Aim. Polypropylene (PPE) synthetic mesh is increasingly used in knee arthroplasty surgery to salvage a disrupted extensor mechanism. Despite its clinical success, it is associated with a high rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), which is hypothesized to be caused by bacterial biofilm. The purpose of the current study is to describe the progression of PPE-based biofilm formation over time and to determine if intraoperative antiseptic solutions could be used to effectively remove biofilm when treating PJI. Method. Commercially available knotted monofilament PPE mesh. 1. was cut into 10mm circular shape, immersed in tryptic soy broth (TSB) with methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus and cultured individually in 48-well plates for 10 days to elucidate the biofilm grown on mesh over time. At every 24 hours, a triplicate of samples was retrieved and biofilm on the mesh was dislodged by sonicating at 52 kHz for 15 minutes and quantified by counting colony-forming units (CFUs) after overnight growth. The biofilm growth was also verified using scanning electron microscopy. The effect of saline and antiseptic solutions was verified by exposing 1) 0.05% chlorohexidine gluconate. 2. , 2) acetic acid-based mixture. 3. , 3) diluted povidone-iodine (0.35%), 4) undiluted povidone-iodine (10%). 4. , and 5) 1:1 combination of 10% povidone-iodine & 3% hydrogen peroxide on immature and mature biofilms for 3 minutes, created by culturing with bacteria for 24 hours and 72 hours respectively. All experiments were performed in quintuples and repeated. Antiseptic treatments that produced a three-log reduction in CFU counts compared to controls were considered clinically significant. Results. PPE-mesh produced reliable CFU counts at 24 hours and reached peak growth at 72 hours. For immature biofilm, all formulations of povidone-iodine produced significant reductions in CFU counts compared to controls. Although not meeting the established threshold, saline irrigation removed 86.5% of CFUs, while formulation based on chlorohexidine and acetic acid removed 99.2% and 99.7% respectively. For mature biofilm, formulations based on povidone-iodine and acetic acid produced significant reductions in CFU counts. Conclusions. Our findings suggest biofilm may form on mesh as early as 24 hours after bacterial exposure. Povidone-iodine formulations were consistently the most effective in removing biofilm on mesh surfaces. We recommend that surgeons consider using an antiseptic solution, preferably povidone-iodine-based, in addition to regular saline lavage when attempting to salvage a PPE mesh in the setting of PJI. 1. Marlex mesh (CR Bard, Davol Inc, Warwick, RI), . 2. Irrisept (Irrimax Corp, Gainesville, FL), . 3. Bactisure (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, IN), . 4. Aplicare (Inc, Meriden, CT)

Aim. Irrigation and debridement with an irrigation solution are essential components of the surgical management of acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Nevertheless, there is a lack of agreement regarding the most effective solution to use. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature concerning the efficacy of different irrigation solutions over bacterial biofilm. Method. This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Network meta-analysis (PRISMA-NMA) checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus databases from inception to September 1, 2023. We combined terms related to PJI, biofilm and irrigation solutions studied in vitro. We performed a network meta-analysis to analyze which irrigation solution achieved a higher reduction of colony forming units (CFU) after specific exposure times, always with a maximum of five minutes, replicating intraoperative conditions. Effect-size was summarized with logarithmic response ratio (logRR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The rank probability for each treatment was calculated using the p-scores. Results. We screened 233 potential sources. Following deduplication, screening and full-text review, four studies with ten irrigation solutions for different duration of exposures were included, always less than five minutes, replicating intraoperative conditions. Solutions were studied over mature biofilms of most frequent bacteria grown over metal, bone cement or polyethylene surfaces. The highest effect was achieved with povidone iodine 10% during 5 minutes (logRR: −12.02; 95% CI: −14.04, −9.99). The best ranked solutions were povidone iodine 10% during five, three and one minute (respective p-scores: 0.977, 0.932, 0.887) and its combination with hydrogen peroxide for 3 minutes (p-score: 0.836). Povidone iodine 0.3% acting for 5 minutes completed the top 5 best ranked solutions in this study (p-score: 0.761). We assumed that there were no inconsistencies in our network because after examining both scenarios, with and without inconsistencies, the results were not significantly different. Conclusions. Our results show that 10% povidone-iodine is the best antiseptic solution when studied in vitro in the context of prosthetic joint infection. However, the included studies did not evaluate the possible cytotoxic effects of these solutions. This should also be taken into account before choosing the most appropriate antiseptic solution

