Purpose. Factors contributing to chronic postoperative pain (CPOP) are poorly defined in young people and developmental considerations are poorly understood. With over 5 million children undergoing surgery yearly and 25% of adults referred to chronic pain clinics identifying surgery as the antecedent, there is a need to elucidate factors that contribute to CPOP in young people. The present study includes patients undergoing hip preservation surgery at a children's hospital. Methods. The HOOS and the SF-12 Health Survey were administered to 614 patients prior to surgery with 422 patients completing follow-up data (6-months, 1-year, and 2-years post-surgery). Examining baseline characteristics for those who completed follow-up versus those who did not, the only significant difference was that patients with more than one surgery were less likely to complete follow-up measures. Pain, quality of life, and functioning across time were examined using SAS PROC TRAJ procedure, a mixture model that estimates a regression model for each discrete group within the population. Longitudinal pain trajectories were empirically grouped. Baseline preoperative characteristics of age, gender, preoperative pain, quality of life, functioning, and mental health that could potentially distinguish trajectory groups were examined. Results. A three trajectory model (low pain, pain improvement, and high pain) emerged indicating three different treatment responders. Pain trajectory groups did not differ significantly on gender, presurgical age, BMI, prior hip surgery, surgical type, joint congruence, or Tönnis grade. The pain trajectory groups differed significantly from each other on presurgical pain, pain chronicity, quality of life, and functioning. Those in the high pain group and pain improvement group endorsed having presurgical depression at significantly higher rates and lower presurgical quality of life compared to those in the low pain group (p<.01). Similarly, those in the high pain group reported significantly worse functioning prior to surgery compared to the pain improvement group (p<.0001) and those in the low pain group (p<.0001). Conclusions. Chronic pain is a common problem and surgery can be a trigger. There may be a subset of hip preservation surgery patients who are predisposed to chronic pain independent of hip health. The results demonstrate the need for preoperative screening prior to hip preservation surgery. A prospective, interventional study to identify patients at risk for a poor pain trajectory is underway. Significance. This is the largest study to date to examine longitudinal pain, quality of life, and functioning trajectories for adolescent and young adults undergoing hip preservation surgery. Chronic pain is a serious public health concern, with the United States spending $19 billion annually on pain-related disability. Identifying predictors of poor long-term outcomes in adolescents and young adult samples with postoperative pain may prevent the development of chronic pain into adulthood as well as inform presurgical preparation and postsurgical care

Management of the young adult hip pathologies is a special entity in orthopaedic surgical practice that needs special emphasis and consideration. A wide range of pathological and traumatic conditions occur in the young adult hip that lead to functional disability and the development of premature osteoarthritis. Proper surgical interference when the hip is still in the pre-arthritic stage restores function to the young hip and protects it from early degenerative changes, and hence the anticipated need for future joint replacement surgery is prevented. Accurate estimation of the biomechanical error combined with careful understanding of the hip joint biology is the cornerstone of success of any hip preservation surgery ever performed to save the young adult hip. Safe surgical hip dislocation approach was adopted as one of the tools in the hands of the hip preservation surgeon to treat a broad spectrum of intra-articular hip pathologies like Perthes disease and severe forms of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Osteo-chondroplasty at the head-neck junction with relative femoral neck lengthening for Perthes disease, and Subcapital re-orientation of severe SCFE based on its retinacular vascular pedicle are often performed via the surgical hip dislocation approach. The approach is also useful with certain types of acetabular fractures that enables fixation of dual-column fractures via single approach with intra-articular visualization for the accuracy of reduction and hardware placement. The 4 cm mini-open direct anterior approach is ideal for the surgical treatment of cases with cam and/or pincer types of femoro-acetabular impingement. Peri-articular osteotomies performed either on the acetabular or the femoral sides of the hip joint are extremely useful in the correction of the biomechanical error that led to an existing hip pathology. Periacetabular osteotomies are commonly performed to treat dysplasia of the young hip. Proximal femoral osteotomies are commonly performed to treat a wide range of hip pathologies including non-unions of femoral neck fractures in the young adult. Correction of the biomechanical error at the proper timing ensures normalization of the hip joint loading conditions and range of motion that leads to reversal of the pathologic process and prevention of osteoarthritis. A hip joint replacement would have an unknown but certainly a finite life, whereas a young hip that has healed after hip preservation surgery would definitely last for a lifetime

There are three major diagnoses that have been associated with early hip degeneration and subsequent hip replacement in young patients: FAI, hip dysplasia and hip osteonecrosis. I will focus mainly on the first two. Both conditions, if diagnosed early in the symptomatic patient, can be surgically treated in order to try to prevent further hip degeneration. But, what is the natural history of these disorders?

