Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are challenging complications following arthroplasty. Staphylococci are a frequent cause of PJI and known biofilm producers. Reoperations for PJI of the hip or knee between 2012 and 2015 performed at Sahlgrenska University Hospital were identified. Medical records were reviewed, and clinical parameters recorded for patients whose intraoperative bacterial isolates had been stored at the clinical laboratory. Staphylococcal strains isolated from reoperations due to first-time PJI were characterised by their ability to form biofilms using the microtiter plate test. The study group included 49 patients (70 bacterial strains) from first-time PJI, whereof 24 (49%) patients had recurrent infection. Strong biofilm production was significantly associated with recurrent infection. Patients infected with strong biofilm producers had a five-fold increased risk for recurrent infection. Strong biofilm production was significantly associated with increased antimicrobial resistance and PJI recurrence. This underscores the importance of determining biofilm production and susceptibility as part of routine diagnostics in PJI. Strong staphylococcal biofilm production may have implications on therapeutic choices and suggest more extensive surgery. Furthermore, despite the increased biofilm resistance to rifampicin, results from this study support its use in staphylococcal PJI

Literature debates whether fluid aspirates for suspected PJI should undergo prolonged incubation for cultures. We looked at sensitivity and specificity of 14-day cultures, compared to 7-days, for aspirates from prosthetic hips and knees. Design and methods. Conducted at a quaternary referral centre for PJIs from Jan 2017 to July 2019. Suspected PJIs who underwent aspiration, incubated 14 days and later surgical intervention with minimum three tissue samples were included. Results. 176 aspirates were included. This is an increased number compared to our historic figures (average 88 Vs 48 pts/yr). 47 patients had fluid and tissue positive (true positive), 20 fluid +ive but tissue -ive (false positive), 98 fluid and tissue -ive (true negative) and 15 fluid negative but tissue +ive (False negative). Thus, sensitivity 76%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value70% and negative predictive value 87%. Of 88 positive aspirates, only 75% were within 7-day cultures. Low virulence organisms as Propionibacterium acnes and coagulase negative staph were grown later. Of 48 with only one tissue sample positive, 38 were culture-negative on aspiration and 6 grew different organisms on aspirate and tissues. Also, as many were cultured later, it suggests contamination. Conclusion. Increased numbers reflect quaternary referral nature of institution and increasing PJI load. Modest drop in sensitivity and specificity of 14-day cultures compared to 7-day(84 and 85% respectively) is due to higher false negatives. Contamination contributes to false-ive as more tissue samples become positive (there were 1076 tissue samples due to multiple sampling Vs 176 aspirates). Higher tissue yield may also be because they are more representative. Effect of antibiotic use between samples cannot be determined. Organism profile suggest14-day culture produces more contaminant growth despite a well-equipped microbiology lab with laminar airflow for subcultures. Caution in interpreting 14-day results in diagnosis of PJI of Hip and Knee is advised

Introduction. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the leading cause of failure of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty. It is challenging condition which represents a growing burden on hospital resources. In-patient hospital stay for antibiotic therapy post-operatively is costly and access to out-patient IV therapy (OPAT) varies between regions. In a tertiary referral centre for revision and infection, the suitability and cost-effectiveness of Dalbavancin was reviewed as a “single-shot” therapy following DAIR or revision lower limb arthroplasty for PJI. Methods & Materials. A prospective service evaluation was carried out for consecutive patients treated for PJI of the hip or knee who received Dalbavancin. Treatment was indicated by Consultant Microbiologist advice within an MDT setting where clinical or patient factors made alternative therapies eg. OPAT inappropriate. Service-level data was collected to allow calculation of bed-day savings compared to a traditional 14-day course of IV treatment. Readmission rates to the trust within 30 days were reviewed as a marker of clinical efficacy and safety. Results. 12 patients received dalbavancin for PJI. Mean bed-day saving was 6.9 (SD 3.7) per patient. A total of 83 bed days were saved compared to traditional treatment and there was a modest cost-benefit. There were no adverse reactions noted and no readmissions within 30 days. Discussion. The safety and efficacy of dalbavancin has been demonstrated in recent literature, but the impact that it can have on health-care costs and in-patient burden has not been explored. In addition, the success of out-patient therapy relies on patient engagement. In patients with co-existing cognitive difficulty or alcohol/substance use Dalbavancin offers an attractive alternative. Conclusions. The results of our pilot suggest that IV Dalbavancin is cost-effective as part of the treatment strategy for PJI and can lead to significant bed-day savings, which can assist in patient flow and departmental efficiency

