Aims. The aim of this study was to measure the effect of hospital case volume on the survival of revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). Methods. This is a retrospective analysis of Scottish Arthroplasty Project data, a nationwide audit which prospectively collects data on all arthroplasty procedures performed in Scotland. The primary outcome was RTKA survival at ten years. The primary explanatory variable was the effect of hospital case volume per year on RTKA survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to determine the lifespan of RTKA. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards were used to estimate relative revision risks over time. Hazard ratios (HRs) were reported with 95% CI, and p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. From 1998 to 2019, 8,301 patients (8,894 knees) underwent RTKA surgery in Scotland (median age at RTKA 70 years (interquartile range (IQR) 63 to 76); median follow-up 6.2 years (IQR 3.0 to 10.2). In all, 4,764 (53.6%) were female, and 781 (8.8%) were treated for infection. Of these 8,894 knees, 957 (10.8%) underwent a second revision procedure. Male sex, younger age at index revision, and positive infection status were associated with need for re-revision. The ten-year survival estimate for RTKA was 87.3% (95% CI 86.5 to 88.1). Adjusting for sex, age, surgeon volume, and indication for revision, high hospital case volume was significantly associated with lower risk of re-revision (HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.94, p < 0.001)). The risk of re-revision steadily declined in centres performing > 20 cases per year; risk reduction was 16% with > 20 cases; 22% with > 30 cases; and 28% with > 40 cases. The lowest level of risk was associated with the highest volume centres. Conclusion. The majority of RTKA in Scotland survive up to ten years. Increasing yearly hospital case volume above 20 cases is independently associated with a significant risk reduction of re-revision. Development of high-volume tertiary centres may lead to an improvement in the overall survival of RTKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):602–609

Introduction. As total knee arthroplasty incidence in the United States continues to increase, health care entities are looking to reform policy to decrease costs while improving efficiency and quality of care. The allocation of hospital and surgeon charges and payments is an important aspect of health care economics, but the trends and relationship between surgeon and hospital charges and payments for knee arthroplasty have not been well examined. The goal of this study is to report trends and variation in hospital charges and payments compared to surgeon charges and payments for total knee arthroplasty in a Medicare population. Methods. The 5% Medicare sample was used to capture hospital and surgeon charges and payments for total knee arthroplasty from 2005–2014. Two important values were calculated: (1) the charge multiplier (CM) which is the ratio of hospital to surgeon charges, and (2) the payment multiplier (PM), which is the ratio of hospital to surgeon payments. The year to year variation and regional trends in patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), length of stay (LOS), CM and PM were evaluated for all patients. Statistical significance of trends was evaluated using student's t-tests. Correlations between the financial multipliers and LOS were evaluated using a Pearson correlation coefficient (r). Results. 117,698 patients were included. Hospital charges were significantly higher than surgeon charges throughout the study period and increased substantially (CM increased from 7.9 to 11.4, p <0.0001) [Fig 1,2]. Hospital payments relative to surgeon payments ratio (PM) followed a similar trend, increasing from 10.0 to 14.6 (p < 0.0001). [Fig 1,2]. Similar trends were noted in all four regions of the US. LOS decreased significantly throughout the study from 3.8 to 2.8 days (p < 0.0001). CCI remained stable over the study period. Both the CM (r2 = −0.90) and PM (r2 = −0.84) were strongly negatively associated with LOS, meaning that as LOS decreased, the ratio of hospital to surgeon charges and payments (CM and PM) paradoxically significantly increased [Fig 3]. Conclusions. Hospital charges and payments relative to surgeon charges and payments have significantly increased for total knee arthroplasty despite stable patient complexity as measured by CCI and decreasing LOS. These results encourage the need for future studies with detailed cost analysis to identify the causes of hospital and surgeon financial malalignment. As healthcare shifts toward value-based care with shared responsibility for outcomes and cost, more closely aligned incentives between hospitals and providers is needed. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Aims. The objectives of this study were to compare postoperative pain, analgesia requirements, inpatient functional rehabilitation, time to hospital discharge, and complications in patients undergoing conventional jig-based unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) versus robotic-arm assisted UKA. Patients and Methods. This prospective cohort study included 146 patients with symptomatic medial compartment knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary UKA performed by a single surgeon. This included 73 consecutive patients undergoing conventional jig-based mobile bearing UKA, followed by 73 consecutive patients receiving robotic-arm assisted fixed bearing UKA. All surgical procedures were performed using the standard medial parapatellar approach for UKA, and all patients underwent the same postoperative rehabilitation programme. Postoperative pain scores on the numerical rating scale and opiate analgesia consumption were recorded until discharge. Time to attainment of predefined functional rehabilitation outcomes, hospital discharge, and postoperative complications were recorded by independent observers. Results. Robotic-arm assisted UKA was associated with reduced postoperative pain (p < 0.001), decreased opiate analgesia requirements (p < 0.001), shorter time to straight leg raise (p < 0.001), decreased number of physiotherapy sessions (p < 0.001), and increased maximum knee flexion at discharge (p < 0.001) compared with conventional jig-based UKA. Mean time to hospital discharge was reduced in robotic UKA compared with conventional UKA (42.5 hours (. sd 5.9). vs 71.1 hours (. sd. 14.6), respectively; p < 0.001). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two groups within 90 days’ follow-up. Conclusion. Robotic-arm assisted UKA was associated with decreased postoperative pain, reduced opiate analgesia requirements, improved early functional rehabilitation, and shorter time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based UKA