Our recent paper published this year described the natural history of hip dysplasia in a group of patients with a contralateral THA. At an average of 20 years, 70% of hips that were diagnosed at Tönnis Grade 0, had progression in degenerative changes with 23% requiring a THA at 20 years. Once the hip degeneration progressed to Tönnis 1, then 60% of hips progressed and required a THA. This natural history study demonstrates that degeneration of a dysplastic hip will occur in over 2/3 of the hips despite the limitations of activity imposed by a contralateral THA.

In this same study, we were unable to detect a significant difference in progression between FAI hips and those categorised as normal. FAI damage has been commonly considered to be “motion-induced” and as such, the limitations imposed by the THA, might have limited the progression in hip damage. Needless to say, progression was seen in about half of the hips at 10 years, but very few required a THA at final follow-up. We have recently presented data on a group of young asymptomatic teenagers with FAI. At 5 years of follow-up, the group of patients with limited ROM in flexion and internal rotation, cam deformity and increased alpha angles, depicting a more severe form of disease, showed MRI evidence of progression in hip damage and worst clinical scores than a control group. This data supports our initial impressions that FAI may truly lead to irreversible hip damage.

Is surgery always the option? I indicate surgery when the patient is symptomatic and has a correctable structural problem that has failed non-operative management. The data suggests that few patients improve with physical therapy, but activity modification may be an option in patients with FAI as the hip damage is mainly activity related. This may not be the case with hip dysplasia. For hip dysplasia, my current recommendations are in the form of a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) to correct the structural problem. The procedure leads to improvement in pain as it takes care of the 4 pain generators in the dysplastic hip: the labrum, cartilage, abductors, and resultant instability. The labrum and cartilage are off-loaded with the PAO, the instability is improved by providing containment and the abductor pain is improved by improving the hip mechanics by medializing the acetabulum. I perform a hip arthroscopy prior to the PAO in the majority to treat the labrum and to perform a head neck junction osteochondroplasty, if needed. Correction of the dysplasia to a more normal hip, will improve the outcome of these hips in the long-term.

For FAI, arthroscopy has become the best option for management and today is considered the gold standard. A careful review of the imaging is important prior to surgical decision making as patient selection and surgical correction is key. Poor outcomes have been seen in patients with advanced degenerative changes (joint space narrowing, femoral head damage) or in patients with incomplete correction of the deformity. Open surgical correction is an option in cases where deformity precludes an arthroscopic treatment alone.

Over the past fifteen years hip preservation surgery has rapidly evolved. Improved understanding of the pathomechanics and associated intra-articular degeneration of both hip instability and femoroacetabular impingement have led to improved surgical indications, refined surgical techniques and more effective joint preservation surgical procedures. The periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) was initially introduced by Ganz and colleagues and has become the preferred treatment in North America for pre-arthritic, symptomatic acetabular dysplasia. Both hip arthroscopy and safe surgical dislocation of the hip have been popularised for the treatment of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement disorders. Hip arthroscopy is effective for focal and\or accessible impingement lesions while the surgical dislocation approach is reserved for nonfocal disease patterns as seen in complex FAI, and residual Perthes and SCFE deformities. Femoroacetabular impingement from major acetabular retroversion can be managed with the PAO if there is coexistent posterosuperior acetabular insufficiency. Short- to mid-term results of these procedures are generally good to excellent for most patients and the complication rates associated with these procedures are very acceptable. Long-term outcomes are best known for the PAO. Several recent studies have documented survivorship rates of 65–90% at 10–20-year follow-up. Certain factors are associated with long-term success including minimal pre-operative radiographic OA, early symptoms, accurate acetabular correction, and younger age. These data strongly suggest that the PAO can defer THA to an older age for most patients while completely avoiding arthroplasty may only be possible in select patients with excellent congruency, no secondary OA and an ideal surgical correction