We cross-matched the Swedish Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registers (SHAR and SKAR) to study the incidence of knee or hip arthroplasty in any of the remaining hip or knee joints. 177835 THR (55.8% females, mean age, SD: 68.5 10.1 years) and 128162 primary TKR (59.8% females, 69.4 9.0 years) procedures in patients with primary osteoarthritis, performed 1992–2014 were studied. Mean and maximum follow up were 7.7 and 23 years. At the index operation more patients were operated on their right side for both locations (hip and knee). Patients who at the index operation had been operated with a TKR and especially on the left side most frequently (32.5%) received one or several additional TKR or THR. For patients who had a THR at their index operation and underwent a second operation of any of the remaining three joints the mean time to this second procedure was 4.0 years (SD: 3.9). In patients who were operated with a TKR this time period was shorter (3.1, 3.2, p<0.0005). In patients who had undergone their first (index) operation of either hip the probability of not being subjected to further arthroplasty operations during the following 20 years amounted to 64.0±0.3%. The corresponding probability for patients who at the index operation had received a TKR was somewhat lower (58.4±0.4%). Decreasing age (HR: 1.029, 95% confidence interval: 1.028–1.0292), female gender (1.13 1.12–1.15), TKR at index operation (1.34 1.32–1.36) and left-sided index operation (1.12 1.10–1.13) were associated with higher probability for at least one additional primary joint replacement in the hip or the knee. During our period of observation 25 to 33 percent of the patients who received their first total hip or knee replacement underwent at least one additional replacement of either the hip or the knee. Knee osteoarthritis more frequently results in staged bilateral joint replacement than in patients who primarily are suffering from osteoarthritis of the hip

Objectives. The primary aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of the recalled preoperative Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) one year following arthroplasty for a cohort of patients. The secondary aim was to assess the reliability of a patient’s recollection of their own preoperative OHS and OKS one year following surgery. Methods. A total of 335 patients (mean age 72.5; 22 to 92; 53.7% female) undergoing total hip arthroplasty (n = 178) and total knee arthroplasty (n = 157) were prospectively assessed. Patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty completed an OHS or OKS, respectively, preoperatively and were asked to recall their preoperative condition while completing the same score one year after surgery. Results. A mean difference of 0.04 points (95% confidence intervals (CI) -15.64 to 15.72, p = 0.97) between the actual and the recalled OHS was observed. The mean difference in the OKS was 1.59 points (95% CI -11.57 to 14.75, p = 0.10). There was excellent reliability for the ‘average measures’ intra-class correlation for both the OHS (r = 0.802) and the OKS (r = 0.772). However, this reliability was diminished for the individuals OHS (r = 0.670) and OKS (r = 0.629) using single measures intra-class correlation. Bland–Altman plots demonstrated wide variation in the individual patient’s ability to recall their preoperative score (95% CI ± 16 for OHS, 95% CI ± 13 for OKS). Conclusion. Prospective preoperative collection of OHS and OKS remains the benchmark. Using recalled scores one year following hip and knee arthroplasty is an alternative when used to assess a cohort of patients. However, the recall of an individual patient’s preoperative score should not be relied upon due to the diminished reliability and wide CI. Cite this article: T. F. M. Yeoman, N. D. Clement, D. Macdonald, M. Moran. Recall of preoperative Oxford Hip and Knee Scores one year after arthroplasty is an alternative and reliable technique when used for a cohort of patients. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:351–356. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.75.BJR-2017-0259.R1

