Hill-Sachs and reverse Hill-Sachs lesions come in different shapes and sizes, and their effect on “glenoid track” can vary. Small Hill-Sachs lesions that do not engage can be successfully treated with a Bankart repair alone done arthroscopically or open. Moderate, engaging, Hill-Sachs lesions can be treated either with the addition of remplissage to an arthroscopic Bankart or by adding the triple blocking effect of the Bristow-Latarjet procedure. Surface replacements vary in size from the small hemi-cap type of procedure to an entire humeral head replacement (HHR). These devices can be used as opposed to allograft replacement when the risk of post-reconstruction arthritis is high with the aforementioned more conventional treatment techniques. When 45% or more of the humeral head is involved with the lesion, or Outerbridge stage III and IV changes prevail, a HHR is preferred. An oval shaped HHR is the author's preference, and the long diameter can be used to provide coverage anteriorly or posteriorly and is particularly useful in large Hill-Sachs lesions associated with epilepsy

The Hill-Sachs lesion is a bony defect of the humeral head that occurs in association with anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. Hill-Sachs lesions are common, with an incidence approaching nearly 100% in the setting of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. However, the indications for surgical management are very limited, with less than 10% of anterior instability patients considered for treatment of the Hill-Sachs lesion. Of utmost importance is addressing bone loss on the anterior-inferior glenoid, which is highly successful at preventing recurrence of instability even with humeral bone loss. In the rare situation where the Hill-Sachs lesion may continue to engage the glenoid, surgical management is indicated. Surgical strategies are variable, including debridement, arthroscopic remplissage, allograft transplantation, surface replacement, and arthroplasty. Given that the population with these defects is typically comprised of young and athletic patients, biologic solutions are most likely to be associated with decades of sustainable joint preservation, function, and stability. The first priority is maximizing the treatment of anterior instability on the glenoid side. Then, small lesions of less than 10% are ignored without consequence. Lesions involving 10–20% of the humeral head are treated with arthroscopic remplissage (defect filled with repair of capsule and infraspinatus). Lesions greater than 20% that extend beyond the glenoid tract are managed with fresh osteochondral allografts to biologically restore the humeral head. Lesions great than 40% are most commonly associated with advanced arthritis and deformity of the humeral articular surface and are therefore treated with a humeral head replacement. This treatment algorithm maximises our ability to stabilise and preserve the glenohumeral joint