Aims. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of combined total joint arthroplasty (TJA) (total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed during the same admission) versus bilateral THA, bilateral TKA, single THA, and single TKA. Combined TJAs performed on the same day were compared with those staged within the same admission episode. Patients and Methods. Data from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample recorded between 2005 and 2014 were used for this retrospective cohort study. Postoperative in-hospital complications, total costs, and discharge destination were reviewed. Logistic and linear regression were used to perform the statistical analyses. p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results. Combined TJA was associated with increased risk of deep vein thrombosis, prosthetic joint infection, irrigation and debridement procedures, revision arthroplasty, length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital costs compared with bilateral THA, bilateral TKA, single THA, and single TKA. Combined TJA performed on separate days of the same admission showed no statistically significant differences when compared with same-day combined TJA, but trended towards decreased total costs and total complications despite increased LOS. Conclusion. Combined TJA is associated with increased in-hospital complications, LOS, and costs. We do not recommend performing combined TJA during the same hospital stay. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:573–581

Abstract

Abstract

In Scotland, the number of primary total knee replacements performed annually has been increasing steadily. The price of the implant is fixed but the length of hospital stay is variable. We prospectively investigated all patients who underwent primary unilateral total knee replacement in the Scottish region of Fife, between December 1994 and February 2007 and assessed their recorded pre-operative details. The data were analysed using univariate and multiple linear regression statistical analysis. Data on the length of stay were available from a total of 2106 unilateral total knee replacements. The median length of hospital stay was eight days. The significant pre-operative risk factors for an increased length of stay were the year of admission, details of the consultant looking after the patient, the stair score, the walking-aid score and age. Awareness of the pre-operative factors which increase the length of hospital stay may provide the opportunity to influence them favourably and to reduce the time in hospital and the associated costs of unilateral total knee replacement