Introduction. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur are potentially catastrophic injuries associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Surgical treatment comprises revision arthroplasty or internal fixation. It is well established that a delay in treating patients with hip fracture leads to higher mortality rates, however there is limited evidence regarding mortality rates and the time to surgery in patients with lower limb periprosthetic fractures. Aim. This study was done to assess if delay to surgery affected the mortality rates in patients with periprosthetic fractures of hip and knee. Method. We performed a retrospective study on periprosthetic fractures treated at a single centre over the period from 2008 to 2013. Data was obtained based on case notes and operating theatre records and patients were grouped based on time to surgery. Group one included those who underwent surgery within forty eight hours of injury and group two those who had surgery after forty eight hours. We then calculated the overall, as well as individual group mortality rates at one year. Subgroup statistical analysis was then calculated to compare between groups. Results. Eighty three patients were included for the final review. The overall mortality rate at one year was twenty two percent. The mortality rate for patients who were operated within forty eight hours was twenty nine percent whereas the mortality rate in the group operated after forty eight hours was nineteen percent. Conclusion. A delay in surgical treatment of lower limb periprosthetic fracture is associated with a reduction in mortality. This occurs in contradistinction to the situation with simple hip fracture. One might speculate that in the former case, appropriate pre-operative optimisation is critically important to prepare patients for their arduous treatment

No single test is 100% sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Joint aspiration is currently the only preoperative investigation that can establish the identity of the infecting organism and its antibiotic susceptibilities. Frequently when attempting to aspirate a joint a ‘dry tap occurs as fluid cannot be aspirated. In this situation, normal saline may be injected into the joint and then reaspirated to provide fluid for culture. The aim of this study was to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of culture of joint aspiratie with or without saline reaspiration in the event of a dry tap. A retrospective analysis of 580 hip and knee aspirations in patients deemed to have moderate-high risk of infection and ultimately proceeded to revision arthroplasty over 12 years at a large quaternary referral centre where pre operative aspiration is routine. Fluid was aspirated in 313 (54%) cases and dry taps in which saline injection reaspiration was performed occurred in 267 (46%) cases. Overall sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic aspiration were 84% (78–89%) and 85% (81–88%) respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of saline injection-reaspiration after dry tap were 87% (79–82%) and 79% (72–84%) compared to 81% (71–88%) and 90% (85–93%) for direct aspiration. Pre operative joint aspiration and culture is a sensitive and specific test for the confirmation of diagnosis in patients at a moderate to high risk of prosthetic joint infection. Culture of saline injection-reaspiration also provides accurate diagnostic information in the event of a dry tap. Both methods allow susceptibility testing of relevant organisms and are therefore able to guide peri-operative and cement instilled antibiotic therapy. Culture of pre operative joint aspirates provides sensitive and specific diagnostic information including antimicrobial susceptibility results. Saline injection-reaspiration is a useful additional technique in those patients in whom fluid cannot be aspirated

Injuries to the sciatic nerve are an occasional complication of surgery to the hip and acetabulum, and traction is frequently the causative mechanism. In vitro and animal experiments have shown that increased tensile strain on peripheral nerves, when applied for prolonged periods, impairs nerve function. We have used video-extensometry to measure strain on the human sciatic nerve during total hip replacement (THR). Ten consecutive patients with a mean age of 72 years undergoing primary THR by the posterior approach were recruited, and strains in the sciatic nerve were measured in different combinations of flexion and extension of the hip and knee, before dislocation of the hip. Significant increases (p = 0.02) in strain in the sciatic nerve were observed in flexion of the hip and extension of the knee. The mean increase was 26% (19% to 30%). In animal studies increases of this magnitude have been shown to impair electrophysiological function in peripheral nerves. Our results suggest that excessive flexion of the hip and extension of the knee should be avoided during THR

Considerable debate exists regarding which agent(s) should be preferred for venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemical prophylaxis following joint replacement. We assessed the practice of surgeons regarding VTE chemical prophylaxis for primary THR and TKR, pre and post issuing of updated NICE guidance in 2018.