Anterior shoulder instability is associated with osseous defects of the glenoid and/or humeral head (Hill-Sachs lesions). These defects can contribute to the pathology of instability by engaging together. There is a need to continue to develop methods to preoperatively identify engaging Hill-Sachs lesions for determining appropriate surgical management. The objective was to created a working moveable 3D CT model that allows the user to move the shoulder joint into various positions to assess the relationship between the Hill-Sachs lesion and the anterior glenoid rim. This technique was applied to a cohort series of 14 patients with recurrent anterior dislocation: 4 patients had undergone osteoarticular allografting of Hill-Sachs lesions and 10 control patients had undergone CT scanning to quantify bone loss but had no treatment to address bony pathology. A biomechanical analysis was performed to rotate each 3D model using local coordinate systems through a functional range using an open-source 3D animation program, Blender (Amsterdam, Netherlands). A Hill-Sachs lesion was considered “dynamically” engaging if the angle between the lesion's long axis and anterior glenoid was parallel. In the classical vulnerable position of the shoulder (abduction=90, external rotation=0–135), none of the Hill-Sachs lesions aligned with the anterior glenoid in any of our patients (Figure 1). Therefore, we considered there to be a “low risk” of engagement in these critical positions, as the non-parallel orientation represents a lack of true articular arc mismatch and is unlikely to produce joint instability. We then expanded our search and simulated shoulder positions throughout a physiological range of motion for all groups and found that 100% of the allograft patients and 70% of the controls had positions producing alignment and were “high risk” of engagement (p = 0.18) (Table 1). We also found that the allograft group had a greater number of positions that would engage (mean 4 ± 1 positions of engagement) compared to our controls (mean 2 ± 2 positions of engagement, p = 0.06). We developed a 3D animated paradigm to dynamically and non-invasively visualize a patient's anatomy and determine the clinical significance of a Hill-Sachs lesion using open source software and CT images. The technique demonstrated in this series of patients showed multiple shoulder positions that align the Hill-Sachs and glenoid axes that do not necessarily meet the traditional definition of engagement. Identifying all shoulder positions at risk of “engaging”, in a broader physiological range, may have critical implications towards selecting the appropriate surgical management of bony defects. We do not claim to doubt the classic conceptual definition of engagement, but we merely introduce a technique that accounts for the dynamic component of shoulder motion, and in doing so, avoid limitations of a static criteria assumed traditional definition (like size and location of lesion). Further investigations are planned and will help to further validate the clinical utility of this method. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Background:. Individuals with large Hill-Sachs lesions may be prone to failure and reoccurrence following standard arthroscopic Bankart repair. Here, the Remplissage procedure may promote shoulder stability through infraspinatus capsulo-tenodesis directly into the lesion. Little biomechanicaldata about the Remplissage procedure on glenohumeral kinematics, stability, and range of motion (ROM) currently exists. Questions/purposes:. What are the biomechanical effects of Bankart and Remplissage repair for large Hill-Sachs lesions?. Methods:. Six cadaveric shoulders were tested using a custom shoulder testing system. ROM and glenohumeral translation with applied loads in anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) directions were quantified at 0° and 60° gleno-humeral abduction. Six conditions were tested: intact, Bankart lesion, Bankart with 40% Hill-Sachs lesion, Bankart repair, Bankart repair with Remplissage, and Remplissage repair alone. Results:. Humeral external rotation (ER) and total range of motion (TR) increased significantly from intact after the creation of the Bankart lesion at both 0° abduction (ER +27.0°, TR +35.8°, p < 0.05) [Fig 1] and 60° abduction (ER +9.5°, TR +30.7°, p < 0.05) [Fig 2], but did not increase further with the addition of the Hill-Sachs lesion. The Bankart repair restored range of motion to intact values 0° abduction at addition of the Remplissage repair did not significantly alter range of motion from the Bankart repair alone. There were no significant changes in AP or SI translation between Bankart repair with and without Remplissage compared to the intact specimen. Conclusions:. The addition of the Remplissage procedure for treatment of large Hill-Sachs lesions had no statistically significant effect on ROM or translation for treatment for large Hill-Sachs lesions. Clinical Relevance: The Remplissage technique may be a suitable option for engaging Hill-Sachs lesions. Further clinical studies are warranted

The classic Hill-Sachs lesion is a compression or impression fracture of the humeral head in occurrence with anterior glenohumeral instability. The true incidence is unknown but clearly increases with recurrent instability episodes. Recent peer-reviewed literature has highlighted the importance of addressing “significant” humeral and glenoid bone defects in the management of glenohumeral instability. Quantification of the “significance” of a Hill-Sachs lesion with regard to location, size, and depth in relation to the glenoid has helped guide indications for surgical management. Options for managing Hill-Sachs lesions include both humeral-sided techniques (soft tissue, bone, and/or prosthetic techniques) and also glenoid-sided techniques (bone transfers to increase glenoid width). The majority of significant acute or chronic Hill-Sachs lesions can be effectively managed without prosthetic replacement. Is a prosthetic surface replacement ever indicated for the management of Hill-Sachs lesions? The peer-reviewed literature is sparse with the outcomes of this treatment, and significant consideration must be given to both the age of the patient and the need for such management when other effective non-prosthetic options exist. In a patient with more than half of the humeral head involved after instability episodes (perhaps seizure or polytrauma patients), metallic surface replacement arthroplasty may be an option that could require less involved post-operative care while restoring range of motion and stability

