The aim of this audit was to assess the union rate of humeral shaft fractures treated conservatively in a functional brace in our unit, compared to a “gold standard” of 98% as reported by Sarmiento (JBJS 1977). A retrospective clinical and radiographic review of 155 closed humeral shaft fractures managed with a humeral brace from 2005–2012 was performed. Pathological fractures and patients under 18 were excluded. The mean age was 60 (18–94) with 45 males and 72 females. 15 (10%) patients under 18 and 8 (5%) pathological fractures were excluded; 15 (10%) patients were lost to follow up. Of the remaining 117 fractures, 83 (71%) went on to union and 34 (29%) developed a non-union. Mean time to union was 131 days (47–622). 80% of distal fractures and 75% of midshaft fractures united but only 58% of proximal fractures went on to unite. There was no significant difference in union rates between multi fragmentary (> 3 parts) and simple fracture patterns (69% vs 71% respectively). Our study suggests that a lower threshold for operative intervention of proximal third humeral shaft fractures may be required

Background. Peri-prosthetic humerus fractures are relatively uncommon occurrences that can be difficult to manage non-operatively. Locking plate technology has enhanced the surgical management of these fractures. We describe an osteosynthesis technique utilizing a locking plate with eccentrically placed screw holes to place “skive screws” in the proximal end of the plate to achieve fixation around the stem of the implant. Methods. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed for a consecutive series of patients treated with this skive screw technique from May 2011 to September 2014. Seven patients presented with postoperative type B peri-prosthetic humerus fractures. Average follow-up was 24 months. Radiographic analysis was performed on most recent postoperative imaging. Clinical outcomes were assessed using VAS pain, ASES total score, ASES functional score, SST, SANE, range of motion and strength. Results. At an average of follow-up of 24 months, all patients demonstrated fracture healing. Functional outcomes were limited with only two patients achieving forward elevation above 90 degrees and average ASES Function score was 27.5. Pain relief was nearly uniform with an average VAS Pain score of 0.5 (Figure 1). Conclusions. Peri-prosthetic humeral shaft fractures can be successfully treated with hybrid fixation technique using a locking plate with eccentric holes that facilitate placement of proximal “skive screws”. Using this technique, a 100% union rate was observed with excellent pain relief

The choice of whether to perform antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) or plate fixation (PF) poses a conundrum for the surgeon who must strike the balance between anatomical restoration while reducing elbow and shoulder functional impairment. Most humeral middle third shaft fractures are amenable to conservative management given the considerable acceptable deformity and anatomical compensation by patients. This study is concerned with the patient reported outcomes regarding shoulder and elbow function for IMN and PF respectively.

A prospective cohort study following up all the cases treated surgically for middle third humeral fractures from 2016 to 2022 at a single centre. Telephonically an analogue pain score, an American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score for shoulder function and the Oxford Elbow score (OES) for elbow function were obtained.

One hundred and three patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty four patients participated in the study, fifteen had IMN (62.5%) and nine had PF (37.5%.). The shoulder function outcomes showed no statistical difference with an average ASES score of sixty-six for the IMN group and sixty-nine for the PF group. Women and employed individuals expressed greater functional impairment. Hand dominance has no impact on the scores of elbow and shoulder function post operatively. The impairment of abduction score post antegrade nailing was higher in the antegrade nailing group than the plated group. The OES demonstrated greater variance in elbow function in the PF group with the IMN group expressing greater elbow disfunction.

This study confirms that treatment of middle third humerus shaft fractures by plate fixation is marginally superior to antegrade intramedullary nailing in preserving elbow function and abduction ability.

Fractures of the shaft of the humerus are often treated conservatively in a hanging cast or a humeral brace. The conservative management of this fracture is often prolonged and quite uncomfortable for the patient. Some of the patients will need an operative fixation after a trial of conservative management.

We retrospectively looked at 72 consecutive patients with fractures of the shaft of the humerus that presented in our institution over a period of two years. The fracture pattern, treatment modality time to union and the number that needed operative fixation following a trial of conservative treatment was analysed. Of the 72 patients 4 were lost to follow-up. 45 patients had a 1.2.B or 1.2.C type of fracture and 23 had a 1.2.A type of fracture. 29 (41%) were successfully treated conservatively, 11 (16%) patients were operated as the primary procedure and 15 (22%) patients were operated due to delayed or non union. 13 (19%) patients were operated within 4 weeks of the fracture as their alignment was not acceptable on their weekly follow-up.