Background. The evaluation and management of outcomes risk has become an essential element of a modern total joint replacement program. Our multidisciplinary team designed an evidence-based tool to address modifiable risk factors for adverse outcomes after primary hip and knee arthroplasty surgery. Methods. Our protocols were designed to identify, intervene, and mitigate risk through evidence-based patient optimization. Nurse navigators screened patients preoperatively, identified and treated risk factors, and followed patients for 90 days postoperatively. We compared patients participating in our optimization program (N=104) to both a historical cohort (N=193) and a contemporary cohort (N=166). Results. Risk factor identification and optimization resulted in lower hospital length of stay and post-operative emergency department visits. Patients in the optimization cohort had a statistically significant decrease in mean LOS as compared to both the historical cohort (2.55 vs 1.81 days, P<0.001) and contemporary cohort (2.56 vs 1.81 days, p<0.001). Patients in the optimization cohort had a statistically significant decrease in 30- and 90-day ED visits compared to the historical cohort (P. 30-day. =0.042, P. 90-day. =0.003). When compared with the contemporary cohort, the optimization cohort had a statistically significant decrease in 90-day ED visits (21.08% vs. 10.58%, P=0.025). The optimization cohort had a statistically significant increase in the percentage of patients discharged home. We noted nonsignificant reductions in readmission rate, transfusion rate, and surgical site infections. Conclusion. Optimization of patients prior to elective primary THA and TKA reduced average LOS, ED visits, and drove tele-rehabilitation use. Our results add to the limited body of literature supporting this patient-centered approach

Aims. The objective of this study was to compare early postoperative functional outcomes and time to hospital discharge between conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and robotic-arm assisted TKA. Patients and Methods. This prospective cohort study included 40 consecutive patients undergoing conventional jig-based TKA followed by 40 consecutive patients receiving robotic-arm assisted TKA. All surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon using the medial parapatellar approach with identical implant designs and standardized postoperative inpatient rehabilitation. Inpatient functional outcomes and time to hospital discharge were collected in all study patients. Results. There were no systematic differences in baseline characteristics between the conventional jig-based TKA and robotic-arm assisted TKA treatment groups with respect to age (p = 0.32), gender (p = 0.50), body mass index (p = 0.17), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (p = 0.88), and preoperative haemoglobin level (p = 0.82). Robotic-arm assisted TKA was associated with reduced postoperative pain (p < 0.001), decreased analgesia requirements (p < 0.001), decreased reduction in postoperative haemoglobin levels (p < 0.001), shorter time to straight leg raise (p < 0.001), decreased number of physiotherapy sessions (p < 0.001) and improved maximum knee flexion at discharge (p < 0.001) compared with conventional jig-based TKA. Median time to hospital discharge in robotic-arm assisted TKA was 77 hours (interquartile range (IQR) 74 to 81) compared with 105 hours (IQR 98 to 126) in conventional jig-based TKA (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Robotic-arm assisted TKA was associated with decreased pain, improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:930–7

Introduction. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of discharge timing on 30-day major and minor complications in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) while adjusting for other variables. Methods. Patients 18 years and older undergoing TKA between the years of 2005 and 2016 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Patients whose length of stay (LOS) was >4 days were excluded. Patient demographics, anesthesia type, length of operation and hospital stay, as well as 30-day major and minor complications were collected from the database. Chi square tests were utilized to compare the unadjusted rates of complications between patients whose LOS was 0, 1, 2, and 3–4 days. Multivariable regression was utilized to evaluate the effect of LOS on complication rates, while adjusting for age, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class, type of anaesthesia, functional status, comorbidities, sex, steroid/immunosuppressant use, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, length of operation and smoking status. Results. A total of 198,191 TKA patients were identified (average age 66 ± 10 years). Average LOS was 2.5 ± 0.81 days. Of these patients, 1,667 (0.84%) were discharged the day of surgery, while 16,186 (8.17%) were discharged one-day post-surgery, 63,540 (32.06%) were discharged on day two, and 115,471 (58.25%) were discharged between 3 and 4 days post-surgery. Unadjusted rates of complications were significantly higher for patients who were discharged on the day of surgery (2.64%), or those whose LOS was 3–4 days (2.78%) compared to those whose LOS was 1 (1.40%) or 2 days (1.67%). After adjusting for all relevant covariables, discharge on the day of surgery increased the risk of major complications by 1.8 (95% Confidence interval [95%CI] 1.2–2.8), and minor complications by 1.6 (95%CI 1.2 – 2.2) compared to patients whose LOS was 2 days. A LOS of 1 day did not affect the risk of major complications compared to a LOS of 2 days, while a LOS of 3–4 days increased the risk of major complications by 1.4 (95%CI 1.3 – 1.6), and minor complications by 1.6 (95%CI 1.4 – 1.7). Regarding specific complications, same-day discharge remained an independent predictor of myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism (PE), unplanned reintubation, >48 hours on ventilator, pneumonia and renal insufficiency, while a LOS of 3–4 days remained an independent predictor of MI, cardiac arrest, sepsis, acute renal failure, PE, unplanned reintubation, >48 hours on ventilator, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, renal insufficiency, deep and superficial surgical site infection, and wound disruption compared to patients whose LOS was 2 days (p<0.01). Conclusion. Discharge on days 1–2 postoperatively following TKA appears to have superior outcomes compared to discharge on the day of surgery, or on days 3–4. Prospective clinical data is required to confirm the effect of discharge timing on postoperative outcomes following TKA