Hip joint preservation remains a preferred treatment option for hips with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity always leads to arthrosis if uncorrected. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement if present. Pre-operative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces. The earlier PAO series show 20 year survivorship of 81% and 65% in Tonnis Grade 0 and 1 hips. Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Cam impingement can be treated by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of pre-operative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis pre-operatively whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomatic with instability in the absence of arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctable problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis

Hip joint preservation remains a preferred treatment option for hips with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity always leads to arthrosis if uncorrected. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement if present. Preoperative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces. Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Cam impingement can be treated by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of preoperative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis preop whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomic with instability in the absence of arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctible problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis

There are a number of progressive conditions that afflict the hip and result in degenerative arthritis. Along the path of progression of the disease and prior to the development of arthritis, some of these conditions may be treatable by joint preservation procedures. Periacetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), femoroacetabular osteoplasty for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), and a variety of surgical procedures for management of early osteonecrosis of the femoral head are some examples of joint preservation of the hip. DDH is characterised by abnormal development of the acetabulum and the proximal femur that leads to suboptimal contact of the articular surfaces and the resultant increase in joint reaction forces. FAI is a condition characterised by an abnormal contact between the femoral neck and the acetabular rim. FAI is believed to exist when a triad of signs (abnormal alpha angle, labral tear, and chondral lesion) can be identified.

The question that remains is whether joint preservation procedures are able to avert the need for arthroplasty or just an intervention along the natural path of progression of the hip disease. There is an interesting study that followed 628 infants born in a Navajo reservation, including 8 infants with severe dysplasia, for 35 years. None of the children with DDH had surgical treatment and all had developed severe arthritis in the interim. The latter study and a few other natural history studies have shown that the lack of administration of surgical treatment to patients with symptomatic DDH results in accelerated arthritis. The situation is not so clear with FAI. Some believe that FAI is a pre-arthritic condition and surgical treatment is only effective in addressing the symptoms and does not delay or defer an arthroplasty. While others believe that restoration of the normal mechanical environment to the hip of FAI patients, by removing the abnormal contact and repair of the labrum, is likely to change the natural history of the disease and at minimum delay the need for an arthroplasty. There is a need for natural history studies or case series to settle the latter controversy.

Surgical invention to preserve the native hip joint remains a preferred treatment option for hips in young patients with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The two most common pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity, if left uncorrected, always leads to arthrosis. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement, if present. Correction of deformities on the femoral side is now less common and reserved for only the more severe combined femoral and acetabular dysplasias or the rare isolated femoral dysplasia. Pre-operative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces.

Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Further, significant cam impingement is clearly associated with the development of osteoarthrosis. Treatment can be performed either by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of pre-operative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis pre-op whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomatic with the onset of instability in the absence of significant secondary arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Similarly, caution should be exercised when considering rim-trimming for protrusion since high central contact pressures due to an enlarged acetabular notch are not corrected by rim trimming.

Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctable problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis.

It has been reported that 60-85% of patients who undergo PAO have concomitant intraarticular pathology that cannot be addressed with PAO alone. Currently, there are limited diagnostic tools to determine which patients would benefit from hip arthroscopy at the time of PAO to address intra-articular pathology. This study aims to see if preoperative PROMs scores measured by IHOT-33 scores have predictive value in whether intra-articular pathology is addressed during PAO + scope. The secondary aim is to see how often surgeons at high-volume hip preservation centers address intra-articular pathology if a scope is performed during the same anesthesia event. A randomized, prospective Multicenter trial was performed on patients who underwent PAO and hip arthroscopy to treat hip dysplasia from 2019 to 2020. Preoperative PROMs and intraoperative findings and procedures were recorded and analyzed. A total of 75 patients, 84% Female, and 16% male, with an average age of 27 years old, were included in the study. Patients were randomized to have PAO alone 34 patients vs. PAO + arthroscopy 41 patients during the same anesthesia event. The procedures performed, including types of labral procedures and chondroplasty procedures, were recorded. Additionally, a two-sided student T-test was used to evaluate the difference in means of preoperative IHOT score among patients for whom a labral procedure was performed versus no labral procedure. A total of 82% of patients had an intra-articular procedure performed at the time of hip arthroscopy. 68% of patients who had PAO + arthroscopy had a labral procedure performed. The most common labral procedure was a labral refixation which was performed in 78% of patients who had a labral procedure performed. Femoral head-neck junction chondroplasty was performed in 51% of patients who had an intra-articular procedure performed. The mean IHOT score was 29.3 in patients who had a labral procedure performed and 33.63 in those who did not have a labral procedure performed P- value=0.24. Our findings demonstrate preoperative IHOT-33 scores were not predictive in determining whether intra-articular labral pathology was addressed at the time of surgery. Additionally, we found that if labral pathology was addressed, labral refixation was the most common repair performed. This study also provides valuable information on what procedures high-volume hip preservation centers are performing when performing PAO + arthroscopy

Higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation have been associated with worse health outcomes. The influence of socioeconomic deprivation on patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) has not previously been investigated. A total of 217 patients (171 female, 46 male; median age 23.4 years) who underwent PAO by a single surgeon were identified. Patients were categorised into three groups according to their New Zealand Deprivation (NZDep) Index: minimal deprivation (NZDep Index 1–3, n=89), moderate deprivation (NZDep Index 4–6, n=94), and maximal deprivation (NZDep Index 7–10, n=34). The three groups were compared with respect to baseline variables, surgical details, complications, and pre-operative and two-year post-operative functional scores (including International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), EQ-5D quality of life score, and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score). Multivariate regression was undertaken to assess for the effect of NZDep Index on patient outcomes. Patients in the maximal deprivation group were more likely to be Māori (p<0.001) and have surgery in a public rather than a private hospital (p=0.004), while the minimal deprivation group demonstrated a lower BMI (p=0.005). There were otherwise no other significant differences in baseline variables, surgical details, complications, nor pre-operative or two-year post-operative functional scores between the three groups (all p>0.05). Multivariate analysis identified a higher NZDep Index to be independently predictive of a lower pre-operative UCLA activity score (p=0.014) and a higher two-year iHOT-12 score (p<0.001). Our results demonstrate an inequality in access to PAO, with patients exposed to higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation under-represented in our study population. When provided access to PAO, these vulnerable patients achieve significant functional improvement at least as great as patients with less socioeconomic deprivation. Initiatives to improve access to hip preservation care in socioeconomically deprived populations appear warranted

We present a prospective two-year follow-up study of 1038 hip arthroscopies performed at a high volume tertiary referral centre for hip preservation. We feel that this manuscript is both pertinent and timely due to the advances in the field of hip preservation. We used four validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores along with the visual analog scale (VAS) and patient satisfaction scores to assess preoperative and postoperative outcomes in all patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. We divided the entire cohort into patients undergoing primary and revision hip arthroscopies. We found a statistically significant improvement from preoperative to two-year postoperative PRO scores in the two subgroups. We also found a significant difference in the PRO scores at three months, one year, and two years postoperatively between the primary and revision subgroups. The revision subgroup had inferior VAS and patient satisfaction compared to the primary subgroup, however these results were not significant. The conversion to total hip arthroplasty/hip resurfacing (THA/HR) was 5.6% and 11.2% in the primary and revision subgroups, respectively. This resulted in a relative risk of 2.0 for conversion to THA/HR in the revision subgroup. We had a complication rate of 5.3 (only 0.5% of which were considered major) which was similar to that reported in the literature for hip arthroscopy. The primary purpose was to perform a survival analysis in a large mixed cohort of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy at a high volume tertiary referral centre for hip preservation with minimum two-year follow-up. The secondary purpose was to compare clinical outcomes of primary versus revision hip arthroscopy. From February 2008 to June 2012, data were prospectively collected on all patients undergoing primary or revision hip arthroscopy. Patients were assessed pre- and post-operatively with modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), and Hip Outcome Score-Sport Specific Subscales (HOS-SSS). Pain was estimated on the visual analog scale (VAS). Patient satisfaction was measured on a scale from 0 to 10. There were a total of 1155 arthroscopies performed, including 1040 primary arthroscopies (926 patients) and 115 revision arthroscopies (106 patients). Of these, 931 primary arthroscopies (89.5%) in 824 patients (89.0%) and 107 revision arthroscopies (93.0%) in 97 patients (91.5%), were available for follow-up and included in our study. The mean change in patient reported outcome (PRO) scores at two-year follow-up in the primary subgroup was 17.4 for mHHS, 19.7 for HOS-ADL, 23.8 for HOS-SSS, 21.3 for NAHS, and −3.0 for VAS. The mean change in PRO scores at two-year follow-up in the revision subgroup was 13.4, 10.9, 16.1, 15.4, and −2.7, respectively. All scores improved significantly compared to pre-operatively (p<0.001). PRO scores were higher at all time points for the primary subgroup compared to the revision subgroup (p<0.05). Satisfaction was 7.7 and 7.2 for primary and revision subgroups, respectively. Of 931 primary arthroscopies, 52 (5.6%) underwent THA/HR. Of 107 revision arthroscopies, 12 (11.2%) underwent THA/HR. The relative risk of a THA/HR was 2.0 after revision procedures compared to primary procedures. The overall complication rate was 5.3%. Hip arthroscopy showed significant improvement in all PRO, VAS, and satisfaction scores at two years postoperatively. Primary arthroscopy patients showed greater PRO scores and a trend towards greater VAS compared to the revision subgroup. The relative risk of a THA/HR was 2.0 after revision procedures compared to primary procedures