Purpose. The presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion is a major contributor to failure of surgical intervention following anterior shoulder dislocation. The relationship between lesion size, measured on pre-operative MRI, and risk of recurrent instability after surgery has not previously been defined. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the size of Hill-Sachs lesions on pre-op MRI would be greater among patients who failed soft tissue stabilization when compared to patients who did not fail. We also hypothesized that the existence of a glenoid lesion would lead to failure with smaller Hill-Sachs lesions. Method. Nested case-control analysis of 114 patients was performed to evaluate incidence of failure after soft tissue stabilization. Successful follow-up of at least 24 months was made with 91 patients (80%). Patients with recurrent instability after surgery were compared to randomly selected age and sex matched controls in a 1:1 ratio. Pre-operative sagittal and axial MRI series were analyzed for presence of Hill-Sachs lesions, and maximum edge-to-edge length and depth as well as location of the lesion related to the bicipital groove (axial) and humeral shaft (sagittal) were measured. Results. Of 91 patients included in analysis, 77 (84.6%) had identifiable Hill-Sachs lesions. 32 patients (35.2%) suffered from failure of soft tissue stabilization (redislocation 22.0%; subjective instability 13.2%). Ten of these patients (11.0%) underwent further surgery. When comparing the age and sex matched failure and control groups, statistically significant differences in unadjusted data were found for axial edge-to-edge length (p = 0.01), axial depth (p = 0.01), and sagittal edge-to-edge length (p = 0.04), with larger sized lesions found in the failure group (Figure 1). Differences trended towards significant for sagittal depth and angle from the bicipital groove. Conclusion. In this retrospective case-control study, humeral head defect size was positively correlated with recurrent instability after soft-tissue stabilization. Larger Hill-Sachs lesions, as measured on pre-op MRI, were found in patients who failure surgical intervention when compared to patients who did not fail. These data and future studies may help determine pre-operative clinical guidelines for the treatment of anterior shoulder dislocation

The Hill-Sachs lesion is a bony defect of the humeral head that occurs in association with anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. Hill-Sachs lesions are common, with an incidence approaching nearly 100% in the setting of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. However, the indications for surgical management are very limited, with less than 10% of anterior instability patients considered for treatment of the Hill-Sachs lesion. Of utmost importance is addressing bone loss on the anterior-inferior glenoid, which is highly successful at preventing recurrence of instability even with humeral bone loss. In the rare situation where the Hill-Sachs lesion may continue to engage the glenoid, surgical management is indicated. Surgical strategies are variable, including debridement, arthroscopic remplissage, allograft transplantation, surface replacement, and arthroplasty. Given that the population with these defects is typically comprised of young and athletic patients, biologic solutions are most likely to be associated with decades of sustainable joint preservation, function, and stability. The first priority is maximising the treatment of anterior instability on the glenoid side. Then, small lesions of less than 10% are ignored without consequence. Lesions involving 10–20% of the humeral head are treated with arthroscopic remplissage (defect filled with repair of capsule and infraspinatus). Lesions greater than 20% that extend beyond the glenoid tract are managed with fresh osteochondral allografts to biologically restore the humeral head. Lesions great than 40% are most commonly associated with advanced arthritis and deformity of the humeral articular surface and are therefore treated with a humeral head replacement. This treatment algorithm maximises our ability to stabilise and preserve the glenohumeral joint