We present detailed information about early morbidity after aseptic revision knee replacement from a nationwide study. All aseptic revision knee replacements undertaken between 1st October 2009 and 30th September 2011 were analysed using the Danish National Patient Registry with additional information from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. The 1218 revisions involving 1165 patients were subdivided into total revisions, large partial revisions, partial revisions and revisions of unicondylar replacements (UKR revisions). The mean age was 65.0 years (27 to 94) and the median length of hospital stay was four days (interquartile range: 3 to 5), with a 90 days re-admission rate of 9.9%, re-operation rate of 3.5% and mortality rate of 0.2%. The age ranges of 51 to 55 years (p = 0.018), 76 to 80 years (p < 0.001) and ≥ 81 years (p < 0.001) were related to an increased risk of re-admission. The age ranges of 76 to 80 years (p = 0.018) and the large partial revision subgroup (p = 0.073) were related to an increased risk of re-operation. The ages from 76 to 80 years (p < 0.001), age ≥ 81 years (p < 0.001) and surgical time > 120 min (p <  0.001) were related to increased length of hospital stay, whereas the use of a tourniquet (p = 0.008) and surgery in a low volume centre (p = 0.013) were related to shorter length of stay. . In conclusion, we found a similar incidence of early post-operative morbidity after aseptic knee revisions as has been reported after primary procedures. This suggests that a length of hospital stay ≤ four days and discharge home at that time is safe following aseptic knee revision surgery in Denmark. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1649–56

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a complex procedure which carries both a greater risk for patients and greater cost for the treating hospital than does a primary TKA. As well as the increased cost of peri-operative investigations, blood transfusions, surgical instrumentation, implants and operating time, there is a well-documented increased length of stay which accounts for most of the actual costs associated with surgery. We compared revision surgery for infection with revision for other causes (pain, instability, aseptic loosening and fracture). Complete clinical, demographic and economic data were obtained for 168 consecutive revision TKAs performed at a tertiary referral centre between 2005 and 2012. Revision surgery for infection was associated with a mean length of stay more than double that of aseptic cases (21.5 vs 9.5 days, p < 0.0001). The mean cost of a revision for infection was more than three times that of an aseptic revision (£30 011 (. sd. 4514) vs £9655 (. sd. 599.7), p < 0.0001). . Current NHS tariffs do not fully reimburse the increased costs of providing a revision knee surgery service. Moreover, especially as greater costs are incurred for infected cases. These losses may adversely affect the provision of revision surgery in the NHS. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:197–201

Introduction. Unlike the NJR, no surgeon driven national database currently exists for ligament surgery in the UK and therefore information on outcome and adverse event is limited to case series. Methods. Prospectively collected Hospital episode statistics (HES) data for England was analysed so as to determine national rates of 90-day symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) rate, significant wound infection and 30-day readmission rates with cause following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This diagnostic and operative codes information is routinely collected on every patient admitted to hospital in England NHS. Results. All HES data between April 2008 and March 2010 was analysed for patients undergoing ACL reconstruction (13571 patients). 90-day DVT and PTE rates were 0.29% (40) and 0.20% (27) respectively. There were no deaths. 0.94% (127) had a wound complication recorded and 1.34% (182) were readmitted to an orthopaedic ward within 30 days. Conclusion. We are particularly interested in adverse event reporting from ACL surgery. Our knowledge of current UK ligament practice and outcome is based upon low uptake postal surveys and small number case series. We have been able to quantify the complication rate for thrombotic events, readmission rate and other adverse events following ACL surgery from a national database. Contrary to popular belief there is a real but small risk of PTE following ACL surgery. We believe this data strengthens the argument for a funded prospective UK ligament registry

Aims

To evaluate the influence of discharge timing on 30-day complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Summary

Despite adoption of robust clinical pathways, narcotic administration within the inpatient setting is highly variable and may benefit from the implementation of standardized multi-modal pain management protocols.

