Introduction. Bisphosphonates (BP) are the first-line therapy for preventing osteoporotic fragility fractures. However, concern regarding their efficacy is growing because bisphosphonate use is associated with over-suppression of remodeling. Animal studies have reported that BP therapy is associated with accumulation of micro-cracks (Fig. 1) and a reduction in bone mechanical properties, but the effect on humans has not been investigated. Therefore, our aim was to quantify the mechanical strength of bone treated with BP, and correlate this with the microarchitecture and density of micro-damage in comparison with untreated osteoporotic hip-fractured and non-fractured elderly controls. Methods. Trabecular bone cores from patients treated with BP were compared with patients who had not received any treatment for bone osteoporotic disease. Non-fractured cadaveric femora from individuals with no history of bone metabolic disease were also used as controls. Cores were imaged in high resolution (∼1.3µm) using Synchrotron X-ray tomography (Diamond Light Source Ltd.) The scans were used for structural and material analysis, then the cores were mechanically tested in compression. A novel classification system was devised to characterise features of micro-damage in the Synchrotron images: micro-cracks, diffuse damage and perforations. Synchrotron micro-CT stacks were visualised and analysed using ImageJ, Avizo and VGStudio MAX. Results. Our findings demonstrated that patients treated with BP (17.2 MPa) had significantly lower tissue strength than untreated fracture (24.0 MPa) and non-fracture controls (28.0 MPa). Yet treated and untreated hip-fracture patient's exhibited comparable bone microarchitecture, volume fraction, apparent and material density. The data also revealed that the BP group had the highest micro-damage density across all groups. The BP group (7.7/mm. 3. ) also exhibited significantly greater micro-crack density than the fracture (4.3/mm. 3. ) and non-fracture (4.1/mm. 3. ) controls. Furthermore, the BP group (1.9/mm. 3. ) demonstrated increased diffuse damage when compared to the fracture (0.3/mm. 3. ) and non-fracture (0.8/mm. 3. ) controls. In contrast, the BP group (1.9. mm. 3. ) had fewer perforations than fracture (3.0/mm. 3. ) and non-fracture controls (3.9/mm. 3. ). Discussion. Despite having comparable microarchitecture apparent and material density, patients taking BP exhibited weaker tissue strength compared to the controls. This weakness is likely to be the the result of the increased accumulation of micro-damage found in BP treated bone. BP inhibits bone remodelling, thereby reducing the number of perforated trabeculae, meanwhile over-suppression leads to the accumulation of micro-cracks and diffuse damage which reduce strength. Conclusion. In our subgroup of hip-fracture patients, BP therapy appeared to offer no mechanical advantage in resisting femoral fractures. BP accumulated micro-damage may have weakened the trabecular bone in the femoral head and neck thereby, therefore increasing the risk of a fracture during a trip or fall