A survey, circulated through the British Hip Society and regional trainee networks/collaboratives, was completed by 306 UK surgeons at 187 units. VTE chemical prophylaxis prescribing patterns for surgeons carrying out primary THR (n=258) and TKR (n=253) in low-risk patients were assessed post publication of 2018 NICE recommendations. Prescribing patterns before and after the NICE publication were subsequently explored. Questions were also asked about surgeon equipoise for participation in future RCTs.

Following the new guidance, 34% (n=87) used low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) alone, 33% (n=85) aspirin (commonly preceded by LMWH), and 31% (n=81) direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs: with/without preceding LMWH) for THR. For TKR, 42% (n=105) used aspirin (usually monotherapy), 31% (n=78) LMWH alone, and 27% (n=68) DOAC (with/without preceding LMWH). NICE guidance changed the practice of 34% of hip and 41% of knee surgeons, with significantly increased use of aspirin preceded by LMWH for THR (before=25% vs. after=73%;p<0.001), and aspirin for TKR (before=18% vs. after=84%;p<0.001). Significantly more regimens were NICE guidance compliant after the 2018 update for THR (before=85.7% vs. after=92.6%;p=0.011) and TKR (before=87.0% vs. after=98.8%;p<0.001). Support from surgeons for future RCTs was dependent on the clinical question, ranging from 48% participation in trials (effectiveness of aspirin vs. a DOAC) to 79% (effectiveness of 14 days LMWH vs. 28 days LMWH).

Over one-third of surveyed surgeons changed their VTE chemical prophylaxis in response to 2018 NICE recommendations, with more THR and TKR surgeons now compliant with latest NICE guidance. The major change in practice was an increased use of aspirin for VTE chemical prophylaxis. Furthermore, there is an appetite amongst UK surgeons for participating in future RCTs, with a trial comparing standard versus extended duration LMWH likely feasible in current practice.

Joint replacement is a life-enhancing, cost-effective surgical intervention widely used to treat disabling joint pain mainly caused by osteoarthritis. Hip and knee joint replacements are common, highly successful operations bringing many patients relief from pain, and improve mobility.

Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are often difficult to diagnose; diagnosis often relying on a combination of clinical findings, microbiological data and histological evaluation of periprosthetic tissue. The majority of recent studies demonstrate a higher sensitivity for the culture of sonication fluid (62–94%) than periprosthetic tissue (55–88%).

The Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust provided a specialist multidisciplinary team. We evaluated the use of sonication for identifying pathogens during revision hip and knee replacement in our unit with the intention of applying for further grants to study this technology in more detail; it was a diagnostic feasibility study. The target recruitment was 50 patients; 25 consecutive patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty for any reason, and 25 undergoing revision knee arthroplasty for any reason. The majority of patients were identified in outpatient clinics.

Our results show that tissue culture remains more sensitive than sonication. The sensitivity for direct sonication was 75% compared with 80% for tissue culture; sensitivity of enriched sonication was 80 %, compared to the unit results for tissue culture of 83%. The combined sensitivity of tissue culture was better as a higher number of tissue specimens were obtained.

The different methodology might explain reported differences between this and other studies; however, our study does not support the use of sonication as the only tool in the diagnosis of PJI.