Purpose. To establish the reliability of reporting and recording revision hip and knee arthroplasties by comparing data in the National Joint Registry (NJR), Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and our local theatre records. Methods. The paper theatre registers for all orthopaedic theatres in the Royal Derby Hospitals NHS Trust were examined for details of revision hip and knee replacements carried out in 2007 and 2008. This was then cross-checked and merged with the local electronic theatre data to obtain a definitive local record of all revision hip and knee arthroplasties. Data for the same period was requested from the NJR and HES and these data were checked against our definitive local record for discrepancies. The HES codes used were the same codes used to compile the recent NJR annual reports. Results. The theatre registers and ORMIS identified 271 revision hip and knee arthroplasties in the study period. The NJR had corresponding data for 176 (65%) of these, and HES had 250 (92%). 10 cases (4%) were not recorded by either NJR or HES: 8 secondary resurfacings of patellae and 2 posterior lip augmentations in hips. Of those operations “missed” by HES, most had been assigned a correct “W” code, but had a “Y” or “Z” OPCS code not used in the NJR annual reports. Conclusion. When HES and the NJR data are combined, they are an accurate representation of real practice. More robust methods of reporting revision arthroplasty to the NJR are required. The OPCS codes used to indicate a revision need to be reviewed

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an established treatment for single compartment end-stage arthrosis with good recorded survivorship. UKRs are often implanted into more active younger patients, but patient selection remains controversial. A recent study, led by the Royal College of Surgeons Clinical Effectiveness Unit, demonstrated that prosthesis revision rates decrease strongly with age (Van Der Meulen et al 2008). It has therefore been suggested that UKR should only be considered in elderly patients. This contrasts our observed experience of early revision cases leading us to compare these patients with a control group.

Between September 2002 and 2008, 812 Oxford Mobile Bearing Medial UKRs were implanted. We compared all patients who underwent UKR revision to Total Knee Replacement (TKR) against a control group of 50 consecutive UKR patients.

20 implants have required revision to TKR in 19 patients since 2002. Median age at index surgery was 68 (range 48-81), median BMI was 31 (range 25-41.5), 17 patients were female (85%), and median implant survival was 25 months (range 6-57). Control group median age at index surgery was 66 (range 46-81), median BMI was 30 (range 22-51), and 27 patients were female (54%). Median Oxford Knee Score recorded in September 2009 was 36 (range 14-54) for revision patients and 21 (range 14-39) for the control group (p=0.021).

Our UKR patients with early failure requiring revision are far more likely to be female (p=0.015), as well as older and with a higher BMI than the control group. We feel this is a subset of patients at high risk of failure, despite meeting all criteria for UKR. The underlying causes are likely to be multifactorial, but a key factor may be that this group has varus tricompartment osteoarthritis rather than classical anteromedial osteoarthritis. Our data counters recent advice based on National Joint Registry data.

Allogeneic blood transfusion is associated with complications and significant cost. The RD&E has looked at the use of autologous drains to decrease the frequency of allogeneic transfusion after our study of 100 cases showed an improved post-operative haemoglobin and reduced length of stay. In 2007 a protocol to identify those patients of increased need for an autologous drain was made using a study of 191 cases showed an average haemoglobin drop post-operatively of 3.05g/dl and average intra-operative blood loss of 285 ml. This protocol gave triggers for autologous drain use; preoperative haemoglobin of <13g/dl, intra-operative blood loss >400ml, tourniquet use, patient weight <50kg and patients refusing donated blood.

