Recently, femoroacetabular impingement has been recognised as a cause of early osteoarthritis. There are two mechanisms of impingement: 1) cam impingement caused by a non-spherical head and 2) pincer impingement caused by excessive acetabular cover. We hypothesised that both mechanisms result in different patterns of articular damage. Of 302 analysed hips only 26 had an isolated cam and 16 an isolated pincer impingement. Cam impingement caused damage to the anterosuperior acetabular cartilage with separation between the labrum and cartilage. During flexion, the cartilage was sheared off the bone by the non-spherical femoral head while the labrum remained untouched. In pincer impingement, the cartilage damage was located circumferentially and included only a narrow strip. During movement the labrum is crushed between the acetabular rim and the femoral neck causing degeneration and ossification.

Both cam and pincer impingement lead to osteoarthritis of the hip. Labral damage indicates ongoing impingement and rarely occurs alone.

Abstract. Background. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has been extensively investigated and is strongly associated with athletic participation. The aim of this systematic review is to assess: the prevalence of cam-type FAI across various sports, whether kinematic variation between sports influences hip morphology, and whether performance level, duration and frequency of participation or other factors influence hip morphology in a sporting population. Methods. A systematic search of Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library was undertaken following PRISMA guidelines. The study was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD4202018001). Prospective and retrospective case series, case reports and review articles published after 1999 were screened and those which met the inclusion criteria decided a priori were included for analysis. Results. The literature search identified 58 relevant articles involving 5,683 participants. Forty-nine articles described a higher prevalence of FAI across various ‘hip-heavy’ sports, including soccer, basketball, baseball, ice hockey, skiing, golf and ballet. In studies including non-athlete controls, a greater prevalence of FAI was reported in 66.7% of studies (n=8/12). The highest alpha angle was identified at the 1 o'clock position (n=9/9) in football, skiing, golf, ice hockey and basketball. Maximal alpha angle was found to be located in a more lateral position in goalkeepers versus positional players in ice hockey (1 o'clock vs 1.45 o'clock). A positive correlation was also identified between the alpha angle and both age and activity level (n=5/8 and n=2/3, respectively) and also between prevalence of FAI and both age and activity level (n=2/2 and n=4/5), respectively. Conclusions. Hip-heavy sports show an increased prevalence of FAI, with specific sporting activities influencing hip morphology. Both a longer duration and increased level of training also resulted in an increased prevalence of FAI

Introduction. Subtle variations in hip morphology associate with risk of hip osteoarthritis (OA). However, validated accurate methods to quantitate hip morphology using plain radiography are lacking. We have developed a Matlab-based software-tool (SHIPs) that measures 19 OA-associated morphological-parameters of the hip using a PACS pelvic radiograph. In this study we evaluated the accuracy and repeatability of the method. Methods. Software accuracy was assessed by firstly measuring the linear ratio of 2 fixed distances and several angles against a gold-standard test radiograph, and secondly by repeated measurements on a simulated AP radiograph of the pelvis (reformatted from CT-data) that was digitally rotated about 3-axes to determine the error associated with pelvic mal-positioning. Repeatability was assessed using 30-AP Pelvic radiographs analysed twice (intra-observer), by 2 readers (inter-observer), and finally, using 2 pelvic radiographs taken in 23 subjects (n=46 radiographs) taken same day after re-positioning (short-term clinical-practice variability), and was expressed as coefficient of variation (CV%). Results. Software accuracy was 0.1% for linear measurements, and 0.2, 0.4, and 0.1 degrees, for angular measurements of 30, 60, and 90 degrees, respectively. Anterior rotation of the pelvis in the sagittal plane beyond 10 degrees produced a decrease in acetabular-tilt (-11 degrees at 20 degrees rotation) and acetabular-index-of-depth-to-width-ratio (-9.3% at 20 degrees rotation). Conversely, femoral-head-to-neck-ratio increased with both anterior and transverse rotation (+9% to +14% at 20 degrees rotation). The intra-observer CV was between 0.3-6.3%, and inter-observer CV was between 0.7-14.9% for all measurements with the exception of the measurement of horizontal-toit-externa (HTE) that had intra and inter-observer CVs of 33.4 and 29.1%, respectively. Short-term clinical repeatability was between 0.4-8.5%, with the exception of HTE that was 20.7%). Discussion. This software showed good accuracy and precision for the measurement of OA-associated hip morphological-parameters from plain radiographs of the pelvis, and may be useful in clinical research studies quantitating the relationship of these parameters to the development of hip OA. The method is, however, sensitive to large variations in pelvic positioning and use of the HTE measurement is associated with poor repeatability that is likely due to poor definition of the bony landmarks used for this parameter

Introduction. A deep squat (DS) is a challenging motion at the level of the hip joint generating substantial reaction forces (HJRF). During DS, the hip flexion angle approximates the functional range of hip motion. In some hip morphologies this femoroacetabular conflict has been shown to occur as early as 80° of hip flexion. So far in-vivo HJRF measurements have been limited to instrumented hip implants in a limited number of older patients performing incomplete squats (< 50° hip flexion and < 80° knee flexion). Clearly, young adults have a different kinetical profile with hip and knee flexion ranges going well over 100 degrees. Since hip loading data on this subgroup of the population is lacking and performing invasive measurements would be unfeasible, this study aimed to report a personalised numerical model solution based on inverse dynamics to calculate realistic in silico HJRF values during DS. M&M. Fifty athletic males (18–25 years old) were prospectively recruited for motion and morphological analysis. DS motion capture (MoCap) acquisitions and MRI scans of the lower extremities with gait lab marker positions were obtained. The AnyBody Modelling System (v6.1.1) was used to implement a novel personalisation workflow of the AnyMoCap template model. Bone geometries, semi-automatically segmented from MRI, and corresponding markers were incorporated into the template human model by an automated nonlinear morphing. Furthermore, a state-of-the-art TLEM 2.0 dataset, included in the Anybody Managed Model Repository (v2.0), was used in the template model. The subject-specific MoCap trials were processed to compute squat motion by resolving an overdeterminate kinematics problem. Inverse dynamics analyses were carried out to compute muscle and joint reaction forces in the entire body. Resulting hip joint loads were validated with measured in-vivo data from Knee bend trials in the OrthoLoad library. Additionally, anterior pelvic tilt, hip and knee joint angles were computed. Results. A preliminary set of results (20 out of 50 subjects) was analysed. The average HJRF was 3.42 times bodyweight at the peak of DS (95% confidence interval: 2.99 – 3.85%BW). Maximal hip and knee flexion angles were 113° (109.7°–116.8°) and 116° (109.4 – 123.0°) respectively. The anterior pelvic tilt demonstrated a biphasic profile with peak value of 33° (28.1° – 38.4°). Discussion. A non-invasive and highly personalised alternative for determining hip loading was presented. Consistently higher HJR forces during DS in young adults were demonstrated as opposed to the Orthoload dataset. Similarly, knee and hip flexion angles were much higher, which could support the increase in HJRF. We can conclude that DS hip kinetics in young adults clearly differ from the typical total hip arthroplasty population