Introduction. In the evaluation of patients with pre-arthritic hip disorders, making the correct diagnosis and identifying the underlying bone pathology is of upmost importance to achieve optimal patient outcomes. 3-dimensional imaging adds information for proper preoperative planning. CT scans have become the gold standard for this, but with the associated risk of radiation exposure to this generally younger patient cohort. Purpose. To determine if 3D-MR reconstructions of the hip can be used to accurately demonstrate femoral and acetabular morphology in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and development dysplasia of the hip (DDH) that is comparable to CT imaging. Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective review of 14 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of FAI or DDH that underwent both CT and MRI scans of the same hip with 3D reconstructions. 2 fellowship trained musculoskeletal radiologists reviewed all scans, and a fellowship trained hip preservation surgeon separately reviewed scans for relevant surgical parameters. All were blinded to the patients' clinical history. The 3D reconstructions were evaluated by radiologists for the presence of a CAM lesion and acetabular retroversion, while the hip preservation surgeon also evaluated CAM extent using a clock face convention of a right hip, location of femoral head blood supply, and morphological anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) variant. The findings on the 3D CT reconstructions were considered the reference standard. Results. Of 14 patients, there were 9 females and 5 males with a mean age 32 (range 15–42). There was no difference in the ability of MRI to detect the presence of a CAM lesion (100% agreement between 3D-MR and 3D-CT, p=1), AIIS morphology (p=1, mode=type 1 variant), or acetabular retroversion (85.7%, p=0.5). 3D-MR had a sensitivity and specificity of 100 in detecting a CAM lesion relative to 3D-CT. Four CT studies were inadequate to adequately evaluate for presence of a CAM. Five CT studies were inadequate to evaluate for location of the femoral head vessels, while MRI was able to determine location in those patients. In the 10 remaining patients for presence of CAM, and nine patients for femoral head vessel location, there was no statistically significant difference between 3D-MR and 3D-CT in determining the location of CAM lesion on a clock face (p=0.8, mean MRI = 12:54, mean CT: 12:51, SD = 66 mins MR, 81 mins CT) or in determining vessel location (p=0.4, MR mean 11:23, CT mean 11:36, SD 33 mins for both). Conclusion. 3D MRI reconstructions are as accurate as 3D CT reconstructions in evaluating osseous morphology of the hip, and may be superior to CT in determining other certain clinically relevant hip parameters. 3D-MR was equally useful in determining the presence and extent of a CAM lesion, acetabular retroversion, and AIIS morphologic variant, and more useful than 3D CT in determining location of the femoral head vessels. In evaluating FAI or hip dysplasia, a 3D-MR study is sufficient to evaluate both soft tissue and osseous anatomy, sparing the need for a 3D CT scan and its associated radiation exposure and cost