The average time to union in the patients treated conservatively was 22 weeks, while that of the patients treated primarily by open reduction and plating was 14 weeks (p-value<0.05). Patients who needed operation after initial conservative management required prolonged period of rehabilitation and union time was 32.2 weeks. At the time of fracture union 72% of the patients who had been treated conservatively had joint stiffness requiring physiotherapy, while only 18% of those who had an open reduction and internal fixation had stiffness and required physiotherapy. (p-value < 0.05).

In conclusion careful consideration should be given before it is decided to treat this fracture conservatively especially in the case of 1.2.A fracture pattern.

Peri-prosthetic fractures around implants in the proximal humerus can present substantial challenges. Most individuals who undergo upper limb arthroplasty tend to be osteopenic to begin with, and the anatomy of the proximal humerus does not provide an excess of bone to work with. Therefore, peri-prosthetic fractures pose difficulties to rotator cuff function and implant stability. There are multiple classification systems, but series are small and the classification does not always lead to treatment algorithms. Risk factors for humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty include endosteal notching, cortical perforation, varus malalignment, stem perforation, ipsilateral shoulder and elbow arthroplasties, and loose stems. Many of these risk factors are directly related to technical errors at the time of surgery. Poor exposure can lead to aberrant starting point and errors in reaming. Oversized prostheses can lead to cortical perforation or even stem perforation. Proper positioning of the patient on the table and surgical releases help avoid these technical errors. Peri-prosthetic fractures should be carefully evaluated radiographically for stability. Two important considerations: 1. Is the implant stable? 2. Is the fracture stable? Generally, if the implant is unstable, the implant must be revised. In the setting of a stable implant, many humeral fractures can be treated nonoperatively. Many fractures at or below the level of the tip of the implant can be treated as typical humeral fractures. Options for fixation include plates with cables or long stem prostheses which bypass the fracture. Displaced tuberosity fractures are treated with suture or wire fixation. Risk factors for a poor outcome include increased time to union, skin breakdown, and stiff shoulder.

The purpose of this study is to describe the use of the PHILOS plate (Synthes) in reverse configuration to treat complex distal humeral non-unions.

Non-union is a frequent complication of distal humeral fracture. It is a challenging problem due to the complex anatomy of the distal humerus, small distal fragment heavily loaded by the forearm acting as a long lever arm with powerful forces increasing the chances of displacement. Rigid fixation and stability with a device of high “pull-out” strength is required. The PHILOS plate has been used in reverse configuration to achieve good fixation while allowing central posterior placement of the implant.

11 patients with established non-union of distal humeral fractures were included in this study. No patient in whom this implant was used has been excluded. Initial fixation was revised using the PHILOS plate in reverse configuration and good fixation was achieved. Bone graft substitutes were used in all cases. Patients were followed to bony union, and functional recovery.

All fractures united. One required revision of plate due to fatigue failure. Average time to union was 8 months with excellent restoration of elbow function.

A reversed PHILOS plate provides an excellent method of fixation in distal humeral non-union, often complicated by distorted anatomy and previous surgical intervention. It has a high “pull-out” strength and may be placed in the centre of the posterior humerus, allowing proximal extension of the fixation as far as is required. It provides secure distal fixation without impinging on the olecranon fossa. It is more versatile and easier to use than available pre contoured plating systems.

