To evaluate the functional outcome of open humerus diaphyseal fractures treated with the Three-stitch technique of antegrade humerus nailing. This is a retrospective study conducted at the Department of Orthopaedics in D. Y. Patil University, School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, India. The study included 25 patients who were operated on from January 2019 to April 2021 and follow-ups done till May 2022. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with open humerus diaphyseal fractures (Gustilo-Anderson Classification). All patients with closed fractures, skeletally immature patients, and patients with associated head injury were excluded from the study. All patients were operated on with a minimally invasive Three-stitch technique for antegrade humerus nailing. All patients were evaluated based on DASH score. Out of the 25 patients included in the study, all patients showed complete union. The mean age of the patients was 40.4 years (range 23–66 years). The average period for consolidation of fracture was 10.56 weeks (range 8–14 weeks). The DASH score ranged from 0 to 15.8 with an average score of 2.96. Five patients reported complications with three patients of post-operative infection and delayed wound healing and two patients with screw loosening. All complications were resolved with proper wound care and the complete union was noted. None of the patients had an iatrogenic neurovascular injury. Three-stitch antegrade nailing technique is a novel method to treat diaphyseal humerus fractures and provides excellent results. It has various advantages such as minimal invasiveness, minimal injury to the rotator cuff, fewer infection rates, minimal iatrogenic injuries, and good functional outcomes. Therefore, this treatment modality can be effectively used for open humerus diaphyseal fractures

Several studies have evaluated the risk of peroneal nerve (PN) injuries in all-inside lateral meniscal repair using standard knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the 30 degrees flexed knee position which is different from the knee position during actual arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair. The point of concern is “Can the risk of PN injury using standard knee MRIs be accurately determined”. To evaluate and compare the risk of PN injury in all-inside lateral meniscal repair in relation to both borders of the popliteus tendon (PT) using MRIs of the two knee positions in the same patients. Using axial MRI studies with standard knee MRIs and figure-of-4 with joint fluid dilatation actual arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair position MRIs, direct lines were drawn simulating a straight all-inside meniscal repair device from the anteromedial and anterolateral portals to the medial and lateral borders of the PT. The distance from the tip of each line to the PN was measured. If a line touched or passed the PN, a potential risk of iatrogenic injury was noted and a new line was drawn from the same portal to the border of the PN. The danger area was measured from the first line to the new direct line along the joint capsule. In 28 adult patients, the closest distances from each line to the PN in standard knee MRI images were significantly shorter than arthroscopic position MRI images (all p-values < 0.05). All danger areas assessed in the actual arthroscopic position MRIs were included within the danger areas as assessed by the standard knee MRIs. We found that the standard knee MRIs can be used to determine the risk of peroneal nerve injury in arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair, although the risks are slightly overestimated

We describe a lateral approach to the distal humerus based on initial location of the superficial branches of the radial nerve, the inferior lateral cutaneous nerve of the arm and the posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm. In 18 upper limbs the superficial branches of the radial nerve were located in the subcutaneous tissue between the triceps and brachioradialis muscles and dissected proximally to their origin from the radial nerve, exposing the shaft of the humerus. The inferior lateral cutaneous nerve of the arm arose from the radial nerve at the lower part of the spiral groove, at a mean of 14.2 cm proximal to the lateral epicondyle. The posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm arose from the inferior lateral cutaneous nerve at a mean of 6.9 cm (6.0 to 8.1) proximal to the lateral epicondyle and descended vertically along the dorsal aspect of the forearm. The size and constant site of emergence between the triceps and brachioradialis muscles constitute a readily identifiable landmark to explore the radial nerve and expose the humeral shaft.