Previously, we conducted a multi-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without remplissage. The end point for the randomized controlled trial was two years post-operative, providing support for the benefits of remplissage in the short term in reducing recurrent instability. The aim of this study was to compare the medium term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of patients previously randomized to have undergone isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) for the management of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. The rate of recurrent instability and instances of re-operation were examined. The original study was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial with two 1:1 parallel groups with recruitment undertaken between 2011 and 2017. For this medium-term study, participants were reached for a telephone follow-up in 2020 and asked a series of standardized questions regarding ensuing instances of subluxation, dislocation or reoperation that had occurred on their shoulder for which they were randomized. Descriptive statistics were generated for all variables. “Failure” was defined as occurrence of a dislocation. “Recurrent instability” was defined as the participant reporting a dislocation or two or more occurences of subluxation greater than one year post-operative. All analyses were undertaken based on intention-to-treat whereby their data was analyzed based on the group to which they were originally allocated. One-hundred and eight participants were randomized of which 50 in the NO REMP group and 52 in the REMP group were included in the analyses in the original study. The mean number of months from surgery to final follow-up was 49.3 for the NO REMP group and 53.8 for the REMP group. The rates of re-dislocation or failure were 8% (4/52) in the REMP group at an average of 23.8 months post-operative versus 22% (11/50) in the NO REMP at an average of 16.5 months post-operative. The rates of recurrent instability were 10% (5/52) in the REMP group at an average of 24 months post-operative versus 30% (15/50) in the NO REMP group at an average of 19.5 months post-operative. Survival curves were significantly different favouring REMP in both scenarios. Arthroscopic Bankart repair combined with remplissage is an effective procedure in the treatment of patients with an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion and minimal glenoid bone loss (<15%). Patients can expect favourable rates of recurrent instability when compared with isolated Bankart repair at medium term follw-up

Purpose. The management of moderate to large engaging Hill-Sachs lesions is controversial and surgical options include remplissage, allograft reconstruction, and partial resurfacing arthroplasty. Few in-vitro studies have quantified their biomechanical characteristics and none have made direct comparisons. The purpose of this study was to compare joint stability and range of motion (ROM) among these procedures using an in-vitro shoulder simulator. It was hypothesized that all procedures would prevent defect engagement, but allograft and partial resurfacing would most accurately restore intact biomechanics; while remplissage would provide the greatest stabilization, possibly at the expense of motion. Method. Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested on an active in-vitro shoulder simulator. Each specimen underwent testing in 11 conditions: intact, Bankart lesion, Bankart repair, and two unrepaired Hill-Sachs lesions (30% & 45%) which were then treated with each of the three techniques. Anterior joint stability, ROM in extension and internal-external rotation, and glenohumeral engagement were assessed. Stability was quantified as resistance, in N/mm, to an anteriorly applied load of 70N. Results. Remplissage significantly increased joint stiffness compared to both defects (6.43.8 N/mm, p=0.01) and the allograft and partial resurfacing (p <= 0.04). No technique significantly surpassed the stability of the intact state (p>0.05). In adduction, the remplissage significantly reduced internal-external rotation compared to both defects (p <= 0.01), but only the 30% repair caused a significant change compared to the intact state (14.511.3 N/mm, p=0.05). In abduction, all repairs reduced rotation ROM compared to the Hill-Sachs defect (>= 8.24o, p <= 0.04), but none with respect to the intact condition (p >= 0.05). Remplissage had significantly less extension than either resurfacing procedure (>= 15.4o, p <= 0.02) and resulted in a greater reduction in extension ROM for 45% defects compared to 30% defects (11.918.91, p=0.06). All unrepaired lesions engaged during extension. None of the remplissage or allograft reconstructions engaged, however, 75% of partial resurfacing arthroplasties partially engaged. Conclusion. This study is the first biomechanical evaluation to directly compare three surgical procedures for engaging Hill-Sachs lesions. Each procedure enhanced stability; however, the enhancement provided by the resurfacing repairs more closely resembled the intact state. Remplissage of the 30% and the 45% defects improved stability and eliminated glenohumeral engagement but caused significant and progressive reductions in ROM. In comparison, both the allograft and partial resurfacing procedures re-established ranges of motion approaching those of the intact joint; however, the partial resurfacing could not fully prevent engagement. These findings indicate that the effects of each technique are not equivalent and further clinical and biomechanical studies are required