Aims. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) with prior multiple failed surgery for reinfection represent a huge challenge for surgeons because of poor vascular supply and biofilm formation. This study aims to determine the results of single-stage revision using intra-articular antibiotic infusion in treating this condition. Methods. A retrospective analysis included 78 PJI patients (29 hips; 49 knees) who had undergone multiple prior surgical interventions. Our cohort was treated with single-stage revision using a supplementary intra-articular antibiotic infusion. Of these 78 patients, 59 had undergone more than two prior failed debridement and implant retentions, 12 patients had a failed arthroplasty resection, three hips had previously undergone failed two-stage revision, and four had a failed one-stage revision before their single-stage revision. Previous failure was defined as infection recurrence requiring surgical intervention. Besides intravenous pathogen-sensitive agents, an intra-articular infusion of vancomycin, imipenem, or voriconazole was performed postoperatively. The antibiotic solution was soaked into the joint for 24 hours for a mean of 16 days (12 to 21), then extracted before next injection. Recurrence of infection and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results. A total of 68 patients (87.1%) were free of infection at a mean follow-up time of 85 months (24 to 133). The seven-year infection-free survival was 87.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 79.4 to 95.8). No significant difference in infection-free survival was observed between hip and knee PJIs (91.5% (95% CI 79.9 to 100) vs 84.7% (95% CI 73.1 to 96.3); p = 0.648). The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score was 76.1 points (63.2 to 92.4) and Hospital for Special Surgery score was 78. 2 (63.2 to 92.4) at the most recent assessment. Polymicrobial and fungal infections accounted for 14.1% (11/78) and 9.0% (7/78) of all cases, respectively. Conclusion. Single-stage revision with intra-articular antibiotic infusion can provide high antibiotic concentration in synovial fluid, thereby overcoming reduced vascular supply and biofilm formation. This supplementary route of administration may be a viable option in treating PJI after multiple failed prior surgeries for reinfection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):867–874

In 1975, Sweden started registering primary knee replacement surgeries based on the personal identity number. Individual-based registrations of primary total hip replacements started in 1992 and for hemiarthroplasties the registration started in 2006. The completeness of these registrations is estimated at 98% during the last 10-year period. The long history and high completeness allow for accurate calculations of population-based prevalence of joint replacement and trends over time. We used all data on primary joint replacements available in the Swedish Arthroplasty Register. The prevalence was calculated using number of alive patients with 1) at least one joint replacement 2) at least one hip replacement 3) at least one knee replacement at the end of each year from 2010 – 2021. Publicly available population numbers were retrieved from Statistics Sweden. We calculated total prevalence and prevalence per age in years. By the end of 2021, 3.2% of the Swedish population had at least one hip or knee replacement. This was an increase from 2.5% in 2010. Among 80-year-old, the prevalence was 17.5% for any joint replacement. For both hip and knee replacement and all ages, the prevalence was higher for women. For knee replacement, the 2021 prevalence peaked at the age of 89 (9,4%) while the prevalence continuously increased with age for hip replacements. A considerable proportion of the Swedish elderly population is living with at least one hip or knee replacement. The prevalence has increased during the last 12-year period for both hips and knees. An increasing prevalence may also affect the incidence of fractures and infections. Knowledge about the prevalence is fundamental for planning future demand for primary and revision hip and knee replacement

We report the impact of implementing a new short-stay hip and knee arthroplasty pathway in a National Health Service (NHS) hospital. This was enacted due to existing concerns with a long length of stay (LOS) and reduced elective operating capacity each winter due to emergency bed pressures. The overnight introduction of this pathway was aimed to reduce LOS, alleviate bed pressures, minimise readmission rates and generate financial savings, all combining to facilitate full elective activity during the winter. We conducted a prospective study at a regional tertiary arthroplasty centre. The new pathway was introduced across the service overnight. It includes rigorous preoperative optimisation, specific anaesthetic protocols and uniform changes in surgical practice to allow a focus on early mobilization and discharge on the day of surgery where possible. Data collection spanned 17 months, including the initial six months post implementation of the short-stay pathway. LOS data was collected for the full period and data was compared pre- and post-implementation of the new pathway. Patient satisfaction and 30-day readmission data were also collected. There was an immediate and significant decrease in median LOS from 4 days pre-implementation to 1 day post-implementation. Patient satisfaction was high, and the 30-day readmission rate was unchanged (5.95%), with no readmissions directly related to decreased inpatient stay. Financial analyses revealed substantial cost savings due to reduced LOS and the elimination of routine post-operative blood tests, estimated at over £1.6m per year. Elective activity over winter was significantly higher (79%) than in the same time period in the previous year. An acute introduction of a carefully planned and coordinated short-stay hip and knee pathway is safe, cost-effective and popular with patients, but also contributes to increased efficiency in the delivery of elective healthcare in the context of increasing demand and financial constraints in the NHS