There is currently no standardised complication grading classification routinely used for paediatric orthopaedic surgical procedures. The Clavien-Dindo classification used in general surgery was modified and validated in 2011 by Sink et al. and has been used regularly to classify complications following hip preservation surgery. The aim of this study was to adapt and validate Sink et al.'s modification of the Clavien-Dindo classification system for grading complications following surgical interventions of the upper and lower extremities and spine in paediatric orthopaedic patients. Sink et al.'s modification of the Clavien-Dindo classification system was further modified for paediatric orthopaedic procedures. The modified grading scheme was based on the treatment required to treat the complication and the long term morbidity of the complication. Grade I complications do not require deviation from standard treatment. Grade II complications deviate from the normal post-operative course and require outpatient treatment. Grade III complications require investigations, re-admission or re-operation. Grade IV complications are limb or life threatening or have a potential for permanent disability (IVa: with no long term disability and IVb: with long-term disability). Grade V complications result in death. Forty-five complication scenarios were developed. Seven paediatric orthopaedic surgeons were trained to use the modified system and they each graded the scenarios on two occasions. The scenarios were presented in a different random order each time they were graded. Fleiss' and Cohen's k statistics were performed to test for inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities, respectively. The overall Fleiss' k value for inter-rater reliability was 0.772 (95% CI, 0.744–0.799). The weighted k was 0.765 (95% CI, 0.703–0.826) for Grade I, 0.692 (95% CI, 0.630–0.753) for Grade II, 0.733 (95% CI, 0.671–0.795) for Grade III, 0.657(95% CI, 0.595–0.719) for Grade IVa, 0.769 (95% CI, 0.707–0.83) for Grade IVb and 1.000 for Grade V (p value <0.001). The Cohen's k value for intra-rater reliability was 0.918 (95% CI, 0.887–0.947). These tests show that the adapted classification system has high inter- and intra-rater reliabilities for grading complications following paediatric orthopaedic surgery. Given the high intra- and inter-rater reliability and simplicity of this system, adoption of this grading scheme as a standard of reporting complications in paediatric orthopaedic surgery could be considered. Since the evaluation of surgical outcomes should include the ability to reliably grade surgical complications, this reproducible, reliable system to assess paediatric surgical complications will be a valuable tool for improving surgical practices and patient outcomes

Purpose. While changes in lower limb alignment and pelvic inclination after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using certain surgical approaches have been studied, the effect of preserving the joint capsule is still unclear. We retrospectively investigated changes in lower limb alignment, length and pelvic inclination before and after surgery, and the risk of postoperative dislocation in patients who underwent capsule preserving THA using the anterolateral-supine (ALS) approach. Methods. Between July 2016 and March 2018, 112 hips (non-capsule preservation group: 42 hips, and capsule preservation group: 70 hips) from patients with hip osteoarthritis who underwent THA were included in this study. Patients who underwent spinal fusion and total knee arthroplasty on the same side as that of the THA were excluded. Using computed tomography, we measured lower limb elongation, external rotation of the knee, and femoral neck/stem anteversion before operation and three to five days after operation. We examined the pelvic inclination using vertical/transverse ratio of the pelvic cavity measured by X-ray of the anteroposterior pelvic region in the standing position before and six to 12 months after operation. All operations were performed using the ALS approach and taper wedge stem. Results. No dislocation was found in both groups. Lower limb elongation was 14.5±6.3 (mean±SD) mm in the non-capsule preservation group and 9.4±8.8 mm in the capsule preservation group. A significant reduction was found in the capsule preservation group (p<0.05). Changes in knee external rotation was 7.2±10.5 degrees in the non-capsule preservation group and 3.5±10.3 degrees in the capsule preservation group. A trend toward decreased knee external rotation in the capsule preservation group (p=0.07) was observed. There was no difference in femoral neck/stem anteversion and vertical/transverse ratio of the pelvic cavity between both groups. Discussion. Patients in the capsule preservation group tended to have reduced external rotation of lower limb, which might prevent postoperative anterior dislocation due to preservation of anterior structures. The capsule preservation group had significantly reduced lower limb elongation, suggesting that preservation of the hip joint capsule ligament contributes to joint stability. There was no significant difference in the pelvic inclination between both groups. Long-term changes will be assessed by regular follow up after operation