Purpose. To describe the geometric variables of the posterosuperior humeral-head (Hill-Sachs) lesion and analyze their relationship with patient clinical variables. Method. Twenty-eight patients with anteroinferior instability and substantial Hill-Sachs lesions were evaluated using arthro-computer tomography (CT) scans. The images were studied with the OSIRIX software, and the following lesion variables were measured: depth, length, width, volume, surface area, and width/depth ratio. Moreover, the ratio of the humeral heads total volume over the volume under its joint surface was calculated to express the lesions severity as the compromised fraction of the humeral heads articular segment. The above data was statistically analyzed in relation to the total number of instability episodes, the distinction between dislocations and subluxations, and the type of sport played. Results. The lesions had an mean depth of 7.3 mm, length of 19.9 mm, and width of 19.7 mm. The mean loss in humeral-head surface area was 3.83 cm2. The mean loss in humeral-head volume was 1.4 cm3, which equates to 2.2% of the total volume and 6.9% of the volume fraction under the joint surface. A linear correlation was found between lesion volume and the number of dislocations. Another significant relationship was identified between higher width/depth ratios and the subluxation group. None of the other analyses revealed any statistically significant correlations. Conclusion. In addition to providing useful descriptive data on Hill-Sachs lesions, this study is the first to demonstrate a significant correlation between lesion severity and the number of instability episodes. It also reveals the occurrence of significantly shallower lesions in the shoulders of subluxators compared to those of dislocators, which (as later studies may show) may have important implications on the therapeutic approach to these distinct types of shoulder instability

Acute Hill-Sachs (HS) reduction represents a potential alternative method to remplissage for the treatment of an engaging HS lesion. The purpose of this study is to biomechanically compare the stabilising effects of a acute HS reduction technique and remplissage in a complex instability model. This was a comparative cadaveric study of 6 shoulders. For the acute HS lesion, a unique model was used to create a 30% defect, compressing the subchondral bone while preserving the articular surface in a more anatomic fashion. In addition, a 15% glenoid defect was made in all specimens. The HS lesion was reduced through a lateral cortical window with a bone tamp, and the subchondral void was filled with Quickset (Arthrex) bone cement to prevent plastic deformation. Five scenarios were tested; intact specimen, bipolar lesion, Bankart repair, remplissage with Bankart repair and HS reduction technique with Bankart repair. Translation, kinematics and dislocation events were recorded. For all 6 specimens no dislocations occurred after either remplissage or the reduction technique. At 90 degrees of abduction and external rotation (ABER), anterior-inferior translation was 11.1 mm (SD 0.9) for the bipolar lesion. This was significantly reduced following both remplissage (5.1±0.7mm; p<0.001) and HS reduction (4.4±0.3mm; p<0.001). For anterior-inferior translation there was no significant difference in translation between the reduction technique and remplissage (p=0.91). At 90 degrees of ABER, the intact specimens average joint stiffness was 7.0±1.0N/mm, which was not significantly different from the remplissage (7.8±0.9 N/mm; p=0.9) and reduction technique (9.1±0.6 N/mm; p=0.50). Compared with an isolated Bankart repair, the average external rotation loss after also performing a remplissage procedure was 4.3±3.5 deg (p=0.65), while average ER loss following HS reduction was 1.1±3.3 deg (p=0.99). There was no significant difference in external rotation between remplissage and the reduction technique (p=0.83). Similar joint stability was conferred following both procedures, though remplissage had 3.2-degree loss of ER in comparison. While not statistically significant, even slight ER loss may be clinically detrimental in overhead athletes. Overall, the acute reduction technique is a more anatomic alternative to the remplissage procedure with similar ability to prevent dislocation in a biomechanical model, making it a viable treatment option for engaging Hill-Sachs lesions