Post-operative peri-prosthetic femoral fracture (PO-PPFF) is one of the most relevant complications in primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (pTHA), accountable for a significant clinical and socio-economic burden both in revision and fixation settings. We retrospectively reviewed of our series of 1586 cementless total hip arthroplasty performed between 1999 and 2019 (achieving a minimum of 5-years follow-up) with different short stems. We have observed a cumulative low incidence of PO-PPFF of 0,33% (5 cases): we divided Po-PPFF in two groups: fracture occurred around a short stem (A) and around a standard shortened stem (B), according to French Hip & Knee Classification of Short Stems. Despite the length of observed period (mean follow-up 12 years, min 5 years max 24 years) a total of 1512 cases (mean age at surgery 61 years, max 74, min 40 years) were available to clinical and radiographic follow-up, being this population enrolled in elective surgery clinical protocols. Our data exceed the low incidence of post-operative femoral fracture around bone -preserving previously reported by Kim in 2018 (12 fracture out of 1089 cases:1.1%). No correlation have been observed among occurrence of PO-PPF age of the patient and no fracture occurred around cemented short stems despite patient's characteristics were unfavourable in term of age and bone quality. This result is not unexpected, giving the lower incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture even cemented conventional stems, as reported in all registry and systematic reviews. A similar behaviour was reported in 2020 Australian Joint Registry, where Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fracture showed a steep curve in early period, but remaining firmly below 1% during the following 12 years. Our clinical data seems to confirm previous studies by Jones (conducted on synthetic bone and fresh-frozen cadaveric femurs) where higher fracture angles and higher fracture torque were detected in short hips compared to standard stems

The development and implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are of particular interest in elective orthopaedics due to clinical benefits and cost effectiveness. The Wycombe Arthroplasty Rapid-Recovery Pathway (WARP) was designed to streamline hip and knee joint arthroplasty to reduce time spent in hospital whilst optimising outcomes in an NHS District General Hospital. 966 patients were admitted to Wycombe General Hospital for primary elective joint replacement (60 UKR, 446 THR, 460 TKR) during the period 1st September 2020 to 31st September 2022. The WARP pathway was used for 357 (37%) patients (32 UKR, 155 THR, 170 TKR) and the standard “non-WARP” pathway was used for 609 (63%) patients (28 UKR 291 THR, 290 TKR). Data was collected on length of stay, time of mobilisation, number of physiotherapy sessions, and inpatient morbidity. Average length of stay following UKR was 0.75 days for WARP vs 2.96 for non-WARP patients, following THR was 2.17 days for WARP vs 4.17 for non-WARP patients, following TKR was 3.4 days for WARP vs 3.92 for non-WARP patients. Day-0 mobilisation after UKR was achieved in 97% of WARP vs 12% of non-WARP patients, after THR in 43% of WARP vs 14% of non-WARP patients, after TKR in 33% of WARP vs 11% of non-WARP patients. Same-day discharge was achieved in the WARP cohort in 63% of UKR, 10% of THR, 2% of TKR patients. There were no same-day discharges in the non-WARP cohort. Complications delaying mobilisation (pain, nausea/vomiting, dizziness/low BP) were identified in 8.4% of WARP vs 25% of non-WARP patients. Our cohort study shows that the initiation of WARP Rapid Recovery pathway for joint arthroplasty decreased the average length of stay after UKR by 2.21 days, after THR by 2 days, after TKR by 0.52 days. Time to first mobilisation was decreased significantly by increased rates of same-day mobilisation and reduced rates of postoperative anaesthetic-related complications