The number of cemented femoral stems implanted in the United States continues to slowly decrease over time. Approximately 10% of all femoral components implanted today are cemented, and the majority are in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The European experience is quite different. In the UK, cemented femoral stems account for approximately 50% of all implants, while in the Swedish registry, cemented stems still account for the majority of implanted femoral components. Recent data demonstrating some limitations of uncemented fixation in the elderly for primary THA, may suggest that a cemented femoral component may be an attractive alternative in such a group. Two general philosophies exist with regards to the cemented femoral stem: Taper slip and Composite Beam. There are flagship implants representing both philosophies and select designs have shown excellent results past 30 years. A good femoral component design and cementing technique, however, is crucial for long-term clinical success. The author's personal preference is that of a “taper slip” design. The cemented Exeter stem has shown excellent results past 30 years with rare cases of loosening. The characteristic behavior of such a stem is to allow slight subsidence of the stem within the cement mantle through the process of cement creep. One or two millimeters of subsidence in the long-term have been observed with no detrimental clinical consequences. There have been ample results in the literature showing the excellent results at mid- and long-term in all patient groups. The author's current indication for a cemented stem include the elderly with no clear and definitive cutoff for age, most likely in females, THA for femoral neck fracture, small femoral canals such as those patients with DDH, and occasionally in patients with history of previous hip infection. Modern and impeccable cement technique is paramount for durable cemented fixation. It is important to remember that the goal is interdigitation of the cement with cancellous bone, so preparing the femur should not remove cancellous bone. Modern technique includes distal plugging of the femoral canal, pulsatile lavage, drying of the femoral canal with epinephrine or hydrogen peroxide, retrograde fill of the femoral canal with cement with appropriate suction and pressurization of the femoral cement into the canal prior to implantation of the femoral component. The dreaded “cement implantation syndrome” leading to sudden death can be avoided by appropriate fluid resuscitation prior to implanting the femoral component. This is an extremely rare occurrence today with reported mortality for the Exeter stem of 1 in 10,000. A cemented femoral component has been shown to be clinically successful at long term. Unfortunately, the art of cementing a femoral component has been lost and is rarely performed in the US. The number of cemented stems, unfortunately, may continue to go down as it is uncommonly taught in residency and fellowship, however, it might find a resurgence as the limits of uncemented fixation in the elderly are encountered. National joint registers support the use of cemented femoral components, and actually demonstrate higher survivorship at short term when compared to all other uncemented femoral components. A cemented femoral component should be in the hip surgeons armamentarium when treating patients undergoing primary and revision THA

The number of cemented femoral stems implanted in the United States continues to slowly decrease over time. Approximately 10% of all femoral components implanted today are cemented, and the majority are in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The European experience is quite different, in the UK, cemented femoral stems account for approximately 50% of all implants, while in the Swedish registry, cemented stems still account for the majority of implanted femoral components. Recent data demonstrating some limitations of uncemented fixation in the elderly for primary THA, may suggest that a cemented femoral component may be an attractive alternative in such a group. Two general philosophies exist with regards to the cemented femoral stem: Taper slip and Composite Beam. There are flagship implants representing both philosophies and select designs have shown excellent results past 30 years. A good femoral component design and cementing technique, however, is crucial for long-term clinical success. The authors' personal preference is that of a “taper slip” design. The cemented Exeter stem has shown excellent results past 30 years with rare cases of loosening. The characteristic behavior of such a stem is to allow slight subsidence of the stem within the cement mantle through the process of cement creep. One or two millimeters of subsidence in the long-term have been observed with no detrimental clinical consequences. There have been ample results in the literature showing the excellent results at mid- and long-term in all patient groups. The authors' current indications for a cemented stem include the elderly with no clear and definitive cutoff for age, most likely in females, THA for femoral neck fracture, small femoral canals such as those patients with DDH, and occasionally in patients with history of previous hip infection. Modern and impeccable cement technique is paramount for durable cemented fixation. It is important to remember that the goal is interdigitation of the cement with cancellous bone, so preparing the femur should not remove cancellous bone. Modern technique includes distal plugging of the femoral canal, pulsatile lavage, drying of the femoral canal with epinephrine or hydrogen peroxide, retrograde fill of the femoral canal with cement with appropriate suction and pressurization of the femoral cement into the canal prior to implantation of the femoral component. The dreaded “cement implantation syndrome” leading to sudden death can be avoided by appropriate fluid resuscitation prior to implanting the femoral component. This is a extremely rare occurrence today with reported mortality for the Exeter stem of 1 in 10,000. A cemented femoral component has been shown to be clinically successful at long term. Unfortunately, the art of cementing a femoral component has been lost and is rarely performed in the US. The number of cemented stems unfortunately may continue to go down as it is uncommonly taught in residency and fellowship, however it might find a resurgence as the limits of uncemented fixation in the elderly are encountered. National joint registers support the use of cemented femoral components, and actually demonstrate higher survivorship at short term when compared to all other uncemented femoral components. A cemented femoral component should be in the hip surgeons' armamentarium when treating patients undergoing primary and revision THA

