‘Primum non nocere’ is one of the most well known moral principles associated with the medical profession. Often, in our bid to maintain and improve quality of life, we neglect to recognise those patients who are in fact nearing the end of theirs. Thus, our aim was to ascertain if we are recognising the ‘dying’ orthopaedic patient and whether key elements of management in accordance with SIGN are being addressed. All hip-fracture deaths occurring at a District General Hospital over a 4-year period (2012–2015) were included. Paper and electronic notes were used to record patient demographics, days from admission to death, diagnosis of ‘dying’ and discussions regarding DNACPR and ceiling of care. Total numbers of investigations undertaken during the week prior to death were noted. 89 hip-fracture deaths occurred between 2012–2015, of which 57 were female with a mean age at death of 84 years. The number of days post-admission to death was 17.5 (range 0–109). 45 patients had a new DNACPR recorded and 13 were longstanding. 43 patients (48.3%) were diagnosed as dying at a mean of 7.2 days following admission, 31 of whom (72.1%) had ceiling of care discussed. Of this cohort, 32 had futile investigations during their last week of life and astoundingly 10 on the day of death. Although some effort is being made to recognise the ‘dying’ orthopaedic patient, further work is needed to establish a clear ceiling of care pathway, which maintains and respects patient comfort and dignity during their last days of life

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe the current pathways of care for patients with a fracture of the hip in five low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) in South Asia (Nepal and Sri Lanka) and Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines).

INTRODUCTION. In recent years the age of world's population has risen and with it there has been a significant increase in the frequency of hip fractures in the elderly. These fractures are known to increase morbidity and mortality. However, little is known about the frequency and characteristics of patients who sustain a second hip fracture. We examined the incidence and the underlying associated medical disorders of patients with a second fracture in the other hip. MATERIAL & METHODS. This study consists of 132/1208 Pts. (10.9%) treated in our department between 1998–2006 that had a secondary hip fracture 1–9 years following the first hip fracture. We examined the most common complications following surgery of this type, the most common related illnesses among these patients, and the influence of post-surgical rehabilitative care on the patients' return to daily functioning. RESULTS. 132 Pts (10.9%) of this series (34 M, 98 F; 64–101 year old; mean 81Y) had a second hip fracture. Most of them (82%) had chronic associated disorders such as heart problems, dementia, old CVA, sight problems and renal failure. Of those with a second hip fracture- 9/132 (6.8%) had the second hip fracture within the first year following surgery, 35/132 (26.5.3%) after 2 years and the remaining 102/132 (66.7%) after 3–6 years. 70.8% of the second hip fracture were of the same type and location of the first hip fracture. 65% of the single hip-fracture patients returned to the same type of daily functioning that they had had prior to injury within one year following surgery. 52% of the patients with the second hip fracture returned to the same level of daily functioning they had had during the period between the first and the second hip fracture Furthermore, we also found that sub-capital fractures are more characteristic of a younger population than are intertrochanteric fractures. DISCUSSION. Based on this study it seems that the frequency of a second fracture in the other hip was 10.9%. The length of time between occurrence of the first and second fractures ranged from one to six years, a third of them within the first 2 years and two thirds of them after 3–6 years. Age and medical status of the patient may be important predictors of a second hip fracture. It is therefore imperative to improve bone quality, medical and functional status of the patients following the first hip fractures in order to reduce the risk of the second hip fractures

For some years, there has been vast international interest in creating models for joint efforts between geriatricians and orthopedic surgeons. We present data from two such models. For the first time in Denmark, the Department of Orthopedics Bispebjerg University Hospital (BUP) recruited two full-time geriatricians in September 2009. They were assigned an independent unit meant for severely ill orthopaedic patients with high comorbidity and polypharmacy. These two geriatricians had, during the previous two years, consulted another orthopaedic department at Gentofte University Hospital (GUH) in a neighbouring community three times a week. The aim of their intervention was then to optimize treatment for comorbidity, to clarify indication of acute fall-assessment, osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment, presence of delirium and dementia. Methods. A total of 1344 hip fracture patients (age 70 years) divided into three populations were included in this study. Mortality data were collected from the Danish Civil Registry. Population 1 (P1), n = 645 was included at GUH from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2007. During the entire period, the patients had access to a senior consultant in geriatric medicine three times a week. In this population, the majority of patients were assessed for dementia (n = 636), delirium (n = 627) and Barthel Index (Barthel100) at admission (n = 394). Population 2 (P2), n = 381 included at BUH from September 1, 2009 until July 8, 2010 with orthogeriatric access. Population 3 (P3), n = 318 were included at BUH from September 28, 2008 until August 31, 2009 with no orthogeriatric access. Age mean (SD): P1 84.7 (6.8), P2 85.5 (7.3), P3 85.3 (14.3) P = 0.1(ANOVA) Sex ratio: females/males: P1 0.73/0.27, P2 0.80/0.20, P3 0.75/0.25 P = 0.09 Chi square). Results. In-hospital mortality rate: P1 4.8%, P2 6.3%, P3 9.1% P = 0.03 (Chi square). Three month mortality: In P1 dementia, delirium and Barthel Index (below 50 versus above 50) were all strong predictors: No dementia: 53/383 (13.8%) versus dementia present 68/253 (26.9%) died, P = 0001 (log-rank test). No delirium 69/456 (15.1%) versus delirium present 47/171 (27.5%) died F = 0.0004 (log-rank test) Barthel Index 50 38/372 (10.2%) versus Barthel<50 7/22 (31.8%) died P = 0.0004. Conclusion. This paper reports data from two different models with orthogeriatric service. Our data present delirium, dementia and Barthel Index to be very strong predictors for three month mortality (P1). Despite the time needed to implement a new orthogeriatric unit and the fact that the geriatricians only assessed a proportion of hip fracture patients, in-hospital mortality was reduced significantly for the total hip-fracture population (P2) within the first 10 months

Aims

Osseointegrated prosthetic limbs allow better mobility than socket-mounted prosthetics for lower limb amputees. Fractures, however, can occur in the residual limb, but they have rarely been reported. Approximately 2% to 3% of amputees with socket-mounted prostheses may fracture within five years. This is the first study which directly addresses the risks and management of periprosthetic osseointegration fractures in amputees.