Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and Reverse Total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are two of the most performed shoulder operations today. Traditionally postoperative rehabilitation included a period of immobilisation, protecting the joint and allowing time for soft tissue healing. This immobilisation period may significantly impact a patient's quality of life (Qol)and ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL's). This period of immobilisation could be safely avoided, accelerating return to function and improving postoperative QoL. This systematic review examines the safety of early mobilisation compared to immobilisation after shoulder arthroplasty focusing on outcomes at one year. A systematic review was performed as per the PRISMA guidelines. Results on functional outcome and shoulder range of motion were retrieved. Six studies were eligible for inclusion, resulting in 719 patients, with arthroplasty performed on 762 shoulders, with information on mobilisation protocols on 736 shoulders (96.6%) and 717 patients (99.7%). The patient cohort comprised 250 males (34.9%) and 467 females (65.1%). Of the patients that successfully completed follow-up, 81.5% underwent RSA (n = 600), and 18.4% underwent TSA (n = 136). Overall, 262 (35.6%) patients underwent early postoperative mobilisation, and 474 shoulders were (64.4%) immobilised for a length of time. Immobilised patients were divided into three subgroups based on the period of immobilisation: three, four, or six weeks. There were 201 shoulders (27.3%) immobilised for three weeks, 77 (10.5%) for four weeks and 196 (26.6%) for six weeks. Five of the six manuscripts found no difference between clinical outcomes at one year when comparing early active motion versus immobilisation after RSA or TSA. Early mobilisation is a safe postoperative rehabilitation pathway following both TSA and RSA. This may lead to an accelerated return to function and improved quality of life in the postoperative period.Methods
Lower limb fractures are commonly treated with cast immobilization, and as a main consequence of strict immobilization this typically leads to loss in muscle mass, decrease of bone density and decline in functional abilities. Body-worn sensors are increasingly used to assess outcome in clinical trials by providing objective mobility parameters in a real-world environment. The aim of this study is to investigate the usability aspects and potential changes in mobility parameters in partial-immobilization patients in real-world conditions. Six healthy young males (age 22.2 ± 1.2 years; weight 76.5 ± 6.7 kg, height 185.8 ± 6.1 cm. Mean ± standard deviation) wore a leg cylinder cast with walker boot to immobilize their dominant leg for two consecutive weeks. Subjects were asked to continuously wear a tri-axial accelerometer on the waist (actibelt) during waking hours for 6 weeks including 2 weeks before, during and after cast immobilisation. The total amount of days of continuous recording was 339 days with a total wearing time of 120 days. Software packages which allow to detect steps and to estimate real-world walking speed were used to analyse the accelerometry data. It was suspected that knee immobilization would affect strongly the wave form of the signal with an impact on the accuracy of the speed algorithm, whereas the step detection should be more robust. This effect was confirmed in a preliminary study performed to quantify the accuracy under immobilization conditions. On the other hand, step numbers are known to be sensitive to fluctuations in wearing time which was not uniform throughout the entire study. We concluded that in this setting step frequency is the most reliable parameter. Step frequency showed a systematic decrease in the values during the immobilization period which recovered to pre-immobilisation values after cast removal. This confirms the usability of accelerometry and sensitivity of its mobility parameters for clinical outcome assessment.