The posterior midline approach used in spinal surgery has been associated with a significant rate of wound dehiscence. This study investigates anatomical study of the arterial supply of the cervical and thoracic spinal muscles and overlying skin at each vertebral level. It aimed to provide possible anatomical basis for such wound complications. A dissection and angiographic study was undertaken on 8 cadaveric neck and posterior torso from 6 embalmed and 2 fresh human cadavers. Harvested cadavers were warmed and hydrogen peroxide was injected into the major arteries. Lead oxide contrast mixture was injected in stepwise manner into the subclavian and posterior intercostal arteries of each specimen. Specimens were subsequently cross-sectioned at each vertebral level and bones elevated from the soft tissue. Radiographs were taken at each stage of this process and analysed. The cervical paraspinal muscles were supplied by the deep cervical arteries, transverse cervical arteries and vertebral arteries. The thoracic paraspinal muscles were supplied by the superior intercostal arteries, transverse cervical arteries and posterior intercostal arteries. In the thoracic region, two small vessels provide the longitudinal connection between the segmental arteries and in the cervical region, deep cervical arteries provide such connection from C3 to C6. The arterial vessels supplying the paraspinal muscles on the left and right side anastomose with each other, posterior to the spinous processes in all vertebral levels. At cervical vertebral levels, source arteries travel near the surgical field and are not routinely cauterised; Haematoma is postulated to be the cause of wound complications. At thoracic levels, source arteries travel in the surgical field and tissue ischemia is a contributing factor to wound complications, especially in operations over extensive levels. Post-operative wound complications is a multi-factorial clinical problem, the anatomical findings in this study provide possible explanations for wound dehiscence in the posterior midline approach. It is postulated that drain tubes may reduce the incidence of haematoma in the cervical level

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to compare using a novel cementing technique with hydroxyapatite granules at bone-cement interface with using the 3. rd. cementing technique on the acetabular component. Patients and Methods. Between 2005 and 2007, we performed 54 primary cemented THAs using the 3. rd. generation cementing technique with hydroxyapatite granules at bone-cement interface (Group A: 21 hips) or without them (Group B: 33 hips) in 49 patients with dysplastic hip (6 males, 43 female; mean age at operation, 67 years; age range, 48–84 years). Mean follow up was 5.3 years (range, 2.3–7.1 years), with none of the patients lost to follow up. According to Crowe's classification, subluxation was Group I in 31 hips, group II in 11 hips, group III in 8 hips, and group IV in 4 hips. We used Exeter flanged cup, Exeter stem with a 22-mm diameter metal head (Stryker, Benoist Girard, France) and Simplex-P bone cement (Stryker, Limerick, Ireland) in all hips. A posterolateral approach was performed for all patients. Bone graft was performed 25 hips (block bone graft: 11 hips; impaction bone grafting with a metal mesh: 13 hips) from autogeneic femoral head. Our 3. rd. cementing technique is to make multiple 6-mm anchor holes, to clean the the host acetabular bed with pulse lavage, to dry it with hydrogen peroxide and to use Exeter balloon pressurizer and Exeter flanged cup. Results. The outcomes showed no aseptic loosening and radiological loosening at final follow up. Radiolucent line around the acetabular component was present 14% in Group A and 42% in Group B at 4 years after operation. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis of appearance of a radioluent line around the acetabuler component as the end point was 85.7% on group A was significant higher than 57.6% on group B at 4 years. Conclusion. Radiolucent line around cemented acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty using the 3. rd. cementing technique with hydroxyapatite granules at bone-cement interface was significant higher survivorship than them of the 3. rd. cementing technique at 4 years after operation. We suggest that improved novel cementing technique will lead to greater long-term success outcomes of the acetabular component

