We have investigated
Introduction: One of the complications of first metatatarsal osteotomies is metatarsalgia secondary to shortening of the first metatarsal. Conservative treatment with insoles is not acceptable to all patients and the traditional treatment of this condition is by shortening osteotomies of the lesser metatarsals (eg Weil, Helal)- the latter osteotomies themselves have complications of causing pain or stiffness in the lesser toes. Purpose: The aim of this work is to report our results of step cut metatarsal lengthening of
Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common elbow injury in children, usually sustained from a fall on the outstretched hand.
Introduction.
Several studies have evaluated the risk of peroneal nerve (PN) injuries in all-inside lateral meniscal repair using standard knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the 30 degrees flexed knee position which is different from the knee position during actual arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair. The point of concern is “Can the risk of PN injury using standard knee MRIs be accurately determined”. To evaluate and compare the risk of PN injury in all-inside lateral meniscal repair in relation to both borders of the popliteus tendon (PT) using MRIs of the two knee positions in the same patients. Using axial MRI studies with standard knee MRIs and figure-of-4 with joint fluid dilatation actual arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair position MRIs, direct lines were drawn simulating a straight all-inside meniscal repair device from the anteromedial and anterolateral portals to the medial and lateral borders of the PT. The distance from the tip of each line to the PN was measured. If a line touched or passed the PN, a potential risk of
Introduction: Injury to the distal third of the axillary artery is well recognised as a complication of proximal humeral fractures. However the risk of
Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the correlation between the occurance of
Background:
Introduction: Operations inside the spinal canal are afflicted with a certain number of
We report seven cases in which open or closed reduction of a shoulder dislocation associated with a fracture of the humeral neck led to displacement of the neck fracture. Avascular necrosis of the humeral head developed in all six patients with anatomical neck fractures. All five anterior dislocations also had a fracture of the greater tuberosity and both posterior dislocations had a fracture of the lesser tuberosity. The neck fracture had not initially been recognised in three of the seven cases. In five cases attempted shoulder reduction led to complete displacement of the head segment, which was treated by open reduction and minimal internal fixation. In the other two cases, shoulder reduction caused only mild to moderate displacement which was accepted and the fracture was treated conservatively. We conclude that biplane radiography is essential before reduction of a shoulder dislocation. Neck fractures must always be ruled out, especially where there are tuberosity fractures. In our series, careful closed reduction under general anaesthesia with optimal relaxation and fluoroscopic control did not prevent
We have reviewed our experience of four
Vascular injuries during total hip arthroplasty
(THA) are rare but when they occur, have serious consequences. These have
traditionally been managed with open exploration and repair, but
more recently there has been a trend towards percutaneous endovascular
management. We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess
if this change in trend has led to an improvement in the overall
reported rates of morbidity and mortality during the last 22 years
in comparison with the reviews of the literature published previously. We found a total of 61 articles describing 138 vascular injuries
in 124 patients. Injuries because of a laceration were the most
prevalent (n = 51, 44%) and the most common presenting feature,
when recorded, was bleeding (n = 41, 53.3%). Delay in diagnosis
was associated with the type of vascular lesion (p <
0.001) and
the clinical presentation (p = 0.002). Open exploration and repair was the most common form of management,
however percutaneous endovascular intervention was used in one third
of the injuries and more constantly during the last 13 years. The main overall reported complications included death (n = 9,
7.3%), amputation (n = 2, 1.6%), and persistent ischaemia (n = 9,
7.3%). When compared with previous reviews there was a similar rate
of mortality but lower rates of amputation and permanent disability,
especially in patients managed by endovascular strategies. Cite this article:
The use of the haptically bounded saw blades in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) can potentially help to limit surrounding soft-tissue injuries. However, there are limited data characterizing these injuries for cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA with the use of this technique. The objective of this cadaver study was to compare the extent of soft-tissue damage sustained through a robotic-assisted, haptically guided TKA (RATKA) A total of 12 fresh-frozen pelvis-to-toe cadaver specimens were included. Four surgeons each prepared three RATKA and three MTKA specimens for cruciate-retaining TKAs. A RATKA was performed on one knee and a MTKA on the other. Postoperatively, two additional surgeons assessed and graded damage to 14 key anatomical structures in a blinded manner. Kruskal–Wallis hypothesis tests were performed to assess statistical differences in soft-tissue damage between RATKA and MTKA cases.Objectives
Methods
Introduction.