There is a surge of patients on the waiting-list for primary total hip replacement (THR), due to unprecedented reduction of elective activity caused by COVID-19. A higher incidence of femoral head collapse (FC) and acetabular erosion (AE) leading to increase in pain and instability as well as requirement of more complex surgery and potentially higher risk to patients was noted in this period. Rapidly progressive Arthritis (RPA) of the hip is a known entity often described as progression of joint space narrowing greater than 2mm over one year time period. The study aims to identify any potential relationship between waiting time and establishment of femoral head collapse and/ or acetabular erosion. A retrospective review of arthroplasty surgeon's waiting list during COVID. Serial hip radiographs recorded between February 2020 and February 2022 were analysed. FC was quantified as a percentage of the femoral head radius, while AE was assessed by drawing two parallel lines, one through both tear drops and the other through superior most aspect of intact acetabulum, parallel to the inter tear-drop line and expressed as percentage of normal side. Only 105 patients out of 264 patients added to the waiting list had elective arthroplasty for hip/knee. Only 35 patients out of 90 listed for THR, had the surgery. 36 of 90 (40%) were found to have developed FC and fitted the criteria for RPA. Acetabular erosion was seen in 19 (21%). Therefore 53% (19 of 36) of those who developed FC progressed to AE. Incidence of collapse was higher in females (32%), with mean age of 62 (range 51–81), compared to 21% in males with mean age 59 (range 53–87). Mean extent of femoral head collapse was 20% (10 – 44%). A significant proportion of patients added to waiting list during COVID developed RPA of the hip with 40% having femoral head collapse and 21% progressing to acetabular erosion leading to a complex case-mix. Patients on long waiting lists need regular x-ray checks/PROMS since significant proportion progress to FC and Acetabular Erosion

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) with prior multiple failed surgeries for re-infection (PMFSR) represented a huge challenge for surgeons because of poor vascular supply and biofilm formation. This study aims to determine the results of single-stage revision using intra-articular antibiotic infusion for treatment of PJIs with PMFSR. A retrospective analysis included 78 PJIs (29 hips; 49 knees) with PMFSR, who were treated with single-stage revision using intra-articular antibiotic infusion. Previous failure was defined as infection recurrence requiring surgical intervention. Besides intravenous pathogen-sensitive agents, a intra-articular infusion of vancomycin, imipenem or voriconazole was performed post-operatively. The antibiotic solution was soaked into the joint for 24 hours then extracted before next injection. Recurrence of infection and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Of these 78 patients, 59 had more than twice failed debridement and implant retentions, 12 patients had a failed arthroplasty resection, 3 hips underwent a failed two-stage revision and 4 cases had a failed one-stage revision before their single-stage revision. A total of 68 patients (87.1%) were free of infection at a mean follow-up time of 85 months. No significant difference in infection control rate was observed between hip and knee PJIs (89.7% versus 85.7%). The mean postoperative Harris hip score was 76.1 points and HSS score was 78. 2 at the most recent assessment. Single-stage revision with intra-articular antibiotic infusion can provide high antibiotic concentration in synovial fluid therefore overcome poor vascular supply and biofilm formation, which can be a viable option in treating PJI with PMFSR

To design osteoarthritis (OA) care based on prognosis, we need to identify individuals who are most likely of disease progression. We estimated survival time of the native hip and knee joint and evaluated what patient-related and OA disease-related factors associated with progression to joint replacement surgery. We included 72,069 patients referred to first-line OA intervention (patient education and exercise) during 2008 and 2016 and registered in the Swedish quality register Better Management of Patients with Osteoarthritis (BOA). Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were used to estimate joint survival time. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval [CI] were calculated using multiple Cox regression. The 5-year survival time of the native joint was 56% for hip OA and 80% for knee OA. Disease-related factors were more strongly associated with progression to joint replacement (e.g. willingness for surgery HR; hip 2.9 [95% CI, 2.7–3.1], knee 2.7 [2.6–2.9] and walking difficulties (HR; hip 2.2 [2.0–2.5], knee 1.9 [1.7–2.2]), than patient-related factors such socioeconomic factors (e.g. highest income quartile HR; hip 1.3 [1.2–1.3], knee 1.3 [1.2–1.4]) and comorbidities (e.g. ≥6 conditions HR; hip: 0.7 [0.6–0.7], knee; 1.1 [1.0–1.2]). Patients with hip OA were more likely to undergo surgery and at an earlier time compared with those with knee OA. Progression was strongly influenced by factors associated with the OA disease, but other patient-related factors are important. However, a large proportion of patients with OA do not seem to require surgery, especially among those with knee OA