In 2007-08, 65% of a further 275 cases analysed met the triggers for use of an autologous system. The remaining patients received low vacuum drains. Of the 275 patients, only 2 (<1%) of those who did not fulfil the criteria for an autologous drain required allogeneic blood, compared with 43 patients (24%) of those deemed high risk of transfusion, and assigned autologous drains. The protocol was successful in identifying those patients who required additional support and expenditure to minimise allogeneic blood transfusion.

Analysis of this data led to recommended changes to the protocol in order to maximise the efficiency of the autologous drain use.

Due to the increased cost of autologous drains (£68) compared with the low vacuum systems (£32), and the cost of allogeneic units at £141, the expenditure per patient was calculated and shown to fall from £92 in 2007 to £78 in a further patient cohort in 2010.

In conclusion, this protocol allows the clinician to appropriately target the use of the more expensive autologous drains to those of increased risk of transfusion. This helps to minimise unnecessary allogeneic transfusion, and this has been shown to be cost effective.

The purpose of the study was to investigate the outcome of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in patients over 70 years old and also to assess their ability to kneel.

We identified from our prospectively collected knee database 90 patients (98 knees) undergoing Oxford medial UKR who were 70 years or older on the day of surgery.

Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) were collected pre-operatively and also post-operatively at the following intervals: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and then annually after this.

The mean patient age at surgery was 73.2 years (range 70.2 – 84.3 years). The OKS pre-operatively had a mean of 35.8/60 (range 22-55) and improved to 23.6/60 post-operatively (range 14-34). Patient follow-up was 44.3 months and ranged from 12-111 months. Two patients were lost to follow-up, 1 was converted to a total knee replacement and 3 died of causes unrelated to the knee surgery. 91.7% of patients still had their original prostheses at last follow-up.

Forty percent of patients stated they were able to kneel pre-operatively which improved to 50.2% postoperatively. This was consistent throughout all the follow up intervals that were assessed. Specific kneeling score from the OKS showed no statistically significant change with a mean of 3.94/5 pre-operatively and a mean of 3.54 averaged over all the post-operative follow up intervals.

We conclude that medial Oxford UKR is a reliable operation in patients over 70 years old. Previous studies include a younger age group which potentially encourages the less familiar surgeon to use a UKR for the young active patient but continue with a total knee arthroplasty for the older patient. Our study suggests age should not be a factor when considering performing Oxford UKR. Ability to kneel is not altered significantly by UKR in this age group.

Aims. In the last decade, perioperative advancements have expanded the use of outpatient primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite this, there remains limited data on expedited discharge after revision TKA. This study compared 30-day readmissions and reoperations in patients undergoing revision TKA with a hospital stay greater or less than 24 hours. The authors hypothesized that expedited discharge in select patients would not be associated with increased 30-day readmissions and reoperations. Methods. Aseptic revision TKAs in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were reviewed from 2013 to 2020. TKAs were stratified by length of hospital stay (greater or less than 24 hours). Patient demographic details, medical comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, operating time, components revised, 30-day readmissions, and reoperations were compared. Multivariate analysis evaluated predictors of discharge prior to 24 hours, 30-day readmission, and reoperation. Results. Of 21,610 aseptic revision TKAs evaluated, 530 were discharged within 24 hours. Short-stay patients were younger (63.1 years (49 to 78) vs 65.1 years (18 to 94)), with lower BMI (32.3 kg/m. 2. (17 to 47) vs 33.6 kg/m. 2. (19 to 54) and lower ASA grades. Diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and cancer were all associated with a hospital stay over 24 hours. Single component revisions (56.8% (n = 301) vs 32.4% (n = 6,823)), and shorter mean operating time (89.7 minutes (25 to 275) vs 130.2 minutes (30 to 517)) were associated with accelerated discharge. Accelerated discharge was not associated with 30-day readmission and reoperation. Conclusion. Accelerated discharge after revision TKA did not increase short-term complications, readmissions, or reoperations. Further efforts to decrease hospital stays in this setting should be evaluated. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1323–1328