Introduction. One of the most common complications of ceramic on ceramic hip replacement is squeaking. The association of Accolade stem and Trident acetabular system has been reported to have squeaking incidence of up to 35,6%. There is doubt if this phenomenon occurs due to: the stem titanium alloy, the V40 femoral neck, the recessed liner of the trident cup or even the mal-seating of the trident insert on the cup. Objectives. Primary: The purpose of the present study was to determine the incidence of squeaking in association with the use of Exeter stem and Trident ceramic acetabular system. Secondary: Analysis of the correlation of the cup abduction angle and squeaking. Methods. During the period from March 2004 to December 2008, two surgeons performed 87 total hip arthroplasties in 77 patients with use of a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing (Exeter stem, alumina head, Trident ceramic acetabular system). Seventy six patients (86 THA) were available for review after at least 18 months follow-up. The incidence of squeaking and other noises was analyzed. Cup abduction angle was measured. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine if a correlation existed between the cup abduction angle and squeaking. Results. The incidence of squeaking was 2,63% (2 patients). Both patients reported a “click” noise in hyperextension of the hip. The mean abduction angle was 44 degress (35–60), and 48 degrees (46 and 50) on the squeaking group. There was no statistically significant difference in the in the mean cup inclination between squeaky and quiet hips. Conclusion. The incidence of squeaking in association with the use of Exeter stem and Trident ceramic acetabular system was 2,63%. There was no correlation of the cup abduction angle and squeaking

Aims

This study aimed to analyze the correlation between transverse process (TP) fractures of the fourth (L4) and fifth (L5) lumbar vertebrae and biomechanical and haemodynamic stability in patients with a pelvic ring injury, since previous data are inconsistent.

We have reviewed our experience in managing 11 patients who sustained an indirect sternal fracture in combination with an upper thoracic spinal injury between 2003 and 2006. These fractures have previously been described as ‘associated’ fractures, but since the upper thorax is an anatomical entity composed of the upper thoracic spine, ribs and sternum joined together, we feel that the term ‘fractures of the upper transthoracic cage’ is a better description. These injuries are a challenge because they are unusual and easily overlooked. They require a systematic clinical and radiological examination to identify both lesions. This high-energy trauma gives severe devastating concomitant injuries and CT with contrast and reconstruction is essential after resuscitation to confirm the presence of all the lesions. The injury level occurs principally at T4–T5 and at the manubriosternal joint. These unstable fractures need early posterior stabilisation and fusion or, if treated conservatively, a very close follow-up.

A total of 11 patients with combined traumatic injuries of the brachial plexus and spinal cord were reviewed retrospectively. Brachial plexus paralysis in such dual injuries tends to be diagnosed and treated late and the prognosis is usually poor. The associated injuries, which were all on the same side as the plexus lesion, were to the head (nine cases), shoulder girdle (five), thorax (nine) and upper limb (seven). These other injuries were responsible for the delayed diagnosis of brachial plexus paralysis and the poor prognosis was probably because of the delay in starting treatment and the severity of the associated injuries. When such injuries are detected in patients with spinal cord trauma, it is important to consider the possibility of involvement of the brachial plexus.