Over the past decade there has been a shift in the approach to management of many femoral neck fractures. As noted by Miller et al. those trends are reflected in the practice patterns of surgeons applying for board certification through the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgeons. From 1999 to 2011 there was a trend toward total hip arthroplasty and corresponding small decreases in the use of hemi-arthroplasty and internal fixation for treatment of femoral neck fractures. For many years the treatment approach has been a simple diagnosis-related algorithm predicated upon classification of the fracture as displaced (historically treated with hemi-arthroplasty) or non-displaced (historically treated with internal fixation). More recently, however, the focus has shifted to a patient-centered approach. In the patient-centered approach factors such as age, functional demands, pre-existent hip disease and bone quality should all be considered. In the contemporary setting it is still important to distinguish between displaced and non-displaced fracture patterns. Non-displaced femoral neck fractures, regardless of patient age or activity, are well-suited to closed reduction and internal fixation, most commonly with three cannulated screws. The union rate is high in non-displaced fractures treated with internal fixation and the benefits of preserving the native hip joint are substantial. Displaced femoral neck fractures in younger active patients, particularly those without pre-existent hip arthritis, are best treated with early anatomic reduction and internal fixation. While a subgroup of young, active patients who undergo ORIF may fail, the benefits of native hip preservation in that group are again substantial. Displaced femoral neck fractures in older patients or those with substantial pre-existing hip arthritis are best treated with arthroplasty. The biggest practice change has been the trend to total hip arthroplasty as opposed to hemi-arthroplasty for a subgroup of patients. Total hip arthroplasty is now favored in almost all active, cognitively well-functioning patients as the degree of pain relief is better and the risk of reoperation is lower in the current era (32mm and 36mm femoral heads). Hemi-arthroplasty, either uni-polar or bi-polar, remains an appropriate treatment for cognitively impaired patients who also have limited functional demands in whom the risk of dislocation is particularly high

The role of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) in the evaluation of patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) to assess femoral head-neck junction asphericity and labral pathology is well established. However, in our experience, the presence of acetabular cysts on MRA, which may signify underlying full thickness articular cartilage delamination and progression towards arthropathy, is also an important feature. We retrospectively reviewed 142 hips (mean age 32 years, 47 men, 95 women), correlating the findings on MRA with those found at the time of open surgical hip debridement to ascertain the prevalence of acetabular cysts and the association with underlying acetabular changes. Fourteen MRAs demonstrated features consistent with underlying acetabular cystic change. At the time of surgery, this was confirmed in eleven cases that demonstrated a full thickness articular chondral flap in all cases and an underlying acetabular cyst. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of MRA in relation to acetabular cysts was 55%, 97.5%, 78.5% and 92.9% respectively. We believe acetabular cysts on MRA to be a significant finding. Such patients are likely to have an associated full thickness chondral lesion and features of early degenerative change, influencing outcome and prognosis. Our clinical practice has changed to reflect this finding. For those patients with cysts on MRA, we offer open debridement only to the severely affected young and favour arthroscopic debridement in older patients with smaller cams. We believe hip preservation surgeons should be aware of the significance of acetabular cysts and be prepared to adjust treatment accordingly

The role of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) in the evaluation of patients with femeroacetabular impingement (FAI) to assess femoral head-neck junction asphericity and labral pathology is well established. However, in our experience the presence of acetabular cysts on MRA, which may signify underlying full thickness articular cartilage delamination and progression towards arthropathy, is also an important feature. We retrospectively reviewed 142 hips (mean age 32 years, 47 men, 95 women), correlating the findings on MRA with those found at the time of open surgical hip debridement to ascertain the prevalence of acetabular cysts and the association with underlying acetabular changes. Fifteen MRA's demonstrated features consistent with underlying acetabular cystic change. At the time of surgery, this was confirmed in eleven cases that demonstrated a full thickness articular chondral flap (carpet lesion) and an underlying acetabular cyst. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of MRA in relation to acetabular cysts was 55%, 96.7%, 73.3% and 92.9% respectively. We believe acetabular cysts on MRA to be a significant finding. Such patients are likely to have an associated full thickness chondral lesion and features of early degenerative change, influencing outcome and prognosis. Our clinical practise has changed to reflect this finding. For those patients with cysts on MRA, we are less likely to offer open debridement and favour arthroscopic intervention followed by arthroplasty when symptoms dictate. We believe hip preservation surgeons should be aware of the significance of acetabular cysts and be prepared to adjust treatment options accordingly

ORIF is the treatment of choice for the majority of acetabular fractures with the ultimate goal of native hip preservation. As long as anatomic reduction and joint congruency is achieved, the results of ORIF have led to good to excellent outcomes. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) after acetabular fracture is indicated: 1.) acutely in the setting of a fracture where ORIF has been shown to portray a poor prognosis (severe femoral head and/or posterior wall impaction, dome comminution (gull sign) or 2.) in the presence of the sequelae of acetabular fractures such as posttraumatic arthritis or osteonecrosis. Independent of the setting, THA after acetabular fracture presents unique challenges to the orthopaedic surgeon and in many instances requires a team approach that includes both joint reconstruction and trauma specialists. The main goal of the operation is to restore continuity of the fractured columns prior to implantation of an uncemented acetabular component. Technical challenges include infection, residual pelvic deformity, acetabular bone loss and/ or ununited fractures, osteonecrosis of bone fragments, retained hardware, heterotopic ossification, sciatic nerve compromise, and the difficulties in obtaining long-term socket fixation. Careful pre-operative assessment with review of x-rays and CT scans to assess bone loss, fracture nonunion, and infection is necessary. The surgeon must anticipate more blood loss, longer operative times, and difficulties with exposure and must anticipate the need of special tools intra-operatively such as pelvic reconstruction plates, use of autogenous bone graft, metal cutting instruments and post-operative heterotopic ossification prophylaxis either in the form of NSAIDS or radiation. In case of a necrosis, nonunion, or bone loss principles of revision total hip arthroplasty are commonly used and today the use of highly porous metals is particularly useful. Cemented acetabular components should be avoided. Care should be taken with cup position as distorted anatomy may influence cup position and bony impingement may lead to dislocation. The results of THA in general has provided excellent pain relief and functional improvement but the biggest historical problem has been socket fixation and bearing surface wear, hopefully now improved with the advent of highly porous metals and alternative bearing surfaces

Background. Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) has long been the standard treatment for cases in which non-surgical alternatives have failed to improve pain and function in hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Outcomes from THA have improved over time with better surgical techniques and improved implant designs. While conventional neck-sacrificing implants have been associated with favorable outcomes, there is evidence to suggest biomechanical advantages of newer, femoral neck-preserving short-stem implants, including the Corin MiniHip. However, there is a still a gap of knowledge regarding the potential benefits of the MiniHip stem over conventional neck-sacrificing stems in regards to patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In this study, we investigated the differences between a neck-sacrificing stem design and neck-preserving short-stem design (MiniHip, Corin Inc.) arthroplasty concerning PROs, and considering the known features of the short stem design, we hypothesized that MiniHip THA would be associated with improved PROs in comparison to a neck-sacrificing implant system. We further sought to investigate gender effects related to MiniHip or conventional stem surgery. Methods. Neck-sacrificing implant patients (n=90, age 57±7.9 years, female=58, male=32) and a matched (matching criteria: follow-up period, BMI, age) cohort group of MiniHip patients (n=105, age 55.16±9.88 years, female: 25, male: 80) reported both pre-operative and post-operative Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) at a minimum interval of 6 months post-operatively and up to three years postoperatively. We applied MANCOVA analysis to compare patient-reported outcome subscores from each group using follow-up period as a covariate and employing gender as an additional grouping factor to evaluate gender effects. Statistical significance was set at α=0.05 and Bonferroni corrections were applied to account for multiple comparisons. Results. There was a main effect of time, showing that all HOOS subscores of both groups increased significantly after surgery (p<0.001). There was a main effect of surgery for subscores Symptoms (p=0.038), ADL (p=0.046), and Sports and Recreation (p=0.039). There was a gender effect only for the subscore Symptoms (p=0.007). There were significant time by surgery interactions for HOOS subscores Symptoms (p=0.002), Pain (p=.009), Sports and Recreation (p=0.004), and QOL (p<0.001) subscores. We also observed a significant time by gender interaction effect for all HOOS subscores (p<0.001). Discussion. The interaction effects regarding most HOOS subscores and surgery/implant type indicate an advantage of MiniHip surgery regarding post-operative reported outcomes. The observed results may be due to previously described improved physiological loading and native hip structure preservation with neck-preserving short-stem designs. While longer-term studies are required for further investigation, evidence suggests the MiniHip may provide a significant benefit to primary THA patients. The additional gender/time interaction effect observed in our study highlights the necessity to consider potential sex differences regarding both the potential/expected improvement in PROs from THA and the requirement to account for such differences when designing osteoarthritis outcome studies based on PROs

Hip joint preservation remains a preferred treatment option for hips with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity, if left uncorrected, always leads to arthrosis. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement if present. Pre-operative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces. Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Further, significant cam impingement is clearly associated with the development of osteoarthrosis. Treatment can be performed either by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of preoperative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis preop whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomatic with instability in the absence of arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Similarly, caution should be exercised when considering rim-trimming for protrusion since high central contact pressures due to an enlarged acetabular notch are not corrected by rim trimming. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctable problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis