glenoids with patterns of posterior wear. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Severe glenoid bone loss in patients with osteoarthritis with intact rotator cuff is associated with posterior glenoid bone loss and posterior humeral subluxation. Management of severe glenoid bone loss during shoulder arthroplasty is controversial and technically challenging and options range from humeral hemiarthroplasty, anatomic shoulder replacement with glenoid bone grafting or augmented glenoid component implantation, to reverse replacement with reaming to correct version or structural bone grafting or metallic augmentation of the bone deficiency. Shoulder replacement with severe glenoid bone loss is technically challenging and characterised by higher rates of complications and revisions. Hemiarthroplasty has limited benefit for pain relief and function especially if eccentric glenoid wear exists. Bone loss with >15 degrees of retroversion likely requires version correction include bone-grafting, augmented glenoid components, or reverse total shoulder replacement. Asymmetric reaming may improve version but is limited to 15 degrees of version correction in order to preserve subchondral bone and glenoid bone vault depth. Bone-grafting of glenoid wear and defects has had mixed results with graft-related complications, periprosthetic radiolucent lines, and glenoid component failure of fixation. Implantation of an augmented wedge or step polyethylene glenoid component improves joint version while preserving subchondral bone, but is technically demanding and with minimal short term clinical follow-up. A Mayo study demonstrated roughly 50% of patients with posteriorly augmented polyethylene had radiolucent lines and 1/3 had posterior subluxation. Another wedge polyethylene design had 66% with bone ingrowth around polyethylene fins at 3 years. Long term outcomes are unknown for these new wedge augmented glenoid components. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty avoids many risks of anatomic replacement glenoid component fixation and stability but is associated with a high complication rate (15%) including neurologic and baseplate loosening and often requires structural bone grafting behind the baseplate with suboptimal outcomes or metallic augmented baseplates with limited evidence and short term outcomes. Reverse replacement with baseplate bone grafting or metal augmentation is technically challenging due to limited native glenoid bone stock available for baseplate component ingrowth and long term fixation. Failure to correct glenoid superior inclination and restore neutral version within 10 degrees increases the risks of reverse baseplate failure of fixation, pull out, and failure of reverse replacement. Reverse baseplate failure rates in patients with severe glenoid bone loss and concomitant glenoid bone grafting range from 5–11%. The minimum native glenoid bony contact with the baseplate is unknown but likely is approximately 1cm of native bone contacting a central ingrowth post and a minority (∼15–25%) of native glenoid contacting the backside of the baseplate. Failure to correct posterior bone loss can lead to retroversion of the baseplate, reduced external rotation, posterior scapular notching, and posteromedial polyethylene wear. In summary, shoulder replacement with severe glenoid bone loss is technically challenging and characterised by higher rates of complication and revision

Patients over 70 years old have subclinical or impending rotator cuff dysfunction, raising concern about TSA in this population. The purpose of this study is to examine whether reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) should be considered for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis in the presence of an intact rotator cuff (GHOA+IRC in patients older than 70 years of age. Twenty-five elderly (>70 years) patients at least one year status-post RTSA for GHOA+IRC were matched via age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and whether the procedure involved the dominant extremity with 25 GHOA+IRC patients who received anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Standardised outcome measures, range of motion, and treatment costs were compared between the two groups. Treatment cost was assessed using implant and physical therapy costs as well as reimbursement. Patients who received RTSA for GHO+IRC had significantly lower pre-operative active forward elevation (AFE, 69° vs. 98°, p <0.001) and experienced a greater change in AFE (p=0.01), but had equivalent AFE at final follow-up (140° vs. 142°, p=0.71). Outcomes were otherwise equivalent between groups with no differences. In both those patients who underwent TSA and those that underwent RTSA, significant improvements between pre-operative and final follow-up were seen in all standardised outcome measures and in AFE (p<0.001 in all cases). RTSA provided these outcomes at a cost savings of $2,025 in Medicare reimbursement due to decreased physical therapy costs. In patients over the age of 70 with GHOA+IRC, RTSA provides similar improvement in clinical outcomes to TSA at a reduced cost while avoiding issues related to the potential for subclinical or impending rotator cuff dysfunction

Aim. Biomechanical models of the shoulder have been used to measure forces and glenohumeral pressures. Their results have been found to vary. The aim of this study was to produce a biomechanical model to replicate the biomechanical principles of the glenohumeral joint and to measure the centre of pressure on the glenoid through a mid-range of arm movement with an intact and a compromised rotator cuff. Method. The model consisted of anatomic saw-bones of a scapula and proximal humerus with calibrated extension springs to mimic rotator cuff muscles. Glenoid pressures were measured using pressure sensitive film. The joint was examined through a mid-range of movement with an intact rotator cuff and a supraspinatus deficiency. Results. In the normal cuff model, in neutral, the centre of pressure was in the centre of the glenoid and migrated inferiorly on abduction, rotation and 45° of flexion. The only exception to this was 90° flexion and 35° extension. Concavity compression force rose in internal/external rotation, was steady on flexion/extension but dropped on abduction. In the supraspinatus-deficient model, the centre of pressure dropped to the inferior lip in neutral and rose on any movement with extremes of flexion and abduction, resulting in subacromial impingement. Concavity compression force rose slightly on flexion and extension. On abduction, the force rose as much as three times that of the normal cuff. Discussion. The results suggest that the humeral joint reaction force rests in the centre of the glenoid and is driven inferiorly on arm movement. Loss of supraspinatus reverses this pattern and leads to impingement. These results would be in keeping with osteoarthritic patterns in vivo and may have a bearing on glenoid prosthesis design. Conclusion. The glenohumeral joint demonstrated inferior migration of the humeral reaction force on elevation of the arm. Cuff pathology leads to breakdown of this mechanism