Introduction. Large diameter femoral heads offer increased range of motion and reduced risk of dislocation. However, their use in total hip arthroplasty has historically been limited by their correlation with increased polyethylene wear. The improved wear resistance of highly crosslinked UHWMPE has led a number of clinicians to transition from implanting traditionally popular sizes (28mm and 32 mm) to implanting 36 mm heads. Desire to further increase stability and range of motion has spurred interest in even larger sizes (> 36 mm). While the long-term clinical ramifications are unknown, in-vivo measurements of highly crosslinked UHMWPE liners indicate increases in head diameter are associated with increased volumetric wear [1]. The goal of this study was to determine if this increase in wear could be negated by using femoral heads with a ceramic surface, such as oxidized Zr-2.5Nb (OxZr), rather than CoCrMo (CoCr). Specifically, wear of 10 Mrad crosslinked UHMWPE (XLPE) against 36 mm CoCr and 44 mm OxZr heads was compared. Materials and Methods. Ram-extruded GUR 1050 UHMWPE was crosslinked by gamma irradiation to 10 Mrad, remelted, and machined into acetabular liners. Liners were sterilized using vaporized hydrogen peroxide and tested against either 36 mm CoCr or 44 mm OxZr (OXINIUM(tm)) heads (n=3). All implants were manufactured by Smith & Nephew (Memphis, TN). Testing was conducted on a hip simulator (AMTI, Watertown, MA) as previously described [2]. The 4000N peak load (4 time body weight for a 102 kg/225 lb patient) and 1.15 Hz frequency used are based upon data obtained from an instrumented implant during fast walking/jogging and have previously been shown to generate measurable XLPE wear [2,3]. Lubricant was a serum (Alpha Calf Fraction, HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT) solution that was replaced once per week [2]. Liners were weighed at least once every million cycles (Mcycle) over the duration of testing (∼ 5 Mcycle). Loaded soak controls were used to correct for fluid absorption. Single factor ANOVA was used to compare groups (a = 0.05). Results. The predominant wear feature displayed on the articular surface of liners was burnishing. There were no signs of fatigue wear or of delamination. Mean wear rates (± std dev) of liners articulated against 36mm CoCr and 44 mm OxZr heads were 3.7 ± 0.4 mm. 3. /Mcycle and 2.7 ± 0.4 mm. 3. /Mcycle, respectively (Figure 1). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.04). Discussion. Although large diameter heads offer biomechanical advantages, their use in total hip arthroplasty has historically been limited due to correlation with increased polyethylene wear. While highly crosslinked liners exhibit significantly improved wear resistance over conventional UHWMPE, their wear has also been shown to increase with head size [1]. Results presented here indicate that this increase in wear can be negated by using OxZr, rather than CoCr. Specifically, wear of XLPE liners was lower against 44 mm OxZr heads than against 36 mm CoCr heads

During the pandemic of COVID-19, some patients with COVID-19 may need emergency surgeries. As spine surgeons, it is our responsibility to ensure appropriate treatment to the patients with COVID-19 and spinal diseases. A protocol for spinal surgery and related management on patients with COVID-19 has been reviewed. Patient preparation for emergency surgeries, indications, and contraindications of emergency surgeries, operating room preparation, infection control precautions and personal protective equipments (PPE), anesthesia management, intraoperative procedures, postoperative management, medical waste disposal, and surveillance of healthcare workers were reviewed. It should be safe for surgeons with PPE of protection level 2 to perform spinal surgeries on patients with COVID-19. Standardized and careful surgical procedures should be necessary to reduce the exposure to COVID-19.