Aims. Routine surveillance of primary hip and knee arthroplasties has traditionally been performed with office follow-up visits at one year postoperatively. The value of these visits is unclear. The present study aims to determine the utility and burden of routine clinical follow-up at one year after primary arthroplasty to patients and providers. Methods. All patients (473) who underwent primary total hip (280), hip resurfacing (eight), total knee (179), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (six) over a nine-month period at a single institution were identified from an institutional registry. Patients were prompted to attend their routine one-year postoperative visit by a single telephone reminder. Patients and surgeons were given questionnaires at the one-year postoperative visit, defined as a clinical encounter occurring at nine to 15 months from the date of surgery, regarding value of the visit. Results. Compliance with routine follow-up at one year was 35%. The response rate was over 80% for all questions in the patient and clinician surveys. Overall, 75% of the visits were for routine surveillance. Patients reported high satisfaction with their visits despite the general time for attendance, including travel, being over four hours. Surgeons found the visits more worthwhile when issues were identified or problems were addressed. Conclusion. Patient compliance with follow-up at one year postoperatively after primary hip and knee is low. Routine visits of asymptomatic patients deliver little practical value and represent a large time and cost burden for patients and surgeons. Remote strategies should be considered for routine postoperative surveillance primary hip and knee arthroplasties beyond the acute postoperative period. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7 Supple B):85–89

Aims. The prevalence of ipsilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is rising in concert with life expectancy, putting more patients at risk for interprosthetic femur fractures (IPFFs). Our study aimed to assess treatment methodologies, implant survivorship, and IPFF clinical outcomes. Methods. A total of 76 patients treated for an IPFF from February 1985 to April 2018 were reviewed. Prior to fracture, at the hip/knee sites respectively, 46 femora had primary/primary, 21 had revision/primary, three had primary/revision, and six had revision/revision components. Mean age and BMI were 74 years (33 to 99) and 30 kg/m. 2. (21 to 46), respectively. Mean follow-up after fracture treatment was seven years (2 to 24). Results. Overall, 59 fractures were classified as Vancouver C (Unified Classification System (UCS) D), 17 were Vancouver B (UCS B). In total, 57 patients (75%) were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF); three developed nonunion, three developed periprosthetic joint infection, and two developed aseptic loosening. In all, 18 patients (24%) underwent revision arthroplasty including 13 revision THAs, four distal femoral arthroplasties (DFAs), and one revision TKA: of these, one patient developed aseptic loosening and two developed nonunion. Survivorship free from any reoperation was 82% (95% confidence interval (CI) 66.9% to 90.6%) and 77% (95% CI 49.4% to 90.7%) in the ORIF and revision groups at two years, respectively. ORIF patients who went on to union tended to have stemmed knee components and greater mean interprosthetic distance (IPD = 189 mm (SD 73.6) vs 163 mm (SD 36.7); p = 0.546) than nonunited fractures. Patients who went on to nonunion in the revision arthroplasty group had higher medullary diameter: cortical width ratio (2.5 (SD 1.7) vs 1.3 (SD 0.3); p = 0.008) and lower IPD (36 mm (SD 30.6) vs 214 mm (SD 32.1); p < 0.001). At latest follow-up, 95% of patients (n = 72) were ambulatory. Conclusion. Interprosthetic femur fractures are technically and biologically challenging cases. Individualized approaches to internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty led to an 81% (95% CI 68.3% to 88.6%) survivorship free from reoperation at two years with 95% of patients ambulatory. Continued improvements in management are warranted. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):122–128