Recurrent shoulder instability in those with bony defects is a difficult surgical problem to resolve. Burkhart and De Beer described an unacceptably high recurrence rate for arthroscopic Bankart repair in the presence of an inverted-pear glenoid with or without an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion, with suggestions that an open modified Latarjet procedure should be recommended in such patients. The Congruent-Arc Latarjet is a modification of the Latarjet open bony stabilisation for shoulder instability developed by Burkhart and De Beer. It involves rotation of the coracoid so the curved under-surface lies congruent with the glenoid. At the Royal Derby Hospital, UK, this procedure has been adopted by our four shoulder surgeons, two of whom undertook fellowship training with De Beer, we studied the outcomes of the patients who had undergone the modified Congruent-Arc Latarjet procedure in our department. Fifty-two consecutive patients were identified over a five-year period at the Royal Derby Hospital or Derbyshire Royal Infirmary between 2006 and 2010 inclusive. With the approval of the clinical audit department, the data was collected using theatre records and clinical coding information to identify the patient group. A review of the case notes and local PACS system was undertaken to establish pre and post-operative examination findings, radiology findings regarding Hill-Sachs defects and glenoid bone loss, re-dislocation rates and post-operative function with return to normal activity. The endpoints of this study were aimed at finding out whether patients did return to normal function, were able to continue doing activity that would have provoked dislocation prior to surgery, and how many of the cases re-dislocated. No surgeon consultant had a patient who re-dislocated after this procedure. The follow-up period was from 1 year to 6 years post-operatively. The complications of this procedure were found to be the dislodgement of bone anchors in 2 patients, who required further arthroscopy to remove the suture anchor from the gleno-humeral joint. One patient had prolonged functionally limiting loss of external rotation, which resolved after intensive physiotherapy at 7 months follow up. We will provide graphical representation of the pre and post operative functional scores. We have demonstrated that the Congruent-Arc Latarjet is a reproducible procedure in the hands of surgeons other than the original authors, particularly when comparing our current 0% re-dislocation rate with the published literature, which suggests that 3.9% of patients undergoing this procedure with greater than 25% bone loss of the glenoid or an engaging Hill-Sachs will re-dislocate post-operatively, and this is better than the 6% re-dislocation rate of the standard Bristow-Latarjet procedure

Purpose. The remplissage technique of insetting the infraspinatus tendon and posterior joint capsule into an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion has gained in popularity. However, a standardized technique for suture anchor and suture placement has not been defined for this novel procedure. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to compare three remplissage techniques by evaluating their effects on joint stiffness and motion. Method. Cadaveric forequarters (n=7) were mounted on a custom active biomechanical shoulder simulator. Three randomly ordered techniques were conducted: T1- anchors in the valley of the defect, T2- anchors in the rim of the humeral head; T3- anchors in the valley with medial suture placement. The testing conditions included: intact, Bankart, Bankart repair, and 15% & 30% HS lesions with repairs (T1, T2, T3). Outcome measures including internal-external range of motion and stability were recorded. Stability was quantified in terms of glenohumeral joint stiffness against an externally applied anterior force of 70N. Results. In abduction, no significant reduction in range of motion was observed between any of the remplissage techniques compared to the intact for 15% defects. For 30% defects, T1 and T2 produced significant reductions (T1:14.36.7o, p=0.02; T2:20.79.8o, p=0.02), but T3 had the greatest mean reduction (26.816.6o, p=0.08) in range of motion. In adduction, for the 15% defect, T1 did not cause a significant reduction in internal-external rotation range of motion; however, T2 reached and T3 approached a significant difference compared to intact (T2:10.75.8o, p=0.02 and T3:20.914.7o, p=0.06, respectively). For the 30% defect, T1 and T3 repairs significantly reduced range of motion (11.0–28.2o, p <= 0.05), while the reduction in motion following T2 repair was not significant (18.815.9o, p=0.3). All three techniques were found to greatly increase joint stiffness when an external anterior force was applied in abduction and 60o of external rotation; however, no comparisons to the unrepaired defect or the intact state were significant. Additionally, T3 produced the greatest increases in stiffness followed by T1 and T2 (9.20 >= 7.06 >= 6.05 N/mm), but these differences were not significant. Conclusion. All remplissage techniques were observed to decrease shoulder motion. Specifically, T3 was found to consistently produce the greatest mean reductions in rotation while T1 produced the smallest decreases. The remplissage procedure also produced increases in joint stiffness in all cases, with T3 producing the greatest increases; however, excessive variation may have prevented these findings from being statistically significant. The choice of remplissage technique does have an impact on joint stiffness and motion. Further biomechanical and clinical studies are required to determine the optimum technique that maximizes stability and motion