The use of shorter humeral stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty has been reported as safe and effective. Shorter stems are purported to be bone preserving, easy to revise, and have reduced surgical time. However, a frequent radiographic finding with the use of uncemented short stems is stress shielding. Smaller stem diameters reduce stress shielding, however, carry the risk of varus or valgus malalignment in the metadiaphyseal region of the proximal humerus. The aim of this retrospective radiographic study was to measure the true post-operative neck-shaft (N-S) angle of a curved short stem with a recommended implantation angle of 145°. True anteroposterior radiographs of patients who received RTSA using an Ascend Flex short stem at three specialized shoulder centres (London, ON, Canada, Lyon, France, Munich, Germany) were reviewed. Radiographs that showed the uncemented stem and humeral tray in orthogonal view without rotation were included. Sixteen patients with proximal humeral fractures or revision surgeries were excluded. This yielded a cohort of 124 implant cases for analysis (122 patients, 42 male, 80 female) at a mean age of 74 years (range, 48 – 91 years). The indications for RTSA were rotator cuff deficient shoulders (cuff tear arthropathy, massive cuff tears, osteoarthritis with cuff insufficiency) in 78 patients (63%), primary osteoarthritis in 41 (33%), and rheumatoid arthritis in 5 (4%). The humeral component longitudinal axis was measured in degrees and defined as neutral if the value fell within ±5° of the humeral axis. Angle values >5° and < 5 ° were defined as valgus and varus, respectively. The filling-ratio of the implant within the humeral shaft was measured at the level of the metaphysis (FRmet) and diaphysis (FRdia). Measurements were conducted by two independent examiners (SA and TW). To test for conformity of observers, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The inter- and intra-observer reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.965, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.911– 0.986). The average difference between the humeral shaft axis and the humeral component longitudinal axis was 3.8° ± 2.8° (range, 0.2° – 13.2°) corresponding to a true mean N-S angle of 149° ± 3° in valgus. Stem axis was neutral in 70% (n=90) of implants. Of the 34 malaligned implants, 82% (n=28) were in valgus (mean N-S angle 153° ± 2°) and 18% (n=6) in varus position (mean N-S angle 139° ± 1°). The average FRmet and FRdiawere 0.68 ± 0.11 and 0.72 ± 0.11, respectively. No association was found between stem diameter and filling ratios (FRmet, FRdia) or cortical contact with the stem (r = 0.39). Operative technique and implant design affect the ultimate positioning of the implant in the proximal humerus. This study has shown, that in uncemented short stem implants, neutral axial alignment was achieved in 70% of cases, while the majority of malaligned humeral components (86%) were implanted in valgus, corresponding to a greater than 145° neck shaft angle of the implant. It is important for surgeons to understand that axial malalignment of a short stem implant does influence the true neck shaft angle

Fractures of the humeral diaphysis occur in a bimodal distribution and represent 3-5% of all fractures. Presently, the standard treatment of isolated humeral diaphyseal fractures is nonoperative care using splints, braces, and slings. Recent data has questioned the effectiveness of this strategy in ensuring fracture healing and optimal patient function. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess whether operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with a plate and screw construct provides a better functional outcome than nonoperative treatment. Secondary objectives compared union rates and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Eligible patients with an isolated, closed humeral diaphyseal fracture were randomized to either nonoperative care (initial sugar-tong splint, followed by functional coaptation brace) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF; plate and screw construct). The primary outcome measure was the Disability Shoulder, Arm, Hand (DASH) score assessed at 2-, 6-, 16-, 24-, and 52-weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), the Constant Shoulder Score, range of motion (ROM), and radiographic parameters. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-squared analyses were used to compare treatment groups. The DASH, SMFA, and Constant Score were modelled over time using a multiple variable mixed effects model. A total of 180 patients were randomized, with 168 included in the final analysis. There were 84 patients treated nonoperatively and 84 treated with ORIF. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for age (mean = 45.4 years, SD 16.5 for nonoperative group and 41.7, SD 17.2 years for ORIF group; p=0.16), sex (38.1% female in nonoperative group and 39.3% female in ORIF group; p=0.87), body mass index (mean = 27.8, SD 8.7 for nonoperative group and 27.2, SD 6.2 for ORIF group; p=0.64), or smoking status (p=0.74). There was a significant improvement in the DASH scores at 6 weeks in the ORIF group compared to the nonoperative group (mean=33.8, SD 21.2 in the ORIF group vs. mean=56.5, SD=21.1 in the nonoperative group; p < 0 .0001). At 4 months, the DASH scores were also significantly better in the ORIF group (mean=21.6, SD=19.7 in the ORIF group vs. mean=31.6, SD=24.6 in the nonoperative group; p=0.009. However, there was no difference in DASH scores at 12-month follow-up between the groups (mean=8.8,SD=10.9 vs. mean=11.0, SD=16.9 in the nonoperative group; p=0.39). Males had improved DASH scores at all timepoints compared with females. There was significantly quicker time to union (p=0.016) and improved position (p < 0 .001) in the ORIF group. There were 13 (15.5%) nonunions in the nonoperative group and four (4.7%) combined superficial and deep infections in the ORIF group. There were seven radial nerve palsies in the nonoperative group and five (a single iatrogenic) radial nerve palsies in the ORIF group. This large RCT comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures found significantly improved functional outcome scores in patients treated surgically at 6 weeks and 4 months. However, the early functional improvement did not persist at the 12-month follow-up. There was a 15.5% nonunion rate, which required surgical intervention, in the nonoperative group and a similar radial nerve palsy rate between groups