This suggests that the transverse process or its associated structures have an important stabilizing function on the spine.
While manual total knee arthroplasty (MTKA) procedures have demonstrated excellent clinical success, occasionally intraoperative damage to soft tissues can occur. Robotic-arm assisted technology is designed to constrain a sawblade in a haptic zone to help ensure that only the desired bone cuts are made. The objective of this cadaver study was to quantify the extent of soft tissue damage sustained during TKA through a robotic-arm assisted (RATKA) haptically guided approach and conventional MTKA approach. Four surgeons each prepared six cadaveric legs for CR TKA: 3 MTKA and 3 RATKA, for a total of 12 RATKA and 12 MTKA knees. With the assistance of an arthroscope, two independent surgeons graded the damage of 14 knee structures: dMCL, sMCL, posterior oblique ligament (POL), semi-membranosus muscle tendon (SMT), gastrocnemius muscle medial head (GMM), PCL, ITB, lateral retinacular (LR), LCL, popliteus tendon, gastrocnemius muscle lateral head (GML), patellar ligament, quadriceps tendon (QT), and extensor mechanism (EM). Damage was defined as tissue fibers that were visibly torn, cut, frayed, or macerated. Percent damage was averaged between evaluators, and grades were assigned: Grade 1) complete soft tissue preservation to ≤5% damage; Grade 2) 6 to 25% damage; Grade 3) 26 to 75% damage; and Grade 4) 76 to 100% damage. A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used for statistical comparisons. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Introduction
Methods
In this study, we discuss 68 cases in which peripheral nerve trunks were inadvertently divided by surgeons. Most of these accidents occurred in the course of planned operations. Delay in diagnosis and in effecting repair was common. We list the nerves particularly at risk and the operations in which special care is needed. We recommend steps to secure prompt diagnosis and early treatment.
I never considered this to be a significant problem if it is noticed. (back to that later) Aaron Rosenberg's report seems to have agreed, but at the last members meeting of the Knee Society, Boston, September 2009, others had experience that contradicted my view. With their experience, ultimately the results were very substantially compromised. This video and presentation show you how to avoid a bad result, actually obtain a perfect result, if you or your student assistant, resident or fellow, bags the MCL. There are three important points. (1) One needs to recognise the occurrence. (2) The setting is usually varus and so direct end-to-end repair cannot be depended upon. (3) Use of a semitendinosis tenodesis, together with an imperfect, distracted direct repair works perfectly well! (1) Recognition: The setting is usually varus, but I have had one case in which the chief resident, working with the fellow succeeded in getting the MCL in a valgus knee! In this usually tight varus setting the key feature is that at some point in the case, before component placement, one notices that the exposure is all of a sudden better! Now, the guilty resident or just a passive assisting resident/fellow will usually disagree. The extension space is not so obviously lax, but the flexion space is. Secondly, you do not feel an intact ligament in flexion. And, to prove it I have had to do a little more exposure of the superficial MCL to show the tear. There are at least three mechanisms. Most common is a saw cut. Next is possibly injury with the scalpel or cutting cautery during exposure, and last is damage essentially pre-operatively by a very sharp medial osteophyte which has thoroughly abraded the ligament. Laxity in full flexion is not necessarily obvious as the posterior capsular integrity helps hide the instability. Again, the really intact ligament is well felt, and in the situation of laceration, the tibia pulls forward more on the medial side, the medial flexion space opens, and what was usually a tight exposure gets suddenly better. (2) When varus is the setting, I have found it impossible or at least uncomfortable to depend upon direct repair. When the soft tissues are needing to be released or simply undergoing more stress than usual and a lot more than on the lateral side, I see it as unwise to expect or depend upon only a medial repair to hold. (3) The semitendinosis tenodesis has worked essentially perfectly in every one of my cases. These patients have had no post-operative instability and they have had better than average to extremely good ROM. A presumably key point is not to alter the patient's post-operative regimen! And, to avoid some passive alteration of PT, I advise specifically that the surgeon or those in his/her team do not mention the occurrence to the patient, the family or the PT! I put the whole story in the op-note, and weeks later I will specifically tell the patient what the staple in place is all about.