Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 14 - 14
1 Jan 2019
Martin J Murphy C Gregory J Aspden R Riemen A Saunders F
Full Access

An increased prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) in post-menopausal women has led to the suggestion that hormonal factors may play a role in the pathogenesis. This study aims to examine if undergoing a hysterectomy, both with retention and removal of ovaries, predisposes women to OA and secondly if the development is influenced by hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Statistical shape modelling (SSM) is a method of image analysis allowing for detection of subtle shape variation described by landmark points. Through the generation of linearly independent modes of variation, each image can be described in terms of numerical scores. 149 radiographs from female participants of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) were examined to compare hip morphology in those who had undergone hysterectomies compared to controls. No differences were observed in BMI, age, height or weight between groups. ANOVA and Games-Howell post-hoc analysis showed that modes 3 and 5 were statistically significant. Lower mode 3 scores were associated with hysterectomy (p=0.019), with narrowing of the femoral neck and increased acetabular coverage. Lower mode 5 scores were associated with hysterectomy and oophorectomy (p=0.049), displaying reduced coverage of the femoral head, superolateral migration of the femoral head and larger greater trochanter. No associations were observed between HRT use and OA. The subtle morphologic features of hip OA present in only hysterectomised women suggests undergoing a hysterectomy may be a predisposing factor and a clinical consideration. The use of HRT was not observed to influence the development of OA and thus cannot be suggested as a protective measure


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 283 - 283
1 Sep 2012
Mangwani J Cichero M Irby S Yates B Williamson D
Full Access

Introduction. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an uncommon complication of foot and ankle surgery but has the potential for significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence, risk factors and prevention of VTE in foot and ankle surgery is not clear. Materials and methods. We conducted a systematic review of the literature using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane library and reference lists of retrieved articles without language or date restriction upto 31st July 2010. The Coleman methodology score was used to evaluate the quality of studies. From 985 citations, 38 full text articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Conclusions were drawn on the incidence, risk factors and prevention of VTE in foot and ankle surgery. Results. The incidence of symptomatic VTE in foot and ankle surgery in general is low; higher incidence has been reported in tendoachilles surgery. There is some evidence that history of prior VTE, immobilisation, non-weight bearing, obesity, hormone replacement therapy and oral contraceptives predispose to VTE in foot and ankle surgery. The evidence on the efficacy of different thromboprophylaxis agents and the optimum duration of treatment is unclear. Conclusion. The current evidence on VTE prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery is insufficient to draw any firm conclusions. Long term effects of VTE in foot and ankle surgery need to be investigated further. Further large scale, multicentre studies are needed to delineate the role of VTE prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 91-B, Issue 3 | Pages 388 - 394
1 Mar 2009
Goel DP Buckley R deVries G Abelseth G Ni A Gray R

The incidence of deep-vein thrombosis and the need for thromboprophylaxis following isolated trauma below the knee is uncertain. We have investigated this with a prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial using low molecular weight heparin with saline injection as placebo in patients aged between 18 and 75 years who had sustained an isolated fracture below the knee which required operative fixation. All patients had surgery within 48 hours of injury and were randomised to receive either the placebo or low molecular weight heparin for 14 days, after which they underwent bilateral lower limb venography, interpreted by three independent radiologists. Further follow-up was undertaken at two, six, eight and 12 weeks.

A total of 238 patients fulfilled all the inclusion criteria, with 127 in the low molecular weight heparin group and 111 in the placebo group, all of whom underwent bilateral venography. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis between those patients treated with low molecular weight heparin or the placebo (p = 0.22). The number of deep-vein thromboses in the two groups was 11 (8.7%) and 14 (12.6%), respectively. Age and the type of fracture were significantly associated with the rate of deep-vein thrombosis (p = 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively) but gender, comorbidities and the body mass index were not.

The overall incidence of deep-vein thrombosis in this series was 11%. There was no clinical or statistical significant reduction in the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis with the use of thromboprophylaxis. However, we accept that owing to a cessation of funding, recruitment to this trial had to be ended prior to establishing the necessary sample size. Our results cannot, therefore, categorically exclude the possibility that low molecular weight heparin treatment could be beneficial. We recommend a further multicentre trial be undertaken to resolve this matter.