Fractures of the humeral diaphysis occur in a bimodal distribution and represent 3-5% of all fractures. Presently, the standard treatment of isolated humeral diaphyseal fractures is nonoperative care using splints, braces, and slings. Recent data has questioned the effectiveness of this strategy in ensuring fracture healing and optimal patient function. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess whether operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with a plate and screw construct provides a better functional outcome than nonoperative treatment. Secondary objectives compared union rates and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Eligible patients with an isolated, closed humeral diaphyseal fracture were randomized to either nonoperative care (initial sugar-tong splint, followed by functional coaptation brace) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF; plate and screw construct). The primary outcome measure was the Disability Shoulder, Arm, Hand (DASH) score assessed at 2-, 6-, 16-, 24-, and 52-weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), the Constant Shoulder Score, range of motion (ROM), and radiographic parameters. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-squared analyses were used to compare treatment groups. The DASH, SMFA, and Constant Score were modelled over time using a multiple variable mixed effects model. A total of 180 patients were randomized, with 168 included in the final analysis. There were 84 patients treated nonoperatively and 84 treated with ORIF. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for age (mean = 45.4 years, SD 16.5 for nonoperative group and 41.7, SD 17.2 years for ORIF group; p=0.16), sex (38.1% female in nonoperative group and 39.3% female in ORIF group; p=0.87), body mass index (mean = 27.8, SD 8.7 for nonoperative group and 27.2, SD 6.2 for ORIF group; p=0.64), or smoking status (p=0.74). There was a significant improvement in the DASH scores at 6 weeks in the ORIF group compared to the nonoperative group (mean=33.8, SD 21.2 in the ORIF group vs. mean=56.5, SD=21.1 in the nonoperative group; p < 0 .0001). At 4 months, the DASH scores were also significantly better in the ORIF group (mean=21.6, SD=19.7 in the ORIF group vs. mean=31.6, SD=24.6 in the nonoperative group; p=0.009. However, there was no difference in DASH scores at 12-month follow-up between the groups (mean=8.8,SD=10.9 vs. mean=11.0, SD=16.9 in the nonoperative group; p=0.39). Males had improved DASH scores at all timepoints compared with females. There was significantly quicker time to union (p=0.016) and improved position (p < 0 .001) in the ORIF group. There were 13 (15.5%) nonunions in the nonoperative group and four (4.7%) combined superficial and deep infections in the ORIF group. There were seven radial nerve palsies in the nonoperative group and five (a single iatrogenic) radial nerve palsies in the ORIF group. This large RCT comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures found significantly improved functional outcome scores in patients treated surgically at 6 weeks and 4 months. However, the early functional improvement did not persist at the 12-month follow-up. There was a 15.5% nonunion rate, which required surgical intervention, in the nonoperative group and a similar radial nerve palsy rate between groups

Durable humeral component fixation in shoulder arthroplasty is necessary to prevent painful aseptic loosening and resultant humeral bone loss. Causes of humeral component loosening include stem design and material, stem length and geometry, ingrowth vs. ongrowth surfaces, quality of bone available for fixation, glenoid polyethylene debris osteolysis, exclusion of articular particulate debris, joint stability, rotator cuff function, and patient activity levels. Fixation of the humeral component may be achieved by cement fixation either partial or complete and press-fit fixation. During the past two decades, uncemented humeral fixation has become more popular, especially with short stems and stemless press fit designs. Cemented humeral component fixation risks difficult and complicated revision surgery, stress shielding of the tuberosities and humeral shaft periprosthetic fractures at the junction of the stiff cemented stem and the remaining humeral shaft. Press fit fixation may minimise these cemented risks but has potential for stem loosening. A randomised clinical trial of 161 patients with cemented vs. press fit anatomic total shoulder replacements found that cemented fixation of the humeral component provided better quality of life, strength, and range of motion than uncemented fixation but longer operative times. Another study found increased humeral osteolysis (43%) associated with glenoid component loosening and polyethylene wear, while stress shielding was seen with well-fixed press fit humeral components. During reverse replacement the biomechanical forces are different on the humeral stem. Stem loosening during reverse replacement may have different factors than anatomic replacement. A systemic review of 41 reverse arthroplasty clinical studies compared the functional outcomes and complications of cemented and uncemented stems in approximately 1800 patients. There was no difference in the risk of stem loosening or revision between cemented and uncemented stems. Uncemented stems have at least equivalent clinical and radiographic outcomes compared with cemented stems during reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Durable humeral component fixation in shoulder arthroplasty is associated with fully cemented stems or well ingrown components that exclude potential synovial debris that may cause osteolysis

