Purpose & Background. Back and lower limb injuries are prevalent in athletes who perform novel weight-lifting techniques with inappropriate kinematics. Visual-auditory instructions and knowledge of performance (KP) verbal instructions are utilised to help novices execute novel skills. Effectiveness of these methods on executing appropriate front-squat lifting kinematics is limited. Aim: to investigate the effects of visual-auditory instructions compared to KP verbal instructions on front-squat kinematics at sticking point in novice lifters, with improvement determined by proximity to the kinematics of an expert lifter at sticking point when performing optimal front-squat lift. Methods. Twenty-four novices were randomised into two groups and performed front-squat lift. The novices in visual-auditory group (n = 12, age = 24.33 ± 2.93 years) received videoaudio instructions, verbal group (n = 12, Age= 22.66 ± 2.34 years) received KP verbal instructions. MATLAB software measured kinematic lumbar angles, Kinovea software measured hip, knee, ankle angles at sticking point of front-squat. Data were collected from video recordings of novices and an expert pre-and post-instructions in one session and expert data were used as reference values of proximity for both groups. Results. No significant differences were found between groups in lumbar, hip, knee, and ankle angles at sticking point of front-squat lift, where improvement was determined by proximity to expert lifter's angles. There was significant improvement with in lumbar angle of both groups and hip angle (verbal group). Conclusion. Visual-auditory instructions and verbal instructions have similar effects on the front-squat kinematics (lumbar spine, hip knee and ankle) of novice lifters. No Conflict of Interests. No funding was obtained

Purpose:. To produce objective evidence that lifting is more comfortable in lumbar flexion than lumbar extension. Traditionally, lifting is taught in lumbar extension (“straight back”) but in our experience is more comfortable and stronger in flexion with backward lumbar tilt. Method and results:. 58 subjects performed maximal comfortable static lifts:. 1. ‘Natural’ lifting position - hip flexion, knee extension, lumbar extension. 2. Traditionally taught position - hip flexion, knee flexion, lumbar extension. 3. Backward pelvic tilt - hip flexion, knee flexion, lumbar flexion. The order of these lifting methods varied to allow for variation due to fatigue/recruitment. All lifts were measured with a computerised dynamometer. The mean force for natural lifting was 13.4 kgs, for traditionally taught lifting 15.1 kgs and for backward pelvic tilt lifting 22.2 kgs. This represented a 13% greater load for traditionally taught lift compared with natural lift, 66% greater for backward pelvic tilt compared with natural lift and 48% greater for backward pelvic tilt compared with traditionally taught lift. Conclusion:. Contrary to accepted teaching and intra-discal pressure studies, this study confirms the observation that lifting strength is greater when the lumbar spine is in flexion. Thus, patients can avoid provoking their back pain when lifting by flexing the lumbar spine. A possible explanation is reduced facet joint compression in lumbar flexion and load sharing with the lumbar fascia and ligaments

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of coccygectomy in patients with persistent coccydynia and coccygeal instability.

Aims

Non-coding microRNA (miRNA) in extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may promote neuronal repair after spinal cord injury (SCI). In this paper we report on the effects of MSC-EV-microRNA-381 (miR-381) in a rodent model of SCI.

Aims

The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that three grades of sagittal compensation for standing posture (normal, compensated, and decompensated) correlate with health-related quality of life measurements (HRQOL).

Background. Implementation fidelity is the extent to which an intervention is delivered as intended by intervention developers, and is extremely important in increasing confidence that changes in study outcomes are due to the effect of the intervention itself and not due to variability in implementation. Growing demands on healthcare services mean that multiple condition interventions involving highly prevalent musculoskeletal pain conditions such as chronic low back pain (CLBP) and/or osteoarthritis (OA) are of increasing clinical interest. This is the first in-depth review of implementation fidelity within self-management interventions for any musculoskeletal pain condition. Methods. Structured self-management interventions delivered by health-care professionals (including at least one physiotherapist) in a group format involving adults with OA of the lumbar spine, hip or knee and/or CLBP were eligible for inclusion. The National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium Treatment Fidelity checklist was used by two independent reviewers to assess fidelity. Results. In total, 22 studies were found. Fidelity was found to be very low within the included studies with only one study achieving >80% on the framework. The domain of Training of Providers achieved the lowest fidelity rating (10%) across all studies. Conclusion. Overall levels of fidelity are poor in self-management interventions for CLBP and/or OA; however it is unclear whether fidelity is poor within the trials included in this review, or just poorly reported. There is a need for the development of fidelity reporting guidelines and for the refinement of fidelity frameworks upon which to base these guidelines. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: This review was conducted as part of Health Research Award HRA_HSR/2012/24 from the Health Research Board of Ireland

Objectives

The objective of this study was to assess the association between whole body sagittal balance and risk of falls in elderly patients who have sought treatment for back pain. Balanced spinal sagittal alignment is known to be important for the prevention of falls. However, spinal sagittal imbalance can be markedly compensated by the lower extremities, and whole body sagittal balance including the lower extremities should be assessed to evaluate actual imbalances related to falls.

Aims

The aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) performed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Aims

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia and to examine its impact on patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS).

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a progressive multisystem chronic inflammatory disorder. The hallmark of this pathological process is a progressive fusion of the zygapophyseal joints and disc spaces of the axial skeleton, leading to a rigid kyphotic deformity and positive sagittal balance. The ankylosed spine is unable to accommodate normal mechanical forces, rendering it brittle and susceptible to injury. Traumatic hyperextension injury of the cervical spine leading to atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) in AS patients can often be fatal. We report a non-traumatic mechanism of injury in AS progressing to AAS attributable to persistent hyperextension, which resulted in fatal migration of C2 through the foramen magnum.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:206–9.

We examined the reliability of radiological findings in predicting segmental instability in 112 patients (56 men, 56 women) with a mean age of 66.5 years (27 to 84) who had degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. They underwent intra-operative biomechanical evaluation using a new measurement system. Biomechanical instability was defined as a segment with a neutral zone > 2 mm/N. Risk factor analysis to predict instability was performed on radiographs (range of segmental movement, disc height), MRI (Thompson grade, Modic type), and on the axial CT appearance of the facet (type, opening, vacuum and the presence of osteophytes, subchondral erosion, cysts and sclerosis) using multivariate logistic regression analysis with a forward stepwise procedure. The facet type was classified as sagittally orientated, coronally orientated, anisotropic or wrapped.

Stepwise multivariate regression analysis revealed that facet opening was the strongest predictor for instability (odds ratio 5.022, p = 0.009) followed by spondylolisthesis, MRI grade and subchondral sclerosis. Forward stepwise multivariate logistic regression indicated that spondylolisthesis, MRI grade, facet opening and subchondral sclerosis of the facet were risk factors. Symptoms evaluated by the Short-Form 36 and visual analogue scale showed that patients with an unstable segment were in significantly more pain than those without. Furthermore, the surgical procedures determined using the intra-operative measurement system were effective, suggesting that segmental instability influences the symptoms of lumbar degenerative disease.