Aim. The purpose of the study was to assess the outcomes of the surgical management of humeral shaft non-unions. Method. Between 2002 and 2010, 23 patients with humeral shaft non-unions underwent revision surgery. Nine were initially treated non-operatively, 11 with a plate, 1 with screws and 2 with an intramedullary nail. In previously operated patients with aseptic non-unions single stage revision was performed, while septic non-unions underwent a two stage revision. Revision stabilisation was by single or double plate fixation +/− external fixator, depending on bone loss and bone quality. Augmentation of fixation was with iliac crest bone graft in all cases. Data collected from the case notes and radiographs included: smoking habits, type and site of non-union, bone loss, infected or not, organism isolated, definitive stabilisation, augmentation used, post operative complications, further surgical interventions and time to radiological union. Results. There were 12 females and 11 males with an average age of 49 years (19–87 years). All but one were initially closed fractures. 12/23 smoked at least 15 cigarettes/day. Mean time from injury to revision surgery was 11 months. Sites of non-union were mid third (10), proximal third (8) and distal third (5). 10/14 in the previous surgery group were infected and underwent two stage revision. Average time to radiological union was 5 months in the uninfected group and 9 months in the infected group. Successful union was achieved in all cases in the uninfected group (100%) and all but two case in the infected group (91%). Four patients needed unanticipated further interventions to achieve union. At discharge all successfully treated patients had good shoulder and elbow function. Conclusion. Successful union of humeral shaft non-unions can be achieved with double plate fixation and augmentation with ICBG. This has reduced the need for supplementary external fixation

The patterns of nerve and associated skeletal injury were reviewed in 84 patients referred to the brachial plexus service who had damage predominantly to the infraclavicular brachial plexus and its branches. Patients fell into four categories: 1. Anterior glenohumeral dislocation (46 cases); 2. ‘Occult’ shoulder dislocation or scapular fracture (17 cases); 3. Humeral neck fracture (11 cases); 4. Arm hyperextension (9 cases). The axillary (38/46) and ulnar (36/46) nerves were most commonly injured as a result of glenohumeral dislocation. The axillary nerve was ruptured in only 2 patients who had suffered high energy trauma. Ulnar nerve recovery was often incomplete. ‘Occult’ dislocation refers to patients who had no recorded shoulder dislocation but the history was suggestive that dislocation had occurred with spontaneous reduction. These patients and those with scapular fractures had a similar pattern of nerve involvement to those with known dislocation, but the axillary nerve was ruptured in 11 of 17 cases. In cases of humeral neck fracture, nerve injury resulted from medial displacement of the humeral shaft. Surgery was performed in 7 cases to reduce and fix the fracture. Arm hyperextension cases were characterised by injury to the musculocutaneous nerve, with the nerve being ruptured in 8 of 9. Five had humeral shaft fracture or elbow dislocation. There was variable involvement of the median and radial nerves, with the ulnar nerve being least affected. Most cases of infraclavicular brachial plexus injury associated with shoulder dislocation can be managed without operation. Early nerve exploration and repair should be considered for:. Axillary nerve palsy without recorded shoulder dislocation or in association with fracture of the scapula. Musculocutaneous nerve palsy with median and/or radial nerve palsy. Urgent operation is necessary for nerve injury resulting from fracture of the humeral neck to relieve ongoing pressure on the nerves

4 years of follow-up study on 27 patients who had biological reverse total shoulder replacement 12 patients who had Bio-RSA by using Tonier Aequalis reversed implants with bone graft extracted from the head of humerus before humeral shaft was prepared. The average age of this group of patients is 77. The average pre-operative shoulder abduction on the affected side is 52 degrees and forward flexion of 90 degrees. Indication for surgery in all those cases are due to cuff tear. The average post-operative abduction is 90 degrees and forward flexion of 97 degrees. The average follow-up period is 9 months with a range from 4 to 18 months. Two patients from this group failed to make an improvement in the range of their shoulder movements post-operatively. 15 underwent Bio-RSA by using Delta XTEND reverse shoulder system without bone graft. The average age of this group of patients is 73. The average pre-operative shoulder abduction is 35 degrees and forward flexion of 37 degrees. Indication for surgery again in most of the cases is due to cuff tear, except one case was due to proximal humeral fracture. The average post-operative abduction is 96 degrees and forward flexion of 101 degrees. The average follow-up period is 19 months with a range of 4–42 months. Only one patient failed to make an improvement post-operatively. This is the patient who had Bio-RSA due to a proximal humeral fracture. 6 patients out of this group also had previous resurfacing which has failed in comparison to the bone graft group which none had previous resurfacing surgery. Conclusion. Overall, the average post-operative range of movements in both groups is not very significant different. Bio-RSA without bone graft seems to make a larger improvement when compared with per-operative range of motion. Howver, whether a much longer follow-up period and younger patients have an impact on the outcome is debatable

Removal of a well-fixed humeral component during revision shoulder arthroplasty presents a challenging problem. If the humeral component cannot be extracted simply from above, an alternate approach must be taken that may include compromising bone architecture to remove the implant. Two potential solutions to this problem that allow removal of the well-fixed prosthesis are making a humeral window or creating a longitudinal split in the humerus. A retrospective review was performed at the Mayo Clinic to determine the complications associated with performing humeral windows and longitudinal splits during the course of revision shoulder arthroplasty. This study included 427 patients from 1994–2010 at Mayo Clinic undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty. From this cohort, those who required a humeral window or a longitudinal split to assist removal of a well-fixed humeral component were identified. Twenty-seven patients had a humeral window produced to remove a well-fixed humeral component. Six intra-operative fractures were reported from this group: 5 were in the greater tuberosity and 1 was in the distal humeral shaft. At the latest radiographic follow-up, 24 of 27 windows healed, 2 patients had limited inconclusive radiographic follow-up (1 and 2 months), and 1 did not have follow-up at our institution. Twenty-four patients underwent longitudinal osteotomy to extract a well-fixed humeral component. From this group, 1 had intra-operative fracture in the greater tuberosity. At most recent radiographic follow-up, 22 of 24 longitudinal splits healed, 1 had short follow-up (1 ½ months) with demonstrated signs of healing, and 1 did not have follow-up at our institution. In both groups, there were no cases of window malunion and no components have developed clinical loosening. Data from this study suggests humeral windows and longitudinal splits can assist with controlled removal of well-fixed humeral components with a high rate of union and a low rate of intra-operative and post-operative sequelae

Introduction. Proximal humeral fracture occurs most frequently in elderly and usually unite within 12 weeks. Malunion is more common than nonunion. And even if nonunion occurs, we usually treat it by the blade plate. Norris et al. reported hemiarthroplasty is indicated for severe degenerative changes of the articular surface, osteonecrosis of the humeral head, or osteopenia severe enough to jeopardize fixation in order patients. Therefore, it is not common that hemiarthroplasty is used for primary treatment of the proximal humeral pseudoarthrosis. We report a case of proximal humerus pseudoarthrosis which was treated by hemiarthroplasty. Case. A patients is 75 years old male. He was injured by falling from ladder. He was diagnosed proximal humeral fracture Neer type2. After he was followed conservatively for one year, he was referred to our hospital. In X-ray film and CT, the humeral head was scraped by the humeral shaft that was tucked inward to humeral head.(Figure 1) In MRI, rotator cuff muscles were left. The fatty infiltration was stage 1 in the Gourtallier classification. (Figure 2)And osteoarthritis of shoulder was not so severe. Therefore, we decided to do hemiarthroplasty. We used the SMR implant (Lima Corporate, Milano, Italy). Surgical reconstruction was done using a deltpectral approach. Lesser tuberosity was cut from greater tuberosity with subscaplaris muscle. We used the cementless stem. Each fragments and stem was fixed using FiberWire (Arthrex, Florida USA), after autograft which scraped from the reseceted humeral head was stuffed. After the operation, the shoulder was fixed by brace for 4weeks. The passive ROM exercise was started from 21 days later. The Active ROM exercise was started at 28 days later. Three months later, the pseudoarthrosis united successfully. (Figure 3) The active flexion was improved from 20 degrees to 110 degrees. The active abduction was from 20 degrees to 90 degrees. USLA score was improved from 10 to 26. Discussion. In this case, the pseudoarthrosis is united successfully. Therefore, the cementless hemiarthroplasty is useful for treatment for the proximal humerus pseudoarthrosis with severe humeral head bone defect

Purpose. Locking plate constructs for proximal humerus fractures can fail due to varus collapse, especially in the presence of osteoporosis and comminution of the medial cortex. Augmentation using a fibular allograft as an intramedullary bone peg may strengthen fixation preventing varus collapse. This study compared the ability of the augmented locking plate construct to withstand repetitive varus stresses relative to the non-augmented construct in cadaveric specimens. Method. Proximal humerus fractures with medial comminution were simulated by performing wedge-shaped osteotomies at the surgical neck in cadaveric specimens. For each cadaver (n=8), one humeral fracture was fixated with the locking plate construct alone and the other with the locking plate construct plus ipsilateral fibular autograft augmentation. The humeral head was immobilized and a repetitive, medially-directed load was applied to the humeral shaft until failure (significant construct loosening or humeral head screw pull-out). Results. No augmented construct failed, withstanding either 20 000 cycles or five times the cycles of the contralateral non-augmented construct [average (standard deviation) = 27958 (4633) cycles], while six of the eight non-augmented constructs failed (p=0.007). Failure in the six non-augmented constructs occurred after an average of 5928 (2543) cycles. Conclusion. Fibular allograft augmentation increased the ability of the locking plate construct to withstand repetitive varus loading. Clinically, this may assist proximal humerus fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone with medial cortex comminution

Aim:. Historically, anterior decompression followed by posterior fusion has been the surgical management of choice in spinal tuberculosis. Due to theatre time being at a premium, we have evolved to performing anterior only debridement, allograft strut reconstruction and instrumentation for tuberculosis in the adult thoracic spine. The aim of this study is to review the safety and the efficacy of this treatment. Methods:. Twenty-eight adult thoracic tuberculosis patients were identified where anterior only surgery had been performed. These were all in the mid-thoracic spine as circumferential surgery is still favoured in thoracolumbar disease. The surgery was performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary hospital. Following transthoracic aggressive debridement, allograft humeral shafts were cut to size and inserted under compression and the spines instrumented with the use of screw-rod constructs into the body above and below. A retrospective review of clinical notes and radiological studies was performed. Results:. Twenty-seven of the patients presented with altered neurology; 2 had only sensory changes while 25 presented with paraparesis; 22 of these patients were unable to walk. The average surgical time was 2 hours 20 minutes with a median blood loss of 726 ml. The majority of patients had 2 vertebral bodies involved and required an average of a 4 body fusion. Surgical complications included inadvertent opening of the diaphragm in 1 patient and 1 patient deteriorated neurologically post operatively. 21 of 28 patients recovered to independent mobility at their latest follow-up appointment. 1 patient showed no recovery, 3 had some motor recovery that was not useful, 1 had some sensory but no motor recovery. 16 of 28 patients have documented bony fusion with no evidence of instrumentation failure in any patients. Conclusion:. Anterior only debridement, allograft strut reconstruction and instrumented fusion for the treatment of thoracic spinal tuberculosis is a safe and effective alternative to circumferential surgery in the adult patient

Introduction. Humeral non-union may present a challenging problem. The instability from the un-united fracture leads to pain, disability and significant morbidity. The incidence of humeral shaft non-union as a complication of both operative and non-operative treatment is approximately 8% to 12%. This retrospective study reviews the results of surgical treatment of humeral fracture non-union performed by a single surgeon with a consistent surgical protocol. Material and Method. We present a retrospective analysis of a series of 51 consecutive cases of humeral fracture non-union treated in our limb reconstruction centre. Data were collected on mechanism of injury, associated co-morbidities, smoking, use of NSAIDs and treatment before referral. Patients were followed up to clinical and radiological union. Results. From 1994-2008, 48 patients with established humeral non-union were referred to our unit following initial management locally. Three patients were managed in our unit from the outset. There were 20 male and 28 female patients with a mean age of 53 years (range 15-86 years). There were 34 (68%) diaphyseal, nine (17%) proximal and eight (15%) distal humeral non-unions. The treatment in our unit involved plate fixation in 44 (86%) cases, intramedullary nailing in three (6%) and external fixation in three (6%) patients. Iliac crest bone graft, bone morphogenetic protein or a combination of these were utilised in 44 (86%) cases. Thirty-six patients required at least one surgical intervention to achieve union. Twelve patients had more than one operation. The average follow-up was 19.6 months. Union was achieved in all but one case at an average time of 9.8 months (range 3-24 months); one case developed a functionally inconsequential pseudoarthrosis. Conclusion. Union of ununited humeral fractures can be achieved consistently by providing appropriate mechanical stability and biological environment at the fracture site

Purpose. The presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion is a major contributor to failure of surgical intervention following anterior shoulder dislocation. The relationship between lesion size, measured on pre-operative MRI, and risk of recurrent instability after surgery has not previously been defined. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the size of Hill-Sachs lesions on pre-op MRI would be greater among patients who failed soft tissue stabilization when compared to patients who did not fail. We also hypothesized that the existence of a glenoid lesion would lead to failure with smaller Hill-Sachs lesions. Method. Nested case-control analysis of 114 patients was performed to evaluate incidence of failure after soft tissue stabilization. Successful follow-up of at least 24 months was made with 91 patients (80%). Patients with recurrent instability after surgery were compared to randomly selected age and sex matched controls in a 1:1 ratio. Pre-operative sagittal and axial MRI series were analyzed for presence of Hill-Sachs lesions, and maximum edge-to-edge length and depth as well as location of the lesion related to the bicipital groove (axial) and humeral shaft (sagittal) were measured. Results. Of 91 patients included in analysis, 77 (84.6%) had identifiable Hill-Sachs lesions. 32 patients (35.2%) suffered from failure of soft tissue stabilization (redislocation 22.0%; subjective instability 13.2%). Ten of these patients (11.0%) underwent further surgery. When comparing the age and sex matched failure and control groups, statistically significant differences in unadjusted data were found for axial edge-to-edge length (p = 0.01), axial depth (p = 0.01), and sagittal edge-to-edge length (p = 0.04), with larger sized lesions found in the failure group (Figure 1). Differences trended towards significant for sagittal depth and angle from the bicipital groove. Conclusion. In this retrospective case-control study, humeral head defect size was positively correlated with recurrent instability after soft-tissue stabilization. Larger Hill-Sachs lesions, as measured on pre-op MRI, were found in patients who failure surgical intervention when compared to patients who did not fail. These data and future studies may help determine pre-operative clinical guidelines for the treatment of anterior shoulder dislocation

Purpose. In total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), especially for elbows with condyle defect due to rheumatoid arthritis or trauma, determination of rotation alignment of implants is often difficult. To develop a navigation system for TEA, selecting bony landmarks that can be identified intraoperatively is important. Therefore, we developed a new roentgen free navigation system such as special alignment jigs for TEA based on CT data of normal elbows. The aim of this study was to evaluate alignments of implants after MIS-TEA using the new systems. And also, we reported that 6 bony landmarks on the elbow showed small variability in normal elbows by CT examinations and were considered to be usable as intraoperative landmarks for determining rotational position of implants last year. Especially in RA elbow, posterior aspect of humerus and ulnar aspect of proximal part of ulna were able to be identified even if there is a large bone defect that extends to the lateral or/and medial epicondyle. We used a new roentgen free navigation system in TEA with using Solar elbow from 2009. The aim of this study was to evaluate alignments of implants after MIS-TEA using the new systems by CT examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. For determination of alignment and anatomical landmarks to develop the jigs, 3D-CT data of 11 normal elbows was investigated. The posterior aspect of humeral shaft and ulnar aspect of proximal ulna were selected as bony landmarks. Because these can be identified intraoperatively and remain in elbows with extensive bone loss. MIS-TEA with Solar Elbow (Stryker) using these new systems were investigated with postoperative 3D-CT in 14 elbows of 13 patients. Their average age was 68.8 years old. Basic diseases were 10 rheumatoid arthritis and 4 distal humerus injuries. The alignments of humeral and ulnar component were measured on postoperative 3D-CT. RESULTS. Rotational alignment (humerus / ulna) was pronation 6.8° ± 5.7° / pronation 4.6° ± 9.1°; frontal alignment was valgus 0.1° ± 2.7° / valgus 0.1° ± 3.7°; and sagittal alignment was extension 0.6° ± 3.0° / extension 8.9° ± 2.5°. In condyle-defect group (n=5), comparable alignment with condyle-preserved group was obtained. DISCUSSION. The new systems were effective in determining intraoperative alignment even in elbows with extensive bone defect. Extension alignment of the ulna component is because the short component of Solar Elbow was placed along the center axis of the proximal ulna, which inclines in the extension direction relative